Open Access
27 July 2015 Evaluation of light scattering and absorption properties of in vivo rat liver using a single-reflectance fiber probe during preischemia, ischemia–reperfusion, and postmortem
Sharmin Akter, Satoshi Maejima, Satoko Kawauchi, Shunichi Sato, Akinari Hinoki, Suefumi Aosasa, Junji Yamamoto, Izumi Nishidate
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) has been extensively used for characterization of biological tissues as a noninvasive optical technique to evaluate the optical properties of tissue. We investigated a method for evaluating the reduced scattering coefficient μs, the absorption coefficient μa, the tissue oxygen saturation StO2, and the reduction of heme aa3 in cytochrome c oxidase CcO of in vivo liver tissue using a single-reflectance fiber probe with two source-collector geometries. We performed in vivo recordings of diffuse reflectance spectra for exposed rat liver during the ischemia–reperfusion induced by the hepatic portal (hepatic artery, portal vein, and bile duct) occlusion. The time courses of μa at 500, 530, 570, and 584 nm indicated the hemodynamic change in liver tissue as well as StO2. Significant increase in μa(605)/μa(620) during ischemia and after euthanasia induced by nitrogen breathing was observed, which indicates the reduction of heme aa3, representing a sign of mitochondrial energy failure. The time courses of μs′ at 500, 530, 570, and 584 nm were well correlated with those of μa, which also reflect the scattering by red blood cells. On the other hand, at 700 and 800 nm, a temporary increase in μs and an irreversible decrease in μs were observed during ischemia–reperfusion and after euthanasia induced by nitrogen breathing, respectively. The change in μs in the near-infrared wavelength region during ischemia is indicative of the morphological changes in the cellular and subcellular structures induced by the ischemia, whereas that after euthanasia implies the hepatocyte vacuolation. The results of the present study indicate the potential application of the current DRS system for evaluating the pathophysiological conditions of in vivo liver tissue.

1.

Introduction

Liver ischemia–reperfusion involves a complex series of processes that may culminate in hepatocellular injury. Liver ischemia–reperfusion is a common consequence of liver surgery, particularly after hepatectomy and liver transplantation, complicated by microcirculatory liver failure, followed by necrosis and cell death.1 Occlusion of hepatic inflow (Pringle maneuver) by portal vein clamping was initially devised to reduce intraoperative blood loss during emergency liver resection.2 The important side effect of partial liver resection is the ischemia in the remnant liver following temporary vascular occlusion.3 The liver contains many more chromophores [oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO), deoxygenated hemoglobin (HbR), cytochrome c oxidase (CcO), lipid, water, etc.] than other organs. Since liver function depends greatly upon the oxygen supply, it is clinically important to monitor the oxygenation state of the liver in patients after liver surgery. In the present study, we demonstrate the characterization of the light scattering and absorption properties of in vivo liver tissue based on diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS). DRS is a promising method of detecting the macroscopic information of tissue samples, such as the scattering property, the total hemoglobin concentration, and the tissue oxygen saturation of hemoglobin (StO2).4,5 Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy has been reported to be useful in detecting the oxygenation state of the graft liver after transplantation, and the StO2 value can be an indicator of the patient’s prognosis.6,7 The recent development of DRS has made it possible to determine the absorption coefficient μa and the reduced scattering coefficient μs of a tissue independently. The absorption coefficient μa is defined as the probability of photon absorption per unit infinitesimal path length, and the reduced scattering coefficient μs is defined as the probability of photon scattering per unit infinitesimal path length.8 DRS is an optical measurement technique that records changes in the spectral distribution of light after its interaction with the tissue. Changes in the diffuse reflectance spectra are primarily a result of the combination of absorption and scattering of light for each wavelength of light produced by a broadband light source. Light absorption is primarily related to chromophore contents of tissue, whereas light scattering is influenced primarily by cellular and subcellular structures of tissue. The total light absorption is the sum of the absorption due to endogenous chromophores.9 HbO and HbR are the primary absorbers in biological tissues in the visible wavelength region,10 whereas the dominant absorbers in the NIR wavelength region are lipids, water, and collagen.11 The severity of liver ischemia–reperfusion injury can be reliably assessed by measuring changes in HbO, HbR, and the redox state of heme aa3 in CcO.9 By illuminating tissue with a selected spectral band of light and subsequent analysis of the characteristic scattering and absorption patterns, it is possible to obtain an “optical fingerprint” of the tissue. Such an optical fingerprint represents specific quantitative biochemical and morphological information from the examined tissue and may depend on the metabolic rate, vascularity, intravascular oxygenation, and alterations in tissue morphology.12 DRS has been used for tissue surface analysis during endoscopical procedures and analysis of tissue abnormalities in solid organs.13 Light scattering and absorption properties of in vivo tissues can be evaluated by several noninvasive methods, such as time-resolved measurements,14 a frequency-domain method,15 optical coherence methods,16 a pulsed photothermal radiometry method,17 and spatially resolved measurements.1821 DRS based on the spatially resolved measurements with continuous-wave light can be simply achieved with a white light source, inexpensive optical components, and a spectrometer. The primary notable changes within a light spectrum after interaction with tissue are a result of either the absorption or scattering of light. Using various mathematical models, the spectral characteristics of the absorption coefficient μa(λ) and the reduced scattering coefficient μs(λ) can be extracted from the measured reflectance spectrum.22 DRS using a fiber optic probe is a promising technique for monitoring tissue oxygenation, demonstrating promising results in the discrimination of malignant lesions from normal tissue2326 and assessment of tissue viability.27 In addition, DRS has been demonstrated to identify irreversible cell damage during radiofrequency ablation,28 severe steatosis, and hepatitis, thereby preventing overly extensive resections in these high-risk patients.2932 Furthermore, DRS could potentially be used intraoperatively for the assessment of bowel viability in real time.33 Various source-collector geometries have been used to estimate the reduced scattering coefficient μs and the absorption coefficients μa in DRS with a fiber-optic probe.18,26,3336 Moreover, a single-reflectance fiber probe will be easy to use for practical uses, especially in clinical situations. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, information regarding measurement of ischemia–reperfusion injury using a DRS system is very limited.

In the present study, we use a simple DRS system previously developed by Nishidate et al.37 to estimate the reduced scattering coefficient spectrum μs(λ) and the absorption coefficient spectrum μa(λ) of in vivo biological tissue. In order to confirm the validity of the method for evaluating changes in the optical properties of in vivo liver tissue, we performed in vivo experiments using exposed rat liver before and during ischemia–reperfusion induced by the occlusion of the hepatic portal as well as postmortem.

2.

Principle

2.1.

Reflectance Fiber Probe System

Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the single-reflectance fiber probe system with the two source-collection geometries used in the present study. The system consists of a reflectance fiber probe, bifurcated fiber, a light source, and two spectrometers under the control of a personal computer. The bifurcated fiber has two optical fibers of the same diameter of 400μm placed side by side in the common end. The reflectance fiber probe has one 600-μm-diameter fiber in the center surrounded by six 600-μm-diameter fibers. One end of the center fiber of the reflectance probe is connected to the common end of the bifurcated fiber through a fiber connector. A halogen lamp light (HL-2000, Ocean Optics Inc., Dunedin, Florida), which covers the visible to NIR wavelength range, is used to illuminate the sample via one lead of the bifurcated fiber and the central fiber of the reflectance probe. Diffusely reflected light from the sample is collected by both the central fiber and the six surrounding fibers. The center-to-center distances between the surrounding fibers and the central fiber are 700μm. The light collected by the central fiber is delivered to a multichannel spectrometer (USB4000, Ocean Optics Inc.) via another lead of the bifurcated fiber, whereas the light collected by the six surrounding fibers is delivered to a different multichannel spectrometer (USB4000, Ocean Optics Inc.). A solution of Intralipid 10%38 was prepared in order to calibrate the spectral responses of both spectrometers as a reference solution. Diffuse reflectance spectra Rc(λ) and Rs(λ) ranging from 500 to 800 nm were calculated from the spectral intensities of light collected by the central fiber and the six surrounding fibers, respectively, based on the reflected intensity spectra from the reference solution.

Fig. 1

Single-fiber probe system for measuring the diffuse reflectance spectra with two source-collection geometries setup.

JBO_20_7_076010_f001.png

2.2.

Determination of Empirical Formulas for Estimating μs and μa

In order to estimate μs and μa from the measurements of Rc and Rs, we consider the following equation based on the results of the Monte Carlo simulation:

Eq. (1)

[μsμa]=[αcαsβcβs][AcAs],
where Ac=log10Rc and As=log10Rs are the apparent absorbances for the recording by the center fiber and the surrounding fibers, respectively. In order to improve the accuracy of Eq. (1), we used the higher order terms of Ac and As in Eq. (1) as follows:

Eq. (2)

[μsμa]=[α0α1α2α3α4α5β0β1β2β3β4β5][1Ac2As2AcAsAcAs]t,
where coefficients αi and βi (i=0,1,2,3,4,5) in Eq. (2) can be determined statistically by multiple regression analysis of the results of the Monte Carlo simulations, and []t represents the transposition of a vector. The details of the Monte Carlo simulation model were published previously.37 In the Monte Carlo simulations, Rc and Rs were calculated for the ranges of μa=0.1 to 80cm1 and μs=5.0. The values of μs(λ) and μa(λ) can be estimated by applying Eq. (2) to each wavelength point of Ac(λ) and As(λ). Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show the results obtained from the Monte Carlo simulations for Rc and Rs, respectively. The value of Rc increases monotonically as μs increases, whereas Rs reaches a plateau for larger values of μs. Both Rc and Rs decrease exponentially as μa increases, but the effect is more pronounced for Rs. Figure 3 shows the estimated and given values of the reduced scattering coefficient μs [Fig. 3(a)] and the absorption coefficient μa obtained from the preliminary numerical investigations [Fig. 3(b)]. In both Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), the estimated values will agree with the given values for the given ranges of μs and μa. The coefficient of determination r2 for μa and μs was 0.996 and 0.994, respectively, which indicates a good regression.

Fig. 2

Results obtained from the Monte Carlo simulations for (a) Rc collected by the center fiber and (b) Rs collected by the surrounding six fibers.

JBO_20_7_076010_f002.png

Fig. 3

Estimated and given values obtained from the numerical investigations for (a) the reduced scattering coefficient μs and (b) the absorption coefficient μa.

JBO_20_7_076010_f003.png

2.3.

Evaluation of Tissue Oxygen Saturation and Redox State of Heme aa3 in Cytochrome c Oxidase from μa(λ)

The absorption coefficient spectrum is given by the sum of absorption due to oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin. Using the absorption coefficient spectrum μa(λ) as a response variable and the extinction coefficient spectra of εHbO(λ) and εHb(λ)39 as predictor variables, the multiple regression model can be expressed as:

Eq. (3)

μa(λk)=aHbO×εHbO(λk)+aHb×εHb(λk)+a0+e(λk),
where aHbO, aHb, and a0 are the regression coefficients, e(λk) is an error component, and λk indicates discrete values in the wavelength range treated in the analysis. By executing the multiple regression analysis for one sample of the absorption coefficient spectrum consisting of p discrete wavelengths, one set of the three regression coefficients is obtained. In this case, the regression coefficient a0 is a constant component or an intercept and is expressed as:
a0=μ¯aε¯HbO·aHbOε¯HbR·aHbR,
where μ¯a, ε¯HbO, and ε¯HbR are the averages of μa(λk), εHbO(λk), and εHbR(λk) over the wavelength range, or k=1 to p. In the present study, we used the spectral data in the range from 500 to 600 nm at intervals of 10 nm for the multiple regression analysis because the spectral features of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin notably appear in this wavelength range. The regression coefficients aHbO and aHb describe the degree of contributions of εHbO(λ) and εHb(λ), respectively, to the absorption coefficient spectrum μa(λ) and, consequently, are closely related to the concentrations of CHbO and CHb, respectively. The oxygen saturation of hemoglobin, StO2, is defined as the percentage of concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin in the concentration of total hemoglobin. In this study, the oxygen saturation is estimated from the regression coefficients aHbO and aHb as follows:

Eq. (5)

StO2[%]=aHbOaHbO+aHb×100.

We also used the estimated absorption coefficient spectrum μa(λ) to evaluate the redox state of heme aa3 in CcO. There is an isosbestic point of heme aa3 around 620 nm, where the absorption of light by the reduced heme aa3 and oxidized heme aa3 take the same value, while the absorption spectrum of the reduced heme aa3 is maximized at 605 nm.40 The ratio of absorption at 605 nm and that at 620 nm can be used to evaluate the redox state of heme aa3, which indicates the state of mitochondrial energy metabolism. Therefore, in the present study, we evaluate the redox state of heme aa3 based on the ratio of the estimated absorption coefficient at 605 nm and that at 620 nm as μa(605)/μa(620).

In order to justify the use of μa(605)/μa(620) to represent the redox state of heme aa3 in CcO of liver tissue, we performed the preliminary experiments with an in vitro excised liver sample. A normal saline was infused into the excised liver via the portal vein to remove blood from the liver tissue. The oxidation of heme aa3 in CcO was induced by continuous infusion of a saline saturated with 95% O25% CO2 into the liver via the portal vein and subsequent submersion of the liver sample into the saline saturated with 95% O25% CO2. The reduction of heme aa3 in CcO was induced by submersing the liver sample into the mixture of normal saline and a sodium dithionite (Na2S2O4). Figure 4 shows the estimated absorption coefficient spectra μa(λ) normalized at 620 nm obtained from the excised liver sample submerged into the saline saturated with 95% O25% CO2 and the mixture of saline and Na2S2O4. The normalized absorption at 605 nm under the hyperoxic condition is higher than that treated with Na2S2O4, which corresponds to the absorption change due to the reduction of heme aa3 in CcO reported in literature.40

Fig. 4

Estimated absorption coefficient spectra normalized at 620 nm obtained from the excised rat liver sample submerged into the saline saturated with 95% O25% CO2 (red square) and the mixture of saline and Na2S2O4 (blue circle).

JBO_20_7_076010_f004.png

3.

Experiments

3.1.

Validation of the Method Using Optical Phantoms

Before the in vivo experiments, the experiments with optical phantoms were carried out to validate the empirical model. The phantoms were prepared using Intralipid stock solution (Fresenius Kabi AB, Sweden) as scattering materials. We prepared the scattering solutions by diluting Intralipid stock solution with saline. Hemoglobin solution extracted from red blood cells of horse blood was used as an absorber for lower values of μa, whereas an India ink (R591217, Rotring, Germany) was used for higher values of μa. The absorption coefficients of hemoglobin and India ink were experimentally determined based on the transmittance measurements of the hemoglobin solution and India ink solution, respectively, using a cuvette and a spectrometer. The reduced scattering coefficients of Intralipid solutions were evaluated based on the published values.38 We produced 22 phantoms with ranges of μa=0.2 to 93.6cm1 and μs=10.3 to 80.4cm1 in the wavelength range from 500 to 900 nm to compare the estimated and given optical properties.

3.2.

Animal Experiments

Six male Wister rats weighing from 150 to 300 g were maintained at 27°C with a 12-/12-h dark/light cycle and allowed food and water ad libitum. Experiments performed in the present study were approved by the Animal Research Committee of Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology. Rats were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of a mixture of α-chloralose (50mg/kg) and urethane (600mg/kg). A rat model with ischemia–reperfusion to 90% of the liver (Fig. 5) was used.41 After laparotomy was performed by a transversal injection, the ligaments around the liver lobes were dissected in order to mobilize the left lobe. At the same time, the hepatoduodenal ligament was taped in preparation for further clamping. Before induction of ischemia, the diffuse reflectance spectra of liver tissue were recorded as baseline values. Hepatic ischemia was induced by clamping the hepatic portal (the hepatic artery, the portal vein, and the bile duct) for 30 min, followed by declamping. Anoxia was induced by nitrogen breathing at 60 min after the onset of reperfusion (t = 100 min). The caudate lobe of the liver was kept as a passage for the portal blood. The reflectance fiber probe was placed on the surface of the liver lobe. Measurements of Rc(λ) and Rs(λ) were obtained simultaneously in the wavelength range from 500 to 800 nm at 30-s intervals for 160 min: oxygen breathing for 5 min, normal air breathing for 5 min, ischemia for 30 min, reperfusion for 60 min, and nitrogen breathing for 60 min. In order to identify the respiration arrest or euthanasia, the respiration of the rat was confirmed by observing the periodic movement of the lateral region of the abdomen during the experiments. The estimations of μs(λ) and μa(λ) were performed based on the process described above. Data are presented as mean±SD. An unpaired t-test was performed in order to compare the average values over the samples between the normal (air breathing) and the other periods (oxygen breathing, ischemia, reperfusion, and nitrogen breathing) and P<0.05 was considered significant.

Fig. 5

Graphical illustration of the surgical operation on the rat liver and the protocol in the present study. (a) Schematic drawing representing the ischemic model of the rat liver by blood inflow occlusion on the pedicles of the left lobe, the median lobe, and the right lobe, with no occlusion of the caudate lobe, which is kept as a passage for the portal blood. (b) The dorsal surface of the liver lobe is used for the measurement sites for the diffuse reflectance spectra of the liver.

JBO_20_7_076010_f005.png

4.

Results

4.1.

Validation of the Method Using Optical Phantoms

Figure 6 shows the estimated and given values for (a) the reduced scattering coefficient μs and (b) the absorption coefficient μa, obtained from the phantom experiments. Reasonable results were obtained for both μs and μa. Correlation coefficients between the estimated and given values are R=0.97 (P<0.0001) and R=0.98 (P<0.0001) for μs and μa, respectively. The average root mean square error for μs is 9.2±8.0% and that for μa is 34.9±45.6%. The empirical model yields, in principle, good results for both μs and μa, as shown in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b). In Fig. 6(b), however, the estimated error for μa increases as the given value increases, which could be attributed to the fact that the current simulation model does not accurately represent the actual experimental conditions, e.g., the distance between the central and surrounding fibers is not accurately taken into consideration.

Fig. 6

Estimated and given values obtained from the phantom experiments for (a) the reduced scattering coefficient μs and (b) the absorption coefficient μa.

JBO_20_7_076010_f006.png

4.2.

Animal Experiments

Figure 7 shows the time courses of μa averaged over the six samples at specific wavelengths during the period of preischemia (oxygen breathing and air breathing), ischemia, reperfusion, and nitrogen breathing. The error bars in Fig. 7 represent the standard deviation over the six samples. The average values of μa over the six samples at each wavelength are averaged over each period and are summarized in Table 1. The baseline absorption coefficients at 530 and 570 nm are noticeably higher than at the other wavelengths, which coincides with the absorption spectrum of hemoglobin.39 The decrease in μa following the induction of ischemia and increase in μa after the restoration of blood circulation can be observed at 500, 530, 570, and 584 nm. These changes in μa are indicative of a decrease in total hemoglobin concentration because these wavelengths correspond to the isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin in the visible wavelength region. The occlusion of total blood inflow to the liver (except for the caudate lobe) resulted in a drop in μa from the baseline (P<0.05) for 500, 530, 570, and 584 nm, and μa values were gradually recovered 60 min after the onset of reperfusion. In vivo liver tissues examined in the present study exhibited an absorption coefficient that was strongly related to the hemoglobin absorption spectra. The maximum baseline of μa was 36.02±10.77cm1 at 570 nm and was 3.15±1.10cm1 at 800 nm. We found a significant difference in μa between the normal and ischemic liver tissues (P<0.05) for a wavelength range from 500 to 700 nm, between the normal and reperfused liver tissues (P<0.05) for a wavelength range from 500 to 800 nm, and between the normal and anoxic liver tissues (P<0.05) for a wavelength range from 500 to 800 nm, as shown in Table 1. In the NIR wavelength region, the changes in μa remain, but the μa value increases during the ischemic phase as compared to the baseline value. The decrease in μa during ischemia and gradual increase in μa following reperfusion in the visible wavelength region indicate that μa at the isosbestic wavelengths can be used as a parameter to evaluate the change in total hemoglobin concentration under the hepatic ischemia–reperfusion injury. The period between the onset of nitrogen breathing and respiratory arrest averaged over all six samples was 87±77s.

Table 1

Absorption coefficient μa of in vivo rat liver tissue at specific wavelengths averaged over the period of oxygen breathing, air breathing, ischemia, reperfusion, and nitrogen breathing. Values are presented as mean±standard deviation (SD) for each period. An unpaired t-test revealed the significant differences between air breathing and the other conditions.

μa(λ) (cm−1)O2 breathingAir breathingIschemiaReperfusionN2 breathing
500 nm17.77±0.20*18.48±0.3213.48±0.95*19.51±1.03*27.08±2.04*
530 nm30.89±0.4831.41±0.9919.81±1.71*33.15±1.98*47.85±4.17*
570 nm34.31±0.6135.07±1.0721.55±2.20*37.85±2.63*59.18±5.75*
584 nm20.40±0.26*21.93±0.4916.47±1.67*25.21±2.47*44.32±4.42*
605 nm6.03±0.08*7.23±0.138.66±0.56*8.88±1.05*14.99±1.09*
620 nm4.60±0.07*5.40±0.106.14±0.31*6.36±0.60*8.86±0.48*
700 nm2.90±0.07*3.31±0.093.70±0.16*3.77±0.31*3.98±0.11*
800 nm2.82±0.08*3.00±0.103.02±0.173.24±0.24*2.62±0.09*
Note: *P<0.05

Fig. 7

Time courses of the absorption coefficient μa averaged over six samples during ischemia–reperfusion experiments at (a) 500 nm, (b) 530 nm, (c) 570 nm, (d) 584 nm, (e) 605 nm, (f) 620 nm, (g) 700 nm, and (h) 800 nm. The error bars represent the standard deviation over six samples (n=6). In each figure, i, ii, iii, iv, and v indicate O2-breathing, air-breathing, ischemia under air-breathing, reperfusion under air-breathing, and N2-breathing, respectively.

JBO_20_7_076010_f007.png

Figure 8 shows the time courses of μs averaged over the six samples at specific wavelengths during the period of preischemia (oxygen breathing and air breathing), ischemia, reperfusion, and nitrogen breathing. The error bars in Fig. 8 represent the standard deviation over the six samples. The average values of μs over the six samples at each wavelength are averaged over each period and are summarized in Table 2. Time courses of μs are well correlated with those of μa in the wavelength range from 500 to 584 nm, which is probably due to scattering by red blood cells. The average values of μs at 700 and 800 nm over the ischemia period were significantly (P<0.05) higher than that over the air breathing period. On the other hand, the average values of μs at 500, 530, 570, and 585 nm over the ischemia period decreased significantly (P<0.05) as compared to the average values of μs over the air breathing period, although the maximum value was recorded after the onset of nitrogen breathing.

Table 2

Absorption coefficient μs′ of in vivo rat liver tissue at specific wavelengths averaged over the period of oxygen breathing, air breathing, ischemia, reperfusion, and nitrogen breathing. Values are presented as mean±SD for each period. An unpaired t-test revealed the significant differences between air breathing and the other conditions.

μs′(λ) (cm−1)O2 breathingAir breathingIschemiaReperfusionN2 breathing
500 nm28.32±0.31*30.76±0.3127.87±1.60*33.68±1.53*38.27±1.63*
530 nm40.53±0.41*43.13±0.9033.46±2.21*46.42±2.33*52.21±2.67*
570 nm43.64±0.55*46.13±0.8134.14±2.61*50.07±2.94*60.72±3.26*
584 nm29.64±0.28*32.62±0.3628.89±2.13*37.30±3.07*48.44±3.00*
605 nm14.75±0.22*16.96±0.3520.30±1.12*20.23±1.65*22.93±1.53*
620 nm12.90±0.23*14.60±0.3517.06±0.90*17.07±1.16*16.90±1.34*
700 nm10.25±0.23*11.23±0.3312.92±0.65*12.75±0.81*10.73±1.22
800 nm9.38±0.25*9.83±0.3310.60±0.58*9.98±0.726.77±1.29*
Note: *P<0.05.

Fig. 8

Time courses of the absorption coefficient μs averaged over six samples during ischemia–reperfusion experiments at (a) 500 nm, (b) 530 nm, (c) 570 nm, (d) 584 nm, (e) 605 nm, (f) 620 nm, (g) 700 nm, and (h) 800 nm. The error bars represent the standard deviation over six samples (n=6). In each figure, i, ii, iii, iv, and v indicate O2-breathing, air-breathing, ischemia under air-breathing, reperfusion under air-breathing, and N2-breathing, respectively.

JBO_20_7_076010_f008.png

Figure 9 shows the time courses of StO2 averaged over six samples during the period of preischemia (oxygen breathing and air breathing), ischemia, reperfusion, and nitrogen breathing. The average values of StO2 over each period are summarized in Table 3. A sharp decrease in StO2 following induction of ischemia is clearly observed. Sixty minutes after the onset of reperfusion, the value of StO2 recovered gradually but remained lower than the baseline StO2. The StO2 was 59.56±1.58% during oxygen breathing, 45.14±3.86% during normal air breathing before ischemia, 3.60±3.53% after 30 min of ischemia, 33.35±7.27% 60 min after reflow of blood to the liver, and 4.91±3.40% 60 min after death. The downslope was linear over the entire 30-min period of ischemia. Hence, after 30 min of ischemia, the value of StO2 decreased significantly from the baseline and increased gradually (P<0.05) after 60 min of reperfusion compared to the ischemic value. Figure 10 shows the time courses of μa(605)/μa(620) averaged over six samples during the period of preischemia (oxygen breathing and air breathing), ischemia, reperfusion, and nitrogen breathing. The average values of μa(605)/μa(620) over each period are summarized in Table 4. The value of μa(605)/μa(620) increased significantly after the onset of ischemia and reverted to the preischemic level after 30 min of reperfusion. The value of μa(605)/μa(620) increased dramatically under hypoxia and reached the maximum level 10 min after the onset of nitrogen breathing.

Table 3

Tissue oxygen saturation StO2 of in vivo rat liver tissue at specific wavelengths averaged over the period of oxygen breathing, air breathing, ischemia, reperfusion, and nitrogen breathing. Values are presented as mean±SD for each period. An unpaired t-test revealed the significant differences between air breathing and the other conditions.

O2 breathingAir breathingIschemiaReperfusionN2 breathing
StO2 (%)59.56±1.58*45.14±3.863.60±3.53*33.35±7.27*4.91±3.40*
Note: *P<0.05.

Table 4

Ratio μa(605)/μa(620) of in vivo rat liver tissue at specific wavelengths averaged over the period of oxygen breathing, air breathing, ischemia, reperfusion, and nitrogen breathing. Values are presented as mean±SD for each period. An unpaired t-test revealed the significant differences between air breathing and the other conditions.

O2 breathingAir breathingIschemiaReperfusionN2 breathing
μa(605)/μa(620)1.32±0.01*1.35±0.011.42±0.02*1.39±0.03*1.66±0.04*
Note: *P<0.05.

Fig. 9

Time course of the tissue oxygen saturation StO2 averaged over six samples during ischemia–reperfusion experiments. The error bars represent the standard deviation over six samples (n=6). In each figure, i, ii, iii, iv, and v represent O2-breathing, air-breathing, ischemia under air-breathing, reperfusion under air-breathing, and N2-breathing, respectively.

JBO_20_7_076010_f009.png

Fig. 10

Time course of the ratio of μa(605) and μa(620), averaged over six samples during ischemia–reperfusion experiments. The error bars represent the standard deviation over six samples (n=6). In each figure, i, ii, iii, iv, and v represent O2-breathing, air-breathing, ischemia under air-breathing, reperfusion under air-breathing, and N2-breathing, respectively.

JBO_20_7_076010_f010.png

5.

Discussion

The experimental results revealed that μa decreased sharply after the onset of ischemia at the isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin in the visible wavelength region, which indicates the decrease in hemoglobin concentration in liver tissue due to the occlusion of the hepatic portal. The value of μa for in vivo liver tissue is primarily affected by the absorption properties of hemoglobin and CcO.42 Since the hemoglobin absorbs light strongly in the wavelength range of 500 to 600 nm, the decrease in μa at 500, 530, 570, and 585 nm [Figs. 7(a)7(d)] after the onset of ischemia is primarily reflected by the lower blood content of ischemic liver as compared to normal liver. The remarkable increase in μa at 500, 530, 570, and 585 nm is probably due to the increase in blood volume in the liver after death, which is consistent with the observations of increased liver weight in postmortem animals without immediate bleeding.4345 The change in StO2 during ischemia and reperfusion was also reasonable, as shown in Fig. 9. The value of StO2 decreased rapidly to 1.83±1.39% after the onset of ischemia, whereas in the case of reperfusion, the value of StO2 recovered up to 46.24±12.29%, which is as high as that before ischemia (46.05±11.72%) under the normal condition with air breathing. The results showed that the current DRS system could effectively monitor the decrease in StO2 resulting from the occlusion of blood inflow to the liver, which reflects the dysfunction of microcirculation in the liver induced by ischemia.46 Hepatic ischemia–reperfusion injury reduces total hepatic blood flow and causes severe microcirculatory dysfunction, which results in venous stagnation, adversely affecting hepatic tissue oxygenation.47 The decrease in HbO immediately after occlusion of the hepatic portal vein resulted in a decrease in the StO2 level. At the end of the reperfusion period, HbO levels recovered, which helps to increase StO2 following reperfusion.47 We also observed significant increases in μa(605)/μa(620) during ischemia and after the onset of nitrogen breathing (Fig. 10), representing a reduction in heme aa3, which is a sign of mitochondrial energy failure. This is supported by the change in absorption spectrum of in vitro blood-free liver induced by the application of Na2S2O4, as shown in Fig. 4. On the other hand, it has been reported that noninvasive optical evaluation of CcO redox state in vivo can suffer from optical cross talk from hemoglobin absorption signals.48,49 Hence, the measurements of heme aa3 in CcO based on the value of μa(605)/μa(620) could be varied with the changes in the concentrations of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin. However, the possibility of relative measurements of the redox state of heme aa3 in CcO of in vivo rat liver could still prove valuable. Studies on the multiple regression analysis for the estimated μa(λ) with the extinction coefficient spectra of oxygenated hemoglobin, deoxygenated hemoglobin, oxidized heme aa3, and reduced heme aa3 would strengthen the method in the future. We will investigate the multiple regression analysis for μa(λ) involving those four chromophores further in future work.

It has been reported that ischemia–reperfusion may cause postischemic microvascular reperfusion failure,50 which is characterized by a reduction in sinusoidal red blood cell velocity,51 ultimately affecting μa and μs. The value of μs for in vivo liver tissue is affected by light scattering by cellular structures in tissues and red blood cells in microcirculation. The changes in light scattering at 500, 530, 570, and 584 nm [Figs. 8(a)8(d)] reflect that scattering is strongly affected by red blood cells and is well synchronized with the absorption changes of corresponding wavelengths [Figs. 7(a)7(d)]. By contrast, the light scattering in the NIR wavelength region [Figs. 8(g) and 8(h)] is primarily affected by changes in tissue morphology. The changes in μs in the NIR region during the experiments were quite different from those at the isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin in the visible wavelength region. The spectrum of the reduced scattering coefficient μs(λ) of biological tissues can be treated as a combination of μs(λ) for cellular and subcellular structures of different sizes.52 Generally, the sizes of the cellular and subcellular structures in biological tissues are distributed as follows: membranes, <0.01μm;53 ribosomes, <0.01μm;54 vesicles, 0.1 to 0.5μm;53 lysosomes, 0.1 to 0.5μm;55 mitochondria, 1 to 2μm;52 nuclei, 5 to 10μm;52 and cells, 5 to 75μm.52 Figure 11 shows the spectra of the reduced scattering coefficient μs(λ) calculated by the Mie theory for spheres of various sizes. In the Mie-theory based calculation, the refractive indices of a sphere and the surrounding medium were set to be 1.46 and 1.35, respectively, at a volume concentration of 2%. The slope of μs(λ) decreases as the diameter of the sphere d increases. The entire spectrum of μs(λ) increases as the diameter of the sphere d increases in the range of d=0.01 to 0.2μm, but decreases as the diameter of the sphere d increases in the range of d=0.6 to 10.0μm.

Fig. 11

Reduced scattering coefficient μs(λ) calculated by the Mie theory for spheres of various sizes.

JBO_20_7_076010_f011.png

Anoxia has been reported to induce postmortem hepatocyte vacuolation and liver weight increase.43,44 Pronounced hepatocyte vacuolation can occur as soon as 30 s after the suspension of organ perfusion in vitro or up to 3 to 4 min after death under an anoxic condition.43,44 The hepatocyte vacuoles are single or multiple and round or oval, and are often well demarcated, with variable displacement of hepatocyte nuclei. Some vacuoles are clear, but most have pale or eosinophilic contents with a homogeneous, granular, and/or fibrillary appearance. A mixed clear/eosinophilic stained appearance has been frequently observed within a single vacuole or vacuoles in the same hepatocyte. Intracytoplasmic vacuoles increased in size and number, and hepatocyte vacuolation and sinusoidal congestion extended from more centrilobular to periportal regions as the postmortem interval increased.45 Several studies demonstrated that hepatocyte vacuoles for rats were 2 to 15μm in diameter within 15 min after death43,44 or up to 25μm in diameter 25 min after death.45 As shown in Fig. 11, the volume increase in structures larger than 0.6μm contributes to the decrease in μs in the NIR wavelength region. Therefore, the decrease in μs(λ) in the NIR wavelength region after the onset of nitrogen breathing or pulmonary arrest obtained by the proposed method indicates hepatocyte vacuolation. This implies that the irreversible morphological changes due to the loss of hepatic viability can be evaluated using the reduced scattering coefficients estimated by the current DRS system. The causes of the temporary increase of μs in the NIR region during ischemia remain unclear. One possible explanation for such a reversible scattering change is the volume changes in structures smaller than 0.2μm (membranes, ribosomes, small vesicles, and mitochondrial matrix granules), as shown in Fig. 11. The severity of hepatocyte damage has been reported to depend on the length of warm ischemia.56,57 Short periods of ischemia result in reversible cell injury, in which liver oxygen consumption reverts to normal levels when oxygen is resupplied during reperfusion. Reperfusion after more prolonged periods of ischemia (2 to 3 h) results in irreversible cell damage. The time limit for hepatocytes survival was estimated to be 1.5 h of warm ischemia.56,57 It has also been reported that as an ischemia–reperfusion injury, necrosis and apoptosis occur 3 to 6 h after ischemia–reperfusion.58 The scattering changes in the NIR wavelength region during reperfusion for at least 6 h after more prolonged periods of ischemia should be investigated in the future. Liver transplantation would be one useful clinical application of this technology because an adequate blood supply and tissue oxygenation of the graft is essential to its initial function.59,60 The results for μa(λ), μs(λ), StO2, and μa(605)/μa(620) indicate that the method applied in the present study is reliable and has potential application in the intraoperative assessment of graft tissue viability.

6.

Conclusions

We investigated a method for evaluating the reduced scattering coefficient, the absorption coefficient, the tissue oxygen saturation, and the reduction of heme aa3 of in vivo liver tissue using a single-reflectance fiber probe with two source-collector geometries. The time courses of μa at 500, 530, 570, and 584 nm indicated the hemodynamic change in the liver tissue as well as StO2. A significant increase in μa(605)/μa(620) during ischemia and after euthanasia induced by nitrogen breathing was observed, indicating a reduction in heme aa3, which is a sign of mitochondrial energy failure. The time courses of μs at 500, 530, 570, and 584 nm were well correlated with those of μa, which also reflects the scattering by red blood cells. On the other hand, at 700 and 800 nm, a temporary increase in μs and an irreversible decrease in μs were observed during ischemia–reperfusion and after euthanasia induced by nitrogen breathing, respectively. The change in μs in the NIR wavelength region during ischemia is indicative of the morphological changes in the cellular and subcellular structures induced by ischemia, whereas that after euthanasia implies hepatocyte vacuolation. The results of the present study indicate the potential application of the current DRS system in evaluating the pathophysiological conditions of in vivo liver tissue. The advantages of the proposed method are its simplicity and portability, because the only devices required are a white light source, fiber optics, and two spectrometers. Since the proposed method can be used to simultaneously evaluate changes in hemodynamics, mitochondrial energy level, and tissue morphology, this method will be useful for studying tissue viability of in vivo liver tissue. We intend to further extend the proposed method in order to investigate pathophysiological conditions of liver tissue, such as those resulting from liver transplantation.

References

1. 

J. W. Kupiec-Weglinski and R.W. Busuttil, “Ischemia and reperfusion injury in liver transplantation,” Transplant. Proc., 37 (4), 1653 –1656 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.03.134 Google Scholar

2. 

J. H. Pringle, “Notes on the arrest of hepatic hemorrhage due to trauma,” Ann. Surg., 48 (4), 541 –549 (1908). http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-190810000-00005 Google Scholar

3. 

M. Kretzschmar, A. Krüger and W. Schirrmeister, “Hepatic ischemia–reperfusion syndrome after partial liver resection (LR): hepatic venous oxygen saturation, enzyme pattern, reduced and oxidized glutathione, procalcitonin and interleukin-6,” Exp. Toxicol. Pathol., 54 (5–6), 423 –431 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/0940-2993-00291 Google Scholar

4. 

S. H. Tseng et al., “Noninvasive evaluation of collagen and hemoglobin contents and scattering property of in vivo keloid scars and normal skin using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: pilot study,” J. Biomed. Opt., 17 (7), 077005 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.7.077005 Google Scholar

5. 

D. Fabila et al., “In vivo assessment of liver fibrosis using diffuse reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopy: a proof of concept,” Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther., 9 (4), 376 –382 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2012.05.002 Google Scholar

6. 

T. Kitai et al., “Intraoperative measurement of the graft oxygenation state in living related liver transplantation by near infrared spectroscopy,” Transplant. Int., 8 (2), 111 –118 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.1995.tb01485.x Google Scholar

7. 

T. Kitai et al., “Quantitative detection of hemoglobin saturation in the liver with near-infrared spectroscopy,” Hepatology, 18 (4), 926 –936 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840180426 HEPADF 0161-0538 Google Scholar

8. 

L.-H. Wang, S. L. Jacques and L.-Q. Zheng, “MCML-Monte Carlo modeling of photon transport in multi-layered tissues,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 47 (2), 131 –146 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(95)01640-F CMPBEK 0169-2607 Google Scholar

9. 

A. E. EI-Desoky et al., “Assessment of hepatic ischaemia–reperfusion injury by measuring intracellular tissue oxygenation using near infrared spectroscopy,” Liver, 21 (1), 37 –44 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0676.2001.210106.x LIVEDR 0106-9543 Google Scholar

10. 

L. Sikurova, P. Balis and M. Zvarik, “Penetration of laser light through red blood cell ghosts,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B., 103 (3), 230 –233 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2011.03.015 Google Scholar

11. 

R. Nachabé et al., “Estimation of lipid and water concentrations in scattering media with diffuse optical spectroscopy from 900 to 1,600 nm,” J. Biomed. Opt., 15 (3), 037015 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3454392 Google Scholar

12. 

D. J. Evers et al., “Optical sensing for tumor detection in the liver,” Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 39 (1), 68 –75 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2012.08.005 CECED9 Google Scholar

13. 

Y. Fawzy et al., “In vivo assessment and evaluation of lung tissue morphologic and physiological changes from noncontact endoscopic reflectance spectroscopy for improving lung cancer detection,” J. Biomed. Opt., 11 (4), 044003 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2337529 Google Scholar

14. 

M. S. Patterson, B. Chance and B. C. Wilson, “Time resolved reflectance and transmittance for the noninvasive measurement of tissue optical properties,” Appl. Opt., 28 (12), 2331 –2336 (1989). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.28.002331 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

15. 

J. B. Fishkin et al., “Frequency-domain photon migration measurements of normal and malignant tissue optical properties in a human subject,” Appl. Opt., 36 (1), 10 –20 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.000010 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

16. 

G. Yoon, D. N. Ghosh Roy and R. C. Straight, “Coherent backscattering in biological media: measurement and estimation of optical properties,” Appl. Opt., 32 (4), 580 –585 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.32.000580 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

17. 

S. A. Prahl and I. A. Vitkin, “Determination of optical properties of turbid media using pulsed photothermal radiometry,” Phys. Med. Biol., 37 (6), 1203 –1217 (1992). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/37/6/001 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

18. 

T. J. Farrell, M. S. Patterson and B. Wilson, “A diffusion theory model of spatially resolved, steady-state diffuse reflectance for the noninvasive determination of tissue optical properties in vivo,” Med. Phys., 19 (4), 879 –888 (1992). http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.596777 MPHYA6 0094-2405 Google Scholar

19. 

L. Wang and S. L. Jacques, “Use of a laser beam with an oblique angle on incidence to measure the reduced scattering coefficient of a turbid medium,” Appl. Opt., 34 (13), 2362 –2366 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.002362 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

20. 

A. Kienle et al., “Spatially resolved absolute diffuse reflectance measurements for noninvasive determination of the optical scattering and absorption coefficients of biological tissue,” Appl. Opt., 35 (13), 2304 –2314 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.002304 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

21. 

S.-P. Lin et al., “Measurement of tissue optical properties by the use of oblique-incidence optical fiber reflectometry,” Appl. Opt., 36 (1), 136 –143 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.000136 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

22. 

T. M. Bydlon et al., “Chromophore based analyses of steady-state diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: current status and perspectivesfor clinical adoption,” J. Biophotonics, 8 (1–2), 9 –24 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201300198 Google Scholar

23. 

S. Kennedy et al., “Optical breast cancer margin assessment: an observational study of the effects of tissue heterogeneity on optical contrast,” Breast Cancer Res., 12 (6), R91 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr2770 BCTRD6 Google Scholar

24. 

M. D. Keller et al., “Autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and spectral imaging for breast surgical margin analysis,” Lasers Surg. Med., 42 (1), 15 –23 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20865 Google Scholar

25. 

J. Brown et al., “Quantitative optical spectroscopy: a robust tool for direct measurement of breast cancer vascular oxygenation and total hemoglobin content in vivo,” Cancer Res., 69 (7), 2919 –2926 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3370 Google Scholar

26. 

P. R. Bargo et al., “In vivo determination of optical properties of normal and tumor tissue with white light reflectance and empirical light transport model during endoscopy,” J. Biomed. Opt., 10 (3), 034018 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.1921907 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

27. 

S. Kawauchi et al., “Simultaneous measurement of changes in light absorption due to the reduction of cytochrome c oxidase and light scattering in rat brains during loss of tissue viability,” Appl. Opt., 47 (22), 4164 –4176 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.47.004164 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

28. 

C. Hsu et al., “Liver tumor gross margin identification and ablation monitoring during liver radiofrequency treatment,” J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol., 16 (11), 1473 –1478 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.000017833.30967.39 JVIRE3 1051-0443 Google Scholar

29. 

S. Wong, P. Mangu and M. Choti, “American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 clinical evidence review on radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer,” J. Clin. Oncol., 28 (3), 493 –508 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4450 JCONDN 0732-183X Google Scholar

30. 

T. M. Pawlik et al., “Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases,” Ann. Surg., 241 (5), 715 –722 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000160703.75808.7d Google Scholar

31. 

B. Nordlinger et al., “Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trial,” Lancet, 371 (9617), 1007 –1016 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60455-9 LANCAO 0140-6736 Google Scholar

32. 

A. Muratore et al., “Resection margin and recurrence-free survival after liver resection of colorectal metastases,” Ann. Surg. Oncol., 17 (5), 1324 –1329 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0770-4 Google Scholar

33. 

B. R. Karakas et al., “Investigating viability of intestine using spectroscopy: a pilot study,” J. Surg. Res., 191 (1), 91 –8 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.052 JSGRA2 0022-4804 Google Scholar

34. 

B. Yu et al., “Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy with a self-calibrating fiber optic probe,” Opt. Lett., 33 (16), 1783 –1785 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.33.001783 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

35. 

J. Y. Lo et al., “A strategy for quantitative spectral imaging of tissue absorption and scattering using light emitting diodes and photodiodes,” Opt. Express, 17 (3), 1372 –1384 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.001372 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

36. 

A. Kim et al., “A fiber optic reflectance probe with multiple source-collector separations to increase the dynamic range of derived tissue optical absorption and scattering coefficients,” Opt. Express, 18 (6), 5580 –5594 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.005580 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

37. 

I. Nishidate et al., “In vivo estimation of light scattering and absorption properties of rat brain using a single-reflectance fiber probe during cortical spreading depression,” J. Biomed. Opt., 20 (2), 027003 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.2.027003 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

38. 

H. J. van Staveren et al., “Light scattering in Intralipid-10% in the wavelength range of 400–1100 nm,” Appl. Opt., 30 (31), 4507 –4514 (1991). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.30.004507 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

39. 

S. A. Prahl, “Tabulated molar extinction coefficient for hemoglobin in water,” (1999) http://omlc.ogi.edu/spectra/hemoglobin/summary.html Google Scholar

40. 

D. C. Wharton and A. Tzagoloff, “Studies on the electron transfer system. LVII. The near infrared absorption band of cytochrome oxidase,” J. Biol. Chem., 239 (6), 2036 –2041 (1964). JBCHA3 0021-9258 Google Scholar

41. 

J. H. Dong et al., “Tolerance limit of rats to normothermic hepatic inflow occlusion under portal blood bypass,” Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int., 1 (1), 57 –62 (2002). Google Scholar

42. 

T. Kitai et al., “Application of near-infrared time-resolved spectroscopy to rat liver—a preliminary report for surgical application,” Phys. Med. Biol., 44 (8), 2049 –2061 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/8/314 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

43. 

B. I. Sykes, E. Penny and F. H. Purchase, “Hepatocyte vacuolation and increased liver weight occurring in anoxic rat,” Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 36 31 –39 (1976). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0041-008X(76)90024-7 TXAPA9 0041-008X Google Scholar

44. 

O. A. Trowell, “The experimental production of watery vacuolation of the liver,” J. Physiol., 105 268 –297 (1946). http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1946.sp004171 JPHYA7 0022-3751 Google Scholar

45. 

X. Li et al., “Morphogenesis of postmortem hepatocyte vacuolation and liver weight increases in Sprague-Dawley rats,” Toxicol. Pathol., 31 682 –688 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/714044702 TOPADD 0192-6233 Google Scholar

46. 

C. H. Li et al., “The monitoring of microvascular liver blood flow changes during ischemia and reperfusion using laser speckle contrast imaging,” Microvasc. Res., 94 28 –35 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2014.04.010 MIVRA6 0026-2862 Google Scholar

47. 

C. K. Sun et al., “Effect of ischemia–reperfusion injury on the microcirculation of the steatotic liver of the Zucker rat,” Transplantation, 72 (10), 1625 –1631 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200111270-00008 TRPLAU 0041-1337 Google Scholar

48. 

C. E. Cooper and R. Springett, “Measurement of cytochrome oxidase and mitochondrial energetics by near-infrared spectroscopy,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B352 (1354), 669 –676 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0048 Google Scholar

49. 

C. E. Cooper et al., “Measurement of cytochrome oxidase redox state by near infrared spectroscopy,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 413 63 –73 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0048 AEMBAP 0065-2598 Google Scholar

50. 

T. Kondo et al., “Impact of ischemia–reperfusion injury on dimensional changes of hepatic microvessels,” Res. Exp. Med., 198 (2), 63 –72 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004330050090 REXMAS 1433-8580 Google Scholar

51. 

B. Vollmar et al., “Role of microcirculatory derangements in manifestation of portal triad cross-clamping-induced hepatic reperfusion injury,” J. Surg. Res., 60 (1), 49 –54 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsre.1996.0009 JSGRA2 0022-4804 Google Scholar

52. 

V. Tuchin, Tissue Optics: Light Scattering Methods and Instruments for Medical Diagnosis, 2nd edSPIE Press, Bellingham, Washington (2007). Google Scholar

53. 

S. L. Jacques and S. A. Prahl, “Some biological scatteres,” (2014) http://omlc.org/classroom/ece532/class3/scatterers.html August ). 2014). Google Scholar

54. 

H. Fang et al., “Noninvasive sizing of subcellular organelles with light scattering spectroscopy,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 9 (2), 267 –276 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2003.812515 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

55. 

J. R. Mourant et al., “Mechanisms of light scattering from biological cells relevant to noninvasive optical-diagnostics,” Appl. Opt., 37 (16), 3586 –3593 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.37.003586 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

56. 

C. Peralta, M. B. Jiménez-Castro and J. Gracia-Sancho, “Hepatic ischemia and reperfusion injury: effects on the liver sinusoidal milieu,” J. Hepatol., 59 (5), 1094 –106 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2013.06.017 Google Scholar

57. 

B. González-Flecha, J. C. Cutrin and A. Boveris, “Time course and mechanism of oxidative stress and tissue damage in rat liver subjected to in vivo ischemia–reperfusion,” J. Clin. Invest., 91 (2), 456 –464 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI116223 Google Scholar

58. 

S. Suzuki, L. H. Toledo-Pereyra and F. J. Rodriguez, “Role of neutrophils during the first 24 hours after liver ischemia and reperfusion injury,” Transplant. Proc., 26 (6), 3695 –3700 (1994). Google Scholar

59. 

R. M. Goldstein et al., “Problematic vascular reconstruction in liver transplantation. Part I. Arterial,” Surgery, 107 (5), 540 –543 (1990). SURGAZ 0039-6060 Google Scholar

60. 

D. M. Payen et al., “Portal and hepatic arterial blood flow measurement of human transplanted livers by implanted Doppler probes: interest for early complications and nutrition,” Surgery, 107 (4), 540 –543 (1990). SURGAZ 0039-6060 Google Scholar

Biographies for the authors are not available.

© 2015 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 1083-3668/2015/$25.00 © 2015 SPIE
Sharmin Akter, Satoshi Maejima, Satoko Kawauchi, Shunichi Sato, Akinari Hinoki, Suefumi Aosasa, Junji Yamamoto, and Izumi Nishidate "Evaluation of light scattering and absorption properties of in vivo rat liver using a single-reflectance fiber probe during preischemia, ischemia–reperfusion, and postmortem," Journal of Biomedical Optics 20(7), 076010 (27 July 2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.7.076010
Published: 27 July 2015
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 14 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Liver

Ischemia

Absorption

Tissues

In vivo imaging

Scattering

Light scattering

Back to Top