You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print format on
SPIE.org.
Abstract
We have, thus far, assumed the image-forming wavefronts to be spherical. As we understand from Chapter 2, the emerging wavefronts from the pupil are in general aspherical, even if the lens surfaces are spherical. Deviation of wavefronts from sphericity is called aberration.
Within the domain of geometrical optics, an aberrated image can be examined by considering the intersection of aberrated rays with the image plane. Such treatment, adequate for instruments in which the aberrations are on the order of wavelengths, is known as the Seidel theory of aberrations. But the precision required of imaging systems in optical lithography means that the wave aberration is a small fraction of the wavelength. In this situation, the geometrical theory loses its validity; the Seidel treatment is insufficient. We need to study the effects of aberrations based on diffraction theory.
Online access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions.