You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print format on
SPIE.org.
Abstract
Imagine if the only way to determine whether bridges were designed with sufficient strength to support the weight of fully loaded trucks was to build each bridge in its desired location according to an engineer's best guess, drive trucks across to see if the bridge collapsed, and redesign the bridge if it failed. This approach to bridge design is clearly impractical. What has made it possible to build large bridges are the mathematical theories of beams and plates enabling civil engineers to predict whether their designs will work or not, prior to construction. Similarly, advancements in lithography technology have been facilitated by the availability of predictive theoretical models and tools. Today, imaging performance can be simulated on personal computers and engineering workstations in order to determine what the design parameters should be for lenses that cost millions of dollars to fabricate.
Lithography simulations involve several key steps:
(1) The calculation of optical images. These are intensities I(x,y) in the plane of the wafer, that are applicable for low-numerical-aperture optics, or they can be fully three dimensional intensities I(x,y,z), that may be needed for accurate simulation of exposures using high-numerical-aperture lenses.
(2) Prediction of the photochemical reactions resulting from the exposure of photoresist to the previously calculated light distributions. This provides a calculated state-of-exposure at every point (x,y,z) of interest in the resist film.
(3) Computation of changes in chemical distributions within the resist as a consequence of diffusion that occurs during post-exposure bakes.
(4) Calculation of resist profiles following resist development.
Models for all of these key steps are discussed in this chapter.
Online access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions.