Open Access
1 September 2011 Spontaneous ultraweak photon emission imaging of oxidative metabolic processes in human skin: effect of molecular oxygen and antioxidant defense system
Anshu Rastogi, Pavel Pospísil
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
All living organisms emit spontaneous ultraweak photon emission as a result of cellular metabolic processes. In this study, the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) formed as the byproduct of oxidative metabolic processes in spontaneous ultraweak photon emission was studied in human hand skin. The effect of molecular oxygen and ROS scavengers on spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from human skin was monitored using a highly sensitive photomultiplier tube and charged coupled device camera. When spontaneous ultraweak photon emission was measured under anaerobic conditions, the photon emission was decreased, whereas under hyperaerobic condition the enhancement in photon emission was observed. Spontaneous ultraweak photon emission measured after topical application of glutathione, α-tocopherol, ascorbate, and coenzyme Q10 was observed to be decreased. These results reveal that ROS formed during the cellular metabolic processes in the epidermal cells play a significant role in the spontaneous ultraweak photon emission. It is proposed that spontaneous ultraweak photon emission can be used as a noninvasive tool for the temporal and spatial monitoring of the oxidative metabolic processes and intrinsic antioxidant system in human skin.

1.

Introduction

Metabolic processes are the fundamental chemical reactions occurring inside the living cells. It is known that metabolic processes (e.g., cellular respiration, oxidative burst) result in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) known to play an important role in the defense against infection, cell signaling, apoptosis, and aging.1, 2 However, due to the high positive redox potential, ROS have a capability to oxidize various cellular components such as lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids.2, 3, 4, 5 To prevent the oxidative damage of cellular components, the cells developed their own defense system for the protection against ROS. Under certain circumstances, when the formation of ROS exceeds the capacity of an antioxidant system, the dangerous ROS are insufficiently scavenged. The imbalance between formation and scavenging of ROS brings about the damage of cellular membrane known to lead to the death of the cell.

In human skin, superoxide anion radical (O2 .) is formed by one-electron reduction of molecular oxygen catalyzed by various mitochondrial and cytoplasmic enzymes. In the mitochondrial membrane, the leakage of electron from complexes I and III within the electron transport chain leads to the formation of O2 ..6, 7 More recent evidence reveals that complex II in the mitochondrial membrane also contributes to the overall O2 . production in human skin cells.8 Under physiological conditions, up to 5% of molecular oxygen consumed by mitochondria is reduced to O2 ..9 Apart from the mitochondria, O2 . is formed in the cytoplasm of skin keratinocyte cells by a reduction of molecular oxygen catalyzed by heme-flavoprotein NADPH oxidase (NOX). 10

Various types of nonenzymatic and enzymatic antioxidant systems are engaged to eliminate the cellular oxidative damage.11 Nonenzymatic antioxidant systems in human skin include ascorbate, α-tocopherol, carotenoids, gluthatione, and coenzyme Q10, whereas enzymatic scavenging is maintained by enzymes such as the superoxide dismutase (SOD) family of enzymes (copper-zinc SOD, manganese SOD) and the peroxidase family of enzymes (glutathione peroxidases and catalase).11, 12, 13 When the formation of ROS overwhelms the skin antioxidant capacity, the subsequent oxidation of lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids leads to lipid peroxidation, protein degradation, and nucleic acid damage,14 which cause the aging of the skin.

The oxidation of lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids by ROS is accompanied by the formation of electronically excited species such as triplet carbonyls 3(C=O)* and singlet oxygen (1O2).15, 16 The light emission of the electronically excited species in the spectral range from 200 to 800 nm is known as weak chemiluminescence often called ultraweak photon emission.17, 18, 19, 20, 21 Typically, the intensity of photon emission is less than approximately 10−15 W/cm2 on the surface of human skin. It is known that different wavelengths of light have different penetration depths in human skin.22 Due to its ultraweak nature and emission in the visible range of the spectrum, it is possible to detect the ultraweak photon emission only from the 3 mm layer below the body surface.23 It indicates that the oxidative metabolic processes in the skin play a significant role in the overall photon emission from the human body.

Apart from ultraweak photon emission, other noninvasive techniques such as attenuated total reflection-Flourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), resonance Raman spectroscopy, and confocal Raman microscopy can be used for the measurement of oxidative stress in human skin. For the noninvasive detection of lipid composition from stratum corneum, ATR-FTIR can be used.24 On the other hand, resonance Raman spectroscopy can noninvasively detect the antioxidant level of human skin,25, 26 whereas confocal Raman microscopy can be used for noninvasive depth-resolved assessment of specific antioxidants.27, 28 The ultraweak photon emission or weak chemiluminescence is the most frequent noninvasive technique used for the measurement of oxidative stress because of its direct correlation with the oxidative metabolic processes. 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35

The effect of scavengers on ultraweak photon emission was studied in human skin exposed to various types of physical (ultraviolet and ultrasonic radiation) and chemical (hydrogen peroxide, ozone, cigarette smoke) stress factors.30, 31, 32, 33 It has been demonstrated that topical application of ascorbic acid prior to exposure of human skin to ultraviolet radiation (UV) significantly reduced UV-induced ultraweak photon emission.33 More recently, a topical application of antioxidant system (tocopheryl acetate, ferulic acid, and rutin) on human skin has been shown to significantly decrease UV-induced ultraweak photon emission.29 Hagens (2008) demonstrated that exposure of human skin to ozone and cigarette smoke caused an enhancement in ultraweak photon emission, whereas topical application of antioxidant (ascorbate and α-glucosylrutin) to human skin reduced ultraweak photon emission.31

Whereas the application of ultraweak photon emission for the detection of the oxidative metabolic processes in human skin exposed to physical and chemical stress factors is widely used, the application of spontaneous ultraweak photon emission for the detection of oxidative processes in the skin the related to the normal metabolic processes, i.e., without the use of any exogenous stress factor has received less attention. As far as we know, no experimental evidence has been provided on the correlation of spontaneous ultraweak photon emission and oxidative metabolic processes in human skin. The lack of experimental data on the involvement of ROS produced during the normal metabolic processes in spontaneous ultraweak photon emission was due to the insufficient abundance sensitivity of the detection systems in the past. However, the recent development of a highly sensitive device like the photomultiplier tube (PMT) and charged coupled device (CCD) camera has made it possible to detect the spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from human skin.30, 34, 35 Our study, to the best of our knowledge for the first time, shows spontaneous ultraweak photon emission as the tool for the measurement of oxidative and aging processes in human skin.

2.

Material and Method

2.1.

Human

Measurements were done on a healthy man of age 25 to 27 years and each measurement was repeated at least three times. The dorsal side of the right hand was used for all measurements. The person was adapted to the dark for 20 min prior to the measurement. The measurement was performed between 11 and 15 h of the day during the same season to avoid any effect of diurnal and seasonal change.36

2.2.

Aerobic, Hyperaerobic, and Anaerobic Conditions

A special gas chamber designed for the detection of spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from the dorsal side of the hand was used to study the effect of anaerobic and hyperaerobic conditions on ultraweak photon emission. The front side of the gas chamber was made of a glass plate, which allowed the light to penetrate in the visible range of the spectra. The gas chamber was hermetically sealed from the surrounding atmosphere. Prior to the detection of photon emission, a dark-adapted hand was placed inside the chamber faced to the PMT or CCD window at a distance of 10 and 50 cm, respectively (Fig. 1). Nitrogen and oxygen gas was continuously supplied to create the anaerobic and hyperaerobic condition, respectively, whereas the aerobic condition was maintained at the atmospheric air.

Fig. 1

Experimental setup for the detection of two-dimensional spontaneous ultraweak photon emission under aerobic, anaerobic, and hyperaerobic conditions. The gas chamber is distanced 500 cm from the CCD window.

096005_1_1.jpg

2.3.

Topical Application of Scavengers

Glutathione, ascorbate, α-tocopherol, and coenzyme Q10 were used in 5 mM concentration for the study. Scavengers were applied using a micropipette and gloves covering the left hand. For a one-dimensional measurement, a fixed volume of 300 μL of scavengers was used for each measurement and equally distributed to the fixed area of the right hand with the help of the left hand by the subject himself (5 min prior to the measurement) in the dark; whereas for a two-dimensional measurement, 1000 μL of scavengers were applied on the dorsal side of the hand. In the control sample, the same volume of water or ethanol was applied. The person was adapted to the dark for 20 min including a 5 min time interval after the application of scavengers.

2.4.

One-Dimensional Ultraweak Photon Emission

A photon counting unit C9744 (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Iwata City, Japan) and photomultiplier tube R7518P (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Iwata City, Japan) were used to detect the spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from human hand skin. The sensitivity of the instrument was within the range of 185 to 730 nm. To reduce thermal electrons, PMT was cooled to −30°C using a thermoelectric cooler C9143 (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Iwata City, Japan). A data equation unit and a computer were placed in an operational dark room. The screen and light emitting diodes were shielded by a black curtain. Inside the operational dark room, an experimental dark room (3 × 2 × 2 m) was built to avoid any effect of the lost photons on PMT. The whole interior in the experimental dark room was painted black and the door was protected from incoming light by a black curtain.

2.5.

Two-Dimensional Ultraweak Photon Emission

For two-dimensional imaging of spontaneous ultraweak photon emission, a highly sensitive CCD camera VersArray 1300B (Princeton instruments, Trenton, New Jersey) was used. The CCD camera was equipped with a 50-mm focal distance lens with an f-number of 1.2 (F mount Nikkor 50-mm, f:1.2, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) to enhance the light collecting efficiency. The spectral sensitivity of the CCD camera was within the range of 200 to 1000 nm. Due to the lenses used, the spectral sensitivity of CCD camera was restricted to the visible range of the spectra. To reduce thermal electrons, the CCD camera was cooled to −110 °C using liquid nitrogen. The camera was placed in the experimental dark room and controlled by the computer in the operational dark room. The data correction was made by subtracting the background noise before every measurement. The measurement was done in the image format of 1340×1300 pixels. To improve the image quality the binning mode with the binning factor 4 was applied, which reduces the number of pixels by 4. CCD camera parameters were as follows: scan rate, 100 kHz; gain, 3; accumulation time, 30 min.

3.

Results

3.1.

One-Dimensional Spontaneous Ultraweak Photon Emission from the Human Hand

One-dimensional spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from the human hand was measured using a highly sensitive PMT. Figure 2a shows that the dark count of PMT was adjusted to 2 counts s–1. When the dorsal side of the hand was placed below the PMT window, the count rate of 4.5 counts s–1 was observed [Fig. 2b]. After subtraction of the dark count, spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from the dorsal side of the hand was determined as 2.5 counts s–1. When the exogenous environmental conditions in the experimental dark room were unchanged, a spontaneous ultraweak photon emission persisted on the time scale of several hours. These observations reveal that spontaneous ultraweak photon emission connected to the oxidative metabolic processes is an intrinsic property of the epidermal cells in human skin.

Fig. 2

(a) Dark count rate of the photomultiplier tube and (b) one-dimensional spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from the dorsal side of the hand. Before the measurement the subject was adapted to complete darkness for 20 min.

096005_1_2.jpg

3.2.

Effect of Molecular Oxygen on One-Dimensional Spontaneous Ultraweak Photon Emission

To study the involvement of molecular oxygen in spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from human skin, the photon emission was measured under aerobic, anaerobic, and hyperaerobic conditions. To control gas environment around the human hand, the human hand was placed in a gas chamber. Under aerobic conditions, the spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from the dorsal side of the hand was 2 counts s–1 (Fig. 3). The slight decrease in the spontaneous ultraweak photon emission observed in the gas chamber, compared to that observed without the gas chamber [Fig. 2b], is due to the photon absorption by the glass plate in the glass chamber. When the air in the gas chamber was replaced with nitrogen gas, spontaneous ultraweak photon emission was suppressed to 1.25 counts s–1 (by 40% compared to aerobic conditions). The supply of molecular oxygen in the gas chamber results in the enhancement in spontaneous ultraweak photon emission to 3 counts s–1 (by 50% compared to aerobic conditions). These results reveal that the molecular oxygen is involved in spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from the epidermal cells in human skin.

Fig. 3

Effect of molecular oxygen on one-dimensional spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from the dorsal side of the hand. Aerobic condition were established by the supply of the atmospheric air into the gas chamber. Anaerobic conditions were maintained by establishing a continuous flow of nitrogen gas into the gas chamber, whereas molecular oxygen was continuously supplied into the gas chamber to create the hyperaerobic conditions. Spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from human hand was measured for 15 min. Each bar represents the mean value of at least three independent measurements ± SD made at the same diurnal time of three different days.

096005_1_3.jpg

3.3.

Effect of Molecular Oxygen on Two-Dimensional Spontaneous Ultraweak Photon Emission

To monitor spatial distribution of photon emission from the human hand, two-dimensional spontaneous ultraweak photon emission was measured using CCD camera. Figure 4 shows the photograph of the dorsal side of the hand and its corresponding photon emission images measured under aerobic, anaerobic, and hyperaerobic conditions. To quantify the differences in spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from the human hand under various concentrations of molecular oxygen, the spatial profile of photon emission in the middle strip of the image was used. Under aerobic conditions, the spatial profile of photon emission shows the maximum photon emission of 17 counts. The replacement of air by nitrogen gas in the gas chamber caused a decrease in the photon emission to 12 counts, whereas the supply of molecular oxygen in the gas chamber resulted in the enhancement in photon emission to 25 counts. These observations show that molecular oxygen is involved in the two-dimensional spontaneous ultraweak photon emission, which provides valuable information on the spatial distribution of electronically excited species formed during the oxidative metabolic processes in the epidermal cells of the skin.

Fig. 4

Effect of molecular oxygen on two-dimensional spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from the dorsal side of the hand. The bottom panel shows the spatial profile of photon emission in the middle strip of the image. Y axis denotes the number of counts accumulated after 30 min, whereas the X axis denotes the pixel of the image. The other experimental conditions were the same as in Fig. 3.

096005_1_4.jpg

3.4.

Effect of Reactive Oxygen Species Scavengers on One-Dimensional Spontaneous Ultraweak Photon Emission

To study the involvement of ROS in ultraweak photon emission, the effect of various ROS scavengers on spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from the human hand was measured. When hydrophilic (sodium ascorbate and glutathione) and lipophilic (α-tocopherol and coenzyme Q10) ROS scavengers were topically applied on human skin, the decrease in spontaneous ultraweak photon emission to 1.6 counts s–1 (by 30% compared to control) was observed (Fig. 5). To confirm that the decrease in photon emission is not a pure effect of the solvent, the effect of water and ethanol on photon emission from human skin was tested. There was no measurable difference observed when only distilled water or ethanol was topically applied on the human hand (data not shown). These results indicate that ROS are involved in spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from human skin. The observation that suppression of spontaneous ultraweak photon emission with the topical application of hydrophilic or lipophilic scavengers was found to be approximately the same, indicates that the solubility of scavenger does not considerably affect the scavenging property of topically applied scavengers.

Fig. 5

Effect of ROS scavengers on one-dimensional spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from the dorsal side of the hand. Prior to the measurement the hydrophilic (ascorbate and gluthatione) and the lipophilic (α-tocopherol and coenzyme Q10) ROS scavengers at the concentration of 5 mM were topically applied on the the dorsal side of the hand. Spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from the human hand was measured for 15 min. Each bar represents the mean value of at least three independent measurements ± SD made at the same diurnal time of three different days.

096005_1_5.jpg

3.5.

Effect of Reactive Oxygen Species Scavengers on Two-Dimensional Spontaneous Ultraweak Photon Emission

In further study, the effect of ROS scavengers on two-dimensional spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from the human hand was measured using a CCD camera. Figure 6 shows the photograph of the human hand and corresponding photon emission images measured on the dorsal side of the hand without scavengers (control) and after topical application of hydrophilic (sodium ascorbate and glutathione) and lipophilic (α-tocopherol and coenzyme Q10) ROS scavengers. In the control sample, the spatial profile of photon emission shows the maximum photon emission of 30 counts. The spontaneous ultraweak photon emission is higher compared to the photon emission observed in the gas chamber (Fig. 4) due to the lack of photon absorption by the glass plate in the gas chamber. The topical application of hydrophilic (sodium ascorbate and glutathione) and lipophilic (α-tocopherol and coenzyme Q10) ROS scavengers caused a decrease in the photon emission to about 20 counts. The observation that a topical application of water and ethanol on the dorsal side of the hand has no effect on spontaneous ultraweak photon emission, indicates that the decrease in photon emission is solely caused by the scavenging (data not shown). These observations reveal that ROS are involved in the two-dimensional spontaneous ultraweak photon emission, monitoring the spatial distribution of ROS in the oxidative metabolic processes in the epidermal cells of the skin.

Fig. 6

Effect of ROS scavengers on two-dimensional spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from the dorsal side of the hand. The bottom panel shows the spatial profile of photon emission in the middle strip of the image. The Y axis denotes the number of counts accumulated after 30 min, whereas the X axis denotes the pixel of the image. The other experimental conditions were the same as in Fig. 5.

096005_1_6.jpg

4.

Discussion

In this study, the effect of molecular oxygen and various ROS scavengers on spontaneous ultraweak emission from human skin was studied using highly sensitive PMT and CCD camera. The direct evidence is provided on the involvement of molecular oxygen and ROS in the spontaneous ultraweak emission from human skin. Based on the observation that removal of molecular oxygen and topical application of O2 . scavengers on human skin decreased ultraweak photon emission, it is concluded that O2 . formed during oxidative metabolic processes plays a crucial role in the spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from human skin. The direct contact of human skin with atmospheric molecular oxygen and the reduction of molecular oxygen by heme-contaning enzymes in the mitochondrial membrane or cytoplasm are discussed as a possible mechanism responsible for the involvement of O2 . in spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from human skin.

It is well accepted that skin as the outermost layer of the body is in direct contact with the atmospheric gases, such as molecular nitrogen and potentially deleterious molecular oxygen. The exchange of molecular oxygen between epidermal cell and the surrounding atmosphere proceeds via cutaneous respiration.37 At normal rest and ordinary atmospheric conditions, the rate of cutaneous respiration in a human is 1 to 1.5% of pulmonary respiration.38 As the epidermal cells in the stratum corneum absorb the molecular oxygen directly from the atmosphere, the probability of ROS formation by respiration process is higher in the stratum corneum in comparison to other layers of the skin. The data presented in this study shows that molecular oxygen is involved in spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from human skin (Figs. 3, 4).

It is well known that epidermal cells are continuously renewed with a high turnover rate utilizing reservoirs of stem cells located in the basal layer.39 It has been observed that under in vitro conditions, the mitochondrial activity increases in the epithelial cell with high proliferation.40 It seems likely that enhancement in the mitochondrial activity increases the probability of electron leakage to molecular oxygen and production of O2 .. In addition to the mitochondrial electron transport chain, the skin karatinocytes cell contains a special cytoplasmic enzyme, i.e., heme-flavoprotein NOX known to reduce molecular oxygen to O2 ..10

To prevent a deleterious effect of O2 . formed during the normal metabolic processes in the epidermal cells, it has developed effective nonenzymatic and enzymatic antioxidant systems.11 Nonenzymatic antioxidant system in human skin includes hydrophilic (ascorbate and gluthatione) and lipophilic (α-tocopherol and coenzyme Q10) antioxidants.13 The observation that the topical application of both hydrophilic and lipophilic O2 . scavengers on human skin decreased the photon emission, reveals that O2 . is involved in spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from human skin (Figs. 5, 6). Ascorbate, glutathione, α-tocopherol, and coenzyme Q10 were reported to penetrate in the skin with the following efficiency: 100% stratum corneum >20% viable layer of epidermis >2% dermis.41, 42, 43 It has been previously established that these are predominantly reduced antioxidants that effectively eliminate O2 . by its reduction to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).44, 45 The oxidation of hydrophilic ascorbate and gluthatione by O2 . results in the formation of monodehydroascorbate and glutathione disulfide, respectively, whereas the oxidation of lipophilic α-tocopherol and coenzyme Q10 by O2 . forms α-tocopheryl and ubisemiquinone, respectively.46, 47

To maintain continuous scavenging of O2 . by reduced scavengers, re-reduction of oxidized antioxidants has to be maintained. The re-reduction of an oxidized antioxidant proceeds either by nonenzymatic or enzymatic reactions. In the nonenzymatic reaction, self-reaction of monodehydroascorbate forms ascorbate and dehydroascorbate, whereas α-tocopherol is recovered by the reduction of α-tocopheryl by ascorbate.46, 48 It has been previously reported that the epidermal cells contain a higher level of ascorbate and α-tocopherol compared to the dermal cells of the skin.11, 49 In the enzymatic reaction, the re-reduction of oxidized antioxidants is catalyzed by various types of NADPH-reductase.2 The reduction of glutathione disulfide to glutathione is catalyzed by NADPH-glutathione reductase,50 whereas NADPH quinine reductase converts ubisemiquinone to ubiquinol.41 It has been previously reported that the activity of NADPH-glutathione reductase11 and NADPH quinine reductase47 in the epidermis cells is several times higher compared to the dermis cells. Enzymatic scavenging is maintained by the peroxidase family of enzymes such as glutathione peroxidases and catalase.49 Glutathione peroxidase catalyzes decomposition of H2O2 in the water and molecular oxygen using glutathione as a substrate, whereas catalase catalyzes the decomposition of H2O2 in the water and molecular oxygen. It has been previously shown that catalase activity is several orders higher in the epidermal cells when compared to the dermal cells of the skin.11, 51

In this study, the ultraweak photon emission is demonstrated as a nondestructive technique for the monitoring of oxidative metabolic processes in the epidermal cells of the skin. It is proposed here that ultraweak photon emission can serve as a reliable and relevant method for the noninvasive determination of antioxidant capacity in human skin. The application of ultraweak photon emission in the clinical studies opens the area for the use of ultraweak photon emission as a highly sensitive and fast diagnostic tool for the early detection of various chronic skin diseases and skin aging processes in the medicine and the cosmetic industry.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Centre of the region Haná for biotechnological and agricultural research (Grant No. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0007), the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of Czech Republic (Grant No. MSM6198959215), and the student project PrF_2010_050 of the Palacký University. We thank to Ankush Prasad for his help with data collection and Dr. Pavel Krchňák for technical assistance with respect to PMT and CCD camera measurements.

References

1. 

V. J. Thannickal and B. L. Fanburg, “Reactive oxygen species in cell signaling,” Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol., 279 L1005 –L1028 (2000). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11076791 Google Scholar

2. 

B. Halliwell and J. M. C. Gutteridge, Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, 4th ed.Oxford University, London (2007). Google Scholar

3. 

J. P. Spencer, A. Jenner, K. Chimel, O. I. Aruoma, C. E. Cross, R. Wu, and B. Halliwell, “DNA strand breakage and base modification induced by hydrogen peroxide treatment of human respiratory tract epithelial cells,” FEBS Lett., 374 233 –236 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(95)01117-W Google Scholar

4. 

J. Krutmann, “Ultraviolet A radiation-induced biological effects in human skin: relevance for photoaging and photodermatosis,” J. Dermatol. Sci., 23 S22 –S26 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-1811(99)00077-8 Google Scholar

5. 

M. Kunisada, H. Kumimoto, K. Ishizaki, K. Sakumi, Y. Nakabeppu, and C. Nishigori, “Narrow-band UVB induces more carcinogenic skin tumors than broad-band uvb through the formation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 127 2865 –2871 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5701001 Google Scholar

6. 

G. Lenaz, “Role of mitochondria in oxidative stress and ageing,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1366 53 –67 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(98)00120-0 Google Scholar

7. 

S. Raha and B. H. Robinson, “Mitochondria, oxygen free radicals, disease and ageing,” TIBS, 25 502 –508 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01674-1 Google Scholar

8. 

G. R. Aitken, J. R. Henderson, S.-C. Chang, C. J. McNeil, and M. A. Birch-Machin, “Direct monitoring of UV-induced free radical generation in HaCaT keratinocytes,” Clin. Exp. Dermatol., 32 722 –727 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.2007.02474.x Google Scholar

9. 

M. A. Birch-Machin and H. Swalwell, “How mitochondria record the effects of UV exposure and oxidative stress using human skin as a model tissue,” Mutagenesis, 25 101 –107 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gep061 Google Scholar

10. 

W. Chamulitrat, W. Stremmel, T. Kawahara, K. Rokutan, H. Fujii, K. Wingler, H. H. H. W. Schmidt, and R. Schmidt, “A constitutive NADPH oxidase-like system containing gp91phox homologs in human keratinocytes,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 122 1000 –1009 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.22410.x Google Scholar

11. 

Y. Shindo, E. Witt, D. Han, W. Epstein, and L. Packer, “Enzymic and non-enzymic antioxidents in epidermis and dermis of human skin,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 102 122 –124 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12371744 Google Scholar

12. 

B. Allemann and L. Baumann, “Antioxidents used in skin care formulations,” Skin Therapy Letter, 13 5 –9 (2008). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18839043 Google Scholar

13. 

H. Masaki, “Role of antioxidents in skin: anti-ageing effects,” J. Dermatol. Sci., 58 85 –90 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2010.03.003 Google Scholar

14. 

S. Briganti and M. Picardo, “Antioxidant activity, lipid peroxidation and skin diseases. What's new,” J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 17 663 –669 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3083.2003.00751.x Google Scholar

15. 

N. Duran and E. Cadenas, “The role of singlet oxygen and triplet carbonyls in biological systems,” Rev. Chem. Intermed., 8 147 –187 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03156138 Google Scholar

16. 

G. Cilento and I. L. Brunetti, “Triplet carbonyls: from photophysics to biochemistry,” J. Mol. Struct., 324 45 –48 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2860(94)08225-1 Google Scholar

17. 

M. Kobayashi, M. Usa, and H. Inaba, “Highly sensitive detection and spectral analysis of ultraweak photon emission from living samples of humans origin for the measurement of biomedical information,” Trans. Soc. Instrument. Control Eng., E-1 214 –220 (2001). http://srv01.sice.or.jp/~e-trans/papers/E1-27.pdf Google Scholar

18. 

C. Kageyama, K. Kato, H. Iyozumi, H. Inagaki, A. Yamaguchi, K. Furuse, and K. Baba, “Photon emissions from rice cells elicited by N-acetylchitooligosaccharide are generated through phospholipid signaling in close association with the production of reactive oxygen species,” Plant. Physiol. Biochem., 44 901 –909 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2006.09.010 Google Scholar

19. 

B. S. Cheun, S. H. Yi, K. Y. Baik, J. K. Lim, J. S. Yoo, H. W. Shin, and K. S. Soh, “Biophoton emission of MDCK cell with hydrogen peroxide and 60 Hz AC magnetic field,” J. Environ. Bio., 28 735 –740 (2007). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=18405105%20 Google Scholar

20. 

R. V. Wijk, E. P. A. V. Wijk, F. A. C. Wiegant, and J. Evis, “Free radicals and low-level photon emission in human pathogenesis: state of the art,” Indian J. Exp. Biol., 46 273 –309 (2008). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=18697612%5Buid%5D Google Scholar

21. 

A. Rastogi and P. Pospíšil, “Effect of exogenous hydrogen peroxide on biophoton emission from radish root cells,” Plant. Physiol. Biochem., 48 117 –123 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.12.011 Google Scholar

22. 

K. Lieboda, D. Fabler, W. D. Schmidt, T. Kühn, and U. Wollina, “In vivo spectroscopy in dermatology: methods and new fields of application,” J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 14 1 –4 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00011.x Google Scholar

23. 

M. Takeda, M. Kobayashi, M. Takayama, S. Suzuki, T. Ishida, K. Ohnuki, T. Moriya, and N. Ohuchi, “Biophoton detection as a novel technique for cancer imaging,” Cancer Sci., 95 656 –661 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb03325.x Google Scholar

24. 

L. Brancaleon, M. P. Bamberg, T. Sakamki, and N. Kollias, “Attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy as a possible method to investigate biophysical parameters of stratum corneum in vivo,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 116 380 –386 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.2001.01262.x Google Scholar

25. 

M. E. Darvin, W. Sterry, and J. Lademann, “Resonance Raman spectroscopy as an effective tool for the determination of antioxidative stability of cosmetic formulation,” J. Biophoton., 3 82 –88 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.200910060 Google Scholar

26. 

J. Lademann, S. Schanzer, M. Meinke, W. Sterry, and M. E. Darvin, “Interaction between carotenoids and free radicals in human skin,” Skin Pharmacol. Physiol., 24 238 –244 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1159/000326074 Google Scholar

27. 

J. W. Fluhr, P. Caspers, J. A. V. D. Pol, H. Richter, W. Sterry, J. Lademann, and M. E. Darvin, “Kinetics of carotenoid distribution in human skin in vivo after exogenous stress: disinfectant and wIRA-induced carotenoid depletion recovers from outside to inside,” J. Biomed. Opt., 16 035002-1–035002-7 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3555183 Google Scholar

28. 

M. E. Darvin, J. W. Fluhr, P. Caspers, A. V. D. Pool, H. Richter, A. Patzelt, W. Sterry, and J. Lademann, “In vivo distribution of carotenoids in different anatomical locations of human skin: comparative assessment with two different Raman spectroscopy methods,” Exp. Dermatol., 18 1060 –1063 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.00946.x Google Scholar

29. 

A. Jain, I. Rieger, M. Rohr, and A. Schrader, “Antioxidant efficieny on human skin in vivo investigated by UVA-induced chemiluminescence decay analysis via induced chemiluminescence human skin,” Skin Pharmacol. Physiol., 23 266 –272 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1159/000314701 Google Scholar

30. 

A. Rastogi and P. Pospíšil, “Ultra-weak photon emission as a non-invasive tool for monitoring of oxidative processes in the epidermal cells of human skin: comparative study on the dorsal and the palm side of the hand,” Skin Res. Technol., 16 365 –370 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2010.00442.x Google Scholar

31. 

R. Hagens, F. Khabiri, V. Schreiner, H. Wenck, K.-P. Wittern, H.-J. Duchstein, and W. Mei, “Non-invasive monitoring of oxidative skin stress by ultraweak photon emission measurement. II: biological validation on ultraviolet stressed skin,” Skin Res. Technol., 14 112 –120 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2007.00207.x Google Scholar

32. 

H. Kim, S. Ahn, and J. Kim, “Biophoton emission induced by ultrasonic irradiation,” IFMBE Proceedings, 14 (8), 1277 –1280 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36841-0_310 Google Scholar

33. 

H. Ou-Yang, G. Stamatas, C. Saliouand, and N. Kollias, “A Chemiluminescence study of UVA-induced oxidative stress in human skin in vivo,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 122 1020 –1029 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.22405.x Google Scholar

34. 

R. V. Wijk, M. Kobayashi, and E. P. A. V. Wijk, “Anatomic characterization of human ultra-weak photon emission with a moveable photomultiplier and CCD imaging,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 83 69 –76 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2005.12.005 Google Scholar

35. 

M. Kobayashi, D. Kikuchi, and H. Okamura, “Imaging of ultraweak spontaneous photon emission from human body displaying diurnal rhythm,” PLoS ONE, 4 (7), e6256 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006256 Google Scholar

36. 

H. H. Jung, J. M. Yang, W. M. Woo, C. Choi, J. S. Yang, and K. S. Soh, “Years-long biophoton measurements: normalized frequency count analysis and seasonal dependency,” J. Photochem. Photobiol., B, 78 149 –154 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2004.08.002 Google Scholar

37. 

C. B. Archer, “Functions of the skin,” Rook's Textbook of Dermatology, 4.1–4.11 Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK (2010). Google Scholar

38. 

H. Takiwaki, “Measurement of transcutaneous oxygen tension,” Handbook of Non-Invasive Methods and the Skin, 185 –195 Chemical Rubber, Boca Raton (1995). Google Scholar

39. 

E. Reefman, P. C. Limburg, C. G. M. Kallenberg, and M. Bijl, “Apoptosis in human skin: role in pathogenesis of various diseases and relevance for therapy,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1051 52 –63 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1361.046 Google Scholar

40. 

K. Takeda, S. Akagi, S. Takahashi, A. Onishi, H. Hanada, and C. A. Pinkert, “Mitochondrial activity in response to serum strvation in bovaine (Bos taurus) cell culture,” Cloning and Stem Cells, 4 223 –229 (2002). https://doi.org/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12398803 Google Scholar

41. 

U. Hoppe, J. Bergemann, W. Diembeck, J. Ennen, S. Gohla, I. Harris, J. Jocob, J. Kielholz, W. Mei, D. Pollet, D. Schachtschabel, G. Sauermann, V. Schreiner, F. Stab, and F. Steckel, “Coenzyme Q10, a cutaneous antioxidant and energizer,” BioFactors, 9 371 –378 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.5520090238 Google Scholar

42. 

R. M. W. Moison and G. M. J. B. V. Henegouwen, “Topical antioxidant vitamins C and E prevent UVB-radiation-induced peroxidation of eicosapentaenoic acid in pig skin,” Radiat. Res., 157 402 –409 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2002)157[0402:TAVCAE]2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar

43. 

J. M. Rijnkels, R. M. W. Moison, E. Podda, and G. M. J. B. V. Henegouwen, “Photoprotection by antioxidants against UVB-radiation-induced damage in pig skin organ culture,” Radiat. Res., 159 210 –217 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0210:PBAAUR]2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar

44. 

A. Nandi and I. B. Chatterjee, “Scavenging of superoxide radical by ascorbic acid,” J. Biosci., 11 435 –441 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02704692 Google Scholar

45. 

E. Damiani, P. Astolfi, P. Carloni, P. Stipa, and L. Greci, “Antioxidents: how they work,” Oxidants in Biology, 251 –266 Springer Science, New York (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8399-0_12 Google Scholar

46. 

L. Packer, S. U. Weber, and G. Rimbach, “Molecular aspect of α-tocoptrienol antioxidant action and cell signaling,” J. Nutr., 131 369S –373S (2001). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=11160563%5Buid%5D Google Scholar

47. 

M. Takada, T. Yuzuriha, and C. Yamato, “Redox levels of intravenously administered [14C] Coenzyme Q10 and Coenzyme Q10-reducing activity in subcellular fractions of guinea pig liver,” J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo), 31 147 –155 (1985). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=3928843%5Buid%5D Google Scholar

48. 

G. Banhegyi, L. Braun, M. Csala, P. Ferenc, and M. Jozsef, “Ascorbate metabolism and its regulation in animals,” Free Radic. Biol. Med., 23 793 –803 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(97)00062-2 Google Scholar

49. 

M. Lopez-Torres, J. J. Thiele, Y. Shindo, D. Han, and L. Packer, “Topical application of α-tocopherol modulates the antioxidant network and diminishes ultraviolet-induced oxidative damage in murine skin,” Br. J. Dermatol., 138 207 –215 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02062.x Google Scholar

50. 

O. Ortolani, A. Conti, A. R. De Gaudio, E. Moraldi, Q. Cantini, and G. Novelli, “The effect of glutathione and N-acetylcysteine on lipoperoxidative damage in patients with early septic shock,” Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med., 161 1907 –1911 (2000). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=10852765 Google Scholar

51. 

G. E. Rhie, M. H. Shin, J. Y. Seo, W. W. Choi, K. H. Cho, K. H. Kim, K. C. Park, H. C. Eun, and J. H. Chung, “Aging- and photoageing-dependent changes of enzymic and nonenzymic antioxidents in the epidermis and dermis of human skin in vivo,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 117 1212 –1217 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01469.x Google Scholar
©(2011) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Anshu Rastogi and Pavel Pospísil "Spontaneous ultraweak photon emission imaging of oxidative metabolic processes in human skin: effect of molecular oxygen and antioxidant defense system," Journal of Biomedical Optics 16(9), 096005 (1 September 2011). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3616135
Published: 1 September 2011
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 53 scholarly publications and 1 patent.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Skin

Oxygen

CCD cameras

Defense systems

Nitrogen

Imaging systems

Photomultipliers

Back to Top