Open Access
1 November 2006 Lycopene is more potent than beta carotene in the neutralization of singlet oxygen: role of energy transfer probed by ultrafast Raman spectroscopy
Kong-Thon Tsen, Shaw-Wei D. Tsen, Juliann G. Kiang
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Energy transfer processes between beta carotene, lycopene, and singlet oxygen (1O2) have been studied by ultrafast Raman spectroscopy. Our experimental results demonstrate that during the neutralization of singlet oxygen by beta carotene the excitation energy of singlet oxygen is transferred directly to the first excited electronic state S1 of beta carotene. In contrast, the excitation energy of singlet oxygen is transferred directly to the ground excited vibronic state S0 of lycopene. Our data not only provide the first direct experimental elucidation of energy transfer processes in such important biological systems but also help explain why lycopene is a more potent antioxidant than beta carotene in the neutralization of singlet oxygen.

1.

Introduction

Recently, a lot of experimental studies have demonstrated that free radicals play an important role on various diseases in human beings.1 Free radicals are molecules that contain unpaired electrons.2 The unpaired electron is highly reactive. It can either cause oxidative damage to the molecules or be passed from one molecule to another so as to turn the recipient into a free radical. In the case of lipid peroxidation, there is a chain reaction that involves damage and passing of radicals.3 In general, cellular macromolecules, such as proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids, are vulnerable to free radical damage. For example, oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by free radicals leads to atherosclerosis.4 Removal or neutralization of the free radicals can, therefore, protect against cardiovascular diseases. It has also been reported that free radicals might underlie the aging process itself because low caloric intake that reduces the generation of free radicals has been shown to increase the life span in C. elegans 5 and others.6

Most free radicals in biological systems are derivatives of oxygen that are usually referred to as reactive oxygen species (ROSs). They primarily are produced by mitochondria and their damage is mainly to mitochondrial membranes and mitochondrial DNA. Between 1 and 5% of the oxygen used by mitochondrial to generate adenosine triphosphate results in the formation of superoxide radicals. Although mitochondria are the major source of free radicals, there are numerous other sources. For example, free radicals are released from white blood cells (neutrophils) associated with inflammation. Neutrophils use oxidative free radicals (superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl) to kill intruding bacteria. The lysosomal enzyme—myeloperoxidase—catalyzes the production of bacteriocidal hypochlorite from hydrogen peroxide and chloride ions. Free radicals are also generated by eicosanoids from arachidonic acid during ischemia-reperfusion injuries. Air pollution, tobacco smoking, and ultraviolet irradiation can produce free radicals that cause oxidative damage to lungs, blood vessels, and other body tissues.

On the other hand, antioxidants are molecules that can neutralize free radicals by accepting or donating an electron to eliminate the unpaired condition. Typically, this means that the antioxidant molecule becomes a free radical in the process of neutralizing another free radical molecule. However, the antioxidant molecule will be a much less reactive free radical than the free radical neutralized. The antioxidant molecule may be very large, thereby allowing it to dilute the unpaired electron; it may be readily neutralized by another antioxidant molecule; or it may have another mechanism for terminating its free radical condition.

Recent studies have shown that high dietary intake of carotenoids tremendously lowers the risk of various diseases.1 Carotenoid molecules such as beta carotene and lycopene are powerful antioxidants that usually accumulated in the human body through consumption of fruits and vegetables. These molecules play the role of scavengers for free radicals,7 singlet oxygen,8, 9 and other harmful ROSs10 that are formed during the biological and chemical processes in the cell. Carotenoids also have great promise for use as inhibitors of various cancers and precancers.11, 12 An inverse relationship between beta carotene intake and the incidence of certain type of cancers, such as lung and gastrointestinal tract cancers, has been observed.13

Despite evidence of the effects of carotenoids on the health of human beings, no knowledge about their neutralization processes has been available. It becomes, therefore, very essential to unfold the neutralization processes of carotenoids on free radicals. In this paper, we report our spectroscopic findings of the energy transfer process during the neutralization of singlet oxygen by beta carotene and lycopene. Our experimental results demonstrate that during the neutralization of singlet oxygen by beta carotene, the excitation energy of singlet oxygen is transferred directly to the first excited electronic state S1 of beta carotene; whereas, the excitation energy of singlet oxygen is transferred to the ground excited vibronic state S0 of lycopene, implying that lycopene is capable of more efficiently neutralizing singlet oxygen than beta carotene. Therefore, our findings not only provide the first direct experimental elucidation of energy transfer processes in such important biological systems but also help explain why lycopene is a more potent antioxidant than beta carotene in the neutralization of singlet oxygen.

2.

Methods and Materials

The experimental technique—ultrafast Raman spectroscopy employed in this work has been described in detail elsewhere. 14, 15, 16, 17 As shown in Fig. 1 , the output of the second harmonic generation of a mode-locked Ti-sapphire laser is used as both the excitation and probing sources in the case of pump-probe experiments. In the single beam (pump only) experiments, our experimental results represent an average over the duration of the pulse width of the laser. The laser can provide a continuous pulse train of 80MHz in repetition rate, at photon wavelengths ranging from 350 to 450nm , having a pulse width of about 100fs and with average power of about 100mW . One advantage of probing with Raman spectroscopy is that the Raman scattering signal is present only when the probing photons are present; as a result, the time resolution in ultrafast Raman spectroscopy is limited only by the pulse duration of the laser and not by the response time of the detection system. In addition, Stokes processes can provide information on both the ground and excited states; whereas, anti-Stokes processes reflect the very existence of the excited states. The Raman signal is collected and analyzed by a standard computer-controlled Raman system that includes a double spectrometer, a photomultiplier tube, and associated photon counting electronics. All the experimental data were taken at T=300K and with a laser operating at a 390-nm wavelength.

Fig. 1

The experimental setup used to study energy transfer processes in the neutralization of singlet oxygen molecules by beta carotene and lycopene. M: mirror; P: prism; B.S.: beamsplitter; P.R.: polarization rotator; L: lens; PMT: photomultiplier tube.

064025_1_014606jbo1.jpg

Beta carotene, lycopene, and porphyrin samples used in this study were purchased from Aldrich Co.

3.

Results and Discussions

The dynamics of beta carotene have been studied extensively in the literature. 18, 19, 20, 21 As depicted in Fig. 2 , absorption of a photon having a wavelength around 450nm brings the beta carotene from the ground electronic state S0 to the second excited electronic state S2 (excitation to the first excited electronic state S1 from the ground electronic state S0 by photons is forbidden because of the selection rule). The excited S2 state relaxes to S1 state on a timescale of about 200fs . 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 The excited vibronic state associated with S1 thermalizes to its ground vibronic state within 1ps .21 The transition then occurs within a few picoseconds with the CC stretching motion as the major accepting mode.22, 27, 28 The excited beta carotene relaxed to its ground state within about 20ps .

Fig. 2

Schematic energy diagram of a beta carotene molecule excited by a near uv photon. S2 state relaxes toward S1 state in about 200fs ; S1 thermalizes to S0 state in a few picoseconds. Also shown are the Stokes and anti-Stokes Raman processes associated with S0 , S1 states, respectively.

064025_1_014606jbo2.jpg

A typical Raman spectrum for beta carotene taken by the ultrafast laser when only the pump pulse is present is shown in Fig. 3a (after a suitable subtraction of the luminescence background on the Stokes side). There are no observable structures found on the anti-Stokes side of the spectrum. This is because the first excited electronic state S1 is populated by the pump pulse about 200fs after the pump excitation, but the pulse duration of the excitation laser is about 100fs . On the other hand, the three profound Raman lines on the Stokes side come from scattering of light by the rocking motion of CCH3 (1005cm1) , the stretching motion of CC (1157cm1) , and the stretching motion of CC (1524cm1) , respectively, all of which are associated with the ground electronic state S0 of beta carotene.20

Fig. 3

Typical Raman spectra for beta carotene in toluene solution excited by an ultrashort laser with pulse width about 100fs in (a) pump pulse only, and (b) pump/probe configuration with time delay about 0.5ps . See text for discussions.

064025_1_014606jbo3.jpg

Figure 3b shows a typical Raman spectrum for beta carotene taken by the ultrafast laser in the pump-probe configuration in which the time delay between the pump and probe is about 0.5ps . We have found that on the Stokes side of the spectrum, in addition to those appearing in the single beam excitation of Fig. 3a, there is an additional feature at around 1800cm1 that is attributed to the scattering of light by the stretching motion of CC associated with the first excited electronic state S1 of beta carotene.21, 29 This unique feature will be used later to justify unambiguously the direct involvement of S1 electronic state in the neutralization of singlet oxygen molecules by beta carotene. The small structures observed on the anti-Stokes side indicate that there are sizable excited vibronic states associated with both the S1 and S0 present during the probing.

Figure 4 shows a schematic diagram of how the free radicals—singlet oxygen molecules—are produced in our experiment. Absorption of a near uv photon brings the photosensitizer molecule—porphyrin—into the excited state S1 .30, 31, 32 The excited porphyrin then undergoes an intersystem crossing to a triplet state T1 with energy of 110 to 130kJmol on the timescale of nanoseconds. From the triplet state, the energy is transferred to the nearby oxygen molecules by turning them from a triplet ground state Σg3 into an excited singlet state Δg1 with excitation energy of 94kJmol , which happens on the timescale of a few milliseconds. The presence of excited singlet oxygen molecules in solution is usually detected by their Δg1Σg3 luminescence at around 1270nm . Figure 5 shows a typical luminescence spectrum detected when the porphyrin in air-saturated toluene solution is excited by our laser pulses.

Fig. 4

Energy diagram demonstrating the production of singlet oxygen molecules from porphyrin in air-saturated toluene solution. OPE: one photon excitation; ISC: intersystem crossing; ET: energy transfer. See text for discussions.

064025_1_014606jbo4.jpg

Fig. 5

A typical luminescence spectrum detected in the mixture of porphyrin in air-saturated toluene after excitation of an ultrafast laser having a 390-nm wavelength. The luminescence comes from the radiative relaxation of the singlet oxygen toward its triplet ground state.

064025_1_014606jbo5.jpg

Figure 6a shows a Raman spectrum for a mixture of beta carotene with porphyrin in toluene and under about 104Torr air pressure, that is, without the presence of oxygen molecules, taken with the pump pulse present only. We notice that the spectrum is strikingly similar to Fig. 3a in which only beta carotene is present. However, as the solution in Fig. 6a is air-saturated, the Raman spectrum, which is shown in Fig. 6b, mimics that of Fig. 3b in which a delayed probe pulse is also present. Apparently, the addition of oxygen molecules in the mixture causes the presence of Stokes as well as anti-Stokes signal at around 1800cm1 in Fig. 6b, which provides21, 29 unambiguous evidence that the first excited vibronic state S1 of beta carotene is populated during the energy transfer processes.

Fig. 6

Typical Raman spectra for beta carotene with porphyrin in toluene solution (a) without oxygen molecules, (b) with oxygen molecules, excited by a 390-nm pump laser only. The presence of an additional Raman line at around 1800cm1 on the Stokes side in (b) as compared with (a) is indicative of the direct involvement of the excited vibronic state S1 of beta carotene in the neutralization of singlet oxygen molecules.

064025_1_014606jbo6.jpg

Comparison of the relative intensities of CC (S0) versus CC (S0) on the anti-Stokes side between Figs. 3b and 6b indicates that intramolecular vibrational redistributions do depend on the mechanism of 2Ag generation.

We note that because the energy transfer between the triplet state T1 of porphyrin and the nearby oxygen molecule occurs on the timescale of milliseconds,32 while the repetition rate of our excitation or probing laser is 80MHz , we are exciting or probing under a quasi-steady-state condition in our current experimental configuration. It is this quasi-steady-state condition that enables us to detect the transient and therefore the intermediate states of energy transfer processes with a single–laser beam experiment.

We notice that the first excited vibronic state S1 of beta carotene can be populated through the relaxation of higher excited states in beta carotene. However, this possible scenario is unlikely, because it involves simultaneous relaxation of three or more singlet oxygen molecules. Another possible energy transfer pathway is that the excitation energy of singlet oxygen transfers partly to the vibronic states associated with the ground electronic state S0 of beta carotene and partly to that associated with the first excited state S1 . This is not possible considering the fact that in Fig. 6b nonequilibrium CC (S1) stretching mode is observed and its occupation number (Δn0.0054) has been found to be about the same as that of CC (S0) (Δn0.0058) and much larger than that of CC (S0) (Δn0.0012) stretching modes. On the other hand, these experimental observations are consistent with what one would expect under the quasi-steady-state conditions when the excitation energy of singlet oxygen is transferred directly to the S1 state. Therefore, the presence of Stokes as well as anti-Stokes Raman lines coming from the scattering of light by the stretching motion of CC at around 1800 and 1800cm1 seen in Fig. 6b, provides concrete evidence that during the neutralization of singlet oxygen by beta carotene, the excitation energy of singlet oxygen molecules transfers primarily to the excited vibronic states associated with the first excited electronic state S1 of beta carotene. As shown in Fig. 7 , because the energy difference between the S1 and S0 states of beta carotene is about 14500cm1 ,33 in order for such an energy transfer to occur while conserving the energy, two singlet oxygen molecules (each of them has excess energy of about 7875cm1 ) must be simultaneously losing their energy by relaxing to their ground triplet states with the excitation of a beta carotene molecule to its first excited vibronic state associated with S1 .

Fig. 7

A proposed energy transfer process suggested by our experimental results in the neutralization of singlet oxygen molecules by beta carotene. In the process, two singlet oxygen molecules simultaneously lose their excitation energy to beta carotene, which is excited to the first excited vibronic state S1 .

064025_1_014606jbo7.jpg

Figure 8 shows a Raman spectrum for a mixture of lycopene with porphyrin in air-saturated toluene solution, taken with the pump pulse present only. All the experimental parameters are kept the same except that beta carotene has been replaced by lycopene. The intriguing feature of this spectrum, when compared with Fig. 6b in which beta carotene is used, is the disappearance of 1800cm1 structures on both Stokes and anti-Stokes sides. This observation provides direct evidence that the first excited state S1 in lycopene is not involved in the energy transfer processes. On the other hand, a relatively large occupation number (Δn0.017) is detected for the CC stretching mode associated with the ground electronic state S0 , suggesting that the excitation energy of singlet oxygen is transferred primarily to the ground excited vibronic state S0 of lycopene. We notice that the full width at half maximum (FWHM) for Raman signals associated with CC (S0) is significantly wider for lycopene (Fig. 8) than for beta carotene [Fig. 6b]. This is because under the quasi-steady-state condition, significantly more higher vibronic modes are populated in lycopene (up to υ5 ) than in beta carotene (υ1) . In addition, the peak has been found to be redshifted, as a result of the effect of anharmonicity of the CC vibrational mode. A proposed energy transfer process for a lycopene–single oxygen system based on our experimental results is depicted in Fig. 9 . Because an energy transfer process involving simultaneous deexcitation of two singlet oxygen molecules is much less likely than a process involving a single one, our findings provide a possible answer to the following question: Why is lycopene a more potent antioxidant than beta carotene in the neutralization of singlet oxygen?34, 35

Fig. 8

A typical Raman spectrum for lycopene with porphyrin in air-saturated toluene solution, excited by 390-nm pump laser only. The absence of Raman lines at around 1800cm1 on the Stokes side and anti-Stokes side as compared with Fig. 6b suggests that the excitation energy of singlet oxygen is transferred primarily to the excited vibronic state S0 of lycopene in the neutralization of singlet oxygen molecules.

064025_1_014606jbo8.jpg

Fig. 9

A proposed energy transfer process suggested by our experimental results in the neutralization of singlet oxygen molecules by lycopene. In the process, one singlet oxygen molecule loses its excitation energy to lycopene, which is excited to the ground excited vibronic state S0 .

064025_1_014606jbo9.jpg

We now address why beta carotene can be excited by a pair of singlet oxygen molecules, whereas lycopene can be excited by a singlet oxygen molecule. One likely explanation is that the pair of beta-ionone rings attached to both ends of beta carotene may be relevant, because it is known that their double bonds can be oxidized to form epoxides, see for example the case of the violaxanthin cycle. Another possible explanation is that when a pair of 1 Bu3(T1) fragments is formed in a beta carotene molecule by energy transfer from two O21 , the 2 Ag1 (S1) state of the beta carotene can be formed by fusion, because 1 Bu3×1 Bu3=2 Ag1 in symmetry.36

4.

Conclusion

We have studied energy transfer processes in the beta carotene–singlet oxygen and lycopene–singlet oxygen systems by using ultrafast Raman spectroscopy. Our experimental results provide concrete evidence that excitation energy of singlet oxygen is transferred primarily to the first excited electronic vibronic state S1 of beta carotene, suggesting that the neutralization process involves simultaneous relaxation of two singlet oxygen molecules. On the other hand, the excitation energy of singlet oxygen is transferred primarily to the ground excited vibronic state S0 of lycopene. These experimental results indicate that lycopene is capable of more efficiently neutralizing singlet oxygen than that of beta carotene. Therefore, our findings not only provide the first direct experimental elucidation of energy transfer processes in such important biological systems but also help explain why lycopene is a more potent antioxidant than beta carotene in the neutralization of singlet oxygen.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMR-0305147 and by Department of Defense Research Area Directorate II Science and Technology Objective C. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the U.S. Department of the Army, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, or the U.S. Department of Defense. The authors would also like to thank Y. F. Chen and S. H. Lin for useful discussions.

References

1. 

T. W. M. Boileau, A. D. Moore, J. W. Erdman Jr., “Carotene and vitamin A,” Antioxidant Status, Diet, Nutrition, and Health, 133 –158 CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1999). Google Scholar

2. 

B. Halliwell and J. Gutteridge, Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999). Google Scholar

3. 

W.-Y. Lee and S.-M. Lee, “Ischemic preconditioning protects post-ischemic oxidative damage to mitochondria in rat liver,” Shock, 24 370 –375 (2005). 1073-2322 Google Scholar

4. 

R. Stocker, J. F. Keaney Jr., “New insights on oxidative stress in the artery wall,” J. Thromb. Haemost., 3 1825 –1834 (2005). Google Scholar

5. 

Y. Luo, “Long-lived worms and ageing,” Redox. Rep., 9 65 –69 (2004). Google Scholar

6. 

L. Kappeler and J. Epelbaum, “Biological aspects of longevity and ageing,” Rev. Epidemiol. Sante Publique, 53 235 –241 (2005). 0398-7620 Google Scholar

7. 

F. Bohm, J. H. Tinkler, and T. G. Truscott, “Carotenoids protect against cell membrane damage by the nitrogen dioxide radical,” Nat. Med., 1 98 –99 (1995). 1078-8956 Google Scholar

8. 

C. S. Foote and R. W. Denny, “Chemistry of singlet oxygen. Quenching by β-carotene,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 90 6233 –6235 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01024a061 0002-7863 Google Scholar

9. 

A. Farmillo and F. Wilkinson, “On the mechanism of quenching of singlet oxygen in solution,” J. Photochem. Photobiol., 18 447 –450 (1973). Google Scholar

10. 

P. F. Conn, W. Schalch, and T. G. Truscott, “The singlet oxygen and carotenoid interaction,” J. Photochem. Photobiol., 11 41 –47 (1991). Google Scholar P. F. Conn, W. Schalch, and T. G. Truscott, “Erratum,” , 17 89 (1993). Google Scholar

11. 

L. C. Chen, L. Sly, C. S. Jones, R. De Tarone, and L. M. Luca, “Differential effects of dietary beta-carotene on papilloma and carcinoma formation induced by an initiation-promotion protocol in SENCAR mouse skin,” Carcinogenesis, 14 713 –717 (1993). 0143-3334 Google Scholar

12. 

H. S. Garewal, R. Katz, F. Meyskens, J. Pitcock, D. Morse, S. Friedman, Y. Peng, D. Pendrys, S. Mayne, D. Alberts, T. Kiersch, and E. Graver, “Beta-carotene produces sustained remissions in patients with oral leukoplakia: Results of a multicenter prospective trial,” Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 125 1305 –1310 (1999). 0886-4470 Google Scholar

13. 

R. Peto, R. Doll, J. D. Buckley, and M. B. Sporn, “Can dietary beta-carotene materially reduce human cancer rates?,” Nature (London), 290 201 –208 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/290201a0 0028-0836 Google Scholar

14. 

K. T. Tsen, “Electron velocity overshoot, ballistic electron transport and non-equilibrium phonon dynamics in nanostructure semiconductors,” Ultrafast Phenomena in Semiconductors, 191 –259 Springer-Verlag, New York (2001). Google Scholar

15. 

K. T. Tsen, “Ultrafast dynamics in wide bandgap wurtzite GaN,” Ultrafast Physical Processes in Semiconductors, 69 109 –149 Academic Press, New York (2001). Google Scholar

16. 

K. T. Tsen, “Optical studies of electric-field induced electron and hole transient transports and optical phonon instability in semiconductor nanostructures,” Ultrafast Dynamical Processes in Semiconductors, 92 193 –258 Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2004). Google Scholar

17. 

K. T. Tsen, “Optical studies of carrier dynamics and non-equilibrium optical phonons in nitride-based semiconductors,” Non-equilibrium Dynamics of Semiconductors and Nanostructures, CRC Press, Inc., New York (2005). Google Scholar

18. 

T. Polivka, D. Zigmantas, H. A. Frank, J. A. Bautista, J. L. Herek, Y. Koyama, R. Fujii, and V. Sundstrom, “Near-infrared time-resolved study of the S1 state dynamics of the carotenoid Spheroidene,” J. Phys. Chem. B, 105 1072 –1080 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp002206s 1089-5647 Google Scholar

19. 

G. Cerullo, G. Lanzani, M. Zavelani-Rossi, and S. De Silvestri, “Early events of energy relaxation in all-trans-beta carotene following sub-10fs optical-pulse excitation,” Phys. Rev. B, 63 241104-1 –241104-4 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.241104 0163-1829 Google Scholar

20. 

D. W. McCamant, J. E. Kim, and R. A. Mathies, “Vibrational relaxation in beta carotene probed by picosecond Stokes and anti-Stokes resonance Raman spectroscopy,” J. Phys. Chem. A, 106 6030 –6038 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0203595 1089-5639 Google Scholar

21. 

D. W. McCamant, P. Kukura, and R. A. Mathies, “Femtosecond time-resolved stimulated Raman spectroscopy: Application to the ultrafast internal conversion in beta carotene,” J. Phys. Chem. A, 107 8208 –8214 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp030147n 1089-5639 Google Scholar

22. 

A. P. Shreve, J. K. Trautman, T. G. Owens, and A. C. Albrecht, “Determination of the S2 lifetime of β-carotene,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 178 89 –96 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(91)85058-5 0009-2614 Google Scholar

23. 

J. P. Zhang, T. Inaba, Y. Watanabe, and Y. Koyama, “Excited-state dynamics among the 1Bu+, 1Bu and 2Ag states of all-trans-neurosporene as revealed by near-infrared time-resolved absorption spectroscopy,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 332 351 –358 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(00)01275-6 0009-2614 Google Scholar

24. 

H. Kandori, H. Sasabe, and M. Mimuro, “Direct determination of a lifetime of the S2 state of beta-carotene by femtosecond time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116 2671 –2672 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00085a078 0002-7863 Google Scholar

25. 

S. Akimoto, I. Yamazaki, S. Takaichi, and M. Mimuro, “Excitation relaxation of carotenoids within the S2 state probed by the femtosecond fluorescence up-conversion method,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 313 63 –68 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01015-5 0009-2614 Google Scholar

26. 

A. N. Macoherson and T. Gillbro, “Solvent dependence of the ultrafast S2S1 internal conversion rate of beta-carotene,” J. Phys. Chem. A, 102 5049 –5058 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp980979z 1089-5639 Google Scholar

27. 

H. Nagae, M. Kuki, J. P. Zhang, T. Sashima, Y. Mukai, and Y. Koyama, “Vibronic coupling through the in-phase, CC stretching mode plays a major role in the 2Ag to 1Ag internal conversion of all-trans-beta-carotene,” J. Phys. Chem. A, 104 4155 –4166 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9924833 1089-5639 Google Scholar

28. 

M. R. Wasielewski, D. G. Johnson, E. G. Bradford, and L. D. Kispert, “Temperature dependence of the lowest excited singlet-state lifetime of all-trans-beta-carotene and fully deuterated all-trans-beta-carotene,” J. Chem. Phys., 91 6691 –6697 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.457337 0021-9606 Google Scholar

29. 

H. Hashimoto and Y. Koyama, “The CC stretching Raman lines of β-carotene isomers in the S1 state as detected by pump-probe resonance Raman spectroscopy,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 154 321 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(89)85363-1 0009-2614 Google Scholar

30. 

B. W. Henderson and T. J. Dougherty, “How does photodynamic therapy work?,” Photochem. Photobiol., 55 (1), 147 –157 (1992). 0031-8655 Google Scholar

31. 

R. Bonnett, “Photosensitizers of the porphyrin and phtalocyanine series for photodynamic therapy,” Chem. Soc. Rev., 24 (1), 19 –33 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1039/cs9952400019 0306-0012 Google Scholar

32. 

A. Karotki, M. Kruk, M. Drobizhev, A. Rebane, E. Nickel, and C. W. Spangler, “Efficient singlet oxygen generation upon two-photon excitation of new porphyrin with enhanced nonlinear absorption,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 7 (6), 971 –975 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/2944.983301 1077-260X Google Scholar

33. 

K. Onaka, R. Fujii, H. Nagae, M. Kuki, Y. Koyama, and Y. Watanabe, “The state energy and the displacements of the potential minima of the 2Ag state in all-trans-β-carotene as determined by fluorescence spectroscopy,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 315 75 –81 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01212-9 0009-2614 Google Scholar

34. 

P. Di Mascio, S. Kaiser, and H. Sies, “Lycopene as the most efficient biological carotenoid singlet oxygen quencher,” Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 274 (2), 532 –538 (1989). 0003-9861 Google Scholar

35. 

V. Bhuvaneswari and S. Nagini, “Lycopene: A review of its potential as an anticancer agent,” Curr. Med. Chem., 5 627 –635 (2005). 0929-8673 Google Scholar

36. 

P. Tavan and K. Schulten, “Electronic excitations in finite and infinite polyenes,” Phys. Rev. B, 36 4337 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.36.4337 0163-1829 Google Scholar
©(2006) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Kong-Thon Tsen, Shaw-Wei D. Tsen, and Juliann G. Kiang "Lycopene is more potent than beta carotene in the neutralization of singlet oxygen: role of energy transfer probed by ultrafast Raman spectroscopy," Journal of Biomedical Optics 11(6), 064025 (1 November 2006). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2398884
Published: 1 November 2006
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 13 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Oxygen

Molecules

Raman spectroscopy

Energy transfer

Ultrafast laser spectroscopy

Molecular energy transfer

Light scattering

Back to Top