Over the past two decades, optical methods have been widely employed to obtain information about the absorption and scattering content of biological tissues.1 Recently, spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) has been developed to extract spatially resolved tissue properties at multiple wavelengths from reflectance measurements at multiple spatial frequencies.2 SFDI studies have typically employed wavelengths in the near-infrared (NIR) (650 to 1000 nm).
Expanding the wavelength range of SFDI to include the short-wave infrared (SWIR) can potentially provide increased sensitivity to water3 and lipids,3,4 both of which have absorption features throughout the SWIR that are more prominent than those found in the NIR. Thus, SWIR imaging has the potential to complement NIR imaging approaches.5
SWIR optical sensing of skin has previously been employed to spectrally characterize porcine6,7 and human8,9 skin properties. However, these measurements have largely been performed on ex-vivo tissue samples using integrating sphere based techniques.67.8.–9
In this letter, we report on integration of SFDI methods, which we have previously described elsewhere,1,2,10 with planar illumination and a SWIR camera capable of spectral imaging from 850 to 1800 nm. This combination of SWIR instrumentation and a hybrid SFDI procedure (using data from both structured and uniform planar light) enables us to obtain tissue absorption and scattering spectra well into the SWIR wavelength range.
The outline of this hybrid SFDI technique is as follows: (1) SFDI data from 850 to 1050 nm is employed to extract the tissue reduced scattering coefficient using a Monte Carlo fitting method. (2) The reduced scattering coefficients are fit with a power law to extrapolate the scattering spectrum at SWIR wavelengths. (3) The reflectance data from unstructured illumination and the extrapolated scattering spectrum are employed to solve for the absorption spectrum over the entire wavelength range. The hybrid SFDI method can extract tissue optical properties over a greatly expanded wavelength range (850 to 1800 nm) that has not been heavily explored by SFDI or other tissue optics methods.
Here, for a proof-of-principle experiment, we employed this hybrid SFDI procedure to characterize SWIR tissue optical properties in an in vivo rat model of partial-thickness burns. Following the controlled rat burn protocol, detailed in Nguyen et al. , partial thickness burns were produced on the lateral side of a shaved 500 g Sprague–Dawley rat using a brass burn comb heated to 100°C. The comb was placed in contact with the skin for 8 s, producing four deep partial thickness burn areas, in size. Upon conclusion of the experiment, the burn areas were resected and prepared for histological examination. This in vivo preclinical work was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at University of California, Irvine (#1999-2064).
The imaging setup for the rat burn measurements is similar to that employed previously,10 except with a SWIR camera for detection. The sample was illuminated with multiple spatially modulated patterns of broadband light from a tungsten halogen lamp projected through a digital micromirror device (DMD, Texas Instruments, Dallas, Texas).2 A Raytheon Vision Systems minSWIR camera was employed to detect reflectance over 850 to 1800 nm. The camera contained an InGaAs detector array and a SB373 CMOS readout, and the lens was attached to a Perkin-Elmer (Waltham, Massachusetts) liquid crystal tunable filter (#131928 LNIR 850 to 1800 nm, at 850 nm, at 1790 nm). The camera integration time was set to 32 ms. Images were acquired preburn and postburn. At both time points, the data consisted of reflectance images taken in 50 nm steps from 850 to 1800 nm, using three spatial frequencies: 0, , and . A solution of 2% Intralipid9 was used as a reference phantom.
Data Analysis Methods and Results
With the hybrid SFDI method, we can use both efficiently transmitted unstructured light in the SWIR range and spatially modulated wavelengths in the NIR to extract the absorption coefficient () and reduced scattering coefficient () spectra over the entire 850 to 1800 nm range. First, spatially resolved maps of and were obtained at the five shortest wavelengths (850, 900, 950, 1000, and 1050 nm) by fitting the spatial frequency-dependent reflectance images pixel-by-pixel to a Monte Carlo model10 of light transport. The extracted maps at the aforementioned five wavelengths were fit with a power-law model: , where is the wavelength of the light and is a “reference” wavelength (set here to 850 nm). This power law is a well-known approximation for bulk tissue scattering1112.–13 and has previously been shown (via comparison with integrating sphere data) to be an accurate model for the scattering coefficient of biological tissue over the 850- to 1800-nm wavelength range.8,9 This procedure produced spatial maps of the reduced scattering amplitude and slope .
Second, a power law was employed to extrapolate the reduced scattering spectrum over the 1100 to 1800 nm range.12 This method has been extensively employed in the time/frequency domain for diffuse optical spectroscopy “point-measurement” studies of breast and skin.12,13 Here, we have extended the approach to SFDI. The mean spectra over a region of interest were calculated for the rat tissue preburn and postburn (Fig. 1). Over this region of interest, the () value of the reduced scattering amplitude was calculated to be prior to the burn and at postburn, while the value of the reduced scattering slope was calculated to be prior to the burn and at postburn. This result suggests that the scattering parameters and have the potential to distinguish between burned and nonburned tissues as we have seen in our NIR rat burn studies.10
Finally, the extrapolated values were employed to extract the maps from the unstructured illumination reflectance images.12 The extracted scattering amplitude and absorption coefficient obtained by this hybrid SFDI method at 1350 nm are shown in Fig. 2 for rat tissue preburn and postburn. We use 1350 nm as a representative example of an SWIR wavelength at which water absorption is notably () greater than at the 970 nm NIR absorption peak.14 The mean preburn and postburn SWIR spectra over the region of interest denoted by the white box in Fig. 2 are shown in Fig. 3. As Fig. 3 suggests, many of the detected SWIR wavelengths (especially those in the 1100 to 1600 nm range) have the potential to provide maps that may provide insight into tissue functional status, such as changes in hydration/edema, as suggested by Fig. 2. For instance, we report an absorption coefficient (attributed primarily to water in the SWIR regime) of normal rat tissue that is greater at 1200 nm [Fig. 3(b)] than at 1000 nm [Fig. 3(a)] and greater at 1450 nm [Fig. 3(c)] than at 1000 nm.
The multispectral SWIR data illustrate a mean postburn increase of greater than 10% in over the 1150 to 1800 nm range. This change is attributed to increased water fraction caused by edema, as previously observed in partial-thickness burns using SFDI in the NIR regime.10 The SWIR data also show a postburn decrease in from 850 to 900 nm, a postburn increase of 16% in the reduced scattering amplitude, and a postburn increase of 11% in the reduced scattering slope. Similar burn-related trends in absorption and reduced scattering slope were observed in Ref. 10, attributed to changes in hemoglobin content and denaturation of collagen, respectively.
Discussion and Conclusions
This proof-of-principle experiment was constrained by several factors. First, at many wavelengths greater than 1050 nm that are associated with water absorption, the signal-to-noise ratio of the collected reflectance at spatial frequencies greater than was insufficient to determine optical properties by direct fit. Second, the light engine, through which excitation from the source must pass in order to obtain structured illumination, is a source of significant transmission loss through the optical system. Third, the integration of the SWIR camera with the SFDI system was not optimized to maximize SNR for the entire wavelength range (due to proprietary software constraints related to the Raytheon SWIR camera). Future work will involve refinements to the light delivery and detection method over the entire 850 to 1800 nm range, to improve signal-to-noise and enhance precision in the SWIR reflectance and tissue optical property measurements.
In this study, we have combined an SFDI system with a SWIR camera that detects light from 850 to 1800 nm. This experiment serves as a proof of principle for two key concepts: (1) integration of SFDI with unstructured illumination and (2) use of this hybrid SFDI technique to measure tissue optical properties over an expanded wavelength range (850 to 1800 nm). As a specific biological example, we used the hybrid SFDI method to quantify in vivo burn related changes in the optical properties of rat skin over this wide wavelength range, which is not typically employed in SFDI experiments. The SWIR range provides two key advantages for enhanced tissue characterization: lower relative to the NIR (enabling a increase in penetration depth at some wavelengths, such as 1100 nm, as compared to a typical penetration depth in the 650 to 1000 nm range8) and increased sensitivity to absorption from water and lipids.15,16 These features of the SWIR regime also suggest potential for quantitative, noninvasive, wide-field burn severity analysis, which will be the topic of our future study.
R.H.W. was supported by a fellowship from the Hewitt Foundation for Medical Research. K.P.N. was supported by the NSF IGERT (Grant 1144901). F.B.J. was internally funded by Raytheon Vision Systems. Additional support is provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH-R21EB014440 and NIH-R21NS078634), the NIH/NIBIB funded P41EB015890, the Military Medical Photonics Program (FA9550-10-1-0538), and the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation.
T. D. O’Sullivanet al., “Diffuse optical imaging using spatially and temporally modulated light,” J. Biomed. Opt. 17(7), 071311 (2012).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.7.071311Google Scholar
D. J. Cucciaet al., “Quantitation and mapping of tissue optical properties using modulated imaging,” J. Biomed. Opt. 14(2), 024012 (2009).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3088140Google Scholar
R. Nachabéet al., “Estimation of lipid and water concentrations in scattering media with diffuse optical spectroscopy from 900 to 1600 nm,” J. Biomed. Opt. 15(3), 037015 (2010).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3454392Google Scholar
I. Bargigiaet al., “Time-resolved diffuse optical spectroscopy up to 1700 nm by means of a time-gated InGaAs/InP single photon avalanche diode,” Appl. Spectrosc. 66(8), 944–950 (2012).APSPA40003-7028http://dx.doi.org/10.1366/11-06461Google Scholar
Q. Caoet al., “Multispectral imaging in the extended near-infrared window based on endogenous chromophores,” J. Biomed. Opt. 18(10), 101318 (2013).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.10.101318Google Scholar
E. Zamora-Rojaset al., “Optical properties of pig skin epidermis and dermis estimated with double integrating spheres measurements,” Innov. Food Sci. Emerging Technol. 20, 343–349 (2013).1466-8564http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2013.06.008Google Scholar
A. Bashkatovet al., “Optical properties of human skin, subcutaneous and mucous tissues in the wavelength range from 400 to 2000 nm,” J. Phys. D 38(15), 2543–2555 (2005).JPAPBE0022-3727http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/38/15/004Google Scholar
T. L. TroyS. N. Thennadil, “Optical properties of human skin in the near infrared wavelength range of 1000 to 2200 nm,” J. Biomed. Opt. 6(2), 167–176 (2001).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.1344191Google Scholar
J. Q. Nguyenet al., “Spatial frequency domain imaging of burn wounds in a preclinical model of graded burn severity,” J. Biomed. Opt. 18(6), 066010 (2013).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.6.066010Google Scholar
S. L. Jacques, “Origins of tissue properties in the UVA, visible, and NIR regions,” in Advances in Optical Imaging and Photon Migration, R. R. AlfanoJ. G. Fujimoto, Eds., TOPS 2, pp. 364–371, Optical Society of America, Washington, DC (1996).Google Scholar
F. Bevilacquaet al., “Broadband absorption spectroscopy in turbid media by combined frequency-domain and steady-state methods,” Appl. Opt. 39(34), 6498–6507 (2000).APOPAI0003-6935http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.39.006498Google Scholar
S.-H. Tsenget al., “Chromophore concentrations, absorption and scattering properties of human skin in vivo,” Opt. Express 17(17), 14599–14617 (2009).OPEXFF1094-4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.014599Google Scholar
E. M. Attaset al., “Near-IR spectroscopic imaging for skin hydration: the long and the short of it,” Biopolymers 67(2), 96–106 (2002).BIPMAA0006-3525http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0282Google Scholar