Translator Disclaimer
Paper
26 January 2016 Comparison of the influence of CMM measurement strategies on uncertainty evaluation
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 9903, Seventh International Symposium on Precision Mechanical Measurements; 990317 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2211682
Event: Seventh International Symposium on Precision Mechanical Measurements, 2015, Xia'men, China
Abstract
In the present application of Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMMs), generally only the estimated value of the measured quantity can be computed while its corresponding measurement uncertainty can not. It is well known that a result without its uncertainty is incomplete. However, uncertainty evaluation has always been one difficult issue in application of CMM because error sources causing measurement uncertainty of CMM are very complex. Based on Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS), the three measurement strategies of CMM application, i.e. conventional measurement, substitution measurement and compensation measurement strategies, are studied in this paper. For each measurement strategy, the uncertainty sources are analyzed, and the corresponding task-oriented uncertainty evaluation model is established. In this paper, the hole diameter measurement of one workpiece is taken as an example. The uncertainty is evaluated respectively according to the three different strategies, and the results are compared. The comparison result shows that the influence of different measurement strategy on measurement result is different, the maximum difference is about 2 times, and the accuracy of measurement can be improved through selecting proper measurement strategy for specific measurement task.
© (2016) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Hongli Li, Xiaohuai Chen, Hongtao Wang, Qiao Yang, Hanbin Wang, and Yinbao Cheng "Comparison of the influence of CMM measurement strategies on uncertainty evaluation", Proc. SPIE 9903, Seventh International Symposium on Precision Mechanical Measurements, 990317 (26 January 2016); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2211682
PROCEEDINGS
9 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
RELATED CONTENT

SCIIB pressure sensors for oil extraction applications
Proceedings of SPIE (December 08 1999)
Uncertainty estimation by the concept of virtual instruments
Proceedings of SPIE (October 22 2001)
Infrared standards in space
Proceedings of SPIE (September 26 2007)
Ground truth and benchmarks for performance evaluation
Proceedings of SPIE (September 30 2003)
Quality control measures for SMP environmental sensors
Proceedings of SPIE (March 31 2009)

Back to Top