A friendly rebuttal to Mallick and Sindhu on particle flow for Bayes' rule

Fred Daum; Jim Huang; Arjang Noushin

doi:10.1117/12.2217758

17 May 2016 A friendly rebuttal to Mallick and Sindhu on particle flow for Bayes' rule

Fred Daum, Jim Huang, Arjang Noushin

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 9842, Signal Processing, Sensor/Information Fusion, and Target Recognition XXV; 98420H (2016) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2217758
Event: SPIE Defense + Security, 2016, Baltimore, MD, United States

Abstract

In a recent paper by Mallick and Sindhu, they assert three “problems” with our particle flow theory for Bayes’ rule. Our paper explains why all three assertions are wrong.

Citation Download Citation

Fred Daum, Jim Huang, and Arjang Noushin "A friendly rebuttal to Mallick and Sindhu on particle flow for Bayes' rule", Proc. SPIE 9842, Signal Processing, Sensor/Information Fusion, and Target Recognition XXV, 98420H (17 May 2016); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2217758

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE