You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print format on
SPIE.org.
Abstract
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is accepted widely as the most complete way of quantifying and reporting accuracy in two-group classification tasks. Based in statistical decision theory [1], ROC methodology was developed initially for evaluation of detectability in radar [2, 3] but soon was extended to applications in psychology and psychophysics [4-8] and in other fields [9-11]. The use of ROC analysis in medical decision making, medical diagnosis and medical imaging was first proposed by Lusted [12-15], who pointed out that a diagnostician or radiologist can achieve different combinations of sensitivity and specificity by consciously or unconsciously changing the "threshold of abnormality" or "critical confidence level" which is used to distinguish nominally positive test results (or images) from nominally negative outcomes, and that ROC analysis is ideally suited to the task of separating such âdecision thresholdâ effects from inherent differences in diagnostic accuracy. Subsequently, ROC techniques have been employed in the evaluation of a broad variety of diagnostic procedures [16-21], especially in medical imaging [22-30]. The medical applications of ROC analysis have fostered a number of methodological innovations, particularly in ROC curve fitting, in elucidating distinctions among several sources of variation in ROC estimates, and in testing the statistical significance of differences between such estimates.
This chapter surveys conventional ROC methodology from a broad perspective, both to acquaint the reader with the current state of the art and to guide the reader to other literature that provides greater conceptual and/or methodological detail. Variants of ROC analysis that take localization into account [31-38] are described in a subsequent chapter, whereas relationships between ROC analysis and cost-benefit analysis [22, 39-43] as well as the use of ROC analysis in predicting and quantifying the gains in accuracy obtained from multiple readings of each image [44, 45] are discussed elsewhere.
Online access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions.