Detailed analysis of the Canary on-sky results at the WHT using Rayleigh laser guide stars

O. Martin; É. Gendron; T. Morris; A. Basden; Z. Hubert; D. Gratadour; J. Osborn; F. Vidal; F. Chemla; G. Rousset; R Myers

doi:10.1117/12.2055820

21 July 2014 Detailed analysis of the Canary on-sky results at the WHT using Rayleigh laser guide stars

O. Martin, É. Gendron, T. Morris, A. Basden, Z. Hubert, D. Gratadour, J. Osborn, F. Vidal, F. Chemla, G. Rousset, R Myers

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 9148, Adaptive Optics Systems IV; 91482N (2014) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2055820
Event: SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, 2014, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

Abstract

CANARY is the multi-object adaptive optics (MOAO) on-sky demonstrator developed by Durham University and LESIA Observatoire de Paris, in the perspective of the E-ELT. Since 2013, CANARY has been operating with 3 off-axis NGS and 4 off-axis Rayleigh LGS and compensating for one on-axis NGS observed with a near IR camera and the Truth Sensor (TS) for diagnostic purpose. In this paper, we present the tomographic performance of CANARY during the runs in 2013. We propose a detailed analysis of the tomographic error leading to the establishment of the CANARY wave-front error budget. In particular we are able to evaluate the tomographic error for each altitude in the atmosphere for a given reconstructor by modelling a set of one-layer covariance matrices. This tool allows us to understand the tradeoffs to be made in the building of the tomographic reconstructor. We present two methods for the wavefront error budget computation. The DTI one uses input system parameters and open loop WFS slopes to estimate the error in a number of independent terms. The DMTS method directly uses the Truth Sensor measurements to estimate the error. We show a good agreement between the two approaches making us confident in our modelling of the instrument. We derive estimations of the Strehl ratio from the error variance and compare them to the recorded IR image Strehl ratio. We find a good agreement between the two, hence validating our wavefront error analysis. Finally we present an on-sky validation of the tomographic reconstruction using LGS based on GLAO and MOAO data. We also quantify the gain brought by the LGS, comparing results obtained in MOAO with 3 NGS and with or without LGS in the wavefront measurements.

Citation Download Citation

O. Martin, É. Gendron, T. Morris, A. Basden, Z. Hubert, D. Gratadour, J. Osborn, F. Vidal, F. Chemla, G. Rousset, and R Myers "Detailed analysis of the Canary on-sky results at the WHT using Rayleigh laser guide stars", Proc. SPIE 9148, Adaptive Optics Systems IV, 91482N (21 July 2014); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2055820

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available