The retina, located at the back of the eye, is a neural system responsible for capturing light photons, converting light energy to bioelectrical activities, and conducting preliminary processing of visual information. Given its delicate function, the retina consists of multiple cell types working together as a complex neural network (Fig. 1). In brief, all vertebrate retinas consist of three layers of nerve cell bodies;1 i.e., the outer nuclear layer (ONL), inner nuclear layer (INL), and ganglion cell layer (GCL). There are also two layers of synapses; i.e., the outer plexiform layer (OPL) and inner plexiform layer (IPL). The ONL contains cell bodies of rod and cone photoreceptors, the INL contains cell bodies of the bipolar, horizontal, and amacrine cells, and the GCL contains cell bodies of ganglion cells and displaced amacrine cells. Moreover, the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) supports the rod and cone photoreceptors. The outer limiting membrane (or external limiting membrane) is situated at the bases of the rod and cone photoreceptor inner segments, and the inner limiting membrane is the boundary between the retina and the vitreous body.
It is known that age-related macular degeneration (AMD),2 retinitis pigmentosa, glaucoma,3,4 diabetic retinopathy (DR),5,6 and other eye diseases can produce retinal neural dysfunctions. Different eye diseases can damage different functional layers and cells, causing localized lesions or cell loss at early stages of the disease. For instance, it is established that rods are more vulnerable than cones in early AMD.7,8 Currently, there is no established strategy to allow objective assessment of localized rod dysfunction at high resolution. Because of the complex retinal structure, early detection of eye diseases and reliable evaluation of treatment outcomes require high-resolution examination of retinal morphology and physiology. Optical approaches, such as fundus imaging9,10 and angiography examination,11 are valuable for disease detection and treatment evaluation. By rejecting out-of-focus background light, the scanning laser ophthalmoscope10,1213.–14 can provide enhanced image quality compared to a conventional fundus camera. Further integration of adaptive optics (AO) has enabled cellular resolution examination of retinal morphology.1516.17.18.–19 Given the unprecedented capability to differentiate individual functional layers, optical coherence tomography (OCT)20 has been extensively employed for depth-resolved examination of morphological abnormalities associated with eye diseases.218.104.22.168.26.–27 However, morphological (structural) and physiological (functional) abnormalities in the retina are not always directly correlated,2,28,29 in terms of the time window and spatial location. In principle, distortions of physiological functions can occur before detectable cell loss and corresponding layer thickness changes in the retina. Therefore, functional evaluation of retinal physiology is important for early detection and reliable treatment assessment of eye diseases. Psychophysical methods, such as the Amsler grid test, visual acuity,30,31 hyperacuity perimetry,32 and microperimetry,3334.35.–36 are practical in clinical applications, but they involve higher order cortical processing. In other words, they do not provide exclusive information of retinal physiology and lack the sensitivity required for early disease detection. Electrophysiological approaches such as electroretinography (ERG)37 can be used for objective examination of retinal physiology. In general, it is believed that the a-wave of classic full-field ERG reflects the physiological function of retinal photoreceptors, and the b-wave reflects the physiological function of inner retinal neurons, particularly ON-bipolar cells. However, given the fact that the ERG represents the integral activity of retinal photoreceptors and inner neurons, the clinical interpretation of alterations in full-field ERG components produced by eye diseases can be difficult. Moreover, classical full-field ERG does not provide spatial information in a lateral direction. The focal ERG3839.40.41.–42 and multifocal ERG43,44 have been used to provide limited lateral resolution. Reliable identification of localized dysfunction of different cell types requires a method that can provide an objective evaluation of stimulus-evoked physiological activities at a high resolution. Although it is possible to combine morphological (e.g., high resolution OCT) with physiological (e.g., ERG) evaluation45 to improve retinal study and disease detection, conducting these separate measurements is cost-inefficient and time-consuming. Moreover, the relationship between low spatial resolution in low resolution ERG and high resolution optical imaging is complicated for clinical interpretations.
Stimulus-evoked intrinsic optical signals (IOSs), such as transient light scattering and birefringence changes (Fig. 2), have been demonstrated in endocrine cells,46,47 brain cortex,4849.50.–51 retina,5253.54.55.56.22.214.171.124.61.–62 and other neural tissues.6364.65.–66 Because IOS images are constructed through computer-based dynamic differentiation of retinal images recorded at pre- and post-stimulus periods,6768.–69 concurrent structural and functional assessment can be naturally achieved at a high resolution. Functional IOS imaging promises a useful complement to ERG for objective measurement of retinal physiological function.70,71 However, clinical deployment of functional IOS imaging is still challenging due to unclear signal sources and limited signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). In this article, we provide a systematic review of the study of retinal IOSs. In the following sections, we will describe the definition of fast IOSs (Sec. 2), nonimaging study of retinal IOSs (Sec. 3), in vitro imaging of retinal IOSs (Sec. 4), and in vivo imaging of retinal IOSs (Sec. 5). Current understanding of IOS mechanisms, and technical challenges and the potential of functional IOS imaging of human retinas are discussed in Sec. 6, before the conclusion in Sec. 7.
Definition of Stimulus-Evoked Intrinsic Optical Signals
The IOS is a common name referring to stimulus-evoked changes of all types of intrinsic optical properties, such as transient light scattering, polarization, and absorption fluctuations in excitable tissues and cells. In principle, both stimulus-evoked neural activity as well as subsequent hemodynamic and metabolic changes can produce dynamic optical changes. While hemodynamic and metabolic signals72 can provide important information in the functional assessment of the blood circulation system, they are relatively slow and cannot directly track fast neural activities in the retina and other neural systems. Fast light scattering and birefringence changes (Fig. 2) have been observed in electrically activated nerve tissues.63,73,74 Without the involvement of exogenous chromophores, as in fluorescence microscopy, these rapid light changes reflect intrinsic property dynamics in excitable cells and tissues. As shown in Fig. 2, the typical IOS unit is , where is the stimulus-evoked magnitude change and is the background light magnitude before the stimulation delivery. The fast IOS in Fig. 2 shows a tight correlation with corresponding electrophysiological kinetics. During the past years, extensive efforts have been undertaken to pursue functional IOS mapping of physiological activities in the brain.50,7576.77.–78 A systematic review of IOS mechanisms has been provided by Rector et al.79 In brief, stimulus-evoked structural changes of neural tissues at both molecular and cellular levels may produce transient light scattering and birefringence changes.80,81 The activation of sodium channels, inducing a reorientation of the peptide bonds, may alter the polarization property of scattered light.82 In vitro studies of isolated nerve tissues have suggested that the polarization property of scattered light can also be affected by transient changes in the cylindrical shape of nerve fibers.63,74 Neuron swelling/shrinkage due to water fluxes correlated with ion exchanges may lead to a reduction in the polarization measurement.66,83,84 The additional water may also increase light transparency of the nerve tissues, and thus reduce the detectable scattered light.65,85
Early Study of Retinal Intrinsic Optical Signals
Photoproducts of rhodopsin bleaching play a significant role in the retina, such as alternating light sensitivity or affecting the time course of light adaptation.86126.96.36.199.–91 Each photoproduct such as meta I, meta II, and meta III corresponds to characteristic absorption peaks of visible light. Early studies revealed that ganglion cell sensitivity is inversely affected by the concentration of meta II in the retina,86,90 and the recovery of the ERG b-wave also has a tight correlation to photoproducts of rhodopsin bleaching.92 Visible light spectral measurement of photoproducts of rhodopsin bleaching in animal93 and human94 retinas has provided insights into a better understanding of retinal information processing. However, the visible probe light can involve further rhodopsin bleaching and thus contaminates the original bleaching stimulation. Alternatively, a near-infrared (NIR) (typically 700 to 900 nm) probe light has been used to measure transient IOS changes in rod outer segment (ROS) suspensions and isolated retinas.
Light-Evoked Intrinsic Optical Signal Changes in Rod Outer Segment Suspensions
Light-evoked IOSs have been detected in ROS suspensions.52,54,56,57,95188.8.131.52.–100 Figure 3(a) represents three IOS components in bovine ROS suspensions:54,100 (1) a rhodopsin signal associated with the meta I → meta II transition;101 (2) a binding signal, related to R*-G complex formation, and (3) a dissociation signal observed when guanosine triphosphate is present, related to nucleotide exchange and dissociation of the complex and synchronous with the triggering of phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity.101 Photoexcitation associated outer segment disk swelling/shrinkage has been proposed to explain these observed IOSs.96,97,102 Recently, transient morphological change of photoreceptor outer segments was unambiguously observed in intact retinas.103,104
Light-Evoked Intrinsic Optical Signal Changes in Isolated Retinas
Single-channel photodetectors were also used to detect integral NIR light scattering,58,59 transmission,52,55,61 and birefringence changes105106.–107 in isolated retinas, which enabled quantitative investigation of phototransduction, light adaptation, bleaching desensitization, and G-protein kinetics in intact photoreceptors.58,59,108,109 Figures 3(b) and 3(c) represent IOS study of isolated bovine retinas. As shown in Figs. 3(b) and 3(c), the rising phase of the IOS in intact photoreceptors had a consistent time course (time to peak). However, the time course of the recovery-phase varied significantly and could be affected by recording angles relative to the axis of the illumination light.58 This observation suggested that a single process dominates the early phase IOS, while multiple processes may contribute to the recovery-phase IOS. A low- medium has been used to verify the IOS correlation to retinal photoreceptors [Fig. 3(c1)]. The experiment with background illumination control suggested that the early phase IOS arises largely or entirely from events within the rods [Fig. 3(c2)]. Subsequent studies suggested that the early phase IOS most likely correlates to PDE activation.58 While these experiments consistently detected light-evoked IOS in retinal photoreceptors, other experiments suggested possible IOSs existed in inner retinal layers.61,68 Given the complex retinal structure (Fig. 1), high-resolution imaging is desirable for better study of the IOSs in stimulus activated retinal neural networks.
In vitro Intrinsic Optical Signal Imaging of Isolated Retinas
Several versions of digital microscopes have been used for IOS imaging of the retina at cellular spatial resolution and millisecond temporal resolution.67,110,111 Both microlens arrays (MLAs) and line-scanner-based confocal systems have been explored for selective IOS imaging of retinal photoreceptors.112,113 Time-domain OCTs have been used in in vitro study of IOS changes in animal retinas.68,114,115
Microscopic Imaging of Retinal Intrinsic Optical Signals
Figure 4 represents a modified conventional light microscope for transmitted light microscopy of transient IOSs in isolated retinas. The imaging system consists of two; i.e., visible and NIR, light sources. The visible light is used for retinal stimulation, and the NIR light is used for IOS imaging. The visible light stimulator was a fiber-coupled white light-emitting diode with central wavelength at 550 nm (wavelength band: 450 to 650 nm). The NIR light was produced by using a halogen lamp with a bandpass filter (wavelength band: 800 to 1000 nm). A high-speed camera is used for dynamic mapping of stimulus-evoked IOSs in the retina. A multiple electrode array system is used for concurrent ERG measurement of retinal activation.
High-speed (100 to 1000 Hz) digital cameras67 were used to validate high-resolution () imaging of retinal IOSs. Figure 5 represents the IOS images recorded from the retinal photoreceptor layer, in which the photoreceptor mosaic could be clearly observed. High-resolution IOS images revealed both negative (decreasing) and positive (increasing) signals (Fig. 5). Both fast and slow IOSs were observed. While the fast rising-phase IOS could reach a magnitude peak (arrowheads, Fig. 5) within tens of milliseconds after the stimulus delivery; slow recovery-phase IOS lasted a relatively long time (many seconds). This observation is consistent with the early IOS study shown in Fig. 3. Given the fact that high-resolution imaging could differentiate localized IOSs with opposite (positive and negative) polarities, it is noteworthy that large IOSs could often exceed 5% in individual pixels [Fig. 5(d)]. The substantial improvement in optical sensitivity allows functional imaging with subcellular resolution in single passes.110 Optical sensitivity could improve further with dark-field and polarization imaging.110
By changing the light focus, functional IOS images could also be collected for inner retinal layers (Fig. 6). This indicated that multiple IOS sources exist in the retina, which is consistent with early IOS studies of eyecup slices61 and isolated retinas.68 Dynamic microscopy imaging of retinal slices, which simultaneously open whole cross sections from retinal photoreceptor to ganglion cell layers, further confirmed the existence of IOSs in both outer and inner retinal layers.118 In addition to IOS measurements of normal retinas, comparative investigation of wild-type and mutant mouse retinas with rod degeneration has been conducted to demonstrate IOS distortions in diseased retinal photoreceptors, and enhanced spontaneous IOS changes were observed in the inner layers of the diseased retinas.70
Confocal Imaging of Retinal Intrinsic Optical Signals
While conventional light microscopes can provide high-resolution measurement of retinal IOSs, signal contaminations among adjacent retinal volumes may exist due to possible light diffusion among neighboring volumes. To detect IOSs specifically from the retinal photoreceptor layer, an MLA-based imager was developed.112 This imager used an MLA-based illuminator to simultaneously deliver visible stimulus light and NIR recording light at the retinal photoreceptor layer. The parfocal configuration of the stimulus and recording light illumination enabled confocal recording of retinal IOSs (Fig. 7). Because the MLA stimulation/recording spots were widely separated on the retina, and only photoreceptors within the MLA stimulation/recording spots were stimulated, the potential IOS crosstalk effect among neighboring retinal volumes was minimized. The experiment revealed robust IOS activities tightly correlated with localized retinal responses. Localized IOS responses with magnitude peaks up to 40% were consistently observed [Fig. 7(a)]. Because both the visible stimulus and the NIR recording light were focused at the photoreceptor layer, and because of the very short IOS delay after stimulus onset, it was believed that the observed IOSs primarily resulted from the activities of retinal photoreceptors. An alternative line-scan approach was also explored to demonstrate confocal IOS recording of retinal photoreceptors.113 Subsequent in vivo IOS and ERG study confirmed that confocal IOS was predominantly attributed to retinal photoreceptor responses.71 More details are discussed in Sec. 5.
Functional Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Retinal Intrinsic Optical Signals
Yao et al. demonstrated the first in vitro OCT recording of retinal IOS changes in isolated frog retinas in 2005.68 By using an electro-optic phase modulator (EOPM) to achieve nonmoving-parts OCT, depth-resolved OCT detected IOS changes at both outer and inner retinal layers [Fig. 8(a)]. The EOPM-based OCT was recently combined with a line-scan strategy to achieve rapid functional IOS imaging of living frog eyecups.115 Bizheva et al. reported an in vitro OCT study of rabbit retinas in 2006.114 As shown in Fig. 8(b), stimulus-evoked IOS changes were observed in the inner/outer segments of the photoreceptor layer and the plexiform layers. Comparative pharmacological treatments of the rabbit retinas confirmed that the origin of the observed optical changes is the altered physiological state of the retina evoked by the light stimulus [Fig. 8(b)].
In Vivo Intrinsic Optical Signal Imaging
Fundus Imaging of Retinal Intrinsic Optical Signals
Figures 9 and 10 represent fundus IOS imaging of anesthetized cats121 and monkeys,120 respectively. In the cats, a negative response was typically recorded, and a positive response was also occasionally observed in the adjacent area of the stimulation pattern. Both these positive and negative IOSs showed a rise time on the order of seconds, similar to those observed in the mammalian neocortex. Relative experiments indicated that the spectral dependency of the signals on illumination was similar to the absorbance spectra of hemoglobin and the oximetric relationship.131 Therefore, it was believed that the dominant mechanism of these IOSs was associated with hemodynamic changes. Pharmacological treatments supported that these observed IOSs might be attributed to the outer retina.121 However, other groups reported additional IOSs that might be attributed to the inner retina.120,132
For the monkey experiment, as shown in Fig. 10, three retinal locations were measured: (1) the fovea; (2) the posterior retina between the macula and inferior temporal artery; and (3) the optic disk (Fig. 10). The overall IOS in the stimulated retina showed a negative response compared to the prestimulus baseline [Fig. 10(b)], which is generally consistent with the IOS observed in cat retinas (Fig. 9). The fast IOSs at the fovea and the posterior retina were thought to be derived from retinal photoreceptors and are not related to changes in the blood flow or blood oxygenation levels in the retina or choroid. In contrast, the slow IOSs at the posterior pole and the optic disk are thought to be derived from blood flow increases in the vessels and capillaries triggered by retinal ganglion cells.120
Confocal Ophthalmoscopy of Retinal Intrinsic Optical Signals
A line-scan imager has been demonstrated for confocal IOS imaging of intact frogs.71,133 Figure 11(a) illustrates the schematic diagram of the line-scan confocal ophthalmoscope for in vivo confocal IOS imaging. The line-scan confocal imaging system consisted of two light sources: NIR for IOS recording and visible green for retinal stimulation. The NIR light was produced by a superluminescent laser diode with a center wavelength of 830 nm. A single-mode fiber coupled 532-nm green laser was used to produce the visible light stimulation with low power, or to create localized retinal injury with increased light power. The leopard frog (Rana pipiens) was selected to take advantage of the high-quality optics of the ocular lens134 and the large size of the retinal photoreceptors (cone, ; rod, ).135 Together, these characteristics made it possible to resolve individual photoreceptors [blue arrowhead in Fig. 11(b)] and blood vessels [yellow arrowheads in Figs. 11(b) and 11(c)] in vivo.
Figure 12 represents the line-scan confocal imaging of retinal IOSs in intact frogs. The stimulus-evoked IOSs were mixed with intrinsically hemodynamic changes [Fig. 11(b)]. Retinal blood vessels can be mapped based on dynamic optical changes correlated with blood flow136 [Fig. 12(c)]. This strategy was adapted to separate stimulus-evoked fast IOSs in retinal photoreceptors from blood flow-induced optical change [Fig. 12(c)]. Both positive and negative IOSs were observed almost immediately after retinal stimulation. Figure 12(d) shows the IOS pattern by plotting absolute IOS magnitudes.
To investigate the signal source of the confocal IOS, IOSs and ERG were recorded and compared at variable stimulation intensities over a 5.0 log unit range in nine steps: , , , , , , , , and 0.0. Stimulus flashes were presented at 2-min intervals (Fig. 13). IOS and ERG recordings were consecutively collected in the same frog eye. Figures 13(a) and 13(b) show representative IOS magnitudes and full-field ERG waveforms corresponding to variable stimuli. It was typically observed that the IOS occurred almost immediately after the stimulus delivery, reaching peak magnitude within 150 ms. ERG a-wave, b-wave, and IOS magnitudes and times to peaks were normalized in Figs. 13(c) and 13(d), respectively. It is well established that the full-field ERG a-wave reflects the physiological function of retinal photoreceptors.137 Since the overall trend of IOS magnitudes was consistent with that of the full-field ERG a-wave amplitude, including the threshold and peak value, under variable stimulation conditions it was believed that the confocal-IOS signals predominantly originate from retinal photoreceptors. Both magnitudes and rising-phase time courses of the IOS and a-wave showed similar responses to stimulus intensity changes. However, the time to the peak of IOSs fell between the a-wave and b-wave [Fig. 13(d)]. It is well established that the a-wave leading edge is dominated by retinal photoreceptors, and the later phase is truncated by electrophysiological responses of inner retinal neurons, particularly ON bipolar cells. Figure 14(a) represents a typical integral ERG, and Fig. 14(b) shows a carton diagram of retinal photoreceptors and inner neurons. It is well accepted that the integral ERG can separate into three components: PI reflecting RPE changes, PII reflecting ON bipolar changes, and PIII reflecting photoreceptor changes. As shown in Fig. 14(c), if a pure photoreceptor response is recorded, i.e., postphotoreceptor neurons are blocked, the a-wave may need more time to recover back to the baseline, which results in a longer time to reach a peak compared with the a-wave of a full-field ERG.138139.140.–141 From this perspective, if we assume the rising-phase IOSs originate from retinal photoreceptors, the measured time to peak of the IOS should be longer than that of the a-wave of a full-field ERG, which is consistent with the experimental results in Fig. 13.
To demonstrate the feasibility of IOS mapping of localized retinal dysfunction, a laser lesion was introduced into a frog eye after a control measurement (Fig. 15). To produce a localized retina laser injury, a width 532-nm green laser (FC-532-020-SM-APC-1-1-ST; RGBLase LLC, Fremont, California) with output power of 1 mW at the retina surface was continuously delivered for 30 s.71 Thirty minutes after the laser exposure, the IOS imaging was conducted again with the same full-field stimulation. From the morphological images of Figs. 15(a1) and 15(b1), it is hard to detect any difference. However, functional IOS images showed dramatic differences in the eye before [Fig. 15(a2)] and after [Fig. 15(b2)] the laser injury.
Functional Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Retinal Intrinsic Optical Signals
Both time-domain (TD)68,114,115 and spectral-domain (SD)63,126127.128.–129 OCTs have been explored for depth-resolved IOS recording of stimulus-evoked retinal activities. Moreover, a recent study also revealed optical (and textural) changes on OCT images in patients with DR, which were thought to be correlated with metabolic changes in the retina.142
Srinivasan et al. demonstrated the first in vivo SD-OCT of retinal IOS changes in rat retinas in 2006.126 Spatiotemporal OCT imaging revealed an increase in backscatter from the photoreceptor outer segments in rat retinas (Fig. 16). Recently, in vivo SD-OCT of retinal IOS changes in other animal127,128 and human129 retinas has been validated. Better study of IOS mechanisms and further development of functional OCT instruments promise depth-resolved assessment of retinal physiology at unprecedented resolution.
To achieve subcellular identification of IOS sources, we employed a custom-designed SD-OCT with subcellular spatial resolution in three dimensions () and millisecond temporal resolution (500 Hz).130,143 Equipped with a retinal stimulator and fundus camera, the custom-designed SD-OCT was employed for three-dimensional dissection of retinal IOSs in intact frogs. The integrated fundus camera can provide real time enface mapping to guide the transverse location of OCT B-scan recording (Fig. 17). As shown in Fig. 17(b1), the blood vessels around the optic nerve head (ONH) can be clearly observed, thus easily enabling localization of OCT B-scan imaging required for IOS measurement. Figure 17(b) illustrates an OCT B-scan image across the ONH. Figure 17(b3) shows comparative OCT and histological images of the frog retina with individual layers labeled. The custom-designed OCT provided subcellular resolution to separate photoreceptor outer/inner segments from other retinal layers and the supporting tissues, such as the choroid and sclera [Fig. 17(b3)]. An adaptive algorithm was developed to achieve a high SNR in a single-pass IOS recording.
Transient IOSs, which might reflect an early stage of light phototransduction, are consistently observed at photoreceptor outer segments almost immediately () after retinal stimulation. This is consistent with the confocal IOS images shown in Figs. 7, 11, and 12. Comparative studies of dark- and light-adapted retinas demonstrate the feasibility of functional OCT mapping of rod and cone photoreceptors.130 As shown in Figs. 18(a) and 18(e), both positive and negative IOSs are consistently observed in adjacent retinal areas, which further confirmed that high resolution is essential for functional IOS imaging. Given the excellent OCT resolution in both transverse () and axial () directions, high sensitivity is ensured to achieve robust IOS recording from single-pass measurements [Figs. 18(a2) and 18(a3)], without an averaging requirement for multiple trials. In order to demonstrate the repeatability of the IOS recording, Fig. 18(c) illustrates averaged positive and negative IOSs of six recording trials from the same retina with identical stimulus parameters where both positive and negative IOSs occurred within 10 ms, with similar time courses [Fig. 18(d)]. In order to characterize the onset time of the observed IOSs, the OCT frame speed was increased to 500 Hz, with a reduced frame size () for the experiment represented in Fig. 19. With 2-ms temporal resolution, the IOSs were unambiguously detected as early as at 4 ms (Fig. 19).
Figures 19(d) and 19(e) show the representative IOSs of individual pixels. It was observed that localized IOSs can have different time courses. For instance, the IOS at the position (, ) increased rapidly upon stimulation and reached the peak within 50 ms, while the IOS at position (, ) increased almost linearly after the stimulus. Again, both positive and negative IOSs were consistently observed in adjacent retinal areas.
With short flash (10 ms) stimulation, transient IOSs were predominantly observed in the outer retina, although slow IOSs were sparsely observed in the inner retina [Fig. 20(a1)]. In contrast, prolonged (500 ms) stimulation evoked robust IOSs in both the outer and inner retinal layers (Fig. 20). As shown in Figs. 20(a1), 20(a2), 20(b1)–20(b3), and 20(c1)–20(c3), early phase IOSs were consistently confined to the outer retina; i.e., photoreceptor outer segments. After 1–2 s, later phase IOSs spread into the inner retina [Figs. 20(a2) and 20(c3)] with 500-ms prolonged stimulation. As shown in Fig. 20(e), the IOSs of photoreceptor outer segments occurred immediately after the stimulus onset underwent sharp changes at first and then linear changes until reaching a plateau [Fig. 20(e4)]. However, the onset time of IOSs in inner retinal layers, such as the IPL and OPL, was delayed to [Figs. 20(e1)–20(e2)].
Phototransduction associated IOSs were first observed in ROS suspensions and isolated retinas (Fig. 3). The ROS suspensions provided a simple preparation to investigate rhodopsin, binding, and dissociation signals,100 which are important for understanding phototransduction processes in retinal photoreceptors.109 The morphological structure and physiological function of an intact retina are much more complicated compared to that of the ROS suspension. Light-evoked IOSs have been observed in both retinal photoreceptor and inner retinal layers. The IOSs observed in the retinal photoreceptor layer can be reasonably linked to light changes observed in ROS suspensions, although the integral effect of multiple IOS sources is relatively complicated. High-resolution transmission microscopy revealed positive and negative IOSs in adjacent areas (Fig. 5). This implies that spatial resolution is important for the sensitivity of IOS imaging. Without the necessary resolution to separate positive and negative IOSs, the recording sensitivity can be adjusted due to the integral effect of the IOSs with opposite polarities.
High-speed confocal ophthalmoscopy has been developed to conduct in vivo IOS imaging of intact animals (Fig. 12). It is generally believed that retinal photoreceptors are highly scattering and can dominate the confocal signal when an unambiguous photoreceptor mosaic is observed. Comparative ERG study supported the confocal IOS being predominantly attributed to retinal photoreceptors (Fig. 13). In vivo functional OCT imaging further confirmed retinal photoreceptors as a primary source of the positive and negative IOSs (Fig. 18). Functional OCT imaging of dark- and light-adapted frog retinas has demonstrated the potential of functional IOS mapping of rod and cone photoreceptors.130 There are several mechanisms that may explain the IOSs with mixed polarities (positive and negative). As shown in Fig. 3(a), both binding and release of G-proteins to photoexcited rhodopsin might contribute to the positive (increasing) and negative (decreasing) IOSs.54 Localized biochemical processes might also produce transient refractive index changes, and thus produce positive and negative IOSs in adjacent areas. Photoreceptor outer segment disk swelling/shrinkage has been proposed to interpret the IOSs observed in ROS suspensions,96,97,102 which may also contribute to the IOSs observed in the photoreceptor layer of intact retinas. The rod photoreceptors have been proposed as the dominant source of the IOSs observed in isolated retinas. Recently, high spatiotemporal resolution imaging revealed transient phototropic changes in mouse and frog retinas activated by oblique light stimulation.103 Quantitative analysis indicated that the transient phototropic change was predominated by rod photoreceptors. Subsequent OCT examination revealed photoreceptor outer segments as the primary source of the transient phototropic change,104 which might be reasonably linked to the rod disk swelling/shrinkage associated IOSs. The transient rod phototropism may provide a unique biomarker for functional mapping of rod physiology at high resolution, promising a new method for early disease detection and improved treatment of AMD and other eye diseases that can cause photoreceptor damage. It is well established that the rod photoreceptors are more vulnerable than cone photoreceptors at the onset stage of AMD.7,8 Currently, there is no established strategy to allow objective assessment of localized rod dysfunctions at high resolution. Moreover, the transient rod phototropism may also provide valuable information for better understanding of the nature of the Stiles–Crawford effect (SCE). The SCE is known to be predominantly observed in cone photoreceptors. However, why the SCE is absent in rod photoreceptors is still a mystery. Since the transient rod phototropism can rapidly (onset: for frog and 5 ms for mouse; time to peak: for frog; and 30 ms for mouse103) follow the direction of the visible light, it might quickly compensate for the loss of luminous efficiency due to oblique illumination. In contrast, such directional movement was negligible in retinal cones.103
Functional OCT has also revealed additional IOSs in inner retinal layers (Fig. 20). Compared to the IOSs of the outer retina, the IOSs of the inner retina showed relatively slow time courses. The delayed IOS response in the inner retina is consistent with early study of living retinal tissues.118 The observed slow IOSs in the inner retina may involve complications of nonlinear information processing and retinal adaptation mechanisms, and may also be partially attributed to stimulus-evoked hemodynamic changes.128 Improved imaging speed, with enhanced SNR, is required to record action potentials associated with fast IOSs of inner retinal neurons, such as ganglion cells. Currently, it is still challenging to detect fast IOSs directly correlated with action potentials. Ganglion cells consist of many subtypes regarding morphology and density receptive field properties, and resolution is still far below the axon diameter propagation at various speeds. Thus, IOSs may be canceling each other out and/or have a complexity that needs adequate stimulus protocols to dissect. Better investigation of the IOS sources and mechanisms in the inner retina may lead to a new method to advance the study and diagnosis of glaucoma and other eye diseases that may affect inner retinal function.
In vivo IOS imaging of human retinas has been explored using conventional fundus,119 AO,123124.–125 and OCT129 instruments. While these pilot studies have produced promising IOS results, reliable mapping of fast IOSs tightly correlated with electrophysiological changes of human retinas is still challenging. The dominant challenge is potential contamination of stimulus-associated metabolic changes and eye movements with fast IOS imaging. Recent studies suggested that dynamic differential IOS data processing can provide a practical strategy to reduce the effect of metabolic and hemodynamic changes.71,144 Rapid line-scan71 and functional OCT130 of intact frogs have proven that accurate image registrations can correct subpixel level eye movements. Further integration of dynamic eye tracking system in the confocal and OCT imagers may compensate for eye movements of human subjects.145 Additional integration of AO123124.–125 and super-resolution146,147 imaging techniques may enhance the IOS sensitivity and specificity.
Multiple IOS sources exist in the outer and inner retinal layers. To date, rapid line-scan confocal and functional OCT instruments have allowed robust in vivo observation of transient IOS changes in retinal photoreceptors of intact animals. We expect that better instrument and software improvements of the line-scan and functional OCT instruments may provide a feasible solution to pursue functional IOS mapping of human retinal photoreceptors. Further improvements, such as imaging speed, contrast, and SNR, of the IOS imaging technology are required to enable reliable mapping of the inner retinal physiology.
This research was supported in part by NSF CBET-1055889, NIH R01 EY023522, NIH R01 EY024628, and NIH P30 EY001792.
H. Kolb, “Simple Anatomy of the Retina by Helga Kolb,” (2011), http://webvision.med.utah.edu/book/part-i-foundations/simple-anatomy-of-the-retina/ (4 August 2015).Google Scholar
R. E. Hogg and U. Chakravarthy, “Visual function and dysfunction in early and late age-related maculopathy,” Prog. Retinal Eye Res. 25, 249–276 (2006).PRTRES1350-9462http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2005.11.002Google Scholar
R. W. Nickells, “Ganglion cell death in glaucoma: from mice to men,” Vet. Ophthalmol. 10(Suppl 1), 88–94 (2007).http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-5224.2007.00564.xGoogle Scholar
R. S. Harwerth and H. A. Quigley, “Visual field defects and retinal ganglion cell losses in patients with glaucoma,” Arch. Ophthalmol. 124, 853–859 (2006).AROPAW0003-9950http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archopht.124.6.853Google Scholar
B. Meyer-Rusenberg et al., “Pathological changes in human retinal ganglion cells associated with diabetic and hypertensive retinopathy,” Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 245, 1009–1018 (2007).http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0489-xGoogle Scholar
Y. W. Qin, G. Z. Xu and W. J. Wang, “Dendritic abnormalities in retinal ganglion cells of three-month diabetic rats,” Curr. Eye Res. 31, 967–974 (2006).CEYRDM0271-3683http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02713680600987674Google Scholar
C. Owsley et al., “Cone- and rod-mediated dark adaptation impairment in age-related maculopathy,” Ophthalmology 114, 1728–1735 (2007).OPANEW0743-751Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.12.023Google Scholar
C. A. Curcio, N. E. Medeiros and C. L. Millican, “Photoreceptor loss in age-related macular degeneration,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 37, 1236–1249 (1996).Google Scholar
J. Z. Liang, D. R. Williams and D. T. Miller, “High resolution imaging of the living human retina with adaptive optics,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 38, 55–55 (1997).Google Scholar
K. S. K. Wong et al., “In vivo imaging of human photoreceptor mosaic with wavefront sensorless adaptive optics optical coherence tomography,” Biomed. Opt. Express 6, 580–590 (2015).BOEICL2156-7085http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.000580Google Scholar
A. Pallikaris, “Adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy: results and applications,” J. Refract. Surg. 21, S570–S574 (2005).Google Scholar
D. S. Chauhan and J. Marshall, “The interpretation of optical coherence tomography images of the retina,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 40, 2332–2342 (1999).Google Scholar
H. M. Pakter et al., “Analysis of optical coherence tomography nerve fiber layer thickness and Heidelberg retina tomography optic nerve bead measurements over time in a glaucoma monkey model,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40, S660–S660 (1999).Google Scholar
M. R. Hee et al., “Optical coherence tomography of the human retina,” Arch. Ophthalmol. 113, 325–332 (1995).http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1995.01100030081025Google Scholar
J. A. Izatt et al., “In vivo imaging of the human retina with optical coherence tomography,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34, 761–761 (1993).Google Scholar
R. W. Lu et al., “Investigation of the hyper-reflective inner/outer segment band in optical coherence tomography of living frog retina,” J. Biomed. Opt. 17, 060504 (2012).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.6.060504Google Scholar
R. F. Spaide and C. A. Curcio, “Anatomical correlates to the bands seen in the outer retina by optical coherence tomography literature review and model,” Retina 31, 1609–1619 (2011).http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182247535Google Scholar
B. Falsini et al., “Structure-function relationship in ocular hypertension and glaucoma: interindividual and interocular analysis by OCT and pattern ERG,” Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 246(8), 1153–1162 (2008).http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-0808-5Google Scholar
R. Klein et al., “The relationship of age-related maculopathy, cataract, and glaucoma to visual acuity,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 36, 182–191 (1995).Google Scholar
J. Siderov and A. L. Tiu, “Variability of measurements of visual acuity in a large eye clinic,” Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 77, 673–676 (1999).http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.1999.770613.xGoogle Scholar
A. Loewenstein et al., “Replacing the Amsler grid: a new method for monitoring patients with age-related macular degeneration,” Ophthalmology 110, 966–970 (2003).OPANEW0743-751Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00074-5Google Scholar
J. S. Steinberg et al., “Scotopic and photopic microperimetry in patients with reticular drusen and age-related macular degeneration,” JAMA Ophthalmol. 133, 690–697 (2015).http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0477Google Scholar
C. Ozgonul, G. Gokce and T. Mumcuoglu, “Microperimetry findings in a patient with macular edema secondary to retinitis pigmentosa,” Ophthalmologica 232, 28–29 (2014).OPHTAD0030-3755http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000357980Google Scholar
E. N. Wong, Y. J. Khoo and F. K. Chen, “Microperimetry in a range of macular pathology,” Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 41, 50–50 (2013).http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02817.xGoogle Scholar
H. P. Scholl and E. Zrenner, “Electrophysiology in the investigation of acquired retinal disorders,” Surv. Ophthalmol. 45, 29–47 (2000).SUOPAD0039-6257http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00125-9Google Scholar
W. H. Seiple et al., “Evaluating macular function using the focal ERG,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 27, 1123–1130 (1986).Google Scholar
Vaegan et al., “Macular electroretinograms: their accuracy, specificity and implementation for clinical use,” Aust. J. Ophthalmol. 12, 359–372 (1984).AJOHBL0310-1177http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.1984.tb01182.xGoogle Scholar
G. E. Fish and D. G. Birch, “The focal electroretinogram in the clinical assessment of macular disease,” Ophthalmology 96, 109–114 (1989).OPANEW0743-751Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(89)32944-7Google Scholar
A. Binns and T. H. Margrain, “Development of a technique for recording the focal rod ERG,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 26, 71–79 (2006).OPOPD50275-5408http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00355.xGoogle Scholar
A. Binns and T. H. Margrain, “Evaluation of retinal function using the dynamic focal cone ERG,” Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 25, 492–500 (2005).OPOPD50275-5408http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00338.xGoogle Scholar
D. C. Hood et al., “The multifocal electroretinogram,” J. Neuroophthalmol. 23, 225–235 (2003).http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00041327-200309000-00008Google Scholar
S. G. Jacobson et al., “Disease expression of RP1 mutations causing autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41, 1898–1908 (2000).Google Scholar
X. C. Yao et al., “Functional imaging of glucose-evoked rat islet activities using transient intrinsic optical signals,” J. Mod. Opt. 59, 843–847 (2012).JMOPEW0950-0340http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2012.674564Google Scholar
B. Chance et al., “Optical investigations of physiology: a study of intrinsic and extrinsic biomedical contrast,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 352, 707–716 (1997).http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0053Google Scholar
D. M. Rector et al., “Spatio-temporal mapping of rat whisker barrels with fast scattered light signals,” Neuroimage 26, 619–627 (2005).NEIMEF1053-8119http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.030Google Scholar
Y. Hoshi et al., “Visuospatial imagery is a fruitful strategy for the digit span backward task: a study with near-infrared optical tomography,” Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 9, 339–342 (2000).http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00006-9Google Scholar
H. H. Harary, J. E. Brown and L. H. Pinto, “Rapid light-induced changes in near infrared transmission of rods in Bufo marinus,” Science 202, 1083–1085 (1978).SCIEAS0036-8075http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.102035Google Scholar
M. W. Kaplan, “Concurrent birefringence and forward light-scattering measurements of flash-bleached rod outer segments,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 1467–1471 (1981).JOSAAH0030-3941http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.71.001467Google Scholar
H. Kuhn et al., “Interactions between photoexcited rhodopsin and GTP-binding protein: kinetic and stoichiometric analyses from light-scattering changes,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 78, 6873–6877 (1981).http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.78.11.6873Google Scholar
J. W. Lewis et al., “Sensitive light scattering probe of enzymatic processes in retinal rod photoreceptor membranes,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81, 743–747 (1984).http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.3.743Google Scholar
R. Uhl, H. Desel and R. Wagner, “Separation and characterisation of light scattering transients from rod outer segments of vertebrate photoreceptors: design and performance of a multi angle flash photolysis apparatus (MAFPA),” J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 11, 31–43 (1985).JBBMDG0165-022Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-022X(85)90039-9Google Scholar
D. R. Pepperberg et al., “Photic modulation of a highly sensitive, near-infrared light-scattering signal recorded from intact retinal photoreceptors,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85, 5531–5535 (1988).http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.15.5531Google Scholar
M. Kahlert, D. R. Pepperberg and K. P. Hofmann, “Effect of bleached rhodopsin on signal amplification in rod visual receptors,” Nature 345, 537–539 (1990).http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/345537a0Google Scholar
N. Bennett and A. Clerc, “Cgmp phosphodiesterase dependent light-induced scattering changes in suspensions of retinal disk membranes,” Biochemstry 31, 1858–1866 (1992).http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00121a039Google Scholar
S. M. Dawis and M. Rossetto, “Light-evoked changes in near-infrared transmission by the on and off channels of the anuran retina,” Vis. Neurosci. 10, 687–692 (1993).VNEUEYhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523800005381Google Scholar
A. Akhlagh Moayed et al., “Correlation of visually evoked intrinsic optical signals and electroretinograms recorded from chicken retina with a combined functional optical coherence tomography and electroretinography system,” J. Biomed. Opt. 17, 016011 (2012).http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.1.016011Google Scholar
R. W. Lu, Q. X. Zhang and X. C. Yao, “Circular polarization intrinsic optical signal recording of stimulus-evoked neural activity,” Opt. Lett. 36, 1866–1868 (2011).http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.001866Google Scholar
J. L. Schei et al., “Action potential propagation imaged with high temporal resolution near-infrared video microscopy and polarized light,” Neuroimage 40, 1034–1043 (2008).NEIMEF1053-8119http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.055Google Scholar
X. C. Yao et al., “Cross-polarized reflected light measurement of fast optical responses associated with neural activation,” Biophys. J. 88, 4170–4177 (2005).BIOJAU0006-3495http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.052506Google Scholar
X. C. Yao et al., “Rapid optical coherence tomography and recording functional scattering changes from activated frog retina,” Appl. Opt. 44, 2019–2023 (2005).APOPAI0003-6935http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.002019Google Scholar
X. C. Yao, L. Liu and Y. G. Li, “Intrinsic optical signal imaging of retinal activity in frog eye,” J. Innov. Opt. Health Sci. 2, 201–208 (2009).http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1793545809000462Google Scholar
Q. X. Zhang et al., “In vivo confocal intrinsic optical signal identification of localized retinal dysfunction,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53, 8139–8145 (2012).http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-10732Google Scholar
D. A. Nelson et al., “Special report: noninvasive multi-parameter functional optical imaging of the eye,” Ophthalmic. Surg. Lasers Imaging 36, 57–66 (2005).Google Scholar
I. Tasaki et al., “Changes in fluorescence, turbidity, and birefringence associated with nerve excitation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 61, 883–888 (1968).http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.61.3.883Google Scholar
M. P. Kristensen et al., “State-dependent cellular activity patterns of the cat paraventricular hypothalamus measured by reflectance imaging,” Brain Res. 727, 107–117 (1996).BRREAP0006-8993http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(96)00360-5Google Scholar
D. M. Rector, G. R. Poe and R. M. Harper, “Imaging of hippocampal and neocortical neural activity following intravenous cocaine administration in freely behaving cats,” Neuroscience 54, 633–641 (1993).http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(93)90234-7Google Scholar
K. E. Mathewson et al., “Dynamics of alpha control: preparatory suppression of posterior alpha oscillations by frontal modulators revealed with combined EEG and event-related optical signal,” J. Cognit. Neurosci. 26, 2400–2415 (2014).http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00637Google Scholar
D. M. Rector et al., “In-vivo observations of rapid scattered light changes associated with neurophysiological activity,” in In-Vivo Optical Imaging of Brain Function, 2nd ed. (Frontiers in Neuroscience), and R. Frostig, Ed., pp 143–170, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (2009).Google Scholar
L. B. Cohen and R. D. Keynes, “Evidence for structural changes during the action potential in nerves from the walking legs of Maia squinado,” J. Physiol. 194, 85–86P (1968).Google Scholar
X. C. Yao, D. M. Rector and J. S. George, “Optical lever recording of displacements from activated lobster nerve bundles and Nitella internodes,” Appl. Opt. 42, 2972–2978 (2003).APOPAI0003-6935http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.002972Google Scholar
I. Tasaki and P. M. Byrne, “The origin of rapid changes in birefringence, light-scattering and dye absorbency associated with excitation of nerve-fibers,” Jpn. J. Physiol. 43, S67–S75 (1993).http://dx.doi.org/10.2170/jjphysiol.43.67Google Scholar
A. J. Foust, R. M. Beiu and D. M. Rector, “Optimized birefringence changes during isolated nerve activation,” Appl. Opt. 44, 2008–2012 (2005).APOPAI0003-6935http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.002008Google Scholar
A. J. Foust and D. M. Rector, “Optically teasing apart neural swelling and depolarization,” Neuroscience 145, 887–899 (2007).http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.12.068Google Scholar
K. O. Donner and T. Reuter, “Dark-adaptation processes in the rhodopsin rods of the frog’s retina,” Vision Res. 7, 17–41 (1967).VISRAM0042-6989http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(67)90023-5Google Scholar
K. A. Lee et al., “Relationships among visual cycle retinoids, rhodopsin phosphorylation, and phototransduction in mouse eyes during light and dark adaptation,” Biochemistry 49, 2454–2463 (2010).http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi1001085Google Scholar
D. R. Pepperberg, “Rhodopsin and visual adaptation: analysis of photoreceptor thresholds in the isolated skate retina,” Vision Res. 24, 357–366 (1984).VISRAM0042-6989http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(84)90061-0Google Scholar
C. Baumann and H. Scheibner, “The dark adaptation of single units in the isolated frog retina following partial bleaching of rhodopsin,” Vision Res. 8, 1127–1138 (1968).VISRAM0042-6989http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(68)90022-9Google Scholar
R. N. Frank and J. E. Dowling, “Rhodopsin photoproducts: effects on electroretinogram sensitivity in isolated perfused rat retina,” Science 161, 487–489 (1968).SCIEAS0036-8075http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.161.3840.487Google Scholar
G. P. Brierley et al., “On the permeability of isolated bovine retinal outer segment fragments,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 163, 117–120 (1968).http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(68)90041-2Google Scholar
H. Asai et al., “A light-induced conformational change in rod photoreceptor disc membrane,” Exp. Eye Res. 21, 259–267 (1975).EXERA60014-4835http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4835(75)90097-4Google Scholar
D. G. McConnell, “Relationship of the light-induced proton uptake in bovine retinal outer segment fragments to triton-induced membrane disruption and to volume changes,” J. Biol. Chem. 250, 1898–1906 (1975).Google Scholar
K. P. Hofmann et al., “Measurements on fast light-induced light-scattering and absorption changes in outer segments of vertebrate light sensitive rod cells,” Biophys. Struct. Mech. 2, 61–77 (1976).BSMHBH0340-1057http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00535653Google Scholar
C. L. Wey, P. L. Ahl and R. A. Cone, “Bacteriorhodopsin induces a light-scattering change in Halobacterium halobium,” J. Cell Biol. 79, 657–662 (1978).http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.79.3.657Google Scholar
M. Michelvillaz et al., “Physical analysis of light-scattering changes in bovine photoreceptor membrane suspensions,” Biophys. J. 46, 655–662 (1984).BIOJAU0006-3495http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84064-3Google Scholar
N. Bennett, “Light-induced interactions between rhodopsin and the GTP-binding protein relation with phosphodiesterase activation,” Eur. J. Biochem. 123, 133–139 (1982).EJBCAI0014-2956http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06509.xGoogle Scholar
R. Uhl, K. P. Hofmann and W. Kreutz, “Measurement of fast light-induced disc shrinkage within bovine rod outer segments by means of a light-scattering transient,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta 469, 113–122 (1977).http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(77)90174-2Google Scholar
R. W. Lu et al., “Dynamic near infrared imaging reveals transient phototropic change in retinal rod photoreceptors,” J. Biomed. Opt. 18, 106013 (2013).http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.10.106013Google Scholar
B. Q. Wang et al., “Functional optical coherence tomography reveals transient phototropic change of photoreceptor outer segments,” Opt. Lett. 39, 6923–6926 (2014).OPLEDP0146-9592http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.006923Google Scholar
M. W. Kaplan, “Modeling the rod outer segment birefringence change correlated with metarhodopsin II formation,” Biophys. J. 38, 237–241 (1982).http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84554-2Google Scholar
M. Kahlert and K. P. Hofmann, “Reaction-rate and collisional efficiency of the rhodopsin-transducin system in intact retinal rods,” Biophys. J. 59, 375–386 (1991).BIOJAU0006-3495http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82231-7Google Scholar
V. Y. Arshavsky, T. D. Lamb and E. N. Pugh, “G proteins and phototransduction,” Annu. Rev. Physiol. 64, 153–187 (2002).http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.082701.102229Google Scholar
X. C. Yao and J. S. George, “Near-infrared imaging of fast intrinsic optical responses in visible light-activated amphibian retina,” J. Biomed. Opt. 11, 064030 (2006).http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2393155Google Scholar
X. C. Yao and J. S. George, “Dynamic neuroimaging of retinal light responses using fast intrinsic optical signals,” NeuroImage 33, 898–906 (2006).NEIMEF1053-8119http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.060Google Scholar
Y. G. Li et al., “High-speed line-scan confocal imaging of stimulus-evoked intrinsic optical signals in the retina,” Opt. Lett. 35, 426–428 (2010).OPLEDP0146-9592http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.000426Google Scholar
K. Bizheva et al., “Optophysiology: depth-resolved probing of retinal physiology with functional ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103, 5066–5071 (2006).http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506997103Google Scholar
B. Wang et al., “En face optical coherence tomography of transient light response at photoreceptor outer segments in living frog eyecup,” Opt. Lett. 38, 4526–4529 (2013).http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.004526Google Scholar
X. C. Yao and Y. C. Li, “Functional imaging of retinal photoreceptors and inner neurons using stimulus-evoked intrinsic optical signals,” Methods Mol. Biol. 884, 277–285 (2012).http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-848-1_20Google Scholar
Y. C. Li et al., “Parallel optical monitoring of visual signal propagation from the photoreceptors to the inner retina layers,” Opt. Lett. 35, 1810–1812 (2010).OPLEDP0146-9592http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.001810Google Scholar
M. D. Abramoff et al., “Visual stimulus-induced changes in human near-infrared fundus reflectance,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47, 715–721 (2006).IOVSDA0146-0404http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0008Google Scholar
G. Hanazono et al., “Intrinsic signal imaging in macaque retina reveals different types of flash-induced light reflectance changes of different origins,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 2903–2912 (2007).JJOPA70021-5155Google Scholar
D. Ts'o et al., “Noninvasive functional imaging of the retina reveals outer retinal and hemodynamic intrinsic optical signal origins,” Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 53, 334–344 (2009).Google Scholar
J. B. Schallek et al., “Retinal intrinsic optical signals in a cat model of primary congenital glaucoma,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53, 1971–1981 (2012).http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8299Google Scholar
J. Rha et al., “Variable optical activation of human cone photoreceptors visualized using a short coherence light source,” Opt. Lett. 34, 3782–3784 (2009).OPLEDP0146-9592http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.34.003782Google Scholar
V. J. Srinivasan et al., “In vivo measurement of retinal physiology with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 31, 2308–2310 (2006).http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.002308Google Scholar
A. A. Moayed et al., “In vivo imaging of intrinsic optical signals in chicken retina with functional optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 36, 4575–4577 (2011).http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.004575Google Scholar
W. Suzuki et al., “Stimulus-induced changes of reflectivity detected by optical coherence tomography in macaque retina,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54, 6345–6354 (2013).http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12381Google Scholar
V. J. Srinivasan et al., “In vivo functional imaging of intrinsic scattering changes in the human retina with high-speed ultrahigh resolution OCT,” Opt. Express 17, 3861–3877 (2009).http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.003861Google Scholar
Q. Zhang et al., “Functional optical coherence tomography enables in vivo physiological assessment of retinal rod and cone photoreceptors,” Sci. Rep. 5, 9595 (2015).http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep09595Google Scholar
J. Schallek et al., “Stimulus-evoked intrinsic optical signals in the retina: spatial and temporal characteristics,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 50, 4865–4872 (2009).http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-3290Google Scholar
Q. X. Zhang et al., “In vivo confocal imaging of fast intrinsic optical signals correlated with frog retinal activation,” Opt. Lett. 36, 4692–4694 (2011).http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.004692Google Scholar
S. E. Nilsson, “An electron microscopic classification of the retinal receptors of the leopard frog (Rana Pipiens),” J. Ultrastruct. Res. 10, 390–416 (1964).JULRA70022-5320http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5320(64)80018-6Google Scholar
D. C. Hood and D. G. Birch, “A quantitative measure of the electrical activity of human rod photoreceptors using electroretinography,” Vis. Neurosci. 5, 379–387 (1990).VNEUEYhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523800000468Google Scholar
I. Perlman, “The Electroretinogram: ERG by Ido Perlman,” (2015), http://webvision.med.utah.edu/book/electrophysiology/the-electroretinogram-erg/ (4 August 2015).Google Scholar
D. J. Creel, “The electroretinogram and electro-oculogram: clinical applications,” (2015), http://webvision.med.utah.edu/book/electrophysiology/the-electroretinogram-clinical-applications/ (4 August 2015).Google Scholar
D. C. Hood and D. G. Birch, “Human cone receptor activity: the leading edge of the a-wave and models of receptor activity,” Vis. Neurosci. 10, 857–871 (1993).VNEUEYhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523800006076Google Scholar
A. A. Paupoo et al., “Human cone photoreceptor responses measured by the electroretinogram [correction of electoretinogram] a-wave during and after exposure to intense illumination,” J. Physiol. 529, 469–482 (2000)Pt 2.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00469.xGoogle Scholar
G. M. Somfai et al., “Automated classifiers for early detection and diagnosis of retinopathy in diabetic eyes,” BMC Bioinf. 15, 106 (2014).BBMIC41471-2105http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-106Google Scholar
Q. X. Zhang et al., “In vivo optical coherence tomography of light-driven melanosome translocation in retinal pigment epithelium,” Sci. Rep. 3, 2644 (2013).http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep02644Google Scholar
Y. G. Li et al., “High spatiotemporal resolution imaging of fast intrinsic optical signals activated by retinal flicker stimulation,” Opt. Express 18, 7210–7218 (2010).OPEXFF1094-4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.007210Google Scholar
M. Pircher et al., “Simultaneous SLO/OCT imaging of the human retina with axial eye motion correction,” Opt. Express 15, 16922–16932 (2007).OPEXFF1094-4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.016922Google Scholar
B. Wang et al., “Breaking diffraction limit of lateral resolution in optical coherence tomography,” Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 3, 243–248 (2013).http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2013.10.03Google Scholar
Xincheng Yao is a professor in the Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago. He received his PhD in optics from the Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2001. His research interest includes biomedical optics instrumentation and retinal imaging.