|
1.IntroductionThe islets of Langerhans are small endocrine organs scattered in the pancreas that are crucial for maintaining the glucose homeostasis. The spherical- or ovoid-shaped islet consists of four major secretory cells of insulin, glucagon, somatostatin, and pancreatic polypeptide, i.e., , , , and F cells, respectively. The balance of the four cell types and the release of the metabolic peptides are tightly regulated by a committee of paracrine, endocrine, and neuronal cues, which poses a challenging task of analyzing the islet physiology as well as its critical disorder—diabetes mellitus.1, 2 Anatomically, the endocrine islets are surrounded by the exocrine acini and constantly receive paracrine signals from the neighboring acinar cells. In addition, islets are densely vascularized, receiving 5 to 15% of the pancreatic blood supply, despite contributing only approximately 1% to the pancreatic volume.3, 4 The structural and functional connections between the islet endocrine cells and vascular endothelial cells are important to provide oxygen and nutrients to the endocrine cells and allow rapid transport of endocrine hormones such as insulin to the circulation for regulation of blood glucose levels. Although there is an intensive need to characterize the islet microstructure and vasculature in an integrated fashion, visualization of the pancreatic islet and its vascular network is limited by the spatial resolution of the imaging tools. In routine laboratory practice, the microtome-based imaging method allows -level resolution but confines the view at a specific cut plane. In addition, the disconnection between sectioned tissues as well as the distortions and artifacts caused by microtome slicing prevent an integral, 3-D visualization of the islet in situ. For transparent tissues such as the retina, where light can pass through with minimal scattering, optical imaging such as confocal microscopy provides a useful tool to study the 3-D tissue structure with appropriate fluorescent labeling. Unfortunately, pancreatic tissues are nontransparent [Fig. 1 ], which seriously limits their optical accessibility. Recent progress in optical clearing of tissues and cells,5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 however, sheds light on deep-tissue microscopy by improving the tissue optics for imaging. Tissues such as insect brains,12, 13, 14 mouse intestines,15 and tissue-engineering constructs16 were immersed in optical-clearing solution to reduce refractive mismatch between the tissue constitutes (refractive index at ) and fluids (water has a refractive index at 1.33). This avoids random scattering when light moves between media, therefore facilitating laser penetration and fluorescence detection in confocal microscopy.17 In this research, we integrated optical clearing with confocal microscopy to achieve in situ, 3-D imaging of mouse pancreatic islets with subcellular-level resolution. Using this imaging approach, for the first time we were able to apply vessel painting (lipophilic dye labeling of blood vessels)18, 19 to visualize the islet/pancreatic vasculature network with high definition, which is critically missing in previous studies of optical imaging of islets.20, 21 Panoramas of the mouse islet and its tissue network and our approach to acquire the 3-D images are presented and discussed. 2.Materials and Methods2.1.AnimalsPancreata from the female wild-type BALB/c mice (BioLASCO, Taipei, Taiwan) were used in insulin staining and tests of optical clearing. The tissues were also used in membrane and nuclear staining to examine the islet/pancreatic microstructure. Pancreata from the nestin–green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic mice were used in vessel painting to examine the islet microvasculature. In these transgenic animals, the GFP expression is under the control of the protomer and the second intron of the nestin gene, which encodes a type VI intermediate filament protein.22 Particularly, in the pancreas, this mouse line shows strong GFP expression in the exocrine acinar cells and, minimal, if any, GFP expression in the endocrine islet cells.23 Overall, 15 and 7 wild-type BALB/c (36 islets) and nestin-GFP (32 islets) mice were used, respectively, to generate representative images. The care of the animals was consistent with Guidelines for Animal Experiments, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan. 2.2.Sample PreparationMouse pancreata were fixed by paraformaldehyde (4%) perfusion alone (used in BALB/c mice) or vessel painting of lipophilic dye DiD (4-chlorobenzene sulfonate salt, purchased from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, used in the nestin-GFP mice)18, 19 followed by paraformaldehyde perfusion prior to being harvested for examination. Once harvested, the tissues were fixed in paraformaldehyde (4%) for an additional . Mouse insulin staining was achieved by incubating the specimen with the primary rabbit-anti-mouse insulin antibody (1:50, Cell Signaling, Danvers, Massachusetts) and then revealing with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit IgG (1:200, Invitrogen). Propidium iodide staining (PI staining, , Invitrogen) was performed at room temperature for to label the nuclei. DiD staining of membranes was performed at room temperature overnight. Specimens from the DiD-perfused nestin-GFP mice (vessel painting) were stained with PI only. The labeled specimens were immersed in FocusClear solution (CelExplorer, Hsinchu, Taiwan) for optical clearing before being imaged via confocal microscopy. 2.3.Imaging SettingsConfocal imaging of the optical-cleared specimens was performed with a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope equipped with a objective LD Plan-Apochromat glycerine immersion lens or objective LD C-Apochromat water immersion lens. A objective Fluar was used to acquire gross images. The PI- and DiD- labeled samples were excited with helium/neon lasers at and , respectively. A bandpass filter and a long-pass filter were used to collect signals from PI and DiD, respectively. A argon laser and a bandpass filter were used for GFP excitation and fluorescence detection. In addition to fluorescence imaging, the Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope carries the function of transmission light imaging, which can be integrated with the confocal imaging when the detector of the transmitted light channel (ChD) is open. The imaging process is similar to viewing a thick, transparent tissue using a standard microscope with an additional function so that the focal path can be digitally adjusted in coordination with the confocal imaging. That is, while the detector of the confocal channel is collecting the signals from a single plane, the detector of the transmitted light channel is collecting the laser light traveling across the tissue. Sample scanning was recorded with of the plane. The increment of the -axis optical section was when objective lenses were used to acquire gross images. The increment was 1 or when and objective lenses were used to acquire high-resolution images. The pixel intensity was set to be the mean of four scans, and the value ranged from 0 to 4095 ( data) for the transmitted light imaging and from 0 to 255 ( data) for the rest of the confocal imaging. 2.4.Post-Recording Image Processing and ProjectionThe voxel-based confocal micrographs were processed with the use of the LSM 510 software (Version 3.2, Carl Zeiss) and the Amira 4.1.2 (Mercury, Chelmsford, Massachusetts) for projection and analysis. Typically, for a three-channel confocal microscopy (such as to collect signals from GFP, PI, and DiD), the size of the image data was ( channels of signals) for an imaging depth of . The LSM image data were uploaded into Amira, which was operated under a Dell Precision T5400 workstation. We applied the Gaussian Filter function of Amira for noise reduction of the micrographs. In Videos 1 , 2 , and 5 the image stacks were displayed using the Ortho Slice function, and the video was made via the Movie Maker function with an increase in display time in association with the depth of the optical section. In Videos 2 to 4, 6 , and 7 , the Voltex module of Amira was used to project the image stacks. In addition, the Volume Editing function was used to subtract a cuboid(s) from the scanned volume to expose the interior domain of the specimen for visualization. In video preparation, the Demo Maker function was used to arrange the sequence of the image objects at different time intervals. The Camera Path function was used to adjust the projection angles and zoom-in and zoom-out movements of the 3-D images. 10.1117/1.3470241.110.1117/1.3470241.210.1117/1.3470241.410.1117/1.3470241.510.1117/1.3470241.610.1117/1.3470241.73.Results3.1.Optical Clearing of the Mouse PancreasWe applied an optical-clearing solution FocusClear (U.S. Patent No. 6472216)24 to facilitate photon penetration across the mouse pancreatic tissue. The optical-clearing effect allowed the opaque specimen [Fig. 1, in saline] to become transparent when it was immersed in the FocusClear solution [Fig. 1]. In the transparent pancreas, we were able to visualize islets [Figure 1, insulin immunostaining] and the vascular structure [Figure 1, details described later] in situ. Traditionally, pancreata are sectioned into thin slices (e.g., in thickness) to expose their interior domain for microscopic examination.1 Here, the image area can be as large as ( , depth). The thickness of the specimen can be in the range, given that separate visuals can be made from both sides of the specimen. A significant feature of the FocusClear-mediated optical clearing is its reversibility. Figure 1 shows an islet residing in the transparent pancreas, which was acquired using the transmitted light channel of confocal microscopy. When we replaced FocusClear with saline [Figs. 1, 1, 1] and then repeated the optical-clearing immersion [Figs. 1, 1, 1], the optical-clearing effect was reproduced [Figs. 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. We measured the kinetics of this effect: Figure 1 shows a similar trend in all three tests, confirming the reversibility of the FocusClear-mediated optical clearing. Note that in sample preparation, paraformaldehyde was used to fix the specimen prior to the FocusClear immersion. Importantly, the size of the islet in the paraformaldehyde-fixed specimen remained the same, while the tissue optics changed during the test [Figs. 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]—this is essential with the use of a new optical method for tissue examination. However, we would like to stress the finding by Goldstein that upon comparison of the freshly excised and the formalin-treated specimens, there was shrinkage after fixation.25 Thus, there are still disparate observations in the size of tissue structures between in vivo and in vitro measurements. 3.2.Penetrative Confocal Imaging of Islets of Langerhans in the Mouse PancreasTaking advantage of the transparent specimen, we next applied deep-tissue confocal microscopy to examine the fluorescent-dye-labeled structure. Figures 2, 2, 2, 2, 2 are examples of the confocal micrographs at different depths in the specimen, where the nuclei and membranes were revealed by propidium iodide (PI) and DiD (4-chlorobenzene sulfonate salt) staining, respectively. The complete serial optical sections, from the surface to , are shown in Video 1, which reveals two islets in the imaged region. Because the two islets are embedded in the exocrine acini, we used the Amira image software to digitally subtract two cuboids from the scanned volume to expose their locations [Figs. 2, 2, 2]. In a second example, Figs. 2, 2, 2, we used a higher magnification to examine the pancreatic islet structure. Video 2 uses stereo projection to display continuous orthogonal views of the imaged islet. Because there were no physical sections involved in sample preparation, we can digitally quantify the size of the islet by gathering the islet signals based on their locations in the micrograph and calculating the occupied voxels. For example, the size of the scanned volume shown in Figs. 2, 2, 2 is , and the size of each voxel is . By calculating the voxels occupied by the islet [Fig. 2], we estimate that the volume of the islet is in the specimen. A panoramic presentation of Fig. 2 is shown in Video 3. This approach allows an integral view and assessment of the islet structure, which cannot be done by the standard microtome-based 2-D analysis. 10.1117/1.3470241.33.3.High-Resolution, 3-D Imaging of Islet Vasculature in the Mouse PancreasVessel painting is a direct staining method that uses perfusion of lipophilic dye to label blood vessels in small experimental animals. Previously, this method has been used to visualize the vasculature of the retina, skin, lung, heart, and brain in mice, but with limited imaging depth.18, 19 Here, we tested the compatibility of vessel painting with our optical method to visualize the mouse islet/pancreatic vasculature in a 3-D fashion. Figures 3, 3, 3 show that the mouse tissues, including the pancreas, turned blue after perfusion with the lipophilic dye DiD. The labeled pancreatic tissue was then optically cleared by the FocusClear solution and underwent confocal microscopy for deep-tissue imaging. This approach led to a clear visualization of the vascular network, including the capillaries in the islet. Figures 3, 3, 3 are the gross views of the labeled pancreatic tissue, where there are three embedded islets, residing at under the tissue surface. In Fig. 3, we used the Amira software to digitally subtract a cuboid of signals from acini to reveal the vasculature inside. In Fig. 3, we subtracted the vasculature signals on top of the cuboid (from in depth) to reveal the locations of the three islets. Stereo projections of Figs. 3, 3, 3 are shown in Video 4. We next zoomed in to visualize the islet vasculature with high resolution. The optical sections at different depths of a typical islet are shown in Figs. 4, 4, 4, 4, 4 . Images from the transmitted light and fluorescence channels of confocal microscopy are presented on the left and right sides of the figure, respectively. Video 5 displays the serial optical sections of the scanned region. Specifically, on the left side of Fig. 4, large blood vessels can be seen using transmitted light imaging. On the right side, these vessels are also revealed by fluorescence imaging, confirming the success of vessel painting. Notably, the microvessels with a diameter of are clearly visualized in the islet and acini. Figures 4 and 4 are stereo projections of the blood vessels and an orthogonal view of the islet shown in Figs. 4, 4, 4, 4, 4. The 3-D top view and bottom view of the islet vasculature, shown in Figs. 4 and 4, are created by using the Amira software to merge the signals shown in Figs. 4 and 4 and rotate the viewing angle to project the top and bottom halves of the imaged region. Figures 4 and 4 are two additional results of the high-resolution, 3-D vasculature imaging of the mouse pancreatic islets. A fly-through presentation of Fig. 4 is shown in Video 6. Furthermore, in Video 7, we applied the Image Segmentation function of the Amira software to highlight the vasculature in the interior and exterior domains of the islet. These results explore the feasibility of an in situ 3-D image comparison between the endocrine and exocrine parts of the pancreas, which could be used to examine the remodeling of microvessels during the progression of autoimmune diabetes. 4.DiscussionThe worldwide prevalence of diabetes mellitus underlines the complexity of the disease and an urgent need to better understand the islet physiology and developing diagnostic and monitoring tools for the disease. In this research, we develop a new imaging approach to extend our conventional planar view of the microscopic islet/pancreatic architecture into a 3-D panorama for characterization of islets in situ. In our approach, we explored the efficiency of an optical-clearing reagent, FocusClear, in improving photon penetration in the mouse pancreatic tissue. We engineered the tissue optics to reveal the embedded islets in the pancreas, where random light scattering was suppressed and the size of the islet in the paraformaldehyde-fixed specimen remained the same. Using fluorescent labeling, the islet/pancreatic microstructure and vasculature were revealed by 3-D confocal microscopy with efficient fluorescence excitation and emission in the optical-cleared specimen. The 3-D figures and videos presented in this report make possible viewing the spatial relationship of the endocrine islet and the exocrine acini. Significantly, because microtome sectioning is not involved in sample preparation, our approach provides a useful tool for an integral, 3-D presentation of the intricate islet microvasculature. Recently, significant progress has been made in developing optical methods for in vivo imaging of islet cell mass and vasculature.26, 27, 28, 29 For example, Nyman 28 used confocal microscopy to examine the blood flow in the exteriorized pancreatic islets. Speier 29 transplanted islets into the anterior chamber of the mouse eye for a transparent environment to study islet cell biology via two-photon microscopy. However, the extension of confocal and two-photon microscopy to in vivo imaging still leaves unresolved the problem of light scattering as photons encounter the opaque tissue. In two-photon microscopy, for instance, although the infrared lasers excite fluorophores twice as deep in comparison to confocal microscopy, the resolution is not significantly improved because the emitted fluorescence still needs to travel through the turbid tissue for detection. Evidently, in both Nyman’s and Speier’s studies, images were limited at cellular-level resolution, in addition to lacking a clear view of the vascular structure in the interior domain of the islet. Results of these studies confirm that the process of optical clearing is essential in using optical microscopy to acquire high-definition images of the microvascular network, as shown in Figs. 3 and 4. However, it should be noted that the optical-clearing-enhanced microscopy can be done only on a deceased animal, so the ability to perform longitudinal measurements is restricted to a single time point. Although in vivo microscopy is limited due to optical scattering, a key advantage remains that it can be done in a longitudinal fashion. Therefore, both approaches carry pros and cons. In this study, we applied the FocusClear solution (U.S. Patent No. 6472216)24 for optical clearing to improve photon penetration in the pancreatic tissue. FocusClear is an aqueous mixture of chemicals consisting of sugars and their derivatives with high refractive indices similar to those of the tissue constitutes. Immersion of pancreatic tissues in the solution reduces the amount of refractive mismatch between tissue constitutes and the surrounding fluids, thereby avoiding scattering and making the pancreatic tissue transparent for optical imaging. In addition to optical microscopy, advances have been made in using noninvasive imaging methods, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), in animal models to detect the altered -cell mass and the microvascular remodeling during the progression of type 1 (autoimmune) diabetes.26, 27, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 MRI, for example, can image deep into the pancreas in vivo and provide 3-D information such as the angiogram.30, 31, 32 Continued advances in noninvasive monitoring of the pathophysiological islet changes would provide crucial help in early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention of the disease. However, to date, the spatial resolution of MRI and PET is too low to observe either the islet cellular structure or the microvasculature. Thus, additional imaging approaches, such as the 3-D optical method developed in this study, will need to fill the gap between the routine planar microscopy and the noninvasive imaging methods to provide insights into tissue’s microstructure and networks. 5.ConclusionsIn this report, we present an optical method for imaging the islet microstructure and vasculature in the pancreas. The integration of fluorescent labeling, optical clearing, confocal microscopy, and 3-D image rendering provides a unique approach to visualize the islet and its vascular network in situ. Unlike the microtome-based tissue imaging, this optical method for penetrative imaging of the pancreas yields clear, continuous optical sections for an integrated visualization of the islet microstructure and vascular network with subcellular-level resolution. This new optical approach will change our conventional planar view of the islet structure into a 3-D panorama for better understanding the islet physiology and diabetes mellitus. AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported in part by grants from the National Science Council (NSC 96-3011-P-007-006, 98-3011-P-007-004, and 98-2221-E-007-035) and the Research Program in NTHU, Taiwan. ReferencesO. Cabrera, D. M. Berman, N. S. Kenyon, C. Ricordi, P. O. Berggrern, and A. Caicedo,
“The unique cytoarchitecture of human pancreatic islets has implications for islet cell function,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 103
(7), 2334
–2339
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510790103 0027-8424 Google Scholar
J. Gromada, I. Franklin, and C. B. Wollheim,
“Alpha-cells of the endocrine pancreas: of research but the enigma remains,”
Endocr. Rev., 28
(1), 84
–116
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2006-0007 0163-769X Google Scholar
F. C. Brunicardi, J. Stagner, S. Bonner-Weir, H. Wayland, R. Kleinman, E. Livingston, P. Guth, M. Menger, R. McCuskey, M. Intaglietta, A. Charles, S. Ashley, A. Cheung, E. Ipp, S. Gilman, T. Howard, and E. Passaro,
“Microcirculation of the islets of Langerhans—Long Beach Veterans Administration Regional Medical Education Center Symposium,”
Diabetes, 45
(4), 385
–392
(1996). 0012-1797 Google Scholar
N. Ballian and F. C. Brunicardi,
“Islet vasculature as a regulator of endocrine pancreas function,”
World J. Surg., 31
(4), 705
–714
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0719-8 0364-2313 Google Scholar
V. V. Tuchin,
“A clear vision for laser diagnostics,”
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 13
(6), 1621
–1628
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2007.911313 1077-260X Google Scholar
R. K. K. Wang, X. Q. Xu, V. V. Tuchin, and J. B. Elder,
“Concurrent enhancement of imaging depth and contrast for optical coherence tomography by hyperosmotic agents,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 18
(7), 948
–953
(2001). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.18.000948 0740-3224 Google Scholar
J. Y. Jiang, M. Boese, P. Turner, and R. K. K. Wang,
“Penetration kinetics of dimethyl sulphoxide and glycerol in dynamic optical clearing of porcine skin tissue in vitro studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic imaging,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 13
(2), 021105
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2899153 1083-3668 Google Scholar
E. A. Genina, A. N. Bashkatov, A. A. Korobko, E. A. Zubkova, V. V. Tuchin, I. Yaroslavsky, and G. B. Altshuler,
“Optical clearing of human skin: comparative study of permeability and dehydration of intact and photothermally perforated skin,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 13
(2), 021102
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2899149 1083-3668 Google Scholar
M. G. Ghosn, E. F. Carbajal, N. A. Befrui, V. V. Tuchin, and K. V. Larin,
“Differential permeability rate and percent clearing of glucose in different regions in rabbit sclera,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 13
(2), 021110
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2907699 1083-3668 Google Scholar
A. T. Yeh and J. Hirshburg,
“Molecular interactions of exogeneous chemical agents with collagen—implications for tissue optical clearing,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 11
(1), 014003
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2166381 1083-3668 Google Scholar
A. K. Bui, R. A. McClure, J. Chang, C. Stoianovici, J. Hirshburg, A. T. Yeh, and B. Choi,
“Revisiting optical clearing with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO),”
Lasers Surg. Med., 41
(2), 142
–148
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20742 0196-8092 Google Scholar
Y. C. Liu and A. S. Chiang,
“High-resolution confocal imaging and three-dimensional rendering,”
Methods, 30
(1), 86
–93
(2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00010-0 1046-2023 Google Scholar
H. H. Lin, J. S. Lai, A. L. Chin, Y. C. Chen, and A. S. Chiang,
“A map of olfactory representation in the Drosophila mushroom body,”
Cell, 128
(6), 1205
–1217
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.006 0092-8674 Google Scholar
Y. Wang, A. Mamiya, A. S. Chiang, and Y. Zhong,
“Imaging of an early memory trace in the Drosophila mushroom body,”
J. Neurosci., 28
(17), 4368
–4376
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2958-07.2008 0270-6474 Google Scholar
Y. Y. Fu, C. W. Lin, G. Enikolopov, E. Sibley, A. S. Chiang, and S. C. Tang,
“Microtome-free 3-dimensional confocal imaging method for visualization of mouse intestine with subcellular-level resolution,”
Gastroenterology, 137
(2), 453
–465
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.05.008 0016-5085 Google Scholar
S. J. Tseng, Y. H. Lee, Z. H. Chen, H. H. Lin, C. Y. Lin, and S. C. Tang,
“Integration of optical clearing and optical sectioning microscopy for three-dimensional imaging of natural biomaterial scaffolds in thin sections,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 14
(4), 044004
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3158998 1083-3668 Google Scholar
, “Visualizing the architecture of cells and tissues,”
Brochures for Laser Scanning Microscopy,
(2009) http://www.zeiss.de/micro Google Scholar
D. J. Ravnic, X. Jiang, T. Wolloscheck, J. P. Pratt, H. Huss, S. J. Mentzer, and M. A. Konerding,
“Vessel painting of the microcirculation using fluorescent lipophilic tracers,”
Microvasc. Res., 70
(1–2), 90
–96
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2005.06.002 0026-2862 Google Scholar
Y. Li, Y. Song, L. Zhao, G. Gaidosh, A. M. Laties, and R. Wen,
“Direct labeling and visualization of blood vessels with lipophilic carbocyanine dye DiI,”
Nat. Protoc., 3
(11), 1703
–1708
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.172 1750-2799 Google Scholar
M. Hara, R. F. Dizon, B. S. Glick, C. S. Lee, K. H. Kaestner, D. W. Piston, and V. P. Bindokas,
“Imaging pancreatic beta-cells in the intact pancreas,”
Am. J. Physiol.—Endocrinol. Metab., 290
(5), E1041
–E1047
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00365.2005 Google Scholar
T. Alanentalo, C. E. Loren, A. Larefalk, J. Sharpe, D. Holmberg, and U. Ahlgren,
“High-resolution three-dimensional imaging of islet-infiltrate interactions based on optical projection tomography assessments of the intact adult mouse pancreas,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 13
(5), 054070
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3000430 1083-3668 Google Scholar
J. L. Mignone, V. Kukekov, A. S. Chiang, D. Steindler, and G. Enikolopov,
“Neural stem and progenitor cells in nestin-GFP transgenic mice,”
J. Comp. Neurol., 469
(3), 311
–324
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.10964 0021-9967 Google Scholar
A. Delacour, V. Nepote, A. Trumpp, and P. L. Herrera,
“Nestin expression in pancreatic exocrine cell lineages,”
Mech. Dev., 121
(1), 3
–14
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2003.11.004 0925-4773 Google Scholar
A. S. Chiang,
“Aqueous tissue clearing solution,”
(2002). Google Scholar
N. S. Goldstein, A. Soman, and J. Sacksner,
“Disparate surgical margin lengths of colorectal resection specimens between in vivo and in vitro measurements. The effects of surgical resection and formalin fixation on organ shrinkage,”
Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 111
(3), 349
–351
(1999). 0002-9173 Google Scholar
D. Holmberg and U. Ahlgren,
“Imaging the pancreas: from ex vivo to non-invasive technology,”
Diabetologia, 51
(12), 2148
–2154
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-008-1140-7 0012-186X Google Scholar
J. Virostko and A. C. Powers,
“Molecular imaging of the pancreas in small animal models,”
Gastroenterology, 136
(2), 407
–409
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.024 0016-5085 Google Scholar
L. R. Nyman, K. S. Wells, W. S. Head, M. McCaughey, E. Ford, M. Brissova, D. W. Piston, and A. C. Powers,
“Real-time, multidimensional in vivo imaging used to investigate blood flow in mouse pancreatic islets,”
J. Clin. Invest., 118
(11), 3790
–3797
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI36209 0021-9738 Google Scholar
S. Speier, D. Nyqvist, O. Cabrera, J. Yu, R. D. Molano, A. Pileggi, T. Moede, M. Kohler, J. Wilbertz, B. Leibiger, C. Ricordi, I. B. Leibiger, A. Caicedo, and P. O. Berggren,
“Noninvasive in vivo imaging of pancreatic islet cell biology,”
Nat. Med., 14
(5), 574
–578
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1701 1078-8956 Google Scholar
M. C. Denis, U. Mahmood, C. Benoist, D. Mathis, and R. Weissleder,
“Imaging inflammation of the pancreatic islets in type 1 diabetes,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 101
(34), 12634
–12639
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404307101 0027-8424 Google Scholar
S. E. Turvey, E. Swart, M. C. Denis, U. Mahmood, C. Benoist, R. Weissleder, and D. Mathis,
“Noninvasive imaging of pancreatic inflammation and its reversal in type 1 diabetes,”
J. Clin. Invest., 115
(9), 2454
–2461
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI25048 0021-9738 Google Scholar
Z. Medarova, G. Castillo, G. Dai, E. Bolotin, A. Bogdanov, and A. Moore,
“Noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of microvascular changes in type 1 diabetes,”
Diabetes, 56
(11), 2677
–2682
(2007). https://doi.org/10.2337/db07-0822 0012-1797 Google Scholar
F. Souza, M. Freeby, K. Hultman, N. Simpson, A. Herron, P. Witkowsky, E. Liu, A. Maffei, and P. E. Harris,
“Current progress in non-invasive imaging of beta cell mass of the endocrine pancreas,”
Curr. Med. Chem., 13
(23), 2761
–2773
(2006). https://doi.org/10.2174/092986706778521940 0929-8673 Google Scholar
M. M. Martinic and M. G. von Herrath,
“Real-time imaging of the pancreas during development of diabetes,”
Immunol. Rev., 221 200
–213
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00581.x 0105-2896 Google Scholar
M. Villiger, J. Goulley, M. Friedrich, A. Grapin-Botton, P. Meda, T. Lasser, and R. A. Leitgeb,
“In vivo imaging of murine endocrine islets of Langerhans with extended-focus optical coherence microscopy,”
Diabetologia, 52
(8), 1599
–1607
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1383-y 0012-186X Google Scholar
W. J. Malaisse, K. Louchami, and A. Sener,
“Noninvasive imaging of pancreatic beta cells,”
Nat. Rev. Endocrinol., 5
(7), 394
–400
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2009.103 Google Scholar
|