Open Access
7 April 2014 Nondestructive observation of teeth post core space using optical coherence tomography: a pilot study
Takuya Minamino, Atsushi Mine, Kouta Omiya, Mariko Matsumoto, Hayaki Nakatani, Taichi Iwashita, Masato Ohmi, Hirofumi Yatani
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Coronal tooth lesions, such as caries, enamel cracking, and composite resin restoration cavities, have been observed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). This pilot study was performed to verify whether OCT could reveal details of root canals filled with resin core build-up. A dual-cure, one-step, self-etch adhesive system-bonding agent (Clearfil Bond SE ONE, Kuraray Noritake Dental) and dual-cure resin composite core material (Clearfil DC Core Automix ONE, Kuraray Noritake Dental) were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions in root canals. OCT was performed at three stages of the core build-up: after the post space preparation, after bonding application, and after resin core fabrication. The cementum was removed in the cementum absent group and the root was left untreated in the cementum present group. Bubbles were observed in the resin cores and gaps formed between the resin core and dentin. In the cementum absent group, the internal structure of the root could be visualized clearly compared with the cementum present group. The root internal structure could be observed by OCT and the image became clearer when cementum was removed.

1.

Introduction

A core build-up method using casting, molding materials, and prefabricated posts is performed in order to improve fitness and maintenance of the prosthesis in severely broken down teeth. In the past, casting metal was mainly used for core build-up; this method requires sound tooth substance removal to obtain a satisfactory fit of the metal core and dowel to the abutment tooth and there is a high risk of root fracture.1 A resin core build-up method, which has excellent tooth conservation and resistance to root fracture, has been increasingly used in recent years. However, the prosthesis is often detached at the interface of the resin build-up core and abutment tooth2 because adhesion of resin to root canal dentin is weak compared to that of coronal dentin.35 Since the conditions of root canal dentin are completely different from the coronal dentin, a detailed study on the adhesion aspects in root canal is needed.

Evaluation of adhesion is conventionally done by shear or tensile bond strength test and morphological observation by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and/or transmission electron microscope (TEM). In these methods, distortion (artifact) may occur in the bonding interface during sample preparation. In addition, if the bonding interface is mechanically weak, specimens might fracture and the evaluation may provide no data. In recent years, microcomputed tomography (μCT) is often used as a nondestructive method for root canal observation.68 It is a relatively new technique in the field of reproducible imaging and is based on the collection of two-dimensional projections of x-rays through a specimen, which are then used to reconstruct a three-dimensional image. However, the measurement procedure is time-consuming and there is a risk of radiation exposure.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a device capable of obtaining precise tomographic images of the tissue without invasion.9 OCT is based on the principle of the optical interferometer, which uses a near-infrared reflected light that passes well through living tissue and the apparatus can provide details of the structure 3mm inside from the surface in real time. Studies have reported the use of OCT in dentistry for observation of caries,10,11 soft tissue,1113 enamel cracks,14 evaluation of fit of composite resin to cavity,11,15 and observation of root canal wall.16 Nevertheless, studies to date have not evaluated the bonding interface between resin core and root canal dentin. Therefore, the aim of this study was to observe the adhesive interface between root canal and resin core build-up nondestructively using OCT.

2.

Materials and Methods

2.1.

Tooth Preparation

A total of six caries-free human teeth, including incisors and premolars with single and straight root canals, extracted due to periodontal reasons, were selected for this experiment [Fig. 1(a)]. The crown was removed using a low-speed diamond wheel saw (Maruto Instrument, Fukuoka, Japan) at the level of the cemento-enamel junction under copious water irrigation. Root canal preparation was performed using K-file (MANI, Tochigi, Japan) [Fig. 1(b)] and obturated by lateral condensation using gutta-percha points and noneugenol sealer (Canals N, Showa Yakuhin Kako, Tokyo, Japan). The teeth were then stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h.

Fig. 1

Specimen preparation and optical coherence tomography (OCT) observation timing. (a) The crown was removed. (b) The root canal was prepared and obturated. (c) The root canals were enlarged. (d) The canals were rinsed. (e) The canal was dried well. (f) The adhesive was applied and light cured. (g) All post spaces were filled with dual-cure resin composite core material.

JBO_19_4_046004_f001.png

After immersion, the specimens were randomly divided into two main groups (n=3) based on the presence or absence of cementum. The cementum was removed by a diamond quality bur (FG 102R, Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan) and the surface was polished by waterproof abrasive paper (# 600) in the cementum absent group. The cementum present group did not receive these treatments.

2.2.

Resin Core Build-Up

For both groups, the root canals were enlarged with low-speed preparation drills (FR drill, Tokuyama Dental, Tokyo, Japan) to a working length of 10 mm from the cemento-enamel junction [Fig. 1(c)]. Following preparation, the canals were rinsed with 3% ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid solution (Smear Clean, Nipponshika Yakuhin, Yamaguchi, Japan) for 2 min and followed by sodium hypochlorite gel application (AD gel, Kuraray Noritake Dental, Okayama, Japan) for 1 min. The canal was finally irrigated with distilled water [Fig. 1(d)] and then dried well with paper points [Fig. 1(e)].

A dual-cure one-step self-etch adhesive system-bonding agent (Clearfil Bond SE ONE, Kuraray Noritake Dental) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions for bonding to root canal dentin [Fig. 1(f)]. Excess adhesive resin at the bottom of the canal was removed using a paper point. The adhesive was then light-cured for 20 s with a cordless light-emitting-diode curing light (Mini LED3, Satelec, Merignac, France), which had a maximal light density of 2200mW/cm2. All post spaces were filled with dual-cure resin composite core material (Clearfil DC Core Automix ONE, Kuraray Noritake Dental) [Fig. 1(g)].

2.3.

OCT Observation

The swept-source OCT system (OCM1300SS, Thorlabs Inc., New Jersey) operated in polarization-sensitive mode without phase retardation has been used to acquire two-dimensional and three-dimensional images of ex vivo biological tissues. The system consists of the swept source engine, imaging module, and imaging probe with articulated probe mount for flexible use. The laser contained within the swept source engine has a central wavelength of 1330 nm with a bandwidth of 110 nm, scanning rate of 20 kHz, and image acquisition time of 50 frames per second. The system is capable of acquiring respective axial and lateral resolutions of 12 and 5.6 μm.

OCT observation was performed at three stages for each specimen: after the post space preparation, after bonding application, and after resin core fabrication. The observation area was 5 mm in the tooth axis direction and 3 mm in the horizontal direction for detailed view. Therefore, the image was taken two times for the tooth crown side and root apex side, i.e., to include an entire post space in the range of 10 mm tooth axis direction.

3.

Results

OCT observation revealed the root structure (cementum, dentin) and inside of the root (resin core, gutta-percha) (Fig. 2). Bubbles were observed in the resin core and a gap had formed between the resin core and dentin and at the bottom of the enlarged space. On comparing images of the coronal side [Fig. 2(a)] with that of the apical side [Fig. 2(b)], there were more bubbles in the post space, which tended to increase toward the root apex.

Fig. 2

OCT images of cementum present group after resin core build-up. (a) Coronal side. The resin core material is observed in enlarged canal space. Bubbles are observed in the resin core (arrow heads) and a gap is formed between the resin core and dentin (arrow). (b) Apical side. The gap is formed at the bottom of the enlarged space (arrow). More bubbles are trapped in the resin core (arrow heads), as compared to that of the coronal side. D, dentin; C, cementum; RC, resin core; GP, gutta-percha.

JBO_19_4_046004_f002.png

The internal structure of the root appeared blurred in the cementum present group, probably because the cementum surface reacted strongly and information could not be obtained [Fig. 3(a)]. On the other hand, in the cementum absent group, the internal structure of the root was visualized more clearly as compared with the cementum present group, and bubbles inside cured resin cores could also be observed more clearly [Fig. 3(b)]. Distribution tendency of the bubbles in the resin core and gap formation between dentin and resin core, also affected by cementum, were observed in the same manner in all samples (n=3).

Fig. 3

OCT images of cementum present group and cementum absent group. (a) Cementum present group. When the waves emitted react strongly with cementum, internal information is not obtained because the signal is lost (asterisk). (b) Cementum absent group. The bubbles in resin core are clearly observed (arrow). D, dentin; C, cement; RC, resin core.

JBO_19_4_046004_f003.png

OCT was performed in three stages of core build-up: after the post space preparation, after bonding application, and after resin core fabrication (Fig. 4). OCT image of the specimen after post space preparation revealed the interface between dentin and post space clearer than that of the specimen after bonding application. Bonding resin on dentin surface was observed. The post space was filled by resin core material; however, a gap was found between bonding resin and resin core.

Fig. 4

OCT images of each step of resin core build-up (cementum absent group). (a) After post space preparation [see Fig. 1(c)], the interface between dentin and post space is clearly indicated. The post space is filled by air. (b) After bonding application [see Fig. 1(f), the post space is still filled with air; however, bonding resin is present on dentin surface. (c) After resin core fabrication [see Fig. 1(g)], a gap is observed between bonding resin and resin core (arrow). D, dentin; P, post space; RC, resin core.

JBO_19_4_046004_f004.png

4.

Discussion

OCT enables observation of internal tissue without destroying the sample, helps understand the structure, and allows for observation of samples in real time. Transition to nondestructive testing from destructive inspection is essential for the next generation evaluation of adhesion; thus, the authors focused on OCT. In the present study, the structure of the root canal was clarified in detail by OCT observation (Fig. 2). Since OCT exhibits the characteristics of noninvasiveness, high resolution, objectivity, and concurrency, it has been reported as the latest medical imaging technology in several fields of medicine in recent years.15,17,18 In OCT, a tomographic image is built by applying an interference of near-infrared laser between the reference light and reflected light at various portions of each tissue.19 With OCT, the differences in structure and subtle composition of the organization can be clearly observed because the light is reflected at the interface of materials having different refractive indices.2022 Sumi observed caries, enamel cracking, and composite resin restoration cavity with OCT, and concluded that OCT could be used for clinical applications in dentistry because it provides a high-resolution image and is noninvasive, fast, and nondestructive.9 The present study revealed that OCT observation was feasible not only in coronal tooth but also in root canals.

It has been reported that the bonding effectiveness to tooth root canal dentin is inferior to that of tooth crown dentin.23,24 OCT observation in the present study indicated a clear gap formation between dentin and resin core, which suggests poor bonding effectiveness to root canal dentin.25,26 Moreover, since the gap is greater toward the apical side, it becomes certain that the adhesive–root dentin interface problem in the apical area is more serious than that of the coronal area. The reasons for low bonding effectiveness to root canal dentin include the influence of residual moisture in the root canal,26 insufficient polymerization light reaching the resin,27,28 and a very high C-factor.29,30 Although the present results confirmed the presence of a gap, the origin could not be located. In the future, if formation of the gap can be shown in real time by using OCT (i.e., live mode), it might be very useful to understand the mechanism of the gap formation and help to develop methods to improve the bonding effectiveness in the apical area. In addition, as for the large number of bubbles in the resin core, there is a possibility of water or air getting trapped in the root canal when the resin core was filled or in the syringe when the resin is filled. Matsumoto et al. reported that a large number of bubbles were observed in resin cores in the apical side,26 and OCT images of the present study also gave similar results. Although the resin core build-up method is used more frequently in clinical situations than before, there is still room to improve the method based on the results of the present study. Bubbles present inside the cured resin cores cause a reduction in physical properties of the cured resin cores themselves, and gaps between the resin core and dentin undoubtedly lead to a reduction in force maintenance. Considering the prognosis of the resin core build-up method, future improvements in materials and procedures are necessary to avoid the occurrence of gaps and bubbles. As an idea of reversal, if the adhesion in the apical area is insufficient, the question is whether the post hole preparation method currently used in clinics is effective. In other words, a long post hole may not be necessary during the root canal preparation. This might reduce the incidence of root fracture, which is currently a problem in clinics.31,32

Dental adhesives have been evaluated by shear or tensile bond strength tests and/or morphological observation using TEM and SEM for a long time. These methods have some shortcomings; it is difficult to evaluate specimens if the bonding effectiveness is low, in particular because external forces to the bonding interface cannot be avoided during preparation of the specimen. For example, if such a specimen is subjected to conventional bonding effectiveness evaluation, the specimen will surely fracture and measurements cannot be performed. A nondestructive test that does not exert strong force on the sample is very useful because it is possible to capture phenomena that cannot be observed in conventional adhesion evaluation. The μCT is one nondestructive testing method by which a tomographic image of a wide range can be obtained as compared with OCT. In the present study using OCT, the number of voids and gaps was higher in the apical region compared to the coronal region, as Wolf et al. reported previously using μCT.6 The resolution of OCT used in the present study was 10μm and that of μCT used in published studies, which observed inside of the tooth root, ranged from 6.64 to 28 μm.6,8 Although the resolutions of OCT and μCT were considered to be almost the same, the images of μCT were clearer than that of OCT.6,7 Moreover, the distribution of voids in root canals could be quantified in the previous studies.6,7

When OCT is used to observe the internal root for evaluation of the condition of enamel remaining on the root surface, the dentin inside appears blurred due to strong reflection that occurs at the cementum layer (Fig. 3). To our knowledge, the present study is the first to clearly reveal the impact of cementum on OCT observation. Moreover, each adhesive step of resin core build-up was clarified by observing cementum removed from specimens for the first time (Fig. 4). Strong reflection from the root surface might be caused by surface roughness. The surface roughness in the cementum absent group was less than that in the cementum present group because the surface was polished with waterproof abrasive paper after removal of the cementum, thereby reducing scattering. Even when the cementum was removed, the depth to which OCT could be observed was limited to 3 mm.33 The OCT used in the present study is the one used in the ophthalmic field, with the same conditions that are basically set for observation of soft tissues. In the future, it will be necessary to determine the most optimal conditions required to clearly observe hard tissue. Nonetheless, higher intensity and longer wavelength of light may not be required to observe hard tissues more clearly using OCT.34

The present study showed that it was difficult to visualize the root canal distinctly by OCT used in the ophthalmic field, especially when it was covered with cementum. To observe the root canal more distinctly, the tooth should be mechanically grinded to get close enough to the root canal in most cases. It is considered that further development is required in order to obtain an image with high quality with OCT, although its advantages include observation in real time and no risk of radiation exposure. Thus, it may be said that the insufficient penetration depth of OCT makes it impractical to be applied in vivo.

5.

Conclusions

Tooth roots were observed by OCT to examine the adhesive–dentin interface of resin core build-up. The root internal structure could be examined by OCT and the image became clearer when cementum was removed. In the cementum removed group, bubbles in the resin cores and gaps between resin and dentin were observed.

References

1. 

C. S. Makadeet al., “A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems—an in-vitro study,” J. Adv. Prosthodont., 3 (2), 90 –95 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.90 Google Scholar

2. 

B. J. Rasimicket al., “A review of failure modes in teeth restored with adhesively luted endodontic dowels,” J. Prosthodont., 19 (8), 639 –646 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.2010.19.issue-8 JPORCN 1059-941X Google Scholar

3. 

S. Bouillaguetet al., “Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin,” Dent. Mater., 19 (3), 199 –205 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00030-1 DEMAEP 0109-5641 Google Scholar

4. 

I. A. Mjöret al., “The structure of dentine in the apical region of human teeth,” Int. Endod. J., 34 (5), 346 –353 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00393.x IENJEA 1365-2591 Google Scholar

5. 

J. S. Kurtzet al., “Bond strengths of tooth-colored posts, effect of sealer, dentin adhesive, and root region,” Am. J. Dent., 16 31A –36A (2003). 0894-8275 Google Scholar

6. 

M. Wolfet al., “3D analyses of interface voids in root canals filled with different sealer materials in combination with warm gutta-percha technique,” Clin. Oral Investig., 18 (1), 155 –161 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0970-y 1432-6981 Google Scholar

7. 

L. Moelleret al., “Quality of root fillings performed with two root filling techniques. An in vitro study using micro-CT,” Acta Odontol. Scand., 71 (3–4), 689 –696 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.715192 AOSCAQ 0001-6357 Google Scholar

8. 

S. Sternet al., “Changes in centring and shaping ability using three nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques analysed by micro-computed tomography (μCT),” Int. Endod. J., 45 (6), 514 –523 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.2012.45.issue-6 IENJEA 1365-2591 Google Scholar

9. 

Y. Sumi, “The development of a dental optical coherence tomography system and its clinical application to the diagnosis of oral diseases,” J. Jpn. Soc. Laser Dent., 23 (3), 137 –141 (2012). Google Scholar

10. 

C. S. Azevedoet al., “Evaluation of caries-affected dentin with optical coherence tomography,” Braz. Oral Res., 25 (5), 407 –413 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242011000500006 1806-8324 Google Scholar

11. 

F. I. Feldchteinet al., “In vivo OCT imaging of hard and soft tissue of the oral cavity,” Opt. Express, 3 (6), 239 –250 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.3.000239 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

12. 

B. W. Colstonet al., “Imaging of hard- and soft-tissue structure in the oral cavity by optical coherence tomography,” Appl. Opt., 37 (16), 3582 –3585 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.37.003582 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

13. 

Z. Hamdoonet al., “Structural validation of oral mucosal tissue using optical coherence tomography,” Head Neck Oncol., 4 (1), 29 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-4-29 HNOEAE 1758-3284 Google Scholar

14. 

K. Imaiet al., “Noninvasive cross-sectional visualization of enamel cracks by optical coherence tomography in vitro,” J. Endod., 38 (9), 1269 –1274 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.008 0099-2399 Google Scholar

15. 

K. Ishibashiet al., “Swept-source optical coherence tomography as a new tool to evaluate defects of resin-based composite restorations,” J. Dent., 39 (8), 543 –548 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.05.005 JDENAB 0300-5712 Google Scholar

16. 

H. Shemeshet al., “The ability of optical coherence tomography to characterize the root canal walls,” J. Endod., 33 (11), 1369 –1373 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.022 0099-2399 Google Scholar

17. 

J. M. SchmittM. J. YadlowskyR. F. Bonner, “Subsurface imaging of living skin with optical coherence microscopy,” Dermatology, 191 (2), 93 –98 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000246523 DERMEI 0742-3217 Google Scholar

18. 

O. C. RaffelT. AkasakaJ. K. Jang, “Cardiac optical coherence tomography,” Heart, 94 (9), 1200 –1210 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.130765 1355-6037 Google Scholar

19. 

J. G. Fujimoto, “Optical coherence tomography for ultrahigh resolution in vivo imaging,” Nat. Biotechnol., 21 (11), 1361 –1367 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt892 NABIF9 1087-0156 Google Scholar

20. 

T. A. Bakhshet al., “Non-invasive quantification of resin-dentin interfacial gaps using optical coherence tomography: validation against confocal microscopy,” Dent. Mater., 27 (9), 915 –925 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.05.003 DEMAEP 0109-5641 Google Scholar

21. 

P. Makishiet al., “Non-destructive 3D imaging of composite restorations using optical coherence tomography: marginal adaptation of self-etch adhesives,” J. Dent., 39 (4), 316 –325 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.011 JDENAB 0300-5712 Google Scholar

22. 

A. Nazariet al., “Non-destructive characterization of voids in six flowable composites using swept-source optical coherence tomography,” Dent. Mater., 29 (3), 278 –286 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.004 DEMAEP 0109-5641 Google Scholar

23. 

R. M. de Meloet al., “Effect of adhesive system type and tooth region on the bond strength to dentin,” J. Adhes. Dent., 10 (2), 127 –133 (2008). Google Scholar

24. 

E. O. OnayY. KorkmazA. Kiremitci, “Effect of adhesive system type and root region on the push-out bond strength of glass-fibre posts to radicular dentine,” Int. Endod. J., 43 (4), 259 –268 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.2010.43.issue-4 IENJEA 1365-2591 Google Scholar

25. 

C. F. Reginatoet al., “Polymerization efficiency through translucent and opaque fiber posts and bonding to root dentin,” J. Prosthodont. Res., 57 (1), 20 –23 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2012.05.003 Google Scholar

26. 

M. Matsumotoet al., “Mechanical and morphological evaluation of the bond-dentin interface in direct resin core build-up method,” Dent. Mater., 29 (3), 287 –293 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.003 DEMAEP 0109-5641 Google Scholar

27. 

A. Yamamotoet al., “Influence of light intensity on dentin bond strength of self-etch systems,” J. Oral Sci., 48 (1), 21 –26 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.48.21 JORSF3 1343-4934 Google Scholar

28. 

A. PeutzfeldtE. Asmussen, “Resin composite properties and energy density of light cure,” J. Dent. Res., 84 (7), 659 –662 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400715 JDREAF 0022-0345 Google Scholar

29. 

S. Bouillaguetet al., “Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin,” Dent. Mater., 19 (3), 199 –205 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00030-1 DEMAEP 0109-5641 Google Scholar

30. 

F. R. Tayet al., “Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach,” J. Endod., 31 (8), 584 –589 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000168891.23486.de 0099-2399 Google Scholar

31. 

P. AxelssonB. NyströmJ. Lindhe, “The long-term effect of a plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 30 years of maintenance,” J. Clin. Periodontol., 31 (9), 749 –757 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpe.2004.31.issue-9 JCPEDZ 0303-6979 Google Scholar

32. 

K. Matsudaet al., “Incidence and association of root fractures after prosthetic treatment,” J. Prosthodont. Res., 55 (3), 137 –140 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2010.10.003 Google Scholar

33. 

B. Bistaet al., “Nondestructive assessment of current one-step self-etch dental adhesives using optical coherence tomography,” J. Biomed. Opt., 18 (7), 76020 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.7.076020 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

34. 

J. G. Fujimoto, “Optical coherence tomography: introduction,” Handbook of Optical Coherence Tomography, 1 –40 Marcel Dekker, New York, NY (2002). Google Scholar

Biographies of the authors are not available.

© 2014 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 0091-3286/2014/$25.00 © 2014 SPIE
Takuya Minamino, Atsushi Mine, Kouta Omiya, Mariko Matsumoto, Hayaki Nakatani, Taichi Iwashita, Masato Ohmi, and Hirofumi Yatani "Nondestructive observation of teeth post core space using optical coherence tomography: a pilot study," Journal of Biomedical Optics 19(4), 046004 (7 April 2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.4.046004
Published: 7 April 2014
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 9 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Optical coherence tomography

Cements

Teeth

Nondestructive evaluation

Adhesives

Interfaces

Astronomical imaging

Back to Top