You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
Chapter 15: Choosing a Lossy Compression Technique
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print format on
SPIE.org.
Abstract
The question "What is the best lossy compression algorithm?" is often asked, but unfortunately there is no absolute answer. The choice of a particular algorithm for a given application depends on many factors. For example, when compression is used in an image transmission application, the encoding and decoding operation often needs to be performed in real time, and the issues of implementation complexity, susceptibility to channel errors, and buffering requirements to match the coder output rate to the transmission rate of the channel become important. In contrast, in applications where compression is used to reduce storage requirements, the encoding operation often does not need to be performed in real time. The encoder can be quite complex since it will be used only once for a given image, while a simple decoder is desirable since it will be used repeatedly. Also, the error rates encountered in storage and retrieval applications are typically many orders of magnitude lower than the error rates for a communications channel. This may allow for a more sophisticated algorithm with greater emphasis placed on final image quality.
The following is a list of factors that can influence the choice of a compression algorithm. In general, the weighting of each factor in making a decision is highly dependent on the application. This list is by no means exhaustive, and is intended to serve only as a general guide.
Online access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions.