Translator Disclaimer
22 May 2015 Rare-earth-doped nanophosphors for multicolor cathodoluminescence nanobioimaging using scanning transmission electron microscopy
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We describe rare-earth-doped nanophosphors (RE-NPs) for biological imaging using cathodoluminescence (CL) microscopy based on scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). We report the first demonstration of multicolor CL nanobioimaging using STEM with nanophosphors. The CL spectra of the synthesized nanophosphors (Y2O3:Eu, Y2O3:Tb) were sufficiently narrow to be distinguished. From CL images of RE-NPs on an elastic carbon-coated copper grid, the spatial resolution was beyond the diffraction limit of light. Y2O3:Tb and Y2O3:Eu RE-NPs showed a remarkable resistance against electron beam exposure even at high acceleration voltage (80 kV) and retained a CL intensity of more than 97% compared with the initial intensity for 1 min. In biological CL imaging with STEM, heavy-metal-stained cell sections containing the RE-NPs were prepared, and both the CL images of RE-NPs and cellular structures, such as mitochondria, were clearly observed from STEM images with high contrast. The cellular CL imaging using RE-NPs also had high spatial resolution even though heavy-metal-stained cells are normally regarded as highly scattering media. Moreover, since the RE-NPs exhibit photoluminescence (PL) excited by UV light, they are useful for multimodal correlative imaging using CL and PL.

1.

Introduction

Light microscopy (LM) and electron microscopy (EM) are widely used cellular imaging methods. LM is a useful method for imaging biomolecules stained with fluorescent probes in the fields of biology and medicine. Staining with multiple fluorescent probes such as dyes,1 quantum dots (QDs),2,3 and fluorescent proteins4,5 allows simultaneous visualization of the distributions of individual biomolecular species with different emission spectra, and imaging with multiple labeling provides information about biological molecular interactions. On the other hand, EM gives us fine structural information about cellular components, such as the membrane, mitochondria, and endoplasmic reticulum.

The spatial resolution of EM is higher than that of LM because the spot size of a focused electron beam is on the order of nanometers. Furthermore, EM allows us to observe a molecular species at nanoscale resolution through immunostaining with gold nanoparticles (GNPs).6,7 More than one kind of molecular species can be identified by using GNPs of different sizes.89.10 There is also a method capable of identifying different types of biomolecules by using the sizes and shapes of QDs.11

The spatial resolution achievable with LM is limited to submicrometer order by the diffraction limit of light,12 and discrimination of different kinds of biomolecules using EM is still difficult because EM images are monochromatic, not color. These limitations of LM and EM hamper the detailed understanding of cellular functions in life processes, especially in the case of complex distributions of molecules.

Cathodoluminescence (CL) is one candidate that fills this functional gap between LM and EM. CL is the light emission from a material induced by accelerated electrons. The spatial resolution of CL microscopy reaches the nanometer scale because the spot size of an electron beam is on the order of nanometers, and the CL color depends on the material.13 Therefore, by using suitable imaging probes, CL microscopy enables multicolor biological imaging with nanoscale spatial resolution. To exploit these benefits, we have previously reported biological CL imaging with rare-earth-doped nanophosphors (RE-NPs) based on a combined scanning electron microscopy–cathodoluminescence (SEM-CL) technique.14,15 Several research groups have also studied SEM-CL imaging.1617.18.19 However, SEM-CL imaging has difficulty in imaging cellular structural information due to a low contrast image, even samples stained with heavy metals such as osmium and uranium.

The scanning transmission electron microscopy–cathodoluminescence (STEM-CL) method20,21 is also a promising technique for realizing multicolor biological imaging with nanoscale spatial resolution. It is known that images of cellular structure (e.g., organelles, membranes, and macromolecules) obtained with STEM using thin cell sections stained with heavy metals have high contrast. To reveal the detailed cellular functions at nanoscale resolution, simultaneous observation of both structural information and protein distributions is quite important. Furthermore, higher spatial resolution and higher contrast are obtained compared with SEM-CL because the acceleration voltage of STEM (80 to 200 kV) reduces the electron scattering volume compared with SEM (typical acceleration voltage: 30kV).

Here, we describe multicolor biological imaging using CL microscopy based on STEM, with Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb RE-NPs, which have high resistance against electron beam irradiation and narrow spectral bandwidth. Using these nanophosphors allows simultaneous cellular structural imaging by STEM and multicolor imaging by CL. In addition, multimodal imaging using LM is also demonstrated using the same nanophosphors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of an imaging technique in which RE-NPs are applied to CL biological imaging using STEM.

2.

Imaging System

2.1.

STEM-CL System

Our CL system based on an STEM instrument (JEM-2100F) is illustrated in Fig. 1. CL is collected by a parabolic mirror, forming parallel rays. The parallel rays exit the STEM instrument through a quartz window. The CL is focused onto a slit of a spectrometer (Andor, SR163, f=163mm, F/3.6) by a lens and is detected by an electron multiplying (EM)-CCD detector (Andor, DU920p-BU) for spectral imaging.

Fig. 1

Cathodoluminescence (CL) detection system combined with a scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) instrument.

JBO_20_5_056007_f001.png

The electron beam is controlled via the beam scanning system of the transmission electron microscopy/STEM instrument using an external PC and is scanned on the specimen. CL from the specimen is obtained by the EM-CCD for a certain duration at each point. Using the EM-CCD detector, the emission spectrum is detected for each pixel, realizing spectral imaging at each wavelength. Since the STEM and CL signals are simultaneously obtained by the external PC and the electron beam is scanned step-by-step to observe these images, the position of each pixel in the STEM image is identical to that in the CL image.

2.2.

Fluorescence Imaging System

For cellular fluorescence imaging using RE-NPs, we used an Hg-Ar lamp (Ocean Optics, CAL-2000) as a UV excitation light source. Only 254-nm UV light was used for the excitation light, by using a bandpass filter (Semrock, Hg-01-254). A UV objective lens (Nikon, UV50×A, NA=0.4, WD=11mm) was used. Fluorescence bandpass filters were used for detection (for red emission: Semrock, FF01-615/20-25; for green emission: Semrock, FF01-550/32-25). The fluorescence was detected by an EM-CCD camera (Andor, Luca S).

3.

Preparation of Specimens

3.1.

Synthesis of RE-NPs

For the imaging probes, we used Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb RE-NPs. Y2O3-based RE-NPs are well-known materials for the application of CL to display devices and exhibit high intensity, narrow spectral bandwidth, and high stability against electron beam irradiation at acceleration voltages <30Kv.22 Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb NPs were synthesized using the homogeneous precipitation (HP) method.23 The HP method is a nanophosphor synthesis method that produces nanophosphors of uniform size and spherical shape. Urea was used as the precipitant for homogeneous phosphor precursors. The precipitation reaction proceeds in the whole solution because the pH of the solution is increased by the hydrolysis reaction of urea into ammonia at about 80°C.

As the activator ions, Eu and Tb were selected for red and green phosphors, respectively. Rare-earth nitrates [Y(NO3)3, Eu(NO3)3 and Tb(NO3)3] were used as starting materials for the synthesis without further purification (all rare-earth nitrates were purchased from Kojundo Chemical Laboratory). The concentrations of Eu and Tb ions in the starting material solution were 5 mol % and 2 mol %, respectively, expressed as the concentrations of metal ions. Rare-earth nitrates were dissolved into 40 mL of distilled water to obtain a concentration of 4 mM. The solutions were stirred for 5 min. Urea (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.) was added into the rare-earth nitrate solutions, and the solutions were stirred for 2 h at 80°C. Phosphor precursors started to precipitate in the solution derived from the hydrolysis reaction of urea. Finally, the obtained precursor nanoparticles and urea were separated by ultra-centrifugation (25,000 rpm, 10 min) performed three times and were annealed at 900°C for 1 h.

3.2.

Cellular Specimens for STEM-CL Imaging and Fluorescence Imaging

Details of the specimen preparation for biological STEM-CL imaging and fluorescence imaging with HeLa cells are given here.

HeLa cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) at 37°C in 5% CO2. A distilled deionized water (DDW) solution that contained the two kinds of nanophosphors, Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb, was prepared at a concentration of 0.1mg/mL (the concentrations of Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb were both 0.05mg/mL). The nanophosphors in the solution were dispersed by ultrasound for 10 min. The 200μL of the solution containing the dispersed nanophosphors was added to 2 mL DMEM solution in a cell culture dish, and the phosphors were introduced into the HeLa cells via endocytosis for 1 day.

The cells were fixed using 2.4% glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M Millonig’s phosphate buffer at room temperature for 30 min. Postfixation was performed in 2% osmium tetroxide aqueous solution at 4°C for 1 h. After the fixation process, the specimen was rinsed three times in buffer solution. To enhance the membrane contrast for observation using STEM, samples were treated with 0.15% tannic acid in buffer solution for 1 min and immediately rinsed with the buffer and DDW. Poststaining was performed with 1% uranium acetate at 4°C for 1 h, and the specimens were washed. Dehydration was carried out with ethanol (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100% in triplicate, for 5 min at each concentration). The specimens were embedded in Quetol-821 epoxy resin (Nisshin EM) via the following process. The specimens were first treated with an ethanol–epoxy mixture (2:1 ethanol:epoxy resin) for 2 h, followed by treatment with an ethanol–epoxy mixture having a different concentration (1:2 ethanol:epoxy resin) for 12 h. The resin mixture was then replaced with fresh 100% resin, and the specimens were treated with this resin for 2 h. After this, the resin was again replaced with fresh 100% resin. The epoxy was then polymerized with the sequence: 45°C for 12h60°C for 48h45°C for 12 h. The epoxy molded samples were sliced to 100-nm thin sections using an ultramicrotome. The sliced thin section of the cell was placed on an elastic carbon-coated copper grid (Okenshoji Co., Ltd., SHR-C075 STEM Cu75P).

For fluorescence imaging, in the incubation process, cells were prepared in culture dishes with quartz windows at the bottom to allow the 254-nm UV light to pass through and to avoid background fluorescence from the window. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Wako) after injection of the Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb nanophosphors, and the cells were observed using the fluorescence microscope described previously.

4.

STEM-CL Imaging and Characterization of Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb Nanophosphors

First, we measured the CL spectra of the synthesized Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb nanophosphors on the elastic carbon-coated copper grids using the STEM-CL system in Fig. 1. Figure 2 shows normalized CL intensity spectra of Y2O3:Eu (red) and Y2O3:Tb (green) nanophosphors. The emission at around 600 nm from Eu3+ ions is due to the magnetic dipole transition D05F17, which is insensitive to the symmetry of the lattice field, and the most intense emission around 615 nm is derived from the electric dipole transition D05F27.22 In the Tb3+ ions, electric and magnetic dipole transitions are induced regardless of the symmetry of the lattice field, and the peak in the luminescence intensity is maximum around 545 nm (D45F57).22 Since the most intense emission bands between Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb had almost no overlap and were very narrow, these two kinds of spectra are easy to distinguish.

Fig. 2

Spectra of Y2O3:Tb and Y2O3:Eu nanophosphors synthesized by homogeneous precipitation (HP) method (slit size: 0.1 nm, blaze wavelength: 400 nm, groove density: 150L/mm).

JBO_20_5_056007_f002.png

In biological CL imaging, bleaching of probes due to high-energy electron exposure has been a crucial problem especially for organic fluorophors.24 In inorganic materials, although QDs have high quantum efficiency and high resistance against light exposure,25 they are easily bleached by electron beam exposure (data not shown). To confirm the stability under electron beam exposure, we examined the CL intensity of Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb as a function of time (Fig. 3). The electron beam was focused at one point on each phosphor, and the CL intensity was monitored. The acceleration voltage of the electrons was set to 80 kV. Intensity decreases of about 1% and 3% were observed for 60 s exposure in the Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb samples, respectively. The intensity decrease of the phosphors includes the effect of hydrocarbon contamination from the elastic carbon-supported copper grid and the epoxy resin, thus the actual intensity decay of these phosphors will be smaller.

Fig. 3

Stability of CL intensity against electron beam exposure (Y2O3:Eu nanophosphors synthesized by homogeneous method).

JBO_20_5_056007_f003.png

The CL stability of these phosphors was high enough to achieve imaging even after long-term exposure with high acceleration voltage electrons. This suggests that Y2O3-based RE-NPs are suitable phosphors for biological CL imaging using the STEM-CL method. It is known that these types of phosphors are stable for low acceleration voltages (about 3 kV).26 So far, use of these phosphors for biological measurement of CL intensity using a STEM-CL system has not been reported yet. Our experiments showed that these phosphors can also be used at high acceleration voltage (80 kV). Moreover, our results show the possibility of repeatable observation using STEM with multiple colors.

Figure 4 shows STEM and CL images of Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb nanophosphors. The two contacting particles were spatially resolved, indicating that the spatial resolution of the CL images was a few tens of nanometers, which is obviously beyond the diffraction limit of light. A possible reason for the high spatial resolution is the high acceleration voltage of this STEM system. Since a higher acceleration voltage prevents scattering of electrons in both the membrane and the phosphors, the excitation volume of CL is close to the size of the focused electron beam spot. The obtained CL images had high contrast compared with typical SEM-CL images because of the high CL intensity induced by the high acceleration voltage and the high beam current of the electron beam. The low scattering volume also gives high-contrast images since it prevents undesired CL from nonphosphor areas.15 The aforementioned results demonstrate the suitability of these phosphors and our STEM-CL system for biological CL imaging.

Fig. 4

STEM and CL images of Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb nanophosphors synthesized by HP method. (a) and (b) Interlaced STEM image and CL image of Y2O3:Eu. (c) and (d) Interlaced STEM image and CL image of Y2O3:Tb.

JBO_20_5_056007_f004.png

5.

Cellular STEM-CL and Fluorescence Imaging of HeLa Cells Using Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb Nanophosphors

We demonstrated multicolor biological STEM-CL imaging with nanoscale spatial resolution by using RE-NPs. Figure 5 shows STEM and color CL images of a HeLa cell containing Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb introduced by endocytosis. The acceleration voltage and current were 80 kV and 2 nA, and the exposure time for CL images was set to 100ms/pixel. From the STEM image, nanophosphors were observed in the endocytotic vesicle, and mitochondria and nanophosphors were both clearly observed in the cell structure. The sizes of the introduced nanophosphors were 300 nm (Y2O3:Eu) and 500 nm (Y2O3:Tb). Although it was not possible to discriminate the two kinds of nanophosphors from the STEM image [Fig. 5(a)], the nanophosphor species could be identified from the CL spectra [Figs. 5(c) and 5(d)]. The spatial resolution of the CL images was beyond the diffraction limit of light.

Fig. 5

STEM and CL images of Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb nanophosphors in 100 nm thin section of HeLa cell. (a) STEM image of 100 nm thin section of HeLa cell with introduced nanophosphors, (b) partial view of STEM image of HeLa cell with introduced nanophosphors, (c) and (d) CL images of nanophosphors (Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb) in a cell.

JBO_20_5_056007_f005.png

Since the contrast of these CL images was similar to that of the CL images of phosphors dispersed on elastic carbon-coated copper grid [Figs. 4(b) and 4(d)], it was found that light obstruction due to the biological composition was negligible. In this multicolor biological imaging, crosstalk of the emission from Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb did not hinder discrimination of the phosphor emission. Although cellular regions stained with heavy metals (osmium and uranium) are considered to cause scattering of the electron beam, almost no undesired CL due to scattering from the cellular region was observed in the CL images. The reason for this is the sufficiently high acceleration voltage and sufficiently thin cellular section. It is known that some types of proteins and lipids emit autofluorescence,2728.29 but such fluorescence did not affect the image contrast in this experiment. Since the CL signal from the cellular region was negligibly small, the contrast was maintained compared with CL images of phosphors dispersed on the elastic carbon-supported copper grid. These results imply that our biological STEM-CL imaging might be suitable for color EM. In recent years, synthesis of RE-NPs of 20 to 60 nm in diameter using the hydrothermal method has been reported.30 It may be possible to apply methods of this kind to the synthesis of Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb nanophosphors.

It is possible to excite Y2O3-based RE-NPs with not only an electron beam but also UV light.31 Thus, multimodal multiscale imaging using CL microscopy and fluorescence microscopy is possible using the same probes. Figure 6(a) shows photoluminescence spectra of Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb nanophosphors under 254-nm UV excitation. The inset shows a photograph of the photoluminescence. The shapes of the spectra are similar to those of the CL spectra, and the most intense peaks did not spectrally overlap. Figures 6(b) to 6(d) show transmission, photoluminescence, and merged (transmission, red fluorescence, and green fluorescence) images of a HeLa cell containing Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb. These nanophosphors were identified with their emission wavelengths. Although some aggregated phosphors were not resolved spatially, imaging of a large area in wet conditions was possible.

Fig. 6

(a) Emission spectra of Y2O3:Eu, Y2O3:Tb, (b) transmission, (c) green fluorescence, (d) red fluorescence, and (e) merged images of Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb nanophosphors contained in a HeLa cells. Y2O3:Eu, and Y2O3:Tb nanophosphors were excited by 254-nm UV light.

JBO_20_5_056007_f006.png

These nanophosphors can be used in correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM). CLEM is one kind of bimodal imaging method for biological observation, which combines the advantages of both LM and EM.3233.34 The combination of LM and EM offers more information about biological specimens than either method alone. However, in typical CLEM, multicycle observation of a thin-sectioned sample using LM and EM is not possible due to bleaching of fluorescence probes after irradiation with an electron beam. Our probes make it possible to store stained biological samples, like immunogold-stained samples, which can then be repeatedly used. In addition, fluorescence imaging in wet conditions makes it easy to check the sample condition before carrying out the time-consuming sample preparation process required for CL imaging (e.g., molding, sectioning).

For imaging with deeper penetration and less autofluorescence using LM, upconversion fluorescence imaging is an effective approach.35,36 We have already proposed multimodal/correlative microscopy using Y2O3:Tm, Yb (thulium and ytterbium doped yttria) nanophosphors, which are excited by both an electron beam and near-infrared light.37 This multimodal microscopy, allowing observation at different scales using LM and CL, may contribute to the discovery of new cellular and molecular functions and will improve the effectiveness of our imaging technique.

6.

Summary

Multicolor high-resolution microscopy of biological specimens was performed using a STEM-CL system. CL images of Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb nanophosphors introduced into cells and heavy-metal-stained cellular structure were observed using the STEM-CL system. The CL spectra of the synthesized nanophosphors were sufficiently narrow to distinguish them from each other, and the spatial resolution of the CL images was sufficiently high to image biological molecules at a resolution beyond the diffraction limit of light. The Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb RE-NPs showed remarkable resistance against electron beam exposure even at a high acceleration voltage (80 kV) and kept a high CL intensity for 1 min. CL images of the RE-NPs nanophosphors in cells and the cellular structure, such as mitochondria and endocytotic vesicle, were clearly observed from the STEM image with high contrast. The spatial resolution of cellular CL imaging using RE-NPs was not reduced much, even though heavy-metal-stained cells are usually regarded as highly scattering media.

Y2O3:Eu and Y2O3:Tb RE-NPs will be useful phosphors for biological STEM-CL imaging at high spatial resolution beyond the diffraction limit of light, and the application of this immunostaining method will allow us to identify protein species at high spatial resolution with cellular structural information.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Area “Nanomedicine Molecular Science” (No. 2306) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, a grant from Kazato Research Foundation for “Kazato Research Encourage Prize 2015,” Tokyo, Japan, and a grant from the Amada Foundation for “Encouraged Research,” Kanagawa, Japan.

References

1. 

N. Panchuk-Voloshina et al., “Alexa dyes, a series of new fluorescent dyes that yield exceptionally bright, photostable conjugates,” J. Hystochem. Cytochem., 47 (9), 1179 –1188 (1999). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002215549904700910 JHCYAS 0022-1554 Google Scholar

2. 

X. Michalet et al., “Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics,” Science, 307 (5709), 538 –544 (2005). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1104274 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

3. 

V. M. Alexander, P. L. Choyke and H. Kobayashi, “Fluorescent molecular imaging: Technical progress and current preclinical and clinical applications in urogynecologic diseases,” Curr. Mol. Med., 13 (10), 1568 –1578 (2013). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1566524013666131111125758 CMMUBP 1566-5240 Google Scholar

4. 

O. Shimomura, F. H. Johnson and Y. Saiga, “Extraction, purification and properties of aequorin, a bioluminescent protein from the luminous hydromedusan, aequorea,” J. Cell. Comp. Physiol., 59 223 –239 (1962). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1553-0809 JCCPAY 0095-9898 Google Scholar

5. 

R. N. Day and M. W. Davidson, “The fluorescent protein palette: tools for cellular imaging,” Chem. Soc. Rev., 38 2887 –2921 (2009). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b901966a CSRVBR 0306-0012 Google Scholar

6. 

J. W. Stirling, “Immuno- and affinity probes for electron microscopy: a review of labeling and preparation techniques,” J. Histochem. Cytochem., 38 (2), 145 –157 (1990). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/38.2.2405054 JHCYAS 0022-1554 Google Scholar

7. 

M. C. Risueno and P. S. Testillano, “Cytochemistry and immunocytochemistry of nucleolar chromatin in plants,” Micron, 25 (4), 331 –360 (1994). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0968-4328(94)90004-3 MICNB2 0047-7206 Google Scholar

8. 

B. L. Wang and L. I. Larsson, “Simultaneous demonstration of multiple antigens by indirect immunofluorescence or immunogold staining. Novel light and electron microscopical double and triple staining method employing primary antibodies from the same species,” Histochemistry, 83 (1), 47 –56 (1985). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00495299 HCMYAL 0301-5564 Google Scholar

9. 

R. S. Petralia et al., “Selective acquisition of AMPA receptors over postnatal development suggests a molecular basis for silent synapses,” Nat. Neurosci., 2 (1), 31 –36 (1999). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/4532 NANEFN 1097-6256 Google Scholar

10. 

H. J. Geuze et al., “Use of colloidal gold particles in double-labeling immunoelectron microscopy of ultrathin frozen tissue sections,” J. Cell Biol., 89 (3), 653 –665 (1981). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.89.3.653 JCLBA3 0021-9525 Google Scholar

11. 

B. N. G. Giepmans et al., “Correlated light and electron microscopic imaging of multiple endogenous proteins using quantum dots,” Nat. Methods, 2 743 –749 (2005). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth791 1548-7091 Google Scholar

12. 

M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, (1980). Google Scholar

13. 

B. G. Yacobi and D. B. Holt, Cathodoluminescence Microscopy of Inorganic Solids, Plenum, New York (1990). Google Scholar

14. 

H. Niioka et al., “Multicolor cathodoluminescence microscopy for biological imaging with nanophosphors,” Appl. Phys. Express, 4 112402 (2011). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/APEX.4.112402 1882-0778 Google Scholar

15. 

T. Furukawa et al., “High-resolution microscopy for biological specimens via cathodoluminescence of Eu- and Zn-doped Y2O3 nanophosphors,” Opt. Express, 21 (22), 25655 –25663 (2013). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.025655 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

16. 

E. Kimura et al., “Cathodoluminescence imaging for identifying uptaken fluorescence materials in Kupffer cells using scanning electron microscopy,” Arch. Histol. Cytol., 67 (3), 263 –270 (2004). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1679/aohc.67.263 AHCYEZ 0914-9465 Google Scholar

17. 

P. J. Fisher et al., “Enhanced biological cathodoluminescence,” Opt. Commun., 281 1901 –1908 (2008). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2007.04.069 OPCOB8 0030-4018 Google Scholar

18. 

Y. Nawa et al., “Dynamic and high-resolution live cell imaging by direct electron beam excitation,” Opt. Express, 20 (5), 5629 –5635 (2012). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.005629 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

19. 

D. R. Glenn et al., “Correlative light and electron microscopy using cathodoluminescence from nanoparticles with distinguishable colours,” Sci. Rep., 2 865 (2012). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep00865 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

20. 

N. Yamamoto and K. Araya, “Photon emission from silver particles induced by a high-energy electron beam,” J. Phys. Rev. B, 64 205419 (2001). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.205419 PRBMDO 1098-0121 Google Scholar

21. 

N. Yamamoto, S. Ohtani and F. J. G. de Abajo, “Gap and Mie plasmons in individual silver nanospheres near a silver surface,” Nano Lett., 11 91 –95 (2011). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl102862x NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

22. 

W. M. Yen, S. Shionoya and H. Yamamoto, Phosphor Handbook, CRC, Florida (2007). Google Scholar

23. 

N. Venkatachalam, Y. Saito and K. Soga, “Synthesis of Er3+ doped Y2O3 nanophosphors,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 92 (5), 1006 –1010 (2009). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jace.2009.92.issue-5 JACTAW 0002-7820 Google Scholar

24. 

J. Niitsuma et al., “Cathodoluminescence investigation of organic materials,” J. Electron Microsc., 54 325 –330 (2005). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmicro/dfi043 JELJA7 0022-0744 Google Scholar

25. 

J. K. Jaiswal and S. M. Simon, “Potentials and pitfalls of fluorescent quantum dots for biological imaging,” Trends Cell Biol., 14 (9), 497 –504 (2004). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2004.07.012 TCBIEK 0962-8924 Google Scholar

26. 

T. Nagata, T. Nakayama and H. Murakami, “Low voltage cathodoluminescent properties of Y2O3-based nano-particle phosphors,” in SID’07 Digest, 1328 –1331 (2007). Google Scholar

27. 

T. Ito et al., “Color cathodoluminescence images and cathodoluminescence spectra analysis of biological materials,” Acta Histochem. Cytochem., 19 (5), 621 –633 (1986). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1267/ahc.19.621 ACHCBO 0044-5991 Google Scholar

28. 

T. Nakano et al., “Application of analytical color fluorescence electron microscopy to biomedical field: I. Vitamin A ester in rat retina,” Acta Histochem. Cytochem., 23 (6), 753 –767 (1990). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1267/ahc.23.753 ACHCBO 0044-5991 Google Scholar

29. 

T. Nakano, H. Koike and K. Ogawa, “Analytical color fluorescence electron microscopy of adrenal cortex,” Microsc. Res. Tech., 36 454 –462 (1997). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0029 MRTEEO 1059-910X Google Scholar

30. 

M. K. Devaraju, S. Yin and T. Sato, “Tm3+-doped Y2O3 nanocrystals: rapid hydrothermal synthesis and luminescence,” Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., (29–30), 4441 –4445 (2009). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejic.200900511 EJICFO 1434-1948 Google Scholar

31. 

R. Ozawa, “Photoluminescence of rare earth elements in Y2O3 and the application for their quantitative analysis,” Bunseki-kiki, 6 (2), 108 –117 (1968). Google Scholar

32. 

T. M. Svitkina and G. G. Borisy, “Correlative light and electron microscopy of the cytoskeleton of cultured cells,” Methods Enzymol., 298 570 –592 (1998). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(98)98045-4 MENZAU 0076-6879 Google Scholar

33. 

T. M. Svitkina et al., “Mechanism of filopodia initiation by reorganization of a dendritic network,” J. Cell Biol., 160 409 –421 (2003). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200210174 JCLBA3 0021-9525 Google Scholar

34. 

C. Smith, “Two microscopes are better than one,” Nature, 492 293 –297 (2012). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/492293a NATUAS 0028-0836 Google Scholar

35. 

S. F. Lim et al., “In vivo and scanning electron microscopy imaging of upconverting nanophosphors in caenorhabditis elegans,” Nano Lett., 6 (2), 169 –174 (2006). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl0519175 NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

36. 

M. Nyk et al., “High contrast in vitro and in vivo photoluminescence bioimaging using near infrared to near infrared upconversion in Tm3+ and Yb3+ doped fluoride nanophosphors,” Nano Lett., 8 (11), 3834 –3838 (2008). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl802223f NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

37. 

S. Fukushima et al., “Y2O3:Tm, Yb nanophosphors for correlative upconversion luminescence and cathodoluminescence imaging,” Micron, 67 90 –95 (2014). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2014.07.002 MICNB2 0047-7206 Google Scholar

Biographies for the authors are not available.

© 2015 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 1083-3668/2015/$25.00 © 2015 SPIE
Taichi Furukawa, Shoichiro Fukushima, Hirohiko Niioka, Naoki Yamamoto, Jun Miyake, Tsutomu Araki, and Mamoru Hashimoto "Rare-earth-doped nanophosphors for multicolor cathodoluminescence nanobioimaging using scanning transmission electron microscopy," Journal of Biomedical Optics 20(5), 056007 (22 May 2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.5.056007
Published: 22 May 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top