19 October 2016 Assessment of satellite retrieval algorithms for chlorophyll-a concentration under high solar zenith angle
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Numerous empirical algorithms have been operationally used to retrieve the global ocean chlorophyll-a concentration (Chla) from ocean color satellite data, e.g., the OC4V4 algorithm for SeaWiFS and OC3M for MODIS. However, the algorithms have been established and validated based on the in situ data mainly measured under low to moderate solar zenith angle (<70°). Currently, with the development of the geostationary satellite ocean color remote sensing which observes from early morning to later afternoon, it is necessary to know whether the empirical Chla algorithms could be applied to high solar zenith angle. In this study, the performances of seven widely-used Chla algorithms under high solar zenith angles, i.e., OC2, OC3M, OC3V, OC4V4, CLARK, OCI, and YOC algorithms, were evaluated using the NOMAD global in situ ocean color dataset. The results showed that the performances of all the seven algorithms decreased significantly under high solar zenith angles as compared to those under low-moderate solar zenith angles. For instance, for the OC4V4 algorithm, the relative percent difference (RPD) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) were 13.78% and 1.66 μg/l for the whole dataset, and 3.95% and 1.49 μg/l for the solar zenith angles ranged from 30° to 40°, respectively. However, the RPD and RMSE increased to 30.45% and 6.10μg/l for solar zenith angle larger than 70°.
© (2016) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Hao Li, Hao Li, Xianqiang He, Xianqiang He, Yan Bai, Yan Bai, Xiaoyan Chen, Xiaoyan Chen, Fang Gong, Fang Gong, Qiankun Zhu, Qiankun Zhu, Zifeng Hu, Zifeng Hu, } "Assessment of satellite retrieval algorithms for chlorophyll-a concentration under high solar zenith angle", Proc. SPIE 9999, Remote Sensing of the Ocean, Sea Ice, Coastal Waters, and Large Water Regions 2016, 99990U (19 October 2016); doi: 10.1117/12.2240164; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2240164
PROCEEDINGS
12 PAGES


SHARE
Back to Top