## 1.

## INTRODUCTION

## 1.1

### Introduction

The use of erbium doped fiber amplifiers (EDFA’s)^{1, 2} has been established as a corner stone in today’s optical communication networks either in long distance/high bit rate links or in local networks. Fiber laser market is growing due to its many advantages over conventional lasers^{2, 3}. Among others it should be pointed the advantage of fiber lasers in the Aerospace sector due to its inherent lightweight, robustness and low maintenance, and in the Industrial sector by the flexibility of fiber light guiding and delivery, allowing its integration within industrial robots. From the above considerations it is clear that laboratory activities with fiber amplifiers and lasers are a must in a Photonics Laboratory. Excellent laboratorial activities for exploring the EDFA behavior have been reported^{4, 5}, including the development of some laser systems.

This experiment was implemented for a first year master’s degree laboratory class for Physical Engineering students from the Physics and Astronomy Department at the University of Porto (http://dfa.fc.up.pt). Each weekly class had four hours duration. During the same semester the students attended classes on lasers, semiconductors and applications and magnetic materials and applications. Despite the fact that this communication only reflects the results of the implementation of a fiber laser, students had prior contact with fiber processing techniques (such as cleaving and splicing), spectroscopic characterization (of absorption and fluorescence phenomena) and studied an optical fiber amplifier assembled with the same fiber used in this experiment: the amplifier study followed the procedures presented in the works of Johnstone et al^{4} and Zhu et al^{5}. The laser was usually assembled and tested in a single class.

Our approach to fiber lasers is based on a Fabry-Perot cavity built with two fiber Bragg gratings (FBG)^{6, 7} with a small mismatch in the Bragg wavelength. The laser emission is achieved when this mismatch is reduced through longitudinal stress applied to one of the gratings. This approach is very interesting since it permits students to gain sensitivity to the lasers characteristics as a function of the cavity parameters, in particular mirror reflectivity (total losses) in what concerns both threshold and slope efficiency. Complementary the use of FBGs as guided optical sensors can also be introduced in a transversal way. In this work typical optical sensing structures, namely the FBGs, are used in an inverse way to control the laser cavity parameters.

A Bragg grating is a periodic perturbation of the refractive index along the waveguide, and is formed by exposing it to an intense ultraviolet periodic light pattern created by the interference of two light beams at the same wavelength.

A very common method to fabricate Bragg gratings is based on a diffractive optical element, and is usually referred as the phase mask method, Figure 1. The phase mask consists of a high quality fused silica plate (transparent at the writing wavelength) that contains a one dimensional surface relief structure on its surface. A UV beam incident on the phase mask is thus diffracted by the surface relief grating, and the depth of the grooves of the mask dictates the power distribution among the diffraction orders. The depth value is chosen in such way that the zero order diffracted beam is minimized (typically to less than 5%), while the ±1 diffracted orders are maximized. A spatially modulated UV field is obtained by the interference of these two first order beams, and the period of the pattern is one half of the period of the phase mask relief grating.

To fabricate Bragg gratings it is essential that the waveguide materials, within the core media are photosensitive, i.e., that its refractive index can be permanently changed through UV exposure. Usually, this property can be found in optical fibers doped with germanium. In some cases, such as the ones where the germanium doping is low, photosensitivity enhancement through molecular hydrogen in-diffusion has to be performed.

The refractive index perturbation usually consists of a core geometry variation and/or of a core index perturbation, both inducing an effective index perturbation. The resulting uniform sinusoidal Bragg index grating along the core of the waveguide can be expressed as:

where *n _{0}* is the average index,

*Δn*is the UV induced refractive index perturbation,

*z*is the distance along the longitudinal axis and

*Λ*is the spatial period of the index modulation. For this periodic modulation the central Bragg resonant wavelength is given by:

where *n _{ff}* is the effective index of the propagating mode. Therefore, the Bragg wavelength can be changed by varying the period, such as by stretching or compressing the fiber, or by affecting the modal effective index such as by temperature change.

## 1.2

### Theory

Our discussion starts from the theory presented in Orazio Svelto book^{8}, chapter four, the same bibliography the students use for the lasers course.

The pump laser threshold (*P _{th}*) for a quasi-three-level laser is given by

^{8}:

where, *h* is the Planck constant, *σ _{a}* and

*σ*are respectively the absorption and emission cross-sections,

_{e}*N*, is the number of active atoms per volume unit,

_{t}*ℓ*is the length of the active medium,

*η*is the pump laser efficiency,

_{p}*ν*is the frequency of the pump laser, τ is the upper level lifetime,

_{p}*A*is the section of the active medium and

*γ*is the single pass logarithmic loss.

The total logarithmic loss per pass arises from the intrinsic loss (*γ _{i}*) and from the losses induced by the two mirrors (

*y*= −ln(

_{1}*R*) and

_{1}*γ*= −ln(

_{2}*R*)), and is obtained from:

_{2}Assuming that both gratings are identical in reflectivity, with central Gaussian profile,

where *R _{0}* is the maximum reflectivity and

*ω*is the 1/e half width, we get

_{λ}As laser emission occurs at the wavelength where losses are minimum, it can be easily shown that the laser emission will take place at *λ _{L}* = (

*λ*)/2 if both gratings overlap. As (

_{1}+λ_{2}*λ*)

_{L}-λ_{1}^{2}= (

*λX*)

_{L}-λ_{2}^{2}, using equations 4 and 6 in equation 3 it can be written as:

showing a quadratic behavior of the laser threshold pump power with grating shift.

The laser efficiency (*η _{s}*), defined as the slope of the laser output power versus pump power, above threshold, is given by

^{8}:

where *ν _{L}* is the laser emission frequency and

*A*is de laser mode area inside de fiber.

_{b}Using equations 4 and 6, this equation can be rewritten as:

By using this equation with prior knowledge on *R _{0}* and

*ω*from the FBG characterization, one can obtain

_{λ}*λ*and an estimation of

_{i}*η*.

_{p}## 2.

## EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

The proposed experimental setup is sketched in Figure 2. The optical pumping is achieved by the use of a laser diode (LD, ADC Telecommunications 978B200) including an optical isolator. The optical cavity is assembled between two identical 2x2 wavelength division multiplexer (WDM, EPT SMWDM980/1550) to separate the emission from the pump. It is three meter long with 2m of Erbium doped fiber (EDF, CoreActive High-Tech Inc. EDF-C1400) with 14dB/m at 980 nm. The EDF length was not optimized. Two similar fiber Bragg gratings (FBG’s) terminate the output ports of the fiber optic cavity. One of the gratings, serving as output mirror, at the near end of the cavity, feeds either an optical power detector (EXFO IQ-203), or an optic spectrum analyzer (OSA, Ando AQ-6315B). The other grating, located at the far end of the cavity, is stretched with the aid of a micromechanical translation stage, for cavity detuning - see Figure 3. The fiber is glued to the stage frame and to the moving block, allowing the stretching of the FBG1 positioned between these points 10 cm apart.

## 3.

## RESULTS

## 3.1

### Fiber Bragg grating characterization

The fluorescence due to the erbium doped fiber can be easily measured with the OSA, when the cavity is detuned, i.e different Bragg peaks for each FBG. The spectrum measured by the OSA at the near end of the cavity is shown in Figure 4. Some structure is seen around 1540 nm, from which the working characteristics of FBG’s can be clearly observed and discussed with the students: the positive peak is due to spontaneous emission light being reflected by FBG1 in the far end at its Bragg wavelength, and the negative peak is made by the reflectivity of FBG2 in the near end.

By changing the FBG1 stretching conditions, its Bragg wavelength is changed, thus moving the positive peak location – see Figure 5. Again, the positive peaks are due to spontaneous emission reflected by FBG1 in the far end, and the negative peaks are made by the reflectivity of FBG2 in the near end. For a certain position, between 7.35 and 7.45 mm, both FBGs are tuned to the same Bragg wavelength, thus the cavity retains the spectral energy around that Bragg wavelength for both FBGs are reflecting the same spectral region.

Noting that due to the way the fiber was glued onto the stretching translation stage, an increase in the position corresponds do a decrease in fiber length, as expected, in Figure 5 the FBG1 shows a shift to higher wavelengths as it is stretched. A linear fit of the maximum wavelength vs position gives a sensitivity of −7.797 nm/mm and a crossing of the two peaks at 7.4133 mm.

From the analysis of the spectral attenuation around the Bragg wavelength of FBG2, the grating reflectivity can be reconstructed as a function of wavelength. The results presented in Figure 6 were obtained by measuring the attenuation of the negative peak against wavelength around the FBG2 Bragg wavelength. Then, the reflectivity function can be reconstructed from:

where *Δdbm(λ)* is the attenuation relative to the original fluorescence spectrum.

## 3.2

### Laser characterization

#### Spectral emission characteristics

Fiber laser operation should be characterized in terms of laser emission content as a function of the optical pump power increase. For this study, the FBG1 is stretched until a good overlap with FBG2 is obtained. Then the laser spectrum is recorded for increasing values of pump power. Figure 7 shows different spectra obtained between 4 and 33 mW pump power on the proposed experimental configuration. The spectrum in curve A was obtained below threshold and shows a behavior similar to the ones presented in Figure 5. Just below threshold, curve B, a small increase in output power is clearly visible, and in curve C this peak grows to a 35 dB peak with a small increase in pump power. The 3 dB width of the laser peak was measures to be 0.07 nm. Finally, curve D shows the spectrum well above threshold obtained with 33 mW of pump power. At these conditions a rise to ∼40 dB signal to noise ratio can be measured, preserving the width measured in curve C.

#### Laser power & Laser threshold characteristics

To study the dependence of laser output power as a function of pump power, the OSA is replaced by an optical power meter, and the laser output power should be measured for a set of pump power, and for different stretching’s of FBG1 thus creating different wavelength mismatch. Results obtained for the described setup are presented in Figure 8. For each set, a linear fit was performed along the output power linear behavior section, in order to obtain the threshold pump power value and the slope efficiency. Figure 8 shows three representative curves, clearly showing that the threshold increases with the decrease of reflectivity, and that the best efficiency is not obtained with the lower cavity losses (triangular data point marker). These results were obtained using the power measured after FBG2, at the near end output. Considering that both outputs have similar output power, the maximum estimated output efficiency of this non optimized laser is around 20% (twice the value obtained from fig 8).

As introduced by equation 7, the laser threshold pump power is expected to have a quadratic dependency with the grating detuning. In Figure 9 laser pump power threshold is plotted as a function of absolute position in the translation stage (proportional to the wavelength detuning, as suggested by equation 2). A parabolic fit was performed with its minimum fixed to the position corresponding to tuned gratings (7.4133 mm) showing a good agreement with the experimental values.

#### Laser efficiency

In Figure 10 the inverse of the slope efficiency is plotted against the wavelength difference between laser emission and the peak reflectivity of the two gratings. Using the values of −ln *R _{0}* = 0.277 and

*ω*= 0.1106 nm, obtained from the FBG reflectivity characteristics, we obtained from the fit

_{λ}*γ*= 0.15 and, assuming that the mode area is about the same as the doping area, we can estimate

_{i}*η*as ∼38%.

_{p}## 4.

## CONCLUSIONS

A fiber based setup is presented and characterized aiming at the hands-on study of several photonic devices, namely Fiber Bragg gratings inscribed in fibers and fiber lasers, as well as optical instrumentation and measuring equipment allowing the study of some laser features and fiber manipulation. The proposed activities are targeted to master’s degree first year of studies with strong photonics focus. The proposed experiment has been explored and performed by students along the last years at the Physics and Astronomy Department of the University of Porto, with clear success.

The experiment allows to visually exploit FBGs working principles during laser cavity tuning/detuning by inducing mechanical stress at one of the FBGs. Laser emission characteristics are studied by measuring the threshold dependency on the total losses (mirror reflectivity) as well as it is verified the existence of an optimal output coupler reflectivity, easily inferred from the evolution of the output power vs pump power curves with the detuning.

Finally, it should be noted that the laser experiment is performed with great success even without optimizing the EDF length. Considering that this is a very important parameter in the case of a three level laser system, this challenge should be put forward for students to further develop their knowledge and experimental skills on such systems.

## REFERENCES

Agrawal, G. P., [Fiber-Optic Communication Systems] third edition, John Wiley and Sons, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471221147Google Scholar

Digonnet, M. J. F., editor, [Rare-Earth-Doped Fiber Lasers and Amplifiers], Marcel Dekker, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1201/CRCOPTSCIENGGoogle Scholar

Tünnermann, A., Schreiber, T., and Limpert, J., “Fiber lasers and amplifiers: an ultrafast performance evolution”, Applied Optics, 49(25), F71–F78, (2010) https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.000F71Google Scholar

Johnstone, W., Culshaw, B., Moodie, D. G., Mauchline I. S., and Walsh, D., “Photonics laboratory teaching experiments for scientists and engineers”, Proc. SPIE 4588, Seventh International Conference on Education and Training in Optics and Photonics, 304 (2002).Google Scholar

Wen Zhu, W., Qian, and L., Helmy, A. S., “Implementation of three functional devices using Erbium-doped Fibers: An Advanced Photonics Lab”, International Conference on Education and Training in Optics and Photonics, ETOP 2007, EXP VIII, (2007).Google Scholar

Kashyap, R.; [Fiber Bragg gratings], Academic Press, London, (1999)Google Scholar

Othonos, A., “Fiber Bragg gratings”, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68(12), 4309–4342, (1997) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1148392Google Scholar

Svelto, O., [Principles of Lasers], fifth edition, Springer, New York, (2010) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1302-9Google Scholar