PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
The defendant had three trials. The first and second ended in mistrial; the third he was convicted. Examination of the
gunshot residue evidence presented in the first and third trials starkly define an extraordinary difference: science versus
junk science. The defendant was convicted on the junk science.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Bryan R. Burnett, "A tale of three trials: from science to junk science," Proc. SPIE 9236, Scanning Microscopies 2014, 923619 (16 September 2014); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2065556