23 July 2014 Comparison of EMCCD post-processing methods for photon counting flux ranges
Author Affiliations +
Several post-processing methods were proposed to overcome the excess noise factor induced by EMCCD multiplication register. Each method has a unique effect on SNR. However, since SNR does not account for photometric accuracy, it cannot be reliably used to directly compare the performance of these algorithms. A normalized quadratic error that accounts for both SNR and accuracy is proposed as an alternative figure of merit. This approach provides a quantitative and rigorous comparison. Using both experimental and simulated frames in the faint-flux range, it is used to compare the existing EMCCD post-processing methods.
© (2014) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Nassim Rousset, Nassim Rousset, Jérémie Villeneuve, Jérémie Villeneuve, Jean-Hughes Fournier-Lupien, Jean-Hughes Fournier-Lupien, Anis Attiaoui, Anis Attiaoui, Gabriel Taillon, Gabriel Taillon, Sébastien Francoeur, Sébastien Francoeur, Olivier Daigle, Olivier Daigle, } "Comparison of EMCCD post-processing methods for photon counting flux ranges", Proc. SPIE 9154, High Energy, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy VI, 91540F (23 July 2014); doi: 10.1117/12.2055350; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2055350


Faint flux performance of an EMCCD
Proceedings of SPIE (June 14 2006)
CCCP: a CCD controller for counting photons
Proceedings of SPIE (July 08 2008)
EMCCD technology and its impact on rapid low-light photometry
Proceedings of SPIE (September 28 2004)
L3CCD results in pure photon-counting mode
Proceedings of SPIE (September 28 2004)

Back to Top