Access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions. Access is not available as part of an individual subscription. However, books can be purchased on SPIE.Org
Ebook Topic:
Back Matter
Published: 2012
DOI: 10.1117/
This section contains the bibliography, index, and author bios.



Born, M. and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, Fifth Edition, Oxford, UK, Pergamon Press (1975).Google Scholar


Bufton, J. L., “Comparison of vertical profile turbulence structure with stellar observations,” Appl. Opt. 12, 1785 (1973).Google Scholar


Churnside, J. H., “Aperture averaging of optical scintillations in the turbulent atmosphere,” Appl. Opt. 30, 1982 (1991).Google Scholar


Ellerbroek, B. L., “Efficient computation of minimum-variance wave-front reconstructors with sparse matrix techniques,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 1803–1816 (2002).Google Scholar


Ellerbroek, B. L., L. Gilles, and C. R. Vogel, “Computationally efficient wavefront reconstructor for simulation of multiconjugate adaptive optics on giant telescopes,” Proc. SPIE 4839, 989–1000 (2003) [doi:10.1117/12.459673].Google Scholar


Forbes, F. F., “Bimorph PZT active mirror,” Proc. SPIE 1114, 146–151 (1989).Google Scholar


Franklin, G. F., J. D. Powell, and M. L. Workman, Digital Control of Dynamic Systems, Second Edition, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1990).Google Scholar


Fried, D. L., “Focus anisoplanatism in the limit of infinitely many artificial-guide-star referrence spots,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 939 (1995).Google Scholar


Fried, D. L., “Anisoplanatism in adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 52 (1982).Google Scholar


Gardner, C. S., B. M. Welsh, and L. A. Thompson, “Design and performance analysis of adaptive optical telescopes using laser guide stars,” Proc. IEEE 78, 1721–1743 (1990).Google Scholar


Gonzalez, R. C. and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, Second Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2002).Google Scholar


Goodman, J. W., Introduction to Fourier Optics, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York (1996).Google Scholar


Goodman, J. W., Statistical Optics, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1985).Google Scholar


Greenwood, D. P., “Bandwidth specification for adaptive optics systems,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 390 (1977).Google Scholar


Grosso, R. P. and M. Yellin, “The membrane mirror as an adaptive optical element,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 399 (1977).Google Scholar


Hardy, J. W., Adaptive Optics for Astronomical Telescopes, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK (1998).Google Scholar


Hayes, M. H., Statistical Digital Signal Processing and Modeling, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1996).Google Scholar


Hudgin, R. H., “Wave-front compensation error due to finite corrector-element size,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 393 (1977).Google Scholar


Hyver, G. A. and R. M. Blankinship, “ALI high-power beam control,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences 88, 445–469 (1995).Google Scholar


ISO Standard 11146, “Lasers and laser related equipment – Test methods for laser beam widths, divergence angles and beam propagation ratios,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2005).Google Scholar


Johnson, B. and D. V. Murphy, Thermal Blooming Laboratory Experiment, Part I, Lincoln Laboratory MIT Project Report BCP-2 (November 1988).Google Scholar


Kalman, R. E., “A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems,” Transaction of the ASME—Journal of Basic Engineering 82 (D), 35–45 (1960).Google Scholar


Lee, L. H., “Loopshaped wavefront control using open-loop reconstructors,” Optics Express 14 (17), 7477–7486 (2006).Google Scholar


Miller, M. G. and P. L. Zieske, “Turbulence environment characterization,” RADC-79-131, ADA072379, Rome Air Development Center, U.S. Air Force, Rome, NY (1979).Google Scholar


Noll, R. J., “Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 207 (1976).Google Scholar


Oppenheim, A. V., R. W. Schafer, and J. R. Buck, Discrete-Time Signal Processing, Second Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (1999).Google Scholar


O’Neil, P. V., Advanced Engineering Mathematics, Sixth Edition, Nelson, Toronto, Canada (2007).Google Scholar


OSI Optoelectronics, “Application Note No. 2, Silicon Photodiode Physics and Technology,” OSI Optoelectronics (1982).Google Scholar


OSI Optoelectronics, “Application Note No. 8, Lateral Effect Photodiodes,” OSI Optoelectronics (1982).Google Scholar


Perram, G. P., S. J. Cusumano, R. L. Hengehold, and S. T. Fiorino, An Introduction to Laser Weapon Systems, Directed Energy Professional Society, Albuquerque, NM (2010).Google Scholar


Poyneer, L. A, D. T. Gavel, and J. M. Brase, “Fast wavefront reconstruction in large adaptive optics system with use of the Fourier transform,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19 (10), 2100–2111 (2002).Google Scholar


Poyneer, L. A. and B. Macintosh, “Spatially filtered wavefront sensor for high order adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21 (5), 810–819 (2004).Google Scholar


Roddier, F., “Curvature sensing and compensation: a new concept in adaptive optics,” Appl. Opt. 27, 1223 (1988).Google Scholar


Simon, D, Optimal State Estimation, Kalman, H-∞, and Nonlinear Approaches, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ (2006).Google Scholar


Sinha, N. K. and B. Kuszta, Modeling and Identification of Dynamic Systems, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1983).Google Scholar


Skogestad, S. and I. Postlethwaite, Multivariable Feedback Control, Analysis and Design, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ (2009).Google Scholar


Taranenko, V. G., G. P. Koshelev, and N. S. Romanyuk, “Local deformations of solid mirrors and their frequency dependence,” Sov. J. Opt. Technol. 48, 650 (1981).Google Scholar


Trefethen, L. N. and D. Bau III, Numerical Linear Algebra, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1997).Google Scholar


Tyler, G., “Reconstruction and assessment of the least-squares and slope discrepancy components of the phase,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 1828–1839 (2000).Google Scholar


Tyson, R. K., Introduction to Adaptive Optics, SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA (2000) [doi:10.1117/3.358220].Google Scholar


Tyson, R. K., Principles of Adaptive Optics, Third Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2011).Google Scholar


Tyson, R. K., “Adaptive optics and ground-to-space laser communications,” Appl. Opt. 35, 3640–3646 (1996).Google Scholar


Uchino, K., Ferroelectric Devices, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2000).Google Scholar


Ulrich, P. B., “Hufnagel-Valley profiles for specified values of the coherence length and isoplanatic patch angle,” W. J. Schafer Associates, WJSA/MA/TN-88-013, Arlington, VA (1988).Google Scholar


Vogel, C. R., Computational Methods for Inverse Problems, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2002).Google Scholar


Vogel, C. R. and Q. Yang, “Fast optimal wavefront reconstruction for multi-conjugate adaptive optics using the Fourier domain preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm,” Optics Express 14 (17), 7487–7498 (2006).Google Scholar

gr8-1.jpg Robert K. Tyson is an Associate Professor of Physics and Optical Science at The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He has a B.S. in physics from Penn State University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in physics from West Virginia University. He was a senior systems engineer with United Technologies Optical Systems from 1978 to 1987 and a senior scientist with Schafer Corporation until 1999. He is the author of Principles of Adaptive Optics [Academic Press (1991), Second Edition (1998), Third Edition, CRC Press (2011)], Lighter Side of Adaptive Optics, SPIE Press (2009), and Introduction to Adaptive Optics, SPIE Press (2000) and the editor of ten volumes on adaptive optics. He is also a Fellow of SPIE. Professor Tyson’s current research interests include atmospheric turbulence studies, classical diffraction, novel wavefront sensing, and amplitude and phase manipulation techniques to enhance propagation, laser communications, and imaging.

gr8-2.jpg Benjamin W. Frazier is a Principal Electro-Optical Engineer with AOA Xinetics, a small business unit of Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems. He has B.S.E.E. and M.S.E.E. degrees from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, where he focused on control theory for adaptive optics systems. Frazier has extensive experience with systems integration and testing of beam control systems and components, particularly deformable mirrors and wavefront control systems for high-power and solid state lasers. He currently supports multiple programs in systems engineering, integration and test, data analysis, and performance assessment.


Back to Top