You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
Chapter 16: Application of the CAGE-Barten Model to Extended Contrast Sensitivity Data
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print format on
SPIE.org.
Abstract
Van Nes and Bouman made measurements similar to Patel and van Meeteren and Vos, but using monochromatic light at three wavelengths, and spanning across six decades of retinal illuminance. The salient features of their experiments are reported, which is structurally similar to. They used transparent sinusoidal gratings retroilluminated by the output light from a double-prism monochromator, choosing green (525 nm), red (650 nm), and blue (450 nm) wavelengths. Vision by the observer was monocular through an artificial pupil of 2 mm. Modulation threshold was determined by the method of adjustment, yet the authors varied the modulation in fixed steps of one tenth of a decade (0.1 log unit). In this way, they achieved both an upper and lower limit for the detection threshold. Doubts regarding the accuracy of Van Nes and Bouman's published data were raised in Barten's book, where he had to adopt a value of quantum efficiency 0 ten times greater than his mean value to obtain a satisfactory fitting. He did not try to compose the discrepancy in any way, only observing that for the vNB experiments, "the quantum efficiency is unlikely high compared with the results of other investigations," and to match them "the measured retinal illuminance should have been a factor 10 higher."
Online access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions.