Translator Disclaimer
17 July 2013 Multiphoton imaging microscopy at deeper layers with adaptive optics control of spherical aberration
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Despite the inherent confocality and optical sectioning capabilities of multiphoton microscopy, three-dimensional (3-D) imaging of thick samples is limited by the specimen-induced aberrations. The combination of immersion objectives and sensorless adaptive optics (AO) techniques has been suggested to overcome this difficulty. However, a complex plane-by-plane correction of aberrations is required, and its performance depends on a set of image-based merit functions. We propose here an alternative approach to increase penetration depth in 3-D multiphoton microscopy imaging. It is based on the manipulation of the spherical aberration (SA) of the incident beam with an AO device while performing fast tomographic multiphoton imaging. When inducing SA, the image quality at best focus is reduced; however, better quality images are obtained from deeper planes within the sample. This is a compromise that enables registration of improved 3-D multiphoton images using nonimmersion objectives. Examples on ocular tissues and nonbiological samples providing different types of nonlinear signal are presented. The implementation of this technique in a future clinical instrument might provide a better visualization of corneal structures in living eyes.

1.

Introduction

Two-photon excitation fluorescence (TPEF)1 and second-harmonic generation (SHG) imaging2 are forms of nonlinear microscopy being used in all major areas of biomedical research. Although these techniques allow intrinsic optical sectioning and three-dimensional (3-D) imaging, aberrations caused by the alignment and quality of the optical elements, the objective-sample refractive-index mismatch, and the inhomogeneous structure of the sample37 limit their performance.3 These enlarge, both laterally and axially, the focal spot within the specimen and reduce the multiphoton excitation efficiency, which leads to a reduction in the quality of the images.

In the last decade adaptive optics (AO) yielded substantial improvements in the images obtained with multiphoton microscopy.36,811 In an ideal situation, for each location within the sample, the corresponding wavefront should be accurately measured and corrected. However, since the plane-by-plane wavefront assessment may be complex in thick samples, most of the authors used sensorless techniques for aberration correction.36 Strategies are based on different algorithms modifying the incoming wavefront to improve the recorded image according to different quality metrics, such as intensity, contrast, or sharpness.6,12

These experiments provided image quality improvements by means of an indirect measurement of the actual aberrations within the sample. Only a few studies combined wavefront sensing and correction in multiphoton microscopy.811

It is well known that the use of a high numerical aperture (NA) objective induces spherical aberration (SA) due to the refractive-index mismatch at the interface between materials.13,14 When a microscope is focused into the specimen, SA is induced, leading to a degradation of the images of deeper layers. Then, SA plays an important role when imaging thick samples with a multiphoton microscope. Moreover, it has been reported that SA is often the dominant term3,4,6,15,16 and its correction leads to image enhancement.

Methods to correct for (or minimize) this unwanted SA in multiphoton microscopy were mainly based on the use of an objective correction collar15,16 or a sensorless AO device.36 For these experiments high-NA immersion objectives and previously chosen cover glasses (to minimize the refractive-index mismatch and the SA produced at the corresponding interface) are often used. The correction collar is a manual method only valid for a well-defined set of cover thickness values. An optimal performance depends on the relationship between the refractive indices of the immersion medium and the sample, and how uniform the refractive index within the specimen is.15

Alternatively, sensorless schemes offer a different strategy to compensate for different aberration terms by indirect assessment.36 AO multiphoton microscopes based on modal Zernike correction12 have reported interesting results. However, the effects of partial correction or induction of pure aberrations terms have not been studied in detail. In particular, SA increases imaging depth (i.e., induces a larger depth of focus), a feature that can be used in 3-D microscopy. Therefore, it is conceivable that the manipulation of the wavefront aberrations of the incident laser beam (via AO) to induce predefined values of SA may help to optimize multiphoton signals from deeper layers. In this sense, the aim of this study is to further analyze the influence of the SA on 3-D multiphoton imaging and in particular the effect in imaging deeper sample layers. We will examine the possibility of using a nonimmersion objective and an AO module to optimize both TPEF and SHG imaging in nonbiological samples and ocular tissues.

2.

Experimental Setup and Procedure

2.1.

Adaptive Optics Multiphoton Microscope

The experimental setup (Fig. 1) combines an AO module and a research prototype multiphoton microscope.9 A 76-MHz, 110-fs Ti:sapphire mode-locked laser system (Mira900f, Coherent, St. Clara, CA) centered at 760 nm was used for the multiphoton excitation. This was coupled into an inverted microscope (Nikon TE2000-U, Tokyo, Japan). A pair of nonresonant galvanometric mirrors (GSI, VM1000, Billerica, MA) together with a Z-axis step motor (PI C-136, Karlsruhe, Germany) allowed the acquisition of XY images at different depths within the sample under study. A Plan Fluor 20×/0.5NA air long-working distance microscope objective (WD 2.1, Nikon ELWD Series) was used for the experiments described herein. Nonlinear signals (both TPEF and SHG) were collected via the same objective (backscattering configuration). A dichroic mirror separated these nonlinear backscattered signals from the infrared light used for multiphoton excitation. These signals emitted by the sample passed a spectral filter and reached the photomultiplier tube. Spectral filters in the detection channel were used to isolate either TPEF (broadband fluorescence filter, FGL435, Thorlabs Inc., Newton, NJ) or SHG (narrow-band spectral filter, 380±10nm; FB380-10, Thorlabs Inc.) signals. Image recording was completely controlled through a custom LabView™ (Austin, TX) interface. Image post-processing was performed with MATLAB™ (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA). A continuously variable neutral density filter (not shown in Fig. 1) placed in front of the laser was used to set the appropriate average illumination power at the sample’s plane.

Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the adaptive optics (AO) multiphoton microscope. The AO module is composed of a Hartmann–Shack wavefront sensor and a deformable mirror; PMT, photomultiplier tube.

JBO_19_1_011007_f001.png

2.2.

Closed-Loop Wavefront Aberration Control

The AO module, composed of a Hartmann–Shack (HS) wavefront sensor and a deformable mirror (DM),9 was used to control and manipulate the laser beam aberrations while multiphoton microscopy was performed. The AO module was calibrated in a previous operation. The high-power laser beam passed through this AO module before entering the microscope (see Fig. 1). The corrector device was a gold-coated MEMS-type 140-actuator DM (Boston Micromachines, Cambridge, MA). The HS sensor (WFS150-5C, Thorlabs Inc.) measured the laser beam aberrations and those induced by the DM, and working in closed loop, the AO module set the target wavefront, expressed as a Zernike polynomial expansion. By setting the appropriate DM shape, the system was able to reach a final wavefront composed of any possible combination of Zernike modes (the limit is imposed by the DM stroke). In this experiment, the AO module has been used to produce predefined values for the SA (Z40) correcting for the rest of the aberration modes. To achieve this, initially the AO system measured the beam’s wavefront and set these values to the target aberration, except for the SA whose value was previously stated as desired.

The experimental system was first set to sequentially record multiphoton XZ tomographic (cross-sectional) images17 for different amounts of SA induced by the AO module. SA values were produced in steps of 0.05 μm. This imaging modality permits a fast transversal visualization of the sample (a few seconds). From each tomography the averaged intensity profile as a function of depth was automatically computed. The image with the highest area under the intensity profile was considered to provide the most appropriate SA value for the sample under study. This procedure was carried out for each sample involved in the study.

Once this “optimum” SA value was determined, two stacks of regular XY multiphoton images at different depth locations were recorded, with and without inducing this SA value. Moreover, to establish the relative impact of this optimum SA in the multiphoton microscopy images, different image quality parameters were also computed.18 Moreover, for each parameter P a relative improvement (in %) was defined as follows:

Eq. (1)

improvement=PSAPSA=0PSA=0×100,
with P being the values of the corresponding parameter in the images obtained with a given value of SA and without SA (SA=0).

2.3.

Samples

In order to test the feasibility of the procedure reported herein, different samples were used in the experiment. As nonbiological samples, a piece of cellulose and grains of starch sample were used. These provide TPEF and SHG signals.9 As biological specimens, we used human epiretinal membranes, chicken retinal tissue, and porcine corneas. The corneal stroma (made of type I collagen),1921 produces SHG signal and retinal tissues provide a remarkable TPEF signal.2224 Chicken retinas and human epiretinal membranes were flat-mounted on a microscope slide after overnight fixation with a paraformaldehyde solution (additional details can be found in Ref. 24). Porcine eyes were obtained from a local slaughterhouse (refer to Ref. 21 for further details on the manipulation). These intact ocular globes were placed upside-down on a glass-bottom dish for multiphoton microscopy imaging.

3.

Results

3.1.

Effect of Aberration Correction on Single Plane Images

The influence of SA was first tested by recording individual planes of different samples as shown in Fig. 2. A direct comparison can be made for retinal and corneal tissues providing TPEF (left panels, photoreceptors mosaic) and SHG (right panels, stroma collagen fibers) signals, respectively. As expected, the addition of 0.1 μm of SA led to a reduction in the image quality for both specimens (bottom panels). All image quality metrics (total intensity, entropy, signal-to-noise ratio) reduced when inducing SA (between 8% and 40% depending on the metric).

Fig. 2

Effects of SA on multiphoton images. Top row images (SA=0μm) must be compared to those of the bottom row (SA=+0.1μm). Samples correspond to chicken retina (left) and porcine cornea (right). False color has been used for a better understanding: green for TPEF and blue for SHG. Imaged single planes correspond to the best focus within the sample. Bar length: 50 μm.

JBO_19_1_011007_f002.png

Another preliminary experiment on the dominance of SA over other aberration terms was also carried out. As an example Fig. 3 includes TPEF images of a plane located 100 μm inside a piece of cellulose. The impact of using just SA [Fig. 3(b)] or also other terms such as astigmatism and coma [Fig. 3(c)] can be directly compared to a control image [no AO module in use, Fig. 3(a)]. This illustrative example confirms the dominance of the SA and helps to understand our choice of SA as a unique term to improve multiphoton imaging in thick samples.

Fig. 3

Impact of SA and other aberration terms on TPEF image quality. (a) Image control; (b) SA; (c) SA, astigmatism, and coma. All images have the same intensity scale. Bar length: 50 μm.

JBO_19_1_011007_f003.png

3.2.

Effect of Spherical Aberration on Depth Imaging

Tomographic images of the samples for different amounts of SA were first acquired [see an example of these images in Fig. 4(a)]. As explained in Sec. 2, for each tomographic image (and SA value) the averaged intensity profile was computed. Figure 4(b) shows the impact of inducing different controlled amounts of SA as a function of the sample’s depth compared to the case of complete aberration correction.

Fig. 4

(a) Comparison of tomographic TPEF images of a single cellulose fiber for different values of induced SA (0 μm, left; 0.1μm, center; 0.2μm, right). (b) Intensity profiles as a function of depth, when inducing different controlled amounts of SA compared to the case of complete aberration correction (black line).

JBO_19_1_011007_f004.png

When SA was not induced, the TPEF signal decreased with depth because of the influence of the specimen aberrations themselves [black line in Fig. 4(b)]. The intensity values reduced at the best imaged plane when SA was induced: the higher the SA the more reduction. For  SA=0.1μm the intensity was below the optimal one and provided similar values for deeper locations, as seen by comparing black and black dashed lines. However, this behavior clearly changed when adding larger values of SA. For this sample, this occurred when SA was larger than 0.15μm (gray lines). The arrow in the plot indicates the location where the behavior was reversed, i.e., a better TPEF signal was obtained when imaging deeper into the sample. This implies an extended imaging depth (or alternatively an increase in the depth of focus) from deeper positions within the sample. It is also interesting to observe that for SA=0.3μm (and larger values not shown here) the effects are more noticeable for deeper planes, although a shift in the optimal focal plane is also produced.

From the intensity profiles the optimum SA value was determined (see Sec. 2) and 3-D multiphoton imaging immediately performed (i.e., XY images along the Z direction). These stacks of images for different depth positions were recorded for two experimental conditions: with the optimum SA value and without SA (for comparison purposes). This 3-D imaging gives us information on the interaction between SA and the quality of images from deeper planes. Figure 5 presents an example of TPEF images at different depth locations for the two experimental conditions: SA=0μm (top row) and SA=0.2μm. The improvement of images at planes located 50 and 75 μm within the sample can be qualitatively observed.

Fig. 5

TPEF images for different depth positions acquired with all laser beam aberrations corrected (top row) and 0.2μm SA induced (optimum value for this sample). The sample corresponds to a piece of cellulose. Bar length: 50 μm.

JBO_19_1_011007_f005.png

For a better understanding of this SA impact, Fig. 6(a) presents the corresponding total intensity values (across the entire images) as a function of depth. The tendency for the rest of the image quality metrics (not shown here) was also similar. Moreover, although different image quality metrics are expected to measure different image properties,18 the reversal point positions (see arrow) hardly differ among the different metrics (not more than 3 μm for the samples here used). Figure 6(b) presents the improvement in total TPEF signal versus depth position. This becomes positive when the effect the SA is reversed. Similar results are obtained for a human epiretinal membrane also providing TPEF signal. Results are depicted in Fig. 7.

Fig. 6

(a) Effect of inducing 0.2μm SA (gray line) compared to the case of null SA (black line). (b) Improvement in the total TPEF intensity of the images as a function of depth.

JBO_19_1_011007_f006.png

Fig. 7

Improvement in TPEF signal as a function of depth for a human epiretinal membrane when inducing 0.2μm SA compared to the case of complete aberration correction. The arrow indicates the depth location of the images within the sample. Bar length: 50 μm.

JBO_19_1_011007_f007.png

For completeness, the procedure was also applied to samples providing SHG signal. The increase in depth imaging for a sample of starch grains is also evident for two different metrics (total intensity and entropy) as depicted in Fig. 8. For this sample, a value of 0.1μm SA was the optimal value to observe the improvement.

Fig. 8

SHG signal improvement measured with total intensity (black line) and entropy (gray line) as a function of depth when inducing 0.1μm SA. The arrow indicates a depth location of 12 μm. The sample corresponds to starch grains. Bar length: 50 μm.

JBO_19_1_011007_f008.png

Finally, the procedure was also applied to another biological sample: porcine corneal tissue providing SHG signal originated at the stroma. It is known that within the cornea, the deeper the image plane is located, the lower the SHG signal recorded,25 as upper panels of Fig. 9 show. However, when the illumination laser beam contains a certain amount of SA (bottom panels of Fig. 9), beyond a particular depth location the intensity levels do not follow that behavior. For this particular sample, 0.1μm SA was the optimal value to observe the effect analyzed in this work. In Fig. 10, this improvement in SHG signal as a function of depth is depicted.

Fig. 9

SHG imaging of corneal stroma at different depth locations illustrating the effects of adding 0.1μm SA to the illumination laser beam (bottom panels). Upper panels correspond to the case of all laser beam aberrations corrected. The sample is an ex vivo porcine cornea. Bar length: 50 μm.

JBO_19_1_011007_f009.png

Fig. 10

Improvement in the SHG intensity of corneal stroma images as a function of depth when inducing 0.1μm SA. Vertical dotted lines correspond to the locations of images in Fig. 9.

JBO_19_1_011007_f010.png

4.

Discussion

During the last decade, there has been a remarkable interest in the development of novel AO capabilities for improved 3-D high-resolution multiphoton microscopy imaging. Most reported techniques are sensorless and improved the focal spot within the sample by pre-shaping the wavefront of the input beam to compensate for the specimen-induced aberration according to a sequential adjust of individual Zernike modes.6

In this sense, this study has reported that an accurate manipulation of the aberrations in the illuminating beam provides improved 3-D multiphoton imaging. The AO module has not been used for a modal plane-to-plane correction, but to induce controlled amounts of SA, working in closed loop. This manipulation of the incident laser beam aberrations leads to an improvement in the nonlinear signal from images (as measured with different metrics) acquired at deeper locations within the sample. This effect might be understood as increased imaging depth or extended depth of focus and has been demonstrated in nonbiological and biological (ocular tissues) samples providing both TPEF and SHG signals.

For each sample, the appropriate SA value was computed from fast tomographic nonlinear imaging (for this experiment the highest induced SA value was 0.3μm, in steps of 0.05 μm). This value corresponds to the image with the highest area under the intensity profile. With this optimum induced SA, each sample was imaged with depth in a regular manner (XY+Z scanning). Although the required SA values were particular for each sample, they were never larger than 0.2μm here. The percent of improvement at a certain depth location depended also on the used sample. The shallowest plane at which this improvement takes place was 7μm for starch. For the rest of the samples, it was placed between 25 and 30 μm.

The effects of SA in both linear (bright-field and confocal) and nonlinear microscopy have been a topic of interest.4,15,16,2628 Implementations to eliminate or minimize the effect of SA in the former include an objective correction ring,13,15,16 changes in the effective tube length of the microscope objective,28,29 structured illumination techniques,30,31 point-spread function engineering,32 and AO devices,6,3335 among others.

Although to minimize SA some objectives have a correction ring to adjust for the thickness of the microscope slide, additional SA is also present when focusing deeper within the specimen. Moreover, when imaging specimens in a backscattered configuration, the main drawback is the noticeable reduction of the signal for deeper planes. The anterior layers will produce aberrations that might interfere with the measurement from deeper layers as the light travels through. Lo and coworkers analyzed the effects of a collar in multiphoton microscopy of tendon and skin (maximum depth: 28 μm).15 Although their results showed some improvements, they ignored the nominal SA values required for each sample and depth. They also claimed that the collar’s ability to compensate for the SA decreased with depth and that the required correction collar settings were particular for each sample and distribution of refraction indices. Muriello and Dunn reported a similar experiment.16 The combination of a water immersion objective lens and a correction collar decreased the depth dependence of signal levels in TPEF images of kidney tissue. Débarre et al. combined an immersion objective collar and a DM to pre-compensate for different aberration terms (SA included) in a mouse embryo.6 This procedure is robust but highly time-consuming (minutes).

Despite that aberrations are specimen-dependent, these tend to be dominated by a small number of low-order Zernike aberration modes. The magnitude of the aberrations increases with NA.36,37 Although the ideal compensation would require a plane-by-plane SA correction, in the present work, we have demonstrated that this is not always necessary. We report that an appropriate value of SA can experimentally be measured for each sample in order to improve the image quality of deeper planes because the depth of focus is extended. This procedure, although with some limitations, represents a more elegant and accurate method than an objective collar, where the effect is limited by the discrete values provided by the collar itself.

Unlike most experiments reported in the literature (using immersion high-NA objectives), the objective here used is a low-NA air long-working distance objective. These “air-immersion” objectives would be more suitable for future in vivo experiments. In this sense, the SA value produced in the illumination beam has a double function: (1) a basal correction compensating for the refractive-index mismatch air-microscope cover and (2) an additional correction to partially compensate for the specimen-induced SA. The reduction of image quality is affected by SA to a large extent.36 Despite that the rest of aberration terms are not corrected and a unique value (experimentally computed) of SA is used, the image quality is improved.

Compared to the experimental conditions using a total laser beam aberration correction,9 the “side-effect” of the proposed technique is that the signal at the best imaged plane of the sample is reduced. However, for deeper planes the behavior is reversed, the signal is improved, and more details are visible. Although the enhancement depends on each particular sample, the extended imaging depth has been demonstrated for both TPEF and SHG signals. Moreover, the procedure here reported overpasses (to some extent) the limitation of a single aberration correction per depth (since a unique customized aberration is used) which significantly decreases scan times and enables more rapid imaging. The approach reported in this paper provides a fine balance on the effect of SA aberrations in stacks of nonlinear images. While SA reduces the image quality at best focus, it provides a better series of images at deeper layers. If the amount of incoming light can be easily selected, this can be a better compromise providing a range of improved images.

The present procedure is much faster than a possible plane-by-plane correction. The typical acquisition time for tomography imaging modality is about 5 s for a 100-μm-thick sample (at 3 μm Z-step). The sequential use of six SA values with the computation of the intensity profiles took approximately 40 s. Once the SA value has been determined, the regular XY imaging (planes taken 5 μm apart) will take 1min. The images for a plane-by-plane correction provide better quality, but the time used is much longer. In particular, with our experimental configuration, >5min would necessary to complete the entire operation.

A plane-to-plane correction provides a more accurate SA correction, but the time required for it is excessively long when living samples are imaged. In this sense, the main advantage of our procedure is that it could be used to improve the imaging of living specimens such as embryos or brain neurons, among others.

Probably one of the most interesting consequences is provided by results in Fig. 10. The imaging of corneal tissue in living animals (human included) is a challenging application. Fast recording procedures are of special interest for in vivo applications. The use of the present technique with a nonimmersion objective when imaging the living cornea would produce improved images while decreasing acquisition times, minimizing photobleaching effects, reducing tissues damage, and keeping the safety limits (strongly necessary in ophthalmology).

5.

Conclusions

We have used an AO multiphoton microscope in a backscattered configuration and a nonimmersion low-NA objective to improve 3-D nonlinear imaging. The technique was based on an accurate aberration control of the illuminating beam. In particular, controlled amounts of SA led to an increase in imaging depth independently of the specimen-induced aberrations, which is essential in multiphoton microscopy. The benefits of this AO procedure have been tested in both nonbiological and biological samples, with particular interest in ex vivo ocular tissues. In this type of tissue, an extended imaging depth might be of huge interest to better visualize deep retinal and corneal layers through volume rendering reconstructions. The procedure here described partially overpasses the limits imposed by the aberrations, improves the multiphoton microscopy sectioning capabilities, and represents a further step to produce 3-D images with overall increased quality. This technique might be of great interest in future studies of living samples, especially clinical applications including corneal tissue imaging.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by “Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación,” Spain (Grants FIS2010-14926 & Consolider Program SAUUL CSD2007-00013), “Fundación Séneca,” Murcia, Spain (Grant 04524/GERM/06), and EU-FEDER funds.

References

1. 

W. DenkJ. H. StricklerW. W. Webb, “Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy,” Science, 248 (4951), 73 –76 (1990). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.2321027 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

2. 

P. J. Campagnolaet al., “Second-harmonic imaging microscopy of living cells,” J. Biomed. Opt., 6 (3), 277 –286 (2001). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.1383294 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

3. 

L. Shermanet al., “Adaptive correction of depth-induced aberrations in multiphoton scanning microscopy using a deformable mirror,” J. Microsc., 206 (1), 65 –71 (2002). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01004.x JMICAR 0022-2720 Google Scholar

4. 

M. A. Neilet al., “Adaptive aberration correction in a two-photon microscope,” J. Microsc., 200 (2), 105 –108 (2000). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2000.00770.x JMICAR 0022-2720 Google Scholar

5. 

P. N. MarshD. BurnsJ. M. Girkin, “Practical implementation of adaptive optics in multiphoton microscopy,” Opt. Express, 11 (10), 1123 –1130 (2003). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.11.001123 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

6. 

D. Débarreet al., “Image-based adaptive optics for two-photon microscopy,” Opt. Lett., 34 (16), 2495 –2497 (2009). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.34.002495 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

7. 

J. M. Buenoet al., “Temporal wavefront stability of an ultrafast high-power laser beam,” Appl. Opt., 48 (4), 770 –777 (2009). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.000770 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

8. 

M. RueckelJ. A. Mack-BucherW. Denk, “Adaptive wavefront correction in two-photon microscopy using coherence-gated wavefront sensing,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 103 (46), 17137 –17142 (2006). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604791103 PNASA6 0027-8424 Google Scholar

9. 

J. M. BuenoE. J. GualdaP. Artal, “Adaptive optics multiphoton microscopy to study ex-vivo ocular tissues,” J. Biomed. Opt., 15 (6), 066004 (2010). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3505018 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

10. 

J. W. ChaJ. BallestaP. T. C. So, “Shack–Hartmann wavefront-sensor-based adaptive optics system for multiphoton microscopy,” J. Biomed. Opt., 15 (4), 046022 (2010). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3475954 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

11. 

R. Aviles-Espinosaet al., “Measurement and correction of in vivo sample aberrations employing a nonlinear guide-star in two-photon excited fluorescence microscopy,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 2 (11), 3135 –3149 (2011). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.003135 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

12. 

A. J. Wrightet al., “Exploration of the optimisation algorithms used in the implementation of Adaptive Optics in confocal and multiphoton microscopy,” Microsc. Res. Tech., 67 (1), 36 –44 (2005). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0029 MRTEEO 1059-910X Google Scholar

13. 

M. J. Boothet al., “Adaptive aberration correction in a confocal microscope,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 99 (9), 5788 –5792 (2002). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082544799 PNASA6 0027-8424 Google Scholar

14. 

M. J. BoothT. Wilson, “Refractive-index-mismatch induced aberrations in single-photon and two-photon microscopy and the use of aberration correction,” J. Biomed. Opt., 6 (3), 266 –272 (2001). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.1382808 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

15. 

W. Loet al., “Spherical aberration correction in multiphoton fluorescence imaging using objective correction collar,” J. Biomed. Opt., 10 (3), 034006 (2005). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.1924614 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

16. 

P. A. MurielloK. W. Dunn, “Improving signal levels in intravital multiphoton microscopy using an objective correction collar,” Opt. Commun., 281 (7), 1806 –1812 (2008). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2007.05.070 OPCOB8 0030-4018 Google Scholar

17. 

J. M. Buenoet al., “Multiphoton microscopy of ex vivo corneas after collagen cross-linking,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci., 52 (8), 5325 –5331 (2011). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-7184 IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar

18. 

J. M. Buenoet al., “Characterizing image quality in a scanning laser ophthalmoscope with differing pinholes and induced scattered light,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 24 (5), 1284 –1295 (2007). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.24.001337 JOAOD6 0740-3232 Google Scholar

19. 

M. HanG. GieseJ. Bille, “Second harmonic generation imaging of collagen fibrils in cornea and sclera,” Opt. Express, 13 (15), 5791 –5797 (2005). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.005791 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

20. 

N. Morishigeet al., “Noninvasive corneal stromal collagen imaging using two-photon-generated second-harmonic signals,” J. Cataract Refractive Surg., 32 (11), 1784 –1791 (2006). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.027 JCSUEV 0886-3350 Google Scholar

21. 

J. M. BuenoE. J. GualdaP. Artal, “Analysis of corneal stroma organization with wavefront optimized nonlinear microscopy,” Cornea, 30 (6), 692 –701 (2011). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182000f94 CORNDB 0277-3740 Google Scholar

22. 

M. Hanet al., “Two-photon excited autofluorescence imaging of human retinal pigment epithelial cells,” J. Biomed. Opt., 11 (1), 010501 (2006). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2171649 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

23. 

J. M. Buenoet al., “Analysis of the chicken retina with an adaptive optics multiphoton microscope,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 2 (6), 1637 –1648 (2011). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.001637 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

24. 

E. J. GualdaJ. M. BuenoP. Artal, “Wavefront optimized non-linear microscopy of ex-vivo human retinas,” J. Biomed. Opt., 15 (2), 026007 (2010). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3369001 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

25. 

J. M. BuenoE. J. GualdaP. Artal, “Non-linear 3D microscopy of ex vivo corneas,” Proc. SPIE, 7569 756937 (2010). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.840720 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

26. 

C. J. R. SheppardT. Wilson, “Effect of spherical aberration on the imaging properties of scanning optical microscopes,” Appl. Opt., 18 (7), 1058 –1063 (1979). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.18.001058 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

27. 

P. TörökS. J. HewlettP. Vargas, “The role of specimen-induced spherical aberration in confocal microscopy,” J. Micros., 188 (2), 158 –172 (1997). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.2440802.x JMICAR 0022-2720 Google Scholar

28. 

S. Hellet al., “Aberration in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index,” J. Microsc., 169 (3), 391 –405 (1993). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmi.1993.169.issue-3 JMICAR 0022-2720 Google Scholar

29. 

C. J. R. Sheppard, “Aberrations in high aperture conventional and confocal imaging systems,” Appl. Opt., 27 (22), 4782 –4786 (1988). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.27.004782 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

30. 

M. A. A. NeilR. JuskaitisT. Wilson, “Method of obtaining optical sectioning by using structured light in a conventional microscope,” Opt. Lett., 22 (24), 1905 –1907 (1997). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.22.001905 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

31. 

M. ArigovindanJ. W. SedatD. A. Agard, “Effect of depth dependent spherical aberrations in 3D structured illumination microscopy,” Opt. Express, 20 (6), 6527 –6541 (2012). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.006527 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

32. 

S. YuanC. Preza, “Point-spread function engineering to reduce the impact of spherical aberration on 3D computational fluorescence microscopy imaging,” Opt. Express, 19 (23), 23298 –23314 (2011). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.023298 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

33. 

P. S. Tsaiet al., “Spherical aberration correction in nonlinear microscopy and optical ablation using a transparent deformable membrane,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 91 191102 (2007). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2804014 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

34. 

M. Shawet al., “Characterization of deformable mirrors for spherical aberration correction in optical sectioning microscopy,” Opt. Express, 18 (7), 6900 –6913 (2010). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.006900 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

35. 

D. IwaniukP. RastogiE. Hack, “Correcting spherical aberrations induced by an unknown medium through determination of its refractive index and thickness,” Opt. Express, 19 (20), 19407 –19414 (2011). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.019407 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

36. 

M. J. BoothM. A. A. NeilT. Wilson, “Aberration correction for confocal imaging in refractive-index-mismatched media,” J. Microsc., 192 (2), 90 –98 (1998). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1998.99999.x JMICAR 0022-2720 Google Scholar

37. 

M. Schwertneret al., “Measurement of specimen-induced aberrations of biological samples using phase stepping interferometry,” J. Microsc., 213 (1), 11 –19 (2004). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2004.01267.x JMICAR 0022-2720 Google Scholar
© 2014 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 0091-3286/2014/$25.00 © 2014 SPIE
Juan M. Bueno, Martin Skorsetz, Raquel Palacios, Emilio J. Gualda, and Pablo Artal "Multiphoton imaging microscopy at deeper layers with adaptive optics control of spherical aberration," Journal of Biomedical Optics 19(1), 011007 (17 July 2013). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.011007
Published: 17 July 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top