You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print format on
SPIE.org.
Abstract
This chapter is more difficult to organize than others because of the great variety of requirements that a beamdivider (BD) must meet. For example, if a beamdivider design is developed with a division of 50% reflectance R and 50% transmittance T, what probability is there that the reader will find this of little interest because a beamdivider with a 30%â70% division is needed? §1.8.6.3 cites parameters that specify the performance of a beamdivider as:
(1) Whether the coating is nonimmersed or immersed. In §1.8.1.1.1 it is noted that immersed coatings usually manifest no small amount of polarization splitting.
(2) The range of angle of incidence and spectral region over which it must function.
(3) The amount of polarization, by which is meant that the p transmittance is much higher than the s. The amount of polarization of the output beam is often irrelevant, as when the input light is randomly polarized and the receiver (such as the human eye) of the reflected light from the beamdivider is insensitive to polarization. As compared to the coatings in the category (4) below, these are easier to produce.
(4) In another class of beamdividers, both the degree of polarization [see Eq. (1-5c)] and the differential phase shift (see §2.3.4) are to be controlled.
It is natural that the subject of polarizers appears in this chapter, because both beamdividers and polarizers function at nonnormal incidence.
Online access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions.