7 December 2015 Sub‐40 fs, 1060‐nm Yb‐fiber laser enhances penetration depth in nonlinear optical microscopy of human skin
Author Affiliations +
J. of Biomedical Optics, 20(12), 120501 (2015). doi:10.1117/1.JBO.20.12.120501
Abstract
Advancing the practical utility of nonlinear optical microscopy requires continued improvement in imaging depth and contrast. We evaluated second‐harmonic generation (SHG) and third‐harmonic generation images from ex vivo human skin and showed that a sub‐40 fs, 1060‐nm Yb‐fiber laser can enhance SHG penetration depth by up to 80% compared to a <100  fs, 800 nm Ti:sapphire source. These results demonstrate the potential of fiber‐based laser systems to address a key performance limitation related to nonlinear optical microscopy (NLOM) technology while providing a low‐barrier‐to‐access alternative to Ti:sapphire sources that could help accelerate the movement of NLOM into clinical practice.
Balu, Saytashev, Hou, Dantus, and Tromberg: Sub‐40 fs, 1060‐nm Yb‐fiber laser enhances penetration depth in nonlinear optical microscopy of human skin

In vivo, label‐free nonlinear optical microscopy (NLOM) of human skin is under investigation for a broad range of clinical applications spanning from skin cancer detection and diagnosis12.3.4 to characterizing and understanding keratinocyte metabolism,5 skin aging,6,7 pigment biology,8,9 and cosmetic treatments.1011.12 NLOM signals are derived from several sources including cellular cofactors, melanin, and extracellular matrix proteins. Although exceptionally rich in both anatomic and functional contrast, NLOM has relatively limited penetration depth in turbid materials. This is due to the fact that multiple light scattering diminishes the instantaneous excitation intensity and nonlinear signal generation in the focused laser beam. As a result, there is considerable interest in exploring how light source performance can be optimized to improve imaging depth. Ti:sapphire lasers, commonly used in NLOM imaging, are generally able to access the superficial dermis of human skin to depths of 150 to 200μm. Penetration depth primarily depends on the material scattering length at the excitation wavelength, the efficiency of the nonlinear excitation process, the excitation average power, repetition rate, pulse width, and the detection geometry.13,14 Adjusting these parameters in order to improve the penetration depth has been explored in several studies using Ti:sapphire and optical parametric oscillator‐based femtosecond lasers as excitation light sources.1516.17.18.19.20.21 Sun et al. have shown that reduced light scattering using a Cr:Forsterite 1230 to 1250 nm source can increase penetration depth up to 300μm for harmonic generation imaging of human skin.22 Improvements in penetration depth can also be achieved when using shorter laser pulse widths.16 Depth resolved imaging studies require higher average laser powers and thermal damage to tissue becomes an issue of concern.23,24 Photothermal absorption of tissue is wavelength dependent, and so is the damage threshold. Heating following laser exposure at 800 nm is five times greater than at 1060 nm, and the damage threshold at 800 nm is three times lower than at 1060 nm.25 With the development of next‐generation fiber lasers, it is possible to imagine combining these technical features with more compact, portable, and inexpensive light sources that could facilitate clinical translation of NLOM technology.

Fiber‐based laser sources have been used for NLOM imaging of thin tissue cross‐sections,2627.28 mouse brain,29 and human skin tissue30 using fluorescence labeling. In this work, we evaluate the performance of a sub‐40 fs, 1060‐nm Yb‐fiber laser for label‐free NLOM imaging of human skin. The effect of excitation wavelength and pulse width on penetration depth in thick, turbid tissues is determined by comparing the fiber laser to an 800 nm Ti:sapphire laser source. We employ the depth‐dependent decay of second‐harmonic generation (SHG) signals as a standard metric for evaluating performance.

The excitation laser sources used were a Ti:sapphire oscillator (MIRA 900; Coherent Inc.; 220 fs, 76 MHz, 600 mW output power, tuning wavelength 720 to 980 nm) tuned to 800 nm for this study and a Yb‐fiber laser (BioPhotonic Solutions Inc., 1060 nm, sub‐40 fs, 39.2 MHz, 200 mW compressed output power). The prototype Yb‐fiber laser, with self‐similar pulse evolution,28 has an integrated adaptive phase‐amplitude pulse shaper (MIIPS‐HD, BioPhotonic Solutions Inc.) based on a 4f configuration with a two‐dimensional spatial light modulator. The purpose of the pulse shaper was to control high‐order phase distortions introduced by the high numerical‐aperture (NA) objective and other dispersive elements in the beam path. The 1060‐nm pulses were compressed to nearly transform limited duration using multiphoton intrapulse interference phase scan (MIIPS),31 and their full‐width half maximum duration was measured by interferometric autocorrelation using the microscope detection unit (BioPhotonic Solutions Inc.) at the focal plane. Each of the two excitation beams (800 and 1060 nm) was directed toward our home‐built laser‐scanning microscope and focused into the sample by an Olympus objective (XLPL25XWMP, 25×/1.05 NA water). The nonlinear signals from the sample were epi‐collected and directed toward two photomultiplier tubes (R3896, Hamamatsu) by a dichroic mirror (Semrock, Inc., 510 LP). The dichroic mirror was used to split the emission signal into two spectral channels defined by the emission filters: 440 SP; 375/110BP and 720 SP; 535/150BP (Semrock Inc.). We used discarded human skin tissue (fixed in formalin) to test the effect of sub‐40 fs, 1060‐nm excitation laser pulses on depth penetration in this sample. For each excitation wavelength (800 and 1060 nm), we acquired five stacks of images as optical sections of 430×430μm2 (512×512pixels) at different depths ranging from 0 to 200μm (2μm step). In the sample studied in this work, the main contrast mechanisms for 800‐nm excitation are based on two‐photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) signals from keratin, melanin, and elastin fibers and on SHG signals from collagen fibers. When using 1060 nm as excitation, the epidermis is visualized by third‐harmonic generation (THG) contrast derived from refractive index discontinuities at interfaces, while dermal contrast is derived from collagen fiber SHG.

Figure 1 shows merged images of human skin acquired at the same depth with 800‐ and 1060‐nm excitation. THG imaging of the keratinocyte structure in human skin epidermis using 1230 nm as excitation has been reported by Sun et al. in several studies.6,22 THG is not generated by elastin fibers in human dermis, although signals from elastic cartilage have been observed.32

Fig. 1

Multimodal nonlinear optical microscopy (NLOM) images of human skin acquired with 800‐ and 1060‐nm excitation wavelengths at the same depth. (a) Epidermal‐dermal junction in human skin imaged by third‐harmonic generation (THG) (blue) and second‐harmonic generation (SHG) (red) using 1060 nm and by two‐photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) (green) using 800 nm as excitation wavelengths (z=35μm). TPEF signal originates from keratin in the epidermal keratinocytes and from elastin fibers (arrows) in the superficial papillary dermis, while THG signal highlights the keratinocytes only; SHG signal originates from collagen fibers. (b) Multimodal NLOM image corresponding to the inset in (a) representing contribution from three channels: (c) TPEF signal from keratinocytes and elastin fibers (arrows), (d) THG signal from keratinocytes, and (e) SHG signal from collagen fibers. Scale bar is 50μm.

JBO_20_12_120501_f001.png

Figure 2 shows representative images corresponding to one of the stacks acquired in the same location of the sample by using 800 and 1060 nm as excitation. The images in Figs. 2(a)2(c) and 2(f)2(h) represent en‐face (xy plane) images acquired at different depths. The cross‐sectional (xz plane) images shown in Figs. 2(d) and 2(e) were obtained from three‐dimensional (3‐D) image reconstruction of en‐face stacks using Amira (FEI Inc.).

Fig. 2

Ex vivo imaging of human skin using 800 nm (Ti:sapphire laser) and 1060 nm (Yb‐fiber laser). (a–c) Horizontal sections (xy scans) at different depths corresponding to 800‐nm excitation wavelength. The optical sections show images of the epidermal cells through the TPEF signal (magenta, z=25μm); collagen fibers (green; SHG signal) and elastin fibers (magenta, TPEF signal) (z=100μm; 140μm). Vertical sections were obtained from three‐dimensional reconstruction for (d) 800‐nm and (e) 1060‐nm excitation wavelengths (40 mW for 800 nm and 20 mW for 1060 nm). Horizontal sections (xy scans) at different depths corresponding to 800‐ and 1060‐nm excitation wavelengths are shown in (a–c), (f–h), respectively. The optical sections show images of the epidermal cells through the THG signal (magenta, z=25μm) and collagen fibers (green; SHG signal) (z=100μm; 140μm). Scale bar is 50μm. The plot represents the SHG signal attenuation (logarithmic scale) with depth, for 800‐ and 1060‐nm excitation wavelengths.

JBO_20_12_120501_f002.png

To compare the penetration depth attained by each excitation wavelength, we adjusted the laser powers (40 mW for 800 nm and 20 mW for 1060 nm) such that the average intensity of the SHG signal corresponding to the sample surface (z=0) was similar for both wavelengths. The laser power and all the other experimental parameters were kept the same during the data acquisition. The SHG signals measured in the dermis of the skin sample are plotted versus depth in Fig. 2 on log scale. The signal calculated at each depth represents the average of the pixel intensities in the SHG images at that particular depth. The SHG intensity decay curve was normalized to the maximum intensity value for each wavelength.

The SHG intensity decays as a function of depth z according ISHGexp(Az), where A is the attenuation coefficient that includes the sample absorption and scattering properties at both the excitation and emission wavelengths. The inverse of A yields a 1/e attenuation length of 49μm for 800 nm and 88μm for 1060 nm, an increase of 80% for the Yb‐fiber laser source. Similar results were obtained for all five stacks acquired in the sample, which shows that 1060 nm, sub‐40 fs pulses can provide deeper penetration in highly scattering samples, such as skin.

In summary, these results demonstrate the potential of fiber‐based laser systems to be used as excitation light sources for NLOM imaging of highly turbid media. Despite their current lack of tunability, short‐pulse, >1μm wavelength fiber lasers can provide a low‐barrier‐to‐access alternative to conventional Ti:sapphire lasers. They are of particular interest in applications related to in vivo imaging of human skin as they can deliver up to 80% improvement in SHG imaging depth compared to conventionally used Ti:sapphire lasers. An additional benefit for in vivo human skin imaging is related to the THG contrast mechanism which, unlike TPEF, does not involve absorption and might allow for the use of higher excitation powers. With continued development of expanded wavelengths, powers, and pulse characteristics, these systems are expected to increase in use, particularly in skin studies where assessment of 3‐D morphology is important.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank BioPhotonic Solutions Inc. for making their laser prototype available for these measurements and, in particular, Dr. Bingwei Xu for installing the laser system at UC Irvine. This research was supported partially by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) NIBIB Laser Microbeam and Medical Program (LAMMP, P41‐EB015890), Air Force Research Laboratory Agreement No. FA9550‐04‐1‐0101, and the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation.

References

1. 

M. Balu et al., “Distinguishing between benign and malignant melanocytic nevi by in vivo multiphoton microscopy,” Cancer Res. 74(10), 2688–2697 (2014).CNREA80008‐5472http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008‐5472.CAN‐13‐2582Google Scholar

2. 

M. Balu et al., “In vivo multiphoton microscopy of basal cell carcinoma,” JAMA Dermatol. 151(10), 1068–1074 (2015).http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.0453Google Scholar

3. 

E. Dimitrow et al., “Sensitivity and specificity of multiphoton laser tomography for in vivo and ex vivo diagnosis of malignant melanoma,” J. Invest. Dermatol. 129(7), 1752–1758 (2009).http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jid.2008.439Google Scholar

4. 

M. Ulrich et al., “In vivo detection of basal cell carcinoma: comparison of a reflectance confocal microscope and a multiphoton tomography,” J. Biomed. Opt. 18(6), 061229 (2013).JBOPFO1083‐3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.6.061229Google Scholar

5. 

M. Balu et al., “In vivo multiphoton NADH fluorescence reveals depth‐dependent keratinocyte metabolism in human skin,” Biophys. J. 104(1), 258–267 (2013).BIOJAU0006‐3495http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.3809Google Scholar

6. 

Y. H. Liao et al., “Quantitative analysis of intrinsic skin aging in dermal papillae by in vivo harmonic generation microscopy,” Biomed. Opt. Express 5(9), 3266–3279 (2014).BOEICL2156‐7085http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.003266Google Scholar

7. 

M. J. Koehler et al., “In vivo assessment of human skin aging by multiphoton laser scanning tomography,” Opt. Lett. 31(19), 2879–2881 (2006).OPLEDP0146‐9592http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.002879Google Scholar

8. 

T. B. Krasieva et al., “Two‐photon excited fluorescence lifetime imaging and spectroscopy of melanins in vitro and in vivo,” J. Biomed. Opt. 18(3), 031107 (2013).JBOPFO1083‐3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.3.031107Google Scholar

9. 

Y. Dancik et al., “Use of multiphoton tomography and fluorescence lifetime imaging to investigate skin pigmentation in vivo,” J. Biomed. Opt. 18(2), 026022 (2013).JBOPFO1083‐3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.2.026022Google Scholar

10. 

R. Bazin et al., “Clinical study on the effects of a cosmetic product on dermal extracellular matrix components using a high‐resolution multiphoton tomography,” Skin Res. Technol. 16(3), 305–310 (2010).http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐0846.2010.00432.xGoogle Scholar

11. 

V. R. Leite‐Silva et al., “The effect of formulation on the penetration of coated and uncoated zinc oxide nanoparticles into the viable epidermis of human skin in vivo,” Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 84(2), 297–308 (2013).EJPBEL0939‐6411http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.01.020Google Scholar

12. 

J. Lademann et al., “In vivo methods for the analysis of the penetration of topically applied substances in and through the skin barrier,” Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 34(6), 551–559 (2012).IJCMDW0142‐5463http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468‐2494.2012.00750.xGoogle Scholar

13. 

M Oheim et al., “Two‐photon microscopy in brain tissue: parameters influencing the imaging depth,” J. Neurosci. Methods 111(1), 29–37 (2001).JNMEDT0165‐0270http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165‐0270(01)00438‐1Google Scholar

14. 

F. Helmchen and W. Denk, “Deep tissue two‐photon microscopy,” Nat. Methods 2(12), 932–940 (2005).1548‐7091http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth818Google Scholar

15. 

P. Theer, M. T. Hasan and W. Denk, “Two‐photon imaging to a depth of 1000 micron in living brains by use of a Ti:Al2O3 regenerative amplifier,” Opt. Lett. 28(12), 1022–1024 (2003).http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.28.001022Google Scholar

16. 

S. Tang et al., “Effect of pulse duration on two‐photon excited fluorescence and second harmonic generation in nonlinear optical microscopy,” J. Biomed. Opt. 11(2), 020501 (2006).JBOPFO1083‐3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2177676Google Scholar

17. 

M. Balu et al., “Effect of excitation wavelength on penetration depth in nonlinear optical microscopy of turbid media,” J. Biomed. Opt. 14(1), 010508 (2009).JBOPFO1083‐3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3081544Google Scholar

18. 

D. Kobat et al., “Deep tissue multiphoton microscopy using longer wavelength excitation,” Opt. Express 17(16), 13354–13364 (2009).OPEXFF1094‐4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.013354Google Scholar

19. 

P. Xi et al., “Two‐photon imaging using adaptive phase compensated ultrashort laser pulses,” J. Biomed. Opt. 14(1), 014002 (2009).JBOPFO1083‐3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3059629Google Scholar

20. 

V. Andresen et al., “Infrared multiphoton microscopy: subcellular‐resolved deep tissue imaging,” Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 20(1), 54–62 (2009).CUOBE30958‐1669http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2009.02.008Google Scholar

21. 

D. Kobat, N. G. Horton and C. Xu, “In vivo two‐photon microscopy to 1.6‐mm depth in mouse cortex,” J. Biomed. Opt. 16(10), 106014 (2011).JBOPFO1083‐3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3646209Google Scholar

22. 

S. Y. Chen, H. Y. Wu and C. K. Sun, “In vivo harmonic generation biopsy of human skin,” J. Biomed. Opt. 14(6), 060505 (2009).JBOPFO1083‐3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3269676Google Scholar

23. 

B. R. Masters et al., “Mitigating thermal mechanical damage potential during two‐photon dermal imaging,” J. Biomed. Opt. 9(6), 1265–1270 (2004).JBOPFO1083‐3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.1806135Google Scholar

24. 

I. Saytashev et al., “Pulse duration and energy dependence of photodamage and lethality induced by femtosecond near infrared laser pulses in Drosophila melanogaster,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 115, 42–50 (2012).JPPBEG1011‐1344http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2012.06.009Google Scholar

25. 

J. N. Bixler et al., “Assessment of tissue heating under tunable near‐infrared radiation,” J. Biomed. Opt. 19(7), 070501 (2014).JBOPFO1083‐3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.7.070501Google Scholar

26. 

R. Galli et al., “Non‐linear optical microscopy of kidney tumours,” J. Biophotonics 7(1–2), 23–27 (2014).http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201200216Google Scholar

27. 

R. Galli et al., “Vibrational spectroscopic imaging and multiphoton microscopy of spinal cord injury,” Anal. Chem. 84(20), 8707–8714 (2012).http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac301938mGoogle Scholar

28. 

B. Nie et al., “Multimodal microscopy with sub‐30 fs Yb fiber laser oscillator,” Biomed. Opt. Express 3(7), 1750–1756 (2012).BOEICL2156‐7085http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.001750Google Scholar

29. 

N. G. Horton et al., “In vivo three‐photon microscopy of subcortical structures within an intact mouse brain,” Nat. Photonics 7(3), 205–209 (2013).NPAHBY1749‐4885http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.336Google Scholar

30. 

S. Tang et al., “Developing compact multiphoton systems using femtosecond fiber lasers,” J. Biomed. Opt. 14(3), 030508 (2009).JBOPFO1083‐3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3153842Google Scholar

31. 

Y. Coello et al., “Interference without an interferometer: a different approach to measuring, compressing, and shaping ultrashort laser pulses,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 25(6), A140–A150 (2008).JOBPDE0740‐3224http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.25.00A140Google Scholar

32. 

C. H. Yu et al., “In vivo and ex vivo imaging of intra‐tissue elastic fibers using third‐harmonic‐generation microscopy,” Opt. Express 15(18), 11167–11177 (2007).http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.011679Google Scholar

Mihaela Balu, Ilyas Saytashev, Jue Hou, Marcos Dantus, Bruce J. Tromberg, "Sub‐40 fs, 1060‐nm Yb‐fiber laser enhances penetration depth in nonlinear optical microscopy of human skin," Journal of Biomedical Optics 20(12), 120501 (7 December 2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.12.120501
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
KEYWORDS
Skin

Second-harmonic generation

Microscopy

Optical microscopy

Fiber lasers

Collagen

Laser scattering

Back to Top