Comparisons of different methods for debris covered glacier classification

R. K. Tiwari; P. K. Garg; V. Saini; A. Shukla

doi:10.1117/12.2227115

5 May 2016 Comparisons of different methods for debris covered glacier classification

R. K. Tiwari, P. K. Garg, V. Saini, A. Shukla

Proceedings Volume 9877, Land Surface and Cryosphere Remote Sensing III; 98771K (2016) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2227115
Event: SPIE Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing, 2016, New Delhi, India

Abstract

The paper outlines comparisons between different methods for the mapping of debris covered glaciers. The supervised classification method like Maximum Likelihood Classifier (MLC) has been tested using different data set for deriving the glacier area. Along with MLC the semi-automated method like Hierarchical Knowledge Based Classifier (HKBC) has also been used here. All the results were tested for accuracy, processing time and complexities. The results were also tested against the manually digitized boundary. The results suggests that the MLC when used with other ancillary data like geo-morphometric parameters and temperature image takes slightly more time than HKBC due to some to higher amount of post processing time but the output is satisfactory (89 % overall accuracy). Results show that the time taken in different classifications is significantly different which ranges from 1-2 hours in MLC to 5-10 hours in manual digitization. Depending on the classification method, some to large amount of post processing is always required to achieve the crisp glacial boundary. Classical classifier like maximum likelihood classification is less time consuming but the time taken in post-processing is higher than HKBC. Another factor which is important for a better accuracy is the prior knowledge of glacier terrain. In knowledge based classification method, it is required initially to establish crisp rules which are later used during classification, without this per-classification exercise the accuracy may significantly decrease. This is a time consuming procedure (2-3 hours in this case) but a minimal amount of post-processing is required. Thermal and geo-morphometric data when used synergistically, classified glacier boundaries are more crisp and accurate.

Citation Download Citation

R. K. Tiwari, P. K. Garg, V. Saini, and A. Shukla "Comparisons of different methods for debris covered glacier classification", Proc. SPIE 9877, Land Surface and Cryosphere Remote Sensing III, 98771K (5 May 2016); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2227115

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
7 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Short wave infrared radiation

Geology

Image processing

Remote sensing

Composites

Error analysis

Image classification

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years