In several diseases such as bladder obstruction, spinal cord injuries and diabetes, normal bladder function changes as a result of bladder wall morphology alterations.18.104.22.168.–6 Although these are known to be the main reason for bladder dysfunction, their exact relation to altered bladder functionality is still unclear.4 Bladder wall is composed of extracellular matrix (including collagen and elastin) and smooth muscle.7 During outlet obstructive diseases, the bladder wall experiences smooth muscle overgrowth (hypertrophy and hyperplasia) or changes in smooth muscle cell orientation, an increase in total wall thickness, and excessive extracellular matrix deposition and remodelling.1,3 In many cases, over the long-term these alterations become irreversible, decrease patient quality of life, and increase risk of kidney failure and urinary tract infections. One promising solution is replacing the bladder with engineered tissues.8,9 A major outstanding issue in this approach is ensuring comparable functionality through comparable engineered architecture, required for a healthy normal bladder. Thus, currently ambiguous relationships between distension-induced changes in the organization of smooth muscle and extracellular matrix tissues that comprise the bladder wall, and the resulting alterations in bladder function, warrant further investigation.
Several groups have taken a biomechanical characterization approach in quantifying the bladder wall displacement (strain) and correlating it to the liquid pressure inside the bladder. Korossis et al.,10 mechanically stretched trabeculae from different regions of porcine bladder, and based on the resultant thickness changes in different directions, identified regions with distinct anisotropy and elasticity. To relate the anisotropy to the pressure inside the bladder, approximations such as a spherical bladder shape have been assumed, and Laplace’s law has also been invoked to describe pressure-shape relationships.10 In a recent study, displacement has been measured from the surface of the bladder wall while bladders were distended ex vivo under controlled pressure and volume of liquid,11 from which regional anisotropy and strain have been calculated using Laplace’s law. Although such displacement measurements coupled with bio-mechanical models are useful to detect elasticity and anisotropy, they do not provide any information on the underlying tissue organization. Therefore, this missing organizational information about bladder wall morphology and microstructure is acquired from thin samples using optical microscopy techniques.10,12
Polarized light imaging in bulk intact tissues is beginning to be used for quantitative assessment of morphology in biological tissues.1322.214.171.124.18.19.–20 When the tissue polarimetric properties are properly decoupled with the help of polarization data analysis technique known as polar Mueller matrix decomposition,21,22 a particular parameter known as retardance emerges. Retardance is a measure of tissue anisotropy, which reports on its organized/disorganized nature. It is a product of tissue optical birefringence and sampled tissue thickness. Some tissues are known to be anisotropic (birefringent) in their normal functional state.19,23,24 For example, polarized light imaging has been utilized to determine the micro-structural organization in cardiac muscle, including its alterations due to infarct and post-infarct recovery induced by stem-cell therapies.17 Cardiac anisotropy was shown to decrease with infarct formation (disorganized collagen scar tissue), and recover towards near-normal anisotropic levels with various forms of regenerative stem-cell therapies.17,25,26 Furthermore, birefringence can be induced by mechanical forces (strain) in most materials, including biological tissues.16 In fact, strain induces additional organization, which can be detected optically as birefringence. Birefringence in a distending bladder is a combination of both the birefringence due to intrinsic tissue organization and the strain induced organization.
In this study, we use polarized light imaging to obtain local maps of bladder birefringence (from polarimetry-derived retardance images, normalized by the bladder wall thickness measured with optical coherence tomography). This potential metric of bladder functional status varies spatially in normal bladders and in its regional response to bladder filling pressure, as characterized in this study. We also perform selected nonlinear microscopic examinations of the bladder wall, to help understand the polarimetric findings of bladder anisotropy. We believe our results are the first systematic optical characterization studies of normal ex vivo bladder microstructural/organizational changes as related to distension pressure.
Materials and Methods
Ex vivo Bladder Harvesting and Distension
Female Sprague-Dawley rats were anaesthetised under isofluorane, the abdomen was opened and the bladders were exposed.7,27 A simple anatomical representation of the bladder and a photo of the ex vivo harvested bladder are shown in Fig. 1. The ureters were ligated with a 5-0 blue viacryl suture on the right side of the rat and with a black 8-0 silk suture on the left. This simple colour coding enabled proper orientation of the bladder after harvesting. The urethra was catheterized with a 20-0 angiocatheter and the urethra sutured around the catheter with 4-0 silk suture, in four separate locations. The bladder and urethra were removed carefully from the animal, which was then sacrificed under anaesthesia according to an institutionally approved animal use protocol. The catheterized bladders were then placed in cell culture medium, phenol red-free Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’ Medium (MEM), prior to distension.27,28
To distend the bladders, we used varying pressure head, by varying the height of the liquid reservoir coupled to the bladder via the urethra [Fig. 2(a)]. To ensure that the polarimetric signal was coming from the illuminated spot on the bladder wall, we had to minimize the reflection and scattering from sidewalls and distal portions of the bladder wall; to do so, the liquid in the reservoir-bladder system was a mixture of crimson blue dye dissolved in ethanol (to prevent contributions from bladder regions other than the illuminated region) and oil (to prevent the dye from penetrating into the bladder wall and thus altering the wall tissue optics). This mixture has been optimized empirically, ensuring before the bladder wall begins to absorb the dye. For this reason and also to make sure that we are testing the bladders in their fresh condition, all imaging measurements were performed within 1 h. The density of the liquid mixture was measured to be . The pressure at the top of the bladder (at the urethra) was then determined according to , where is the oil-dye density, is the reservoir height and is the acceleration due to gravity. Three bladders (referred to as 1, 2, and 3 in the text) were distended at three different reservoir heights of 15, 30, and 45 cm, corresponding to pressures of 1.0, 2.2, and 3.3 kPa; this range of pressures in within the relevant physiologic range.7 With this method, we could image bladder 1 distended at 1.0 kPa, bladder 2 at 2.2 kPa and bladder 3 at 3.3 kPa. This was done instead of distending a single bladder to three different pressures, to avoid any possible hysteresis effects.
Polarized Light Imaging
To derive the retardance (and from that the intrinsic tissue birefringence, as a measure of its anisotropy) of the distended bladders, we used polarized light imaging in reflection mode [Fig. 2(b)]. A 635 nm diode laser (Thorlabs, Newton, New Jersey) was used as the light source. We generated four different incident polarization states (three linear and one right circular) using a waveplate and a polarizer for the sample illumination. The ex vivo bladders were placed on a rotational mount. The light spot on the bladder was in diameter. Several spots in each anatomical bladder region (dorsal, ventral, and dome) were imaged by rotating the bladder. The imaging was not performed in the regions close to the sutures, since these likely exhibit strain anisotropy induced by the surgical preparation. The angle between the incident beam and collected backscattered light was 25 deg off the exact backscattering direction. Six different output polarization states (four linear and two circular) were collected using a polarizer and a waveplate. The polarized light images were detected by a CCD camera (CoolSNAPK4, Photometrics, Tuscon, Arizona). From this 24-measurement methodology (four input and six output polarization states), Mueller matrices were calculated at different regions of the bladder at three different distension pressures.17
The measured Mueller matrix contains several sample polarization effects occurring simultaneously intermixed in a complex way in its 16 elements. One way to extract intrinsic constituent components of potential biological/biophysical significance is to use a technique known as polar decomposition.22 In particular, a Lu-Chipman decomposition approach has been used to decompose the Mueller matrix into its constituent basis matrices and extract individual polarization effects from these.22,25,29 We have adopted this method for biophotonic applications, validated it with phantoms and Monte-Carlo simulations, and successfully used it in biological tissues.25,29 The experimentally measured bladder Mueller matrix was therefore decomposed into the product of three constituent ‘basis’ matrices: a diattenuator matrix , a retarder matrix , and a depolarizer matrix . Mathematically, this can be written as:
Although other multiplication orders are possible, the results for biological tissues are essentially unaltered.30 From , one can obtain the sample linear retardance as:31 2)] and dominant orientation [Eq. (3)] of the linear retardance of the interrogated tissue. However, we are interested in bladder intrinsic birefringence (a measure of its anisotropy), and not just retardance, as the latter is influenced by thickness in addition to anisotropic (micro-organizational) changes. The governing equation relating retardance to both sample intrinsic birefringence and its thickness (in our case, the optical pathlength that the backscattered detected photons have traveled) is: 3233.–34 We have measured the rat bladder’s optical properties using the spatially resolved steady state diffused reflectance method described in Kim et al.35 The average value reduced scattering coefficient in normal rat bladders at 635 nm was , giving a transport mean free path of 0.14 cm.36 We have run polarization sensitive Monte Carlo simulations for slabs with the rat bladder optical properties and with different wall thicknesses. Figure 3 demonstrates the averaged pathlength that the polarization preserving photons (detected at 25 deg off backscattering axis) travel in a rat bladder wall of thickness . As illustrated in Fig. 3, the average pathlength is about five times the transport mean free path and increases with the increase in the bladder wall thickness. Having thus obtained (from OCT and Monte Carlo modelling) and from polarimetry, we can derive birefringence from Eq. (4).
Note that the derived birefringence values may be smaller than the true tissue birefringence; we are, in fact, measuring its projection onto the plane perpendicular to the imaging axis. Thus the apparent birefringence will be different at different detection angles .37 Here we keep the measurement angle fixed at 25 deg reflection mode, and report differences in apparent tissue birefringence from different bladder regions and under different distension pressures. However, we have developed methods to derive the true that require additional angular projections,37 and these will be applied to the bladder distension studies in future publications.
The linear retardance driven from Eq. (2) is the net retardance of the tissue. However, biological tissues are heterogeneous and the fiber alignments usually vary in spatial micro-domains, often as a function of depth (i.e., different anisotropy orientations in different bladder wall layers). Therefore, the detected net retardance might be smaller than the real retardance of each layer. Yet it is well known that a stack of retarders with different fast axis orientations results in a total nonzero circular retardance; giving an indication if a derived low net retardance value is due to true tissue isotropy or instead caused by this anisotropic heterogeneity effect. Retardance in general can be written as a combination of linear and circular contributions and can be described by the retardance vector as:22,3822,38 22 Linear retardance is the sum of the retardances along and ; circular retardance (along ) is not a real phase shift between polarization states and instead appears as a rotation (like an optical activity effect). This geometric phase, also known as Pancharatnam phase or Berry’s phase, occurs when the polarization states are transformed in different local coordinates.38 Knowing that the retardance vector itself can be regarded as a Stokes vector, we can define its ellipticity angle as:
Optical Coherence Tomography
To measure the regional thickness of the bladder wall, we used our recently developed Fourier-domain OCT system.39,40 The system is based on Mach-Zehnder interferometer; the source is a frequency domain mode locked fiber-ring laser with a center wavelength at 1310 nm and a sweep rate of 43 to 67 kHz. A polygon based filter is used to sweep a 112 nm wavelength range. The coherence length is 12 mm, the axial resolution is 9 μm in biological tissues, and the average power is 48 mW. We acquired the B-mode cross-sectional OCT images the bladder wall. The ex vivo distended bladders were placed under the OCT probe and several images from different regions were acquired by changing the bladder position. The catheter was inside the bladder in all the experiments and the bladder was filled with the oil-dye mixture to the predetermined distension level.
Multiphoton microscopy has been used in previous studies to investigate the morphology of the bladder wall.12,41,42 Similarly, we have used mulitphoton microscopy to shed light on the underlying causes of the obtained polarimetric anisotropy signals and gain some information on interrogated tissue composition.43 A Zeiss LSM 510 microscope (META NLO, Oberkochen, Germany) with a water immersion objective lens was used to focus a mode locked Ti:sapphire laser at 800 nm. Depth of field was approximately 2 μm and lateral field of view was . The second harmonic generation (SHG) signal, purported to originate primarily from collagen, was collected at 400 nm, in a wavelength window of . The two photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) signal was collected from a spectral window of 430 to 570 nm, and likely represents both smooth muscle and elastin. To flatten the tissue for microscopic examinations, the distended bladder was cut along the apex to dome (see Fig. 1), and placed on a glass coverslip (no top coverslip to flatten the tissue was used, to avoid mechanical artefacts). In order to inhibit the nerve fiber response to slicing and consequently prevent smooth muscle contraction, Oxybutynin was added to the bladder prior to cutting.44 The images were taken in reflection mode, at a depth of about 50 μm below the outer surface of the bladder wall.
Results and Discussion
To quantify the distension pressure/wall thickness relationship, we performed OCT imaging of bladder 1 at 1 kPa, bladder 2 at 2.2 kPa and bladder 3 at 3.3 kPa. Figure 4 shows representative B-mode OCT images, from the dome region of the three bladders. The effect of decreasing wall thickness with increasing distension pressure is evident in these images.
The bladder wall thickness is not as uniform as may appear from the OCT images in Fig. 4. Moving several millimetres to a different spot but still remaining within the same anatomical bladder ‘zone’ (dorsal/ventral/dome) gave rise to wall thickness variation. The mean values of regional wall thicknesses averaged over area of each bladder are shown in Fig. 5. Note the varying magnitude of this effect in different bladder regions: dome exhibit larger thickness decreases than the dorsal and the ventral zones.
As seen in Fig. 5, increasing distension pressure decreases dome thicknesses significantly, but has only minimal effect on the ventral and dorsal wall; specifically, the ventral wall becomes the thickest bladder wall structure at 3.3 kPa. We have examined additional distended bladders (results not shown); although actual numbers vary, the above trends are consistent. Now with this bladder thickness information in hand, we can look up the average pathlength that the photons travel in each bladder wall from Fig. 3 and use it to calculate birefringence from the measured retardance [Eq. (4)].
It is important to note the possible variations in choosing the location of the spots in each zone on different bladders and therefore the necessity for our future studies to evaluate the whole bladder wall anisotropy for larger number of samples to reach statistically significant and clinically relevant results. In this paper, we have chosen illustrative spots with the highest retardance from each region of the distended bladders. The measured retardances varied from 15 deg to 160 deg for the dome, from 10 deg to 78 deg for the ventral and from 8 deg to 114 deg for the dorsal regions. We did not observe phase-wrapping in any of the examined spots. The anisotropy was then calculated using Eq. (4) for each spot. Note that usually anisotropy is gauged from the thickness change or displacement with the approximate assumption of spherical or ellipsoid shape of the examined structure.10,11 In contrast, our approach enables the characterization of the bladder with respect to its optical anisotropy (birefringence), independent of its thickness and ‘regular geometry’ assumptions. Resulting images of regional anisotropy are shown in Fig. 6. The images present 2 mm-diam circular fields of view, chosen from the highest signal to noise ratio (SNR) regions of each 3 mm-diam examined spot.
Maximum anisotropy appears in the dome region distended at 3.3 kPa. The dome is not the most anisotropic region at low and mid pressures (1.0 and 2.2 kPa), but becomes more anisotropic as the pressure increases. Conversely, the ventral wall is nearly isotropic at low pressures, and remains so as the distension is increased. On the other hand, the dorsal wall anisotropy is significant at mid and high pressures. It can thus be concluded that the pressure-anisotropy behavior in dorsal and ventral regions differs from that in the dome region. Physiologically this seems reasonable, since the dome (the far region from the urethra) experiences high pressures when the bladder is almost full and probably shows its maximum compliance at the final filling stages. Also, the dome is known to be the most physiologically vulnerable area of the bladder to acute pressure insults, and is most prone to rupture.45 Further, note that the regional anisotropy–pressure relationship does not follow the regional pressure-thickness correlation depicted in Fig. 4. The polarimetry data hence implies that mechanical strain which results in distension and thickness change is not the only factor leading to change in anisotropy. Most likely, other factors such as organizational changes that are occurring in the different layers and regions of the bladder wall are also responsible for the observed anisotropy (birefringence) changes.
The net birefringence orientation (represented by arrows in Fig. 6) also shows interesting trends. Dorsal and ventral regions both exhibit anisotropic longitudinal alignment along the dome to the urethra. The longitudinal alignment is known to be the dominant direction of the smooth muscle layer as shown previously.3 Therefore, we surmise that the dominant anisotropy in the bladder wall during distension is due to the stretching of the smooth muscle fibers. The orientation of the anisotropy in the dome follows the general orientation of the fibers in dorsal and ventral regions (note that the dome was examined in a horizontal position as shown in Fig. 2). However, at maximum pressure () the anisotropy orientations in the dome deviate from the rest of the dominant orientations in bladder wall. In order to explore the reason we evaluated the retardance ellipticity at this spot; recall that this is a metric of depth-dependent birefringence heterogeneity. As shown in Fig. 7, the retardance ellipticity is high at those regions with abnormal orientations. This indicates existence of spatial micro-domain retarders with different fast axis orientations throughout the depth, resulting in small values of net retardance and random like orientations. The retardance ellipticity angle for all other spots in Fig. 6 is lower than (about 20% of the ellipticity in Fig. 7), suggesting more uniform anisotropy orientation throughout those regions of the bladder wall.
Another interesting point is that although the average thicknesses of dorsal and ventral regions are similar during different distension pressures (Fig. 5) and they both exhibit dominant longitudinal orientations, their anisotropy values are very different at mid and high pressure (Fig. 6). One possible reason might be the differences in the extracellular matrix organization in these two regions; because as previously has been reported, the extracellular matrix organization and orientation alter during the bladder filling.12,46 Thus, to elucidate the nature of the anisotropy–extracellular matrix micro-organization connection, we performed two-photon confocal microscopy at selected depths in the dorsal and ventral regions at 3.3 kPa (high pressure). We were not able to keep the curvature of the dome (when distended) with Oxybutynin after cutting the fresh bladder, so our microscopy results are limited to looking at the differences between dorsal and ventral regions. A normal rat bladder was distended up to 3.3 kPa and depth resolved two-photon microscopy images with 2 μm thick slices (depth of field) were acquired from representative spots of its dorsal and ventral regions. To get some idea of the depth dependence of the tissue structures, the -stacks of depth resolved slices were acquired around a central plane at 50 μm depth. 3-D rendering of these slices are shown in Fig. 8, where the green colour codes the SHG signal (likely emanating from the collagen fibers), while red shows the TPEF signal (likely from the elastin and smooth muscle compartments—see Sec. 2 for details). The collagen content is not very different in the two regions of the bladder wall (at least at the examined depths); however, as seen in the 2-D (maximum intensity projection) top views (1st column of Fig. 8), it appears more densely packed in the dorsal compared to the ventral regions. On the other hand, the elastin/smooth muscle network in the dorsal area is highly organized compared to the ventral zone (2nd column of Fig. 8). Comparison of Figs. 6 and 8 thus suggests that the organized and compact nature of extracellular matrix in the dorsal wall enhances its birefringence (anisotropy) compared to the ventral structures. Note that deriving a dominant orientation for the extracellular matrix is not straightforward due to its complex three dimensional organization.
To fully explain the measured birefringence trends with nonlinear microscopy images would require that the latter be acquired throughout the entire polarimetry imaging depth (), which is not technically possible. However, even these observed micro-structural differences support our speculation about the role of extracellular matrix organization in determining tissue anisotropy properties. From Figs. 6Fig. 7–8, we can note a regional correlation between distension pressure in the bladder and structural organization (morphology) in its wall. This relation may prove to be useful in improving tissue engineered bladders function. For example, Helse et al., have shown that mechanical stimulation of the in vitro tissue engineered bladders triggers elastin production and improves bladder compliance.9 Knowing the regions of the bladder which possess high content of elastin (e.g., dorsal zone according to our results) and their organization, tissue engineers can apply the optimum mechanical stimulation. In addition, our results demonstrate that the different regions of ex vivo distended bladders exhibit very different (thickness independent) anisotropy. Achieving similar regional anisotropy/distension pressure trends in artificial bladders may serve to improve their functionality.
Using polarized light imaging for regional birefringence mapping and OCT for local thickness measurements, we examined organizational anisotropy in ex vivo distended rat bladders as a function of distension pressure. The dome region was seen to become most anisotropic with distension, whereas the ventral side remained roughly isotropic. The dorsal wall showed significant anisotropy at mid and high distension pressures. The dominant average direction of anisotropy in the bladders was longitudinal, along the dome-apex axis. As expected, depth resolved multiphoton microscopy of the ex vivo distended bladder revealed the difference in organization of the extracellular matrix in the dorsal and ventral regions of the bladder wall. Overall, the thickness—pressure relation, birefringence—pressure relation and microscopy data, all together suggest that anisotropy changes with micro-structural remodelling in the bladder wall as well as with mechanical strain (which is proportional to thickness change and distension). Since the bladder function (distension/contraction) is supported by the specific extracellular matrix organization of its wall, these initial results may prove useful in guiding the design and enhancing the functionality of tissue engineered bladders in order to assist bladder failure patients.
K. J. AitkenD. J. Bagli, “The bladder extracellular matrix. Part II: regenerative applications,” Nat. Rev. Urol. 6(11), 612–621 (2009).NRNADQ1759-4812http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2009.202Google Scholar
T. Berrocalet al., “Anomalies of the distal ureter, bladder, and urethra in children: embryologic, radiologic, and pathologic features,” Radiographics 22(5), 1139–1164 (2002).0271-5333Google Scholar
J. Nagatomiet al., “Quantification of bladder smooth muscle orientation in normal and spinal cord injured rats,” Ann. Biomed. Eng. 33(8), 1078–1089 (2005).ABMECF0090-6964http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-5776-xGoogle Scholar
A. Tubaroet al., “The effect of bladder outlet obstruction treatment on ultrasound-determined bladder wall thickness,” Rev. Urol. 7(Suppl. 6), S35–S42 (2005).RVURABGoogle Scholar
C. C. Wanget al., “Diabetes-induced alternations in biomechanical properties of urinary bladder wall in rats,” Urology 73(4), 911–915 (2009).Google Scholar
K. J. AitkenD. J. Bagli, “The bladder extracellular matrix. Part I: architecture, development and disease,” Nat. Rev. Urol. 6(11), 596–611 (2009).NRNADQ1759-4812Google Scholar
K. J. Aitkenet al., “Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) induces proliferation and de-differentiation responses to three coordinate pathophysiologic stimuli (mechanical strain, hypoxia, and extracellular matrix remodeling) in rat bladder smooth muscle,” Am. J. Pathol. 176(1), 304–319 (2010).AJPAA40002-9440http://dx.doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2010.080834Google Scholar
G. S. Jacket al., “Urinary bladder smooth muscle engineered from adipose stem cells and a three dimensional synthetic composite,” Biomaterials 30(19), 3259–3270 (2009).BIMADU0142-9612http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.035Google Scholar
R. L. Heiseet al., “Generating elastin-rich small intestinal submucosa-based smooth muscle constructs utilizing exogenous growth factors and cyclic mechanical stimulation,” Tissue Eng. Part A. 15(12), 3951–3960 (2009).1937-3341http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0044Google Scholar
S. Korossiset al., “Regional biomechanical and histological characterisation of the passive porcine urinary bladder: implications for augmentation and tissue engineering strategies,” Biomaterials 30(2), 266–275 (2009).BIMADU0142-9612http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.034Google Scholar
A. Parekeet al., “Ex vivo deformations of the urinary bladder wall during whole bladder filling: contributions of extracellular matrix and smooth muscle,” J. Biomech. 43(9), 1708–1716 (2010).JBMCB50021-9290http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.034Google Scholar
M. Murakumoet al., “Three-dimensional arrangement of collagen and elastin fibers in the human urinary bladder: a scanning electron microscopic study,” J. Urol. 154(1), 251–256 (1995).JOURAA0022-5347http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67289-6Google Scholar
R. K. CurtisT. D. Tyson, “Birefringence: polarization microscopy as a quantification technique of human hair analysis,” J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 27(7), 411–431 (1976).JSCCA5Google Scholar
M. F. G. Woodet al., “Polarization birefringence measurements for characterizing the myocardium, including healthy, infracted, and stem-cell-regenerated tissues,” J. Biomed. Opt. 15(4), 047009 (2010).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3469844Google Scholar
S. G. DemosR. R. Alfano, “Temporal gating in highly scattering media by the degree of optical polarization,” Opt. Lett. 21(2), 161–163 (1996).OPLEDP0146-9592http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.21.000161Google Scholar
M. R. Antonelliet al., “Mueller matrix imaging of human colon tissue for cancer diagnostics: how Monte Carlo modeling can help in the interpretation of experimental data,” Opt. Express 18(10), 10200–10208 (2010).OPEXFF1094-4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.010200Google Scholar
M. F. G. Woodet al., “Proof-of-principle demonstration of a Mueller matrix decomposition method for polarized light tissue characterization in vivo,” J. Biomed. Opt. 14(1), 014029 (2009).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3065545Google Scholar
S. Y. LuR. A. Chipman, “Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 13(5), 1106–1113 (1996).JOAOD61084-7529http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.13.001106Google Scholar
V. J. SankaranT. Walsh Jr.D. J. Maitland, “Comparative study of polarized light propagation in biologic tissues,” J. Biomed. Opt. 7(3), 300–306 (2002).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.1483318Google Scholar
G. JarryF. HenryR. Kaiser, “Anisotropy and multiple scattering in thick mammalian tissues,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 17(1), 149–153 (2000).JOAOD61084-7529http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.17.000149Google Scholar
N. Ghoshet al., “Mueller matrix decomposition for polarized light assessment of biological tissues,” J. Biophotonics 2(3), 145–156 (2009).JBOIBX1864-063Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbio.v2:3Google Scholar
S. H. Liet al., “Elastin gene overexpression during cell therapy prevents scar expansion and ventricular dysfunction after a myocardial infarction,” J. Molec. Cell Cardiol. (accepted).Google Scholar
K. J. Aitkenet al., “Mechanotransduction of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 mitogen-activated protein kinase activity in smooth muscle is dependent on the extracellular matrix and regulated by matrix metalloproteinase,” Am. J. Pathol. 169(2), 459–470 (2006).AJCPAI0002-9173http://dx.doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2006.050969Google Scholar
B. O. Backhauset al., “Alterations in the molecular determinants of bladder compliance at hydrostatic pressures less than 40 cm ,” J. Urolology 168(6), 2600–2604 (2002).JOURAA0022-5347http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64226-7Google Scholar
N. GhoshM. F. G. WoodI. A. Vitkin, “Mueller matrix decomposition for extraction of individual polarization parameters from complex turbid media exhibiting multiple scattering, optical activity, and linear birefringence,” J. Biomed. Opt. 13(4), 044036 (2008).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2960934Google Scholar
N. GhoshM. F. G. WoodI. A. Vitkin, “Influence of the order of the constituents basis matrices on the mueller matrix decomposition,” Opt. Commun. 283(6), 1200–1208 (2010).OPCOB80030-4018http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2009.10.111Google Scholar
M. A. Wallenburget al., “Comparison of optical polarimetry and diffusion tensor imaging for assessing myocardial anisotropy,” J. Innovat. Opt. Health Sci. 3(2), 109–121 (2010).Google Scholar
D. CoteI. A. Vitkin, “Robust concentration determination of optically active molecules in turbid media with validated three-dimensional polarization sensitive Monte Carlo calculations,” Opt. Express 13(1), 148–163 (2005).OPEXFF1094-4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.000148Google Scholar
X. GuoM. F. G. WoodI. A. Vitkin, “Angular measurements of light scattered by turbid chiral media using linear Stokes polarimeter,” J. Biomed. Opt. 11(4), 041105 (2006).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2339134Google Scholar
X. GuoM. F. G. WoodI. A. Vitkin, “Monte Carlo study of pathlength distribution of polarized light in turbid media,” Opt. Express 15(3), 1348–1360 (2007).OPEXFF1094-4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.001348Google Scholar
A. Kimet al., “A fiberoptic reflectance probe with multiple source-collector separations to increase the dynamic range of derived tissue optical absorption and scattering coefficients,” Opt. Express 18(6), 5580–5594 (2010).OPEXFF1094-4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.005580Google Scholar
M. A. Wallenburget al., “Polarimetry-based method to extract geometry-independent metrics of tissue anisotropy,” Opt. Lett. 35(15), 2570–2572 (2010).OPLEDP0146-9592http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.002570Google Scholar
D. Goldstein, Polarized light, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker, New York (2003).Google Scholar
G. Y. Liuet al., “High power wavelength linearly swept modelocked fiber laser for OCT imaging,” Opt. Express 16(18), 14095–14105 (2008).OPEXFF1094-4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.014095Google Scholar
A. Mariampillaiet al., “Speckle variance detection of microvasculature using swept-source optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 33(13), 1530–1532 (2008).OPLEDP0146-9592http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.33.001530Google Scholar
S. M. Zueet al., “Multiphoton microscopy of unstained bladder mucosa based on two-photon excited autofluorescence and second harmonic generation,” Laser Phys. Lett. 6(1), 80–83 (2009).1612-2011http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lapl.v6:1Google Scholar
R. Cicchiet al., “Time- and spectral-resolved two-photon imaging of healthy bladder mucosa and carcinoma in situ,” Opt. Express 18(4), 3840–3849 (2010).OPEXFF1094-4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.003840Google Scholar
M. A. Wallenburget al., “Two-photon microscopy of healthy, infracted and stem-cell treated regenerating heart,” J. Biophoton. 4(5), 297–304 (2011).JBOIBX1864-063Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbio.v4.5Google Scholar
J. P. VaccaroJ. M. Brody, “CT cystography in the evaluation of major bladder trauma,” RadioGraphics 20(5), 1373–1381 (2000).0271-5333Google Scholar