You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print format on
SPIE.org.
Abstract
The optical path difference W(x,y) between the actual wavefront and its associated reference sphere can be represented as a polynomial series as was indicated by Eq. 1.5. This is an infinite series. But after the eighth order (i+j = 8), the coefficients Wijk are usually insignificant and can be ignored. In Chapter 1 the fourth order terms (where i+j = 4) were discussed. Included here are spherical aberration, coma, and astigmatism. These and higher order terms will be the subject of wavefront sensor measurement in subsequent chapters. This chapter will examine measurements made on the lower order terms in which (i+j) = 0 or 1 or 2. These are piston, tilt, and defocus respectively.
Piston is basically a pedestal shift of the entire wavefront. It does not change the shape of the wavefront, or the resulting point spread (or far-field) pattern. Piston is not something measurable by conventional wavefront sensors, nor is it important that they do so. There is only one scenario where piston plays an extremely important role...optical phased arrays.
Constructing monolithic primary mirrors on the order of 10 meters and larger is prohibitive because of cost, and limits on fabrication technology. Optical phased arrays provide a practical means of building telescope systems with large equivalent apertures. There are two approaches: an array of separate but coupled telescopes, or a segmented primary mirror. The Multi-Mirror Telescope shown in Fig. 3.1 was the pioneer of the first alternative. An embodiment of the latter is the Keck telescope shown in Fig. 3.2.
Online access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions.