10 May 2016 Comparison of analysis techniques for aerial image metrology on advanced photomask
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The standard method for defect disposition and verification of repair success in the mask shop is through the utilization of the aerial imaging platform, AIMSTM. The CD (Critical Dimension) deviation of the defective or repaired region as well as the pattern shift can be calculated by comparing the measured aerial images of this region to that of a reference. Through this analysis it can be determined if the defect or repaired region will be printed on the wafer under the illumination conditions of the scanner. The analysis of the measured aerial images from the AIMSTM are commonly performed manually using the analysis software available on the system or with the help of an analysis software called RV (Repair Verification). Because the process is manual, it is not standardized and is subject to operator variations. This method of manual aerial image analysis is time consuming, dependent on the skill level of the operator and significantly contributes to the overall mask manufacturing process flow. AutoAnalysis (AA), the first application available for the FAVOR® platform, provides fully automated analysis of AIMSTM aerial images [1] and runs in parallel to the measurement of the aerial images. In this paper, we investigate the initial AutoAnalysis performance compared to the conventional method using RV and its application to a production environment. The evaluation is based on the defect CD of three pattern types: contact holes, dense line and spaces and peripheral structure. The defect analysis results for different patterns and illumination conditions will be correlated and challenges in transitioning to the new approach will be discussed.
© (2016) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Seolchong Hwang, Seolchong Hwang, Sungha Woo, Sungha Woo, Heeyeon Jang, Heeyeon Jang, Youngmo Lee, Youngmo Lee, Sangpyo Kim, Sangpyo Kim, Hyunjo Yang, Hyunjo Yang, Kristian Schulz, Kristian Schulz, Anthony Garetto, Anthony Garetto, } "Comparison of analysis techniques for aerial image metrology on advanced photomask", Proc. SPIE 9984, Photomask Japan 2016: XXIII Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology, 998409 (10 May 2016); doi: 10.1117/12.2240301; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2240301
PROCEEDINGS
7 PAGES


SHARE
Back to Top