Comparing observer models and feature selection methods for a task-based statistical assessment of digital breast tomsynthesis in reconstruction space

Subok Park; George Z. Zhang; Rongping Zeng; Kyle J. Myers

doi:10.1117/12.2043598

Translator Disclaimer

11 March 2014 Comparing observer models and feature selection methods for a task-based statistical assessment of digital breast tomsynthesis in reconstruction space

Subok Park, George Z. Zhang, Rongping Zeng, Kyle J. Myers

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 9037, Medical Imaging 2014: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment; 90370M (2014) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2043598
Event: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2014, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

A task-based assessment of image quality1 for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) can be done in either the projected or reconstructed data space. As the choice of observer models and feature selection methods can vary depending on the type of task and data statistics, we previously investigated the performance of two channelized- Hotelling observer models in conjunction with 2D Laguerre-Gauss (LG) and two implementations of partial least squares (PLS) channels along with that of the Hotelling observer in binary detection tasks involving DBT projections.^{2, 3} The difference in these observers lies in how the spatial correlation in DBT angular projections is incorporated in the observer’s strategy to perform the given task. In the current work, we extend our method to the reconstructed data space of DBT. We investigate how various model observers including the aforementioned compare for performing the binary detection of a spherical signal embedded in structured breast phantoms with the use of DBT slices reconstructed via filtered back projection. We explore how well the model observers incorporate the spatial correlation between different numbers of reconstructed DBT slices while varying the number of projections. For this, relatively small and large scan angles (24° and 96°) are used for comparison. Our results indicate that 1) given a particular scan angle, the number of projections needed to achieve the best performance for each observer is similar across all observer/channel combinations, i.e., N_p = 25 for scan angle 96° and N_p = 13 for scan angle 24°, and 2) given these sufficient numbers of projections, the number of slices for each observer to achieve the best performance differs depending on the channel/observer types, which is more pronounced in the narrow scan angle case.

Citation Download Citation

Subok Park, George Z. Zhang, Rongping Zeng, and Kyle J. Myers "Comparing observer models and feature selection methods for a task-based statistical assessment of digital breast tomsynthesis in reconstruction space", Proc. SPIE 9037, Medical Imaging 2014: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 90370M (11 March 2014); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2043598

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE