Airborne pipeline leak detection: UV or IR?

François Babin; Jean-François Gravel; Martin Allard

doi:10.1117/12.2224998

Translator Disclaimer

12 May 2016 Airborne pipeline leak detection: UV or IR?

François Babin, Jean-François Gravel, Martin Allard

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 9824, Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) Sensing XVII; 982417 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2224998
Event: SPIE Defense + Security, 2016, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Abstract

This paper presents a study of different approaches to the measurement of the above ground vapor plume created by the spill caused by a small 0.1 l/min (or less) leak in an underground liquid petroleum pipeline. The scenarios are those for the measurement from an airborne platform. The usual approach is that of IR absorption, but in the case of liquid petroleum products, there are drawbacks that will be discussed, especially when using alkanes to detect a leak. The optical measurements studied include UV enhanced Raman lidar, UV fluorescence lidar and IR absorption path integrated lidars. The breadboards used for testing the different approaches will be described along with the set-ups for leak simulation. Although IR absorption would intuitively be the most sensitive, it is shown that UV-Raman could be an alternative. When using the very broad alkane signature in the IR, the varying ground spectral reflectance are a problem. It is also determined that integrated path measurements are preferred, the UV enhanced Raman measurements showing that the vapor plume stays very close to the ground.

Citation Download Citation

François Babin, Jean-François Gravel, and Martin Allard "Airborne pipeline leak detection: UV or IR?", Proc. SPIE 9824, Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) Sensing XVII, 982417 (12 May 2016); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2224998

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE