Near-infrared (NIR) Raman spectroscopy is a vibrational analytic technique that can provide fingerprint (FP) information about the structure and conformation of tissues at the molecular level.12.–3 Very recently, NIR Raman spectroscopy techniques have gained considerable attention for characterization and diagnosis of precancer and cancer in vivo in a variety of organs such as head and neck,2 cervix,3 lung,4 and gastrointestinal tracts.5,6 To date, most NIR Raman studies have been centered on the FP range (i.e., 800 to 1800 cm−1) owing to the wealth of specific biomolecular information (i.e., protein, deoxyribonucleic acid, and lipid content) contained in this spectral region for tissue characterization and diagnosis.56.–7 With the commonly used NIR 785 nm laser excitation source, however, intense tissue autofluorescence background and fused silica Raman signal arising from fiber-optic Raman probes also fall into the FP range. The tissue autofluorescence can severely interfere with the detection of the inherently weak FP Raman signals by saturating the charge-coupled device (CCD). This remains the primary concern in certain organs such as lung, liver, and stomach.4,6 Recent reports have shown that high wavenumber (HW) (i.e., 2800 to ) Raman spectroscopy also contains valuable biomolecular information that can advantageously be used for diagnostic purposes.12.3.–4,8,9 The use of HW Raman spectroscopy is appealing due to the relatively intense tissue Raman signals generated ( and moiety stretching vibrations of protein and lipids, OH stretching vibrations of water), as well as the considerably reduced fused silica fiber interferences and tissue autofluorescence that may allow a better assessment of the genuine tissue Raman signals.2,9 Our study has established that the integrated FP and HW Raman technique offers complimentary diagnostic information for increasing the accuracy and robustness of detecting precancer in cervical tissue.8 To date, only a very limited clinical work has been reported on the tissue Raman measurements covering both the FP and HW regions. The tissue Raman signals are measured either by successively switching the different laser excitation frequencies or by rotating the gratings for each spectral region,1,8 which are not suitable for rapid in vivo measurements in clinical endoscopic settings. In this letter, we report on the development of a novel multiplexing Raman spectroscopic technique that can simultaneously acquire both FP and HW in vivo tissue Raman spectra with high spectral resolution during endoscopy.
Figure 1 shows the schematic of the multiplexing Raman spectroscopy system developed for simultaneous acquisition of the FP and HW Raman spectra in real-time under endoscopic image-guidance [i.e., white light reflectance (WLR), narrowband imaging (NBI) and autofluorescence imaging (AFI)]. The multiplexing Raman spectroscopy technique consists of a spectrum stabilized 785 nm diode laser (maximum output: 300 mW, B&W TEK Inc., Newark, Delaware), a transmissive imaging spectrograph (Holospec f/1.8, Kaiser Optical Systems Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan) equipped with a liquid nitrogen-cooled (), NIR-optimized, back-illuminated and deep depletion CCD camera ( pixels at per pixel; Spec-10: 400BR/LN, Princeton Instruments, Roper Scientific Inc., Trenton, New Jersey). We integrate a customized volume phase holographic (VPH) dual-transmission grating consisting of two hybrid VPH gratings () (HoloPlex, Kaiser Optical Systems Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan) into the spectrograph for Raman spectral dispersion.10 The hybrid gratings are cemented closely together with a tilted angle of to achieve a separation between the low frequency and high frequency spectral components. The Bragg wavelengths of the hybrid gratings are tuned to two different spectral ranges (i.e., −150 to and 1750 to ) such that it disperses the tissue Raman spectra (i.e., FP and HW spectra) onto two separate vertical segments of the CCD, accordingly. This multiplexing Raman spectroscopy technique based on a VPH dual-transmission grating permits simultaneous coverage of both the FP and HW spectral segments while maintaining a high spectral resolution of a single high-density grating. To correct for the image aberration in the transmissive spectrograph, a customized parabolic aligned fiber bundle ( fibers, ) was coupled into the entrance slit of the spectrograph for significantly improving the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as well as the spectral resolution of the multiplexing Raman system as compared to a conventional straight slit imaging spectrograph.7 This allows us to completely hardware bin the two separate CCD segments vertically for improving the SNR (of up to and spectral resolution () of the Raman spectra.7 The two spectral segments are simultaneously readout so that the FP and HW regions can be spliced into a complete high-resolution broadband Raman spectrum covering to . The rapid multiplexing Raman spectroscopy technique developed for endoscopy was wavelength calibrated to an accuracy () using an argon/mercury spectral lamp (AR-1 and HG-1, Ocean Optics Inc., Dunedin, Florida) and the Raman spectrum of 4-acetamidophenol that exhibits strong well-defined peaks in the HW region at and (ASTM E1840 standard). To correct for the spectral response of the system, intensity calibration was performed using a standard tungsten lamp (RS-10, EG&G Gamma Scientific, San Diego, California) of the two distinct CCD segments separately. In this work, a 1.8 mm fiber-optic confocal Raman probe coupled with a 1.0 mm sapphire ball lens that can pass through the instrument channel of conventional endoscopes was used for epithelial tissue Raman measurements during endoscopic procedures. We have also developed customized software to process the two distinct CCD segments in real-time during clinical endoscopy, and the proper probe-tissue contact handlings can be verified on-line using outlier detection algorithms.11 The real-time data processing specially developed for this biomedical multiplexing FP and HW Raman spectroscopy technique includes silica fiber background subtraction, intensity and wavelength calibration, cosmic rays and signal saturation detection/rejection, autofluorescence background subtraction and linear Savitzky-Golay smoothing (5 pixel window).5 Different tissue autofluorescence background subtraction schemes were employed for robust extraction of the tissue Raman signals. In the FP region (i.e., 800 to ), a 5th order polynomial constrained to the lower portion of the FP Raman spectra is used and this polynomial is then subtracted from the measured spectrum to resolve the FP tissue Raman signal. In the HW region (i.e., 2800 to ), we found that 1st order polynomials constrained to the lower portion of the HW Raman spectra are optimal for extracting the Raman spectra. All Raman spectra are also normalized to the integrated areas under the FP and HW Raman spectral regions, respectively, to reduce power density fluctuations associated with probe handling variations during clinical endoscopic examinations.5,6
Figure 2 shows the full frame CCD image of a parabolic-configured fiber bundle illuminated with argon/mercury spectral lamps (AR-1 and HG-1, Ocean Optics Inc., Dunedin, Florida). With this specific fiber arrangement, the atomic emission lines are substantially straight, indicating effective image-aberration correction on the segmented CCD.7 This in turn allows us to hardware bin the two well-defined CCD regions covering pixels without compromising spectral resolutions or reducing the SNR ratio. The lower segment of the CCD array covers the FP region (i.e., to ), and we obtained a spectral resolution of over the entire FP range using the 100 μm core diameter fibers. On the other hand, the upper segment of the CCD array covers the spectral range of 1750 to comprising the nonspecific Raman region ( to ) and the HW spectral region (i.e., 2800 to ) with a spectral resolution of . Since the dispersion is holographically encoded in the grating for both FP and HW spectral regions, the signal magnitude and resolution of a single high-density grating are essentially maintained.
We have illustrated the utility of the rapid multiplexing Raman spectroscopy system for real-time in vivo Raman measurements of epithelial tissue under wide-field endoscopic imaging (i.e., WLR/NBI/AFI) guidance. Figure 3 shows an example of in vivo Raman spectra acquired from different anatomical sites in the head and neck (i.e., attached gingiva, buccal mucosa, dorsal tongue, hard palate, and oropharynx) from a healthy volunteer under endoscopic imaging guidance. The FP and HW in vivo tissue Raman spectra can be acquired simultaneously with an integration time of 0.5 s and presented on the Raman endoscopy monitor in real-time. Highly resolved tissue Raman peaks in the head and neck are observed in the FP range with tentative molecular assignments2,3,6,8 as follows: ( proteins), ( of hydroxyapatite), ( ring breathing of phenylalanine), ( of lipids), (amide III and of proteins), ( twisting and wagging of proteins), deformation of proteins and lipids), (amide I of proteins), and of lipids. Intense Raman peaks are also seen in the HW region such as 2850 and (symmetric and asymmetric stretching of lipids), ( stretching of proteins) as well as the broad Raman band of water (OH stretching vibrations that peak at in the 3100 to region). One notes that some tissue Raman signals (e.g., ( of hydroxyapatite) of hard palate) observed using the fiber-optic confocal Raman probe in this study slightly deviate from our preceding oral tissue Raman spectra using a rigid ball-lens Raman probe.12 The discrepancies related to bone Raman signals below the masticatory mucosa could be attributed to the shallower tissue probing depth by using the fiber-optic confocal Raman probe suited for superficial epithelial tissue measurements in this work. The approximate SNR of 25 could be obtained from in vivo tissue Raman spectra at using 1.0 s integration time when the fiber-optic confocal Raman probe is in gentle contact with the buccal mucosa. Although the Raman band of water observed was relatively noisy due to the low quantum efficiency above 1090 nm of the CCD camera used, it may still contain important diagnostic information related to the local conformation and interactions of hydrogen-bonds in the cellular and extracellular space of tissue.2,3,8,13 The OH stretching vibrations have been found to be associated with aquaporins and protein/water interactions in precancer and cancer tissues.2,3,8 Therefore, compared with either FP or HW Raman spectroscopy technique alone, the multiplexing Raman spectroscopy technique utilizing a single excitation laser source together with a VPH dual-transmission grating provides both the FP and HW Raman spectra simultaneously (including OH stretching vibrations of water) with high spectral resolution (i.e., 3 to ), paving the way for an improved tissue diagnosis and characterization in vivo.8 The instrumentation development in biomedical spectroscopy reported in this work is of particular importance for Raman endoscopic applications that require rapid tissue Raman measurements in a broad spectral range without switching between different excitation laser sources or rotating the grating back and forth, as well as for those internal organs (e.g., gastric, liver, and lung) that exhibit intense tissue autofluorescence interference in the FP region but require HW Raman measurements. Currently, in vivo FP/HW Raman measurements on a larger series of patients are in progress to evaluate the clinical merits of the multiplexing Raman spectroscopy technique for improving in vivo diagnosis and characterization of early cancer in the head and neck during clinical endoscopy.
In conclusion, we report on the development of a novel multiplexing Raman spectroscopy technique for simultaneous acquisition of the FP (800 to ) and HW (2800 to ) tissue Raman spectra in vivo with high spectral resolution (3 to ). We demonstrate that high quality in vivo Raman spectra ranging from 800 to of different tissue sites in the head and neck can be measured within 1.0 s integration time during endoscopic examination. The rapid multiplexing Raman spectroscopy technique with high spectral resolution developed in this work opens the opportunity for improving real-time in vivo tissue Raman diagnosis and characterization at endoscopy.
This research was supported by the National Medical Research Council, and the Biomedical Research Council, Singapore.
H. Chauet al., “Fingerprint and high-wavenumber Raman spectroscopy in a human-swine coronary xenograftin vivo,” J. Biomed. Opt. Lett. 13(4), 040501 (2008).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2960015Google Scholar
K. LinD. LauZ. Huang, “Optical diagnosis of laryngeal cancer using high wavenumber Raman spectroscopy,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 35(1), 213–217 (2012).BBIOE40956-5663http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2012.02.050Google Scholar
M. A. Shortet al., “Using laser Raman spectroscopy to reduce false negatives of autofluorescence bronchoscopies,” J. Thorac. Oncol. 6(7), 1206–1214 (2011).JTOOB71556-0864http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182178ef7Google Scholar
Z. Huanget al., “Integrated Raman spectroscopy and trimodal wide-field imaging techniques for real-time in vivo tissue Raman measurements at endoscopy,” Opt. Lett. 34(6), 758–760 (2009).OPLEDP0146-9592http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.34.000758Google Scholar
M. S. Bergholtet al., “Fiber-optic Raman spectroscopy probes gastric carcinogenesis in vivo at endoscopy,” J. Biophoton. 6(1), 49–59 (2013).JBOIBX1864-063Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201200138Google Scholar
Z. HuangH. Zeng, “Rapid near-infrared Raman spectroscopy system for real-time in vivo skin measurements,” Opt. Lett. 26(22), 1782–1784 (2001).OPLEDP0146-9592http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.26.001782Google Scholar
S. Duraipandianet al., “Simultaneous fingerprint and high wavenumber confocal Raman spectroscopy enhances early detection of cervical precancer in vivo,” Anal. Chem. 84(14), 5913–5919 (2012).ANCHAM0003-2700http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac300394fGoogle Scholar
H. Owen, “The impact of volume phase holographic filters and gratings on the development of Raman instrumentation,” J. Chem. Educ. 84(1), 61–66 (2007).JCEDA80021-9584http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed084p61Google Scholar
S. Duraipandianet al., “Real-time biomedical Raman spectroscopy for in vivo, on-line gastric cancer diagnosis during clinical endoscopic examination,” J. Biomed. Opt. 17(8), 081418 (2012).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.8.081418Google Scholar
M. S. BergholtW. ZhengZ. Huang, “Characterizing variability in in vivo Raman spectroscopic properties of different anatomical sites of normal tissue in the oral cavity,” J. Raman Spectrosc. 43(2), 255–262 (2012).JRSPAF0377-0486http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrs.v43.2Google Scholar