23 September 2016 Selecting a proper design period for heliostat field layout optimization using Campo code
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
In this paper, different approaches are considered to calculate the cosine factor which is utilized in Campo code to expand the heliostat field layout and maximize its annual thermal output. Furthermore, three heliostat fields containing different number of mirrors are taken into consideration. Cosine factor is determined by considering instantaneous and time-average approaches. For instantaneous method, different design days and design hours are selected. For the time average method, daily time average, monthly time average, seasonally time average, and yearly time averaged cosine factor determinations are considered. Results indicate that instantaneous methods are more appropriate for small scale heliostat field optimization. Consequently, it is proposed to consider the design period as the second design variable to ensure the best outcome. For medium and large scale heliostat fields, selecting an appropriate design period is more important. Therefore, it is more reliable to select one of the recommended time average methods to optimize the field layout. Optimum annual weighted efficiency for heliostat fields (small, medium, and large) containing 350, 1460, and 3450 mirrors are 66.14%, 60.87%, and 54.04%, respectively.
Conference Presentation
© (2016) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Mohammad Saghafifar, Mohammad Saghafifar, Mohamed Gadalla, Mohamed Gadalla, "Selecting a proper design period for heliostat field layout optimization using Campo code", Proc. SPIE 9937, Next Generation Technologies for Solar Energy Conversion VII, 99370V (23 September 2016); doi: 10.1117/12.2238507; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2238507
PROCEEDINGS
15 PAGES + PRESENTATION

SHARE
RELATED CONTENT

The solar-hydrogen economy: an analysis
Proceedings of SPIE (September 10 2007)
Overview of TIMED
Proceedings of SPIE (October 19 1999)
A Comparison Of Tracking Methods For Solar Concentrators
Proceedings of SPIE (January 04 1984)
Prospects and achievement of renewable energy
Proceedings of SPIE (September 08 1994)
Performance Of A 3 . 7 Meter Cylindrical Concentrator
Proceedings of SPIE (March 15 1976)

Back to Top