Translator Disclaimer
17 December 2019 Opto-acoustic imaging of relative blood oxygen saturation and total hemoglobin for breast cancer diagnosis
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Opto-acoustic imaging involves using light to produce sound waves for visualizing blood in biological tissue. By using multiple optical wavelengths, diagnostic images of blood oxygen saturation and total hemoglobin are generated using endogenous optical contrast, without injection of any external contrast agent and without using any ionizing radiation. The technology has been used in recent clinical studies for diagnosis of breast cancer to help distinguish benign from malignant lesions, potentially reducing the need for biopsy through improved diagnostic imaging accuracy. To enable this application, techniques for mapping oxygen saturation differences within tissue are necessary. Using biologically relevant opto-acoustic phantoms, we analyze the ability of an opto-acoustic imaging system to display colorized parametric maps that are generated using a statistical mapping approach. To mimic breast tissue, a material with closely matching properties for optical absorption, optical scattering, acoustic attenuation, and speed of sound is used. The phantoms include two vessels filled with whole blood at oxygen saturation levels determined using a sensor-based approach. A flow system with gas-mixer and membrane oxygenator adjusts the oxygen saturation of each vessel independently. Datasets are collected with an investigational Imagio® breast imaging system. We examine the ability to distinguish vessels as the oxygen saturation level and imaging depth are varied. At depth of 15 mm and hematocrit of 42%, a sufficient level of contrast to distinguish between two 1.6-mm diameter vessels was measured for an oxygen saturation difference of ∼4.6  %  . In addition, an oxygenated vessel was visible at a depth of 48 mm using an optical wavelength of 1064 nm, and a deoxygenated vessel was visible to a depth of 42 mm with 757 nm. The results provide insight toward using color mapped opto-acoustic images for diagnosing breast cancer.

1.

Introduction

Over the past 25 years, a growing community of researchers, clinicians, and device manufacturers have been investigating and developing translational opto-acoustic (OA) imaging technologies with the aim of improving clinical care for several diseases.16 For breast cancer diagnosis, one promising technique is OA imaging combined with ultrasound (OA/US).720 Combining OA with ultrasound is advantageous because each modality provides information that is complementary to the other. Structural and functional information pertaining to total hemoglobin concentration (ctHb) and blood oxygen saturation (sO2) can be visualized with OA, while morphological and anatomical information can be obtained with ultrasound. In conventional ultrasound, which is commonly used to assess and characterize breast masses, there is large overlap between benign and malignant image features, which results in false-positive cases that must be confirmed with subsequent biopsy.2123 However, OA can provide functional information about the metabolism of tumors by imaging blood and vascular structure, which may further differentiate benign from malignant masses and potentially lead to improved patient care.

OA involves several physical principles that make it ideally suited for diagnostic breast imaging. Due to the composition of breast tissue, scattered light can penetrate to a depth of several centimeters, which is suitable for clinical applications. Furthermore, using light means that OA safely visualizes the optical contrast of tissue. By selecting specific optical wavelengths, OA can be optimized to endogenously detect certain molecules, which enables visualizing differences in oxygenated and deoxygenated blood. An illustration showing a handheld OA probe emitting light at two different optical wavelengths is shown in Fig. 1. The probe measures acoustic waves, which are generated by blood and other tissue structures when they are illuminated. From the measured waves, OA images are formed that display the functional composition of tissue. Typically, benign lesions have normal blood vessels and normal oxygen saturation. Malignant lesions are metabolically more active and tend to have higher vascularity, irregular blood vessels, and decreased oxygen saturation.2428 Since OA directly visualizes ctHb and sO2, this can potentially give clinicians the ability to perform more accurate diagnosis.715 In OA/US, the probe also acquires conventional ultrasound images, which are coregistered and displayed simultaneously with OA.

Fig. 1

OA imaging technology for breast cancer diagnosis. A handheld OA probe uses light and sound to visualize benign and malignant lesions. Laser pulses at dual-optical wavelengths produce a detectable acoustic response in tissue that depends on ctHb and sO2.

JBO_24_12_121915_f001.png

An immediate goal for OA/US is to potentially allow downgrading mildly suspicious masses to a category where biopsy is not required, without increasing the number of missed cancer cases.915 It is estimated that over 1.6 million breast biopsies are performed in the United States each year.22,23 A large percentage of these biopsies are negative, which is due to low positive predictive value of the imaging modalities presently used for assessment.21,23 A possible reduction in the total number of breast biopsies could greatly improve patient care and potentially reduce overall health care costs.23

Several groups have conducted clinical research studies involving OA, where breast lesions were imaged in human subjects.716,2942 Scanning devices include full-breast three-dimensional (3-D) imaging systems,2941 as well as real-time two-dimensional (2-D) handheld technologies.718,42,43 To date, the largest clinical effort surrounds the Imagio® breast imaging system (Seno Medical Instruments, Inc., San Antonio, Texas), a 2-D system which has evaluated breast lesions in over 2000 subjects.716,19 The system displays qualitative OA/US maps to visualize areas of strong relative sO2 and ctHb using a statistical color mapping technique.44 The OA/US image maps from a malignant lesion are shown in Fig. 2. In this example, the relative spatial distributions of ctHb and sO2 indicate presence of hemoglobin and relative deoxygenation in the boundary zone of the lesion. These features are consistent with malignancy and are not apparent from the conventional ultrasound map. In a multicenter Pivotal7 study, consisting of 2105 subjects from 16 sites, radiologists assessed the presence of specific OA features, similar to those shown in Fig. 2. OA/US was found to exceed diagnostic specificity of ultrasound by 14.9%.7 For negative OA/US findings, a maximum pretest probability of malignancy of 17.8% could potentially be downgraded with OA/US to a post-test probability of 2%.7 These studies demonstrated that diagnostic assessment of relative OA/US maps may potentially reduce the number of false-positive exams and potentially decrease the total number of performed biopsies.

Fig. 2

Relative OA/US images of malignant lesion. The image maps are (a) ultrasound, (b) OA Total, and (c) OA Relative. The central nidus of the lesion is segmented with a cyan color outline. Histopathology conducted after excision revealed this grade III invasive ductal carcinoma (GR3-IDC) had extensive internal necrosis. This may account for the lack of internal OA signal within the central nidus, as vessels are not present in the necrotic region. In OA Total, strong signal (yellow) due to hemoglobin is observed in the boundary zone of the lesion. Strong relative deoxygenation (red) is observed in the boundary zone of the OA Relative map. The image features are consistent with neoangiogenesis and are interpreted here as signs of malignancy.

JBO_24_12_121915_f002.png

To assess imaging performance in OA/US, there remains a need for approaches to characterize relative image maps, capable of describing how statistical color mapping relates to actual ctHb and sO2 levels. In relative maps, instead of conveying quantitative numerical parameters, which are often difficult to determine, the colorization dynamically adjusts to display high contrast regions from a spatial distribution of values. To characterize this, different levels of relative contrast must be physically reproduced by a phantom that has properties similar to biological tissue. For OA, suitable background materials include gelatin,45,46 gel–wax,47 and polyvinyl chloride plastisol (PVCP).4852 Previously, a phantom comprising channels filled with bovine blood was described for quantitative OA characterization.53,54 However, this involved a single flow-path, providing only one sO2 level, which is insufficient for relative characterization. To deal with this limitation, in earlier work, we presented images where two sO2 levels were used for validation purposes,12 but performance characterization was not described.

In this article, an approach for characterizing relative OA/US color maps is presented, which relates RGB image colorization to controlled sO2 and ctHb levels. To quantify performance, we developed a biologically relevant phantom, and a dual-path perfusion flow system, to emulate relative oxygenation differences between two vessels. The two-vessel configuration permits analyzing differences in relative colorization when both vessels are imaged simultaneously. The first objective was to evaluate relative contrast sensitivity (RCS), which is defined as the minimum resolvable difference in sO2 between two vessels, when using statistically mapped colorization. The initial results were published in our accompanying proceedings paper.55 Here, we also measure the impact on RCS, when varying the imaging depth and blood hematocrit level. In addition, we analyze penetration depth by simultaneously assessing the contrast-to-background ratio (CBR) of an oxygenated vessel and a deoxygenated vessel. Lastly, we discuss these results in a broader context, where relative sO2 and ctHb maps are used to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions.

2.

Theoretical Background

To provide context for our approach, we describe how OA signal is generated from biological tissue and how this affects image formation. In tissue, blood is the dominant optical absorber of near-infrared light. It contains both oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (HbR), which are molecules that have different wavelength-specific optical absorption. For example, light at 757 nm is absorbed more strongly by HbR compared to HbO2, but at 1064 nm this is reversed.

When molecules absorb light, they heat up, which causes thermal expansion. The optical absorption coefficient μa(λ,x) of a material determines the amount of light converted to heat. This is a function of optical wavelength λ, as well as position x=(x,y,z), since molecular composition varies spatially. A material property called the Grüneisen parameter Γ(x) quantifies how the added heat is converted to pressure. The radiant fluence Φ(λ,x) is the amount of light, at wavelength λ, that reaches position x. Following a rapid heating, an initial excess pressure p0(λ,x) is generated, which is equal to

Eq. (1)

p0(λ,x)=μa(λ,x)×Γ(x)×Φ(λ,x).
The generated pressure propagates acoustically, from each position x to transducers on the tissue surface, delayed according to the speed of sound. The received signal amplitude is proportional to p0(λ,x). Since blood has a much stronger μa compared to background tissue, the comparatively strong signal from blood leads to high endogenous image contrast.

In addition to dependence on λ, the optical absorption of blood depends on its sO2 level, which represents the percentage of hemoglobin that is oxygenated.1,56,57 The sO2 can be determined from the hemoglobin mass concentrations cHbO2 and cHbR, according to

Eq. (2a)

sO2=cHbO2cHbO2+cHbR.
The total hemoglobin concentration is

Eq. (2b)

ctHb=cHbO2+cHbR.
The optical absorption from biological tissue is described in Appendix A, Sec. 7.1. By considering only HbO2 and HbR, this can be written in terms of sO2 and ctHb as

Eq. (3)

μa=ctHb×[sO2×εHbO2+(1sO2)×εHbR],
which is obtained by substituting Eqs. (2a) and (2b) into Eq. (7). The optical extinction coefficients εHbO2(λ) and εHbR(λ) describe absorption per unit concentration. Equation (3) illustrates that μa is proportional to ctHb. Since ctHb depends on the hematocrit level αhct of blood,55,58,59 the OA signal strength is a function of αhct.

The OA signal strength is also a function of depth. In Eq. (1), Φ depends on the system illumination geometry, as well as the wavelength-specific optical properties of the medium, including its optical absorption coefficient μa(λ,x), optical scattering coefficient μs(λ,x), and anisotropy parameter g(λ,x).5961 In tissue, Φ(λ,x) can be approximated based on a wide-beam diffusion approximation using an effective optical attenuation coefficient μeff(λ).60 In this case, at depth y and with surface exposure q0(λ), the fluence, at x=(x,y,z), is

Eq. (4)

Φ(λ,x)=q0(λ)×eμeff(λ)y.
Since Φ(λ,x) influences the received signal, it can impact the OA image quality as well as the penetration depth. Also, in tissue, it is commonly assumed that Γ(x) in Eq. (1) does not vary significantly, compared to Φ(λ,x) and μa(λ,x), so it can be treated as a constant.

For OA imaging, estimates of sO2 and ctHb are computed. Typically, this involves using data recorded by transducers to reconstruct a map of the initial pressure p0(λ,x) to solve unknown molecular concentrations. For cHbO2 and cHbR, this can be computed as described in Appendix A, Sec. 7.2. To compute sO2 and ctHb, the computed cHbO2 and cHbR are substituted into Eqs. (2a) and (2b).

Our approach to display relative parametric maps based on sO2 and ctHb, which uses a statistical mapping procedure, is presented in Sec. 3.2.1. The characterization of these relative maps is described in the next section.

3.

Methods

3.1.

Biologically Relevant Phantoms

3.1.1.

PVCP background material

To characterize the ability to display relative OA/US images, a PVCP-based OA phantom was constructed to mimic breast tissue, as shown in Fig. 3. Breast consists of parenchymal and adipose tissue, which have different optical and acoustical properties that are affected by several factors, including age, menopausal state, and the presence of lesions.50,62,63 The biologically relevant ranges for breast tissue properties are shown in Table 1. This assumes the range 0.5 to 0.3  cm1 for optical absorption of near-infrared light;50 1430 to 1520  m/s for acoustic speed of sound;50 and 1 to 25  dB/cm for acoustic attenuation (at broadband frequency range).50 The volume fraction of blood fv,blood is 1.0% for parenchymal breast tissue, and 4% to 10% for invasive breast cancers.64 The reduced optical scattering coefficient follows a nonlinear fit of μs(λ)=aλb, with b=0.99±0.35 for breast tissue.59,65 Thus, for optical wavelengths of 757 and 1064 nm, we obtain μs(757  nm)=9.4  cm1 and μs(1064  nm)=6.8  cm1, with variability of around ±2.5, using a=6700, which is consistent with other published values.

Fig. 3

PVCP-based OA phantom. (a) Two vessels are filled with bovine blood at independently controlled sO2 levels. (b) The vessels are sloped to permit varying of depth during imaging.

JBO_24_12_121915_f003.png

Table 1

Optical and acoustical properties of breast tissue at 757 and 1064 nm.

Optical properties
757 nm1064 nm
Absorption μa (1/cm)0.05 to 0.30.05 to 0.3
Reduced scattering μs (1/cm)9.4±2.56.8±2.5
Anisotropy g (−)0.950.95
Acoustical properties
Speed of sound (m/s)1430 to 1520
Attenuation (dB/cm)1 to 25

In our PVCP phantom, the optical and acoustical properties were tuned, using a similar formulation to Vogt et al.,50 which included TiO2 and carbon black. The optical absorption coefficient μa, anisotropy parameter g, and the reduced scattering coefficient μs of the phantom were measured using inverse adding and doubling66 as shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Measured optical and acoustical properties of PVCP-based phantom.

Optical properties
757 nm1064 nm
Absorption μa (1/cm)0.089±0.0140.279±0.055
Reduced scattering μs (1/cm)7.90±0.206.14±0.07
Anisotropy g (−)0.80±0.080.77±0.01
Acoustical properties
Speed of sound (m/s)1475
Attenuation (dB/cm)0.9 to 8.3

3.1.2.

Vessel configuration

Two vessels of inner diameter 1.6 mm were embedded in the phantom, as shown in Fig. 3(b). The vessels consisted of Teflon tubing and were sloped at a 17-deg incline to permit varying of depth during imaging.

3.1.3.

Blood preparation

During testing, the vessels were filled with bovine blood (Innovative Research Inc., Catalog No.: IR1-040N), which has optical properties that are similar to human blood.67,68 The blood was treated with an anticoagulant (sodium citrate). The hematocrit of the whole blood was analyzed by filling capillary tubes (Fisher, P/N: 22-362-574) with the blood sample and sealing one end with sealing compound (Fisher, P/N: 02-678). Samples were then placed in a microhematocrit centrifuge for 5 min. Using calipers, the length of the red cell volume and the length of total volume were measured. The ratio represents the packed cell volume which corresponds to the hematocrit level. For testing that involved using blood at lowered hematocrit levels, the whole blood was diluted using sterile phosphate-buffered saline (MP Biomedicals, Catalog#: 1860454). The hematocrit of the diluted blood was then remeasured using the same procedure described above.

3.1.4.

Dual-path perfusion flow system

A dual-path perfusion flow system was used to independently control the sO2 of each vessel. This is schematically shown in Fig. 4. The perfusion flow system was driven by a peristaltic pump (Masterflex, model: 75728-10) that pulled blood from a reservoir to a membrane oxygenator (Permselect, model: PDMSXA-2500), to balance the dissolved gas levels of oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide. The gas supply consisted of a tank of each pure compressed gas. In each path, the tanks were connected to a single gas-mixer (MCO, model: GB 100), to control the flow and combine it into a single output connected to an oxygenator. To determine sO2 level, the partial O2 pressure, pH level, and temperature were monitored using sensors. Dissolved CO2 influences the pH level of blood. This was initially adjusted to establish a pH level of 7.4 using a pH meter (Denver Instruments, model: UB-10). The partial O2 pressure was measured by a pair of dissolved oxygen (DO) meters (Oakton, model: DO-450), which also record temperature to ±0.1°C. The meters output DO as a percentage of the calibrated partial pressure of oxygen at atmospheric pressure. As shown in Fig. 4, in each path, the blood flowed from an oxygenator directly to the phantom and then to a DO meter before returning to the reservoir.

Fig. 4

Controlled sO2 measurement apparatus. Two independent paths of bovine blood at controlled oxygenation levels are circulated through the phantom with perfusion flow system. A gas-mixer delivers O2, CO2, and N2 to a membrane oxygenator. Sensor readings for temperature, DO pressure, and pH are used to monitor the sO2 level.

JBO_24_12_121915_f004.png

To determine known sO2 levels for blood in both vessels, we established a measurement approach based on DO sensor readings. Oxygen saturation in blood varies according to known hemoglobin dissociation curves.69 These curves model how sO2 changes as a function of partial oxygen pressure, pH level, and temperature, and to a lesser extent on partial pressure of CO2 and DPG (2,3-diphosphoglycerate) concentration. A mathematical relationship to determine oxygen saturation from these variables is described by Dash and Bassingthwaighte.69 A published Matlab function69 for computing sO2 based on the Dash model was used in the present analysis to relate sensor readings to sO2 values.

An investigation of the measurement accuracy of using hemoglobin dissociation curves was also performed by varying input parameters in the Dash model to compute error-bars for sO2 measurement. It was determined that the highest accuracy occurs near full deoxygenation and full oxygenation. This is due to the lower slope of the oxygen dissociation curves at the extremes. A greater uncertainty was found for midlevel sO2 values. This analysis of measurement accuracy is provided in the Supplemental Material.

3.2.

OA/US Color Maps

3.2.1.

Statistical color mapping

We performed characterization on relative sO2 and ctHb maps of the PVCP phantom that were acquired using an investigational Imagio® system. The maps were generated using a statistical color mapping approach, consisting of two steps. First, statistics were analyzed from a reference region of each map to automatically determine color scaling and offset parameters. Next, using these parameters, a color mapping was applied, to display OA information from areas of strong signal, relative to background tissue. Figure 5 shows how statistical mapping applies a color palette to oxygenation levels for several different scaling and offset parameters.

Fig. 5

Statistical color mapping is used to maximize functional contrast for a region of tissue. The mapping parameters are automatically computed to display areas of high and low sO2, relative to a background reference level. In (a)–(c), the vertical axis illustrates color mapping corresponding to three images with different statistical properties.

JBO_24_12_121915_f005.png

For determining the mapping, the reference region of each map is selected to include average background tissue, so statistical information about the background can be gathered. The choice of the reference region influences the colorization, since different regions have different statistical properties. Commonly, it is set to encompass the entire midfield tissue region (e.g., 5 to 30 mm depth). However, to analyze certain objects, the reference region can also be set to encompass the upper and lower bounds of a target (or targets) of interest (e.g., the vessels of the phantom), which puts higher weight on the statistics of the targets themselves. Color mapping parameters are obtained by computing a mathematical characteristic applied to sO2 or ctHb intensity values of the reference region. In particular, the average signal level of reference region is used as a color midpoint, to determine the offset parameter. The color scaling parameter is computed based on the standard deviation of the reference region to maximize the contrast level displayed. As a result, for sO2, this qualitatively highlights regions of significance that have higher or lower levels of oxygen saturation than the reference level. In addition, a transparency mask is generated to permit only regions exceeding a specific colorization level to be displayed.

Figure 6 shows the RGBA palettes that are used for sO2 and ctHb. Mathematically, an RGBA color palette defines a color-mapping function fRGBA: RR4, by mapping a real value to three color channels (red, green, and blue) and a transparency channel (alpha).

Fig. 6

Color palette for (a) OA Relative and (b) OA Total. The function fRGBA: RR4 maps a real value onto three color channels and alpha transparency channel.

JBO_24_12_121915_f006.png

To perform color mapping, let the estimated values for either sO2(x) or ctHb(x) be represented by a function f(x). The estimated values arise from using Eq. (9) with Eq. (2). Since position is represented by x=(x,y,z), for 2-D imaging, we assume z=0. Let R represent a reference region with N pixels. The mapping function is offset and scaled by the mean μ and standard deviation σ of f(x) in R, where

Eq. (5)

μ=1NxRf(x),σ=1N1xR(f(x)μ)2.
The four-channel color-mapped RGBA image is

Eq. (6)

[vR(x)vG(x)vB(x)vA(x)]=fRGBA{clip[f(x)μkgσ]},
where
clip(u)={kmin,if  u<kminkmax,if  ukmax,u,otherwise.
To produce RGB output, the RGBA data of Eq. (6) are overlaid with a grayscale ultrasound image by blending of the alpha transparency channel. The function clip(u) is used to ensure the values are between kmin and kmax, which represents the domain of fRGBA. Values below kmin or above kmax will be saturated at the maximum or minimum colors of the palette. For the color palette in Fig. 6(a), the values are mapped from the domain 1 to 1; for Fig. 6(b), they are mapped from 0 to 1. The parameter kg represents a gain constant.

3.2.2.

Display of OA/US maps

To display OA information, Imagio® generates six individual image maps, arranged as a six-on-one composite image. A representative image is shown in Fig. 7. Three of these are colorized image maps that are overlaid with conventional grayscale ultrasound (top left). These colorized maps are called “OA Total” (bottom left), “OA Combined” (top middle), and “OA Relative” (bottom middle). Color palettes for sO2 and ctHb are shown in Fig. 6. The OA Total map is computed based on ctHb. In this map, areas with high relative value appear yellow, and areas with low value are transparent. The OA Relative map is computed based on sO2. Areas with high relative value appear green, while areas with low value appear red. Areas with midrange values are transparent. The OA Combined map uses the same RGB values that were computed for OA Relative but combines the transparency channel of OA Total with the transparency of OA Relative to display signal that is strong in both maps. The OA Total, OA Relative, and OA Combined image maps are generated according to the statistical mapping procedure. The “OA Short” (top right) and “OA Long” (bottom right) maps correspond to signal detected at optical wavelengths of 757 and 1064 nm. The 757-nm wavelength most strongly detects HbR, whereas the 1064-nm wavelength strongly detects signal from HbO2. Figure 7 shows image maps from scanning the biologically relevant PVCP phantom at controlled sO2 levels. The appearance of vessels in the maps is described with the results of Sec. 4.1.

Fig. 7

Oxygenated and deoxygenated vessels in PVCP phantom. The circular cross-sections from both vessels are visible in each of the six maps (top row: ultrasound, OA Combined, and OA Short; bottom row: OA Total, OA Relative, and OA Long). The measured sO2 levels are 99% for Vessel 1 (left, green) and 31% for Vessel 2 (right, red). The vessel depth is 15 mm, and the field of view (maximum image height) is 40 mm.

JBO_24_12_121915_f007.png

3.3.

Sensitivity to Differences in Oxygen Saturation

To determine RCS, the biologically relevant PVCP-based phantom was imaged using an investigational Imagio® system. The positioning of the probe relative to the phantom is shown in Fig. 3. The vessels were oriented perpendicular to the imaging plane. A representative image of the configuration is shown in Fig. 7. A reference region with a vertical size of 5 mm encompassed the vessels, as indicated by markers (magenta arrows).

Several tests were performed, with the procedure repeated for varied imaging depth, oxygenation conditions, and hematocrit levels, according to Table 3. In each test, image output in six-on-one format (described in Sec. 3.2.2) was continually collected while the sO2 levels of both vessels were individually controlled. Since the vessels in the phantom are sloped at an incline, the vessel depth was adjusted for each test by an initial positioning of the probe. A clamp was used to keep the probe in a fixed position. Sensor readings of pH, DO, and temperature for each vessel were monitored and recorded as image annotations. Each collected six-on-one image corresponds to a single measurement and was stored as a separate RGB image file (in a lossless PNG format). For each measurement, the sensor readings were used to determine the sO2 for Vessel 1 and Vessel 2. This corresponds to the measured oxygen saturation, which was plotted as a function of measurement number. A series of sequential measurements was stored as a dataset. The datasets that were analyzed are listed in Table 3. For Dataset 1A, the results are in Sec. 4.2.

Table 3

List of collected datasets. Measurements were performed as indicated parameters were varied.

DatasetVessel 1 sO2Vessel 2 sO2DepthHematocrit
1AFull to 30%30% to full15 mm46%
1BFull40% to full15, 23, and 30 mm42%
1CFull40% to full15 mm42%, 24%, 10%
25%Full14 to 54 mm42%

To analyze RCS, a single numerical value ΔM was computed to characterize factors that affect the ability to distinguish small differences oxygen saturation. This was performed for varied depths and hematocrit levels using Datasets 1B and 1C of Table 3. For computing ΔM, the sO2 of one vessel was varied while holding the other constant. The sO2 of Vessel 1 was set to full oxygenation as a fixed reference vessel. Vessel 2 sO2 was initially set to 40% and then gradually increased to full oxygenation. When one vessel remains fully oxygenated, this reduces variability in its sO2 and facilitates measuring the oxygenation level at which a loss of contrast is reached. Image colorization was measured from the RGB data (see Sec. 3.5). The lowest measurement number was identified where the difference in measured image colorization (as described in Sec. 3.5), between the vessels is less than a contrast distinction threshold ΔC. This was set to an empirically selected threshold value of ΔC=0.5, where visual distinction is apparent and above the noise floor. The result ΔM was computed by determining, at the measurement number where threshold occurs, the difference in the measured oxygen saturation between the vessels. The procedure was applied to Datasets 1B and 1C, with results in Sec. 4.3.

3.4.

Penetration Depth

The penetration depth for the biologically relevant phantom was investigated by imaging the vessels at two different sO2 levels (Dataset 2 from Table 3). The sO2 of Vessel 1 was set to full oxygenation (99% sO2), and Vessel 2 was set to very low deoxygenation (5% sO2). The probe was mounted on a linear actuator configured to slide along its elevational axis at a constant speed. Since the vessels are sloped, the acquisition of data at multiple depths could be automated. The geometry of the phantom permitted vessel depth to be varied from 14 to 53 mm. While the linear actuator was active, data acquisition was performed at a constant frame rate. The reference region was set to a vertical size of 5 mm and was positioned to encompass the vessels as their depth was varied. The six-on-one composite image maps were collected and stored as individual RGB data files.

The measurements were analyzed in increments of 1 mm. At each depth, the measured image colorization was computed and recorded for the OA Combined and OA Total maps, as described in Sec. 3.5. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) is defined by CNR=Cσ, where C represents the contrast of a target, divided by the standard deviation σ of the background. In statistical mapping using Eq. (6), the color mapping already includes division by σ. Therefore, the measured image colorization, which can be directly associated with C, is also a measure of each target’s CNR, because the background standard deviation has already been normalized during the color mapping. In addition, CBR measurements were performed for each vessel using the OA Short and OA Long maps. The equation CBR=SBB was used, where S is the peak signal within the vessel, and B is the average background level. Penetration depth corresponds to the point at which CBR is less than a threshold when the vessel can no longer be visualized. The results are presented in Sec. 4.4.

3.5.

Image Analysis

In each dataset, RGB image output was produced by the statistical mapping approach. To analyze this output, an inverse mapping was applied to convert RGB values into a scalar value, which corresponds to the amount of relative colorization of each pixel. Since the hue of RGB colors remains unaltered when RGBA is overlaid with grayscale, this was used to determine the inverse mapping for the fRGBA palette in Eq. (6). The palettes have a unique hue for each color, so the inverse mapping fRGBA1 exists and is not affected by the grayscale wherever the transparency is nonzero. The hue of each pixel was used with fRGBA1 to determine a real number between kmin and kmax. OA Relative and OA Combined are mapped from 1 to 1 (from red to green); OA Total is mapped from 0 to 1 (from transparent to yellow). The gray RGB pixels were set to zero, corresponding to transparent areas.

To measure colorization of the vessels in OA Combined, a rectangular window surrounding each vessel was mapped into numerical values, using the inverse mapping described above. The average of this was computed, but only for pixels with mapped values having a magnitude exceeding the median magnitude of the window, which avoided noise by skipping highly transparent pixels. This numerical result, called the measured image colorization, was recorded for each vessel and plotted as a function of measurement number.

4.

Results

4.1.

Display of Vessels in Biologically Relevant Phantom

Figure 7 shows a composite image of the phantom, captured by an investigational Imagio® system, which consists of the six simultaneously displayed maps described in Sec. 3.2.2. The circular cross-sections from both vessels are visible in each of the six maps. The depth of the vessels is 15 mm, and the field of view (maximum image height) is set to 40 mm. Vessel 1 was fully oxygenated to 99% sO2 and appears green. Vessel 2 was oxygenated to 31% sO2 and appears red. In the OA Combined map, colorization is displayed for regions of strong signal in both OA Relative and OA Total maps. Since the vessels have strong hemoglobin and strong relative oxygenation, OA Relative and OA Combined look fairly similar.

In the OA Short and OA Long image maps of Fig. 7, a different intensity for each vessel is observed because the optical absorption coefficient of blood is wavelength specific and depends on oxygen saturation. Vessel 2, which has a low sO2 (31%), has a low signal in the long wavelength; however, Vessel 2 has strong signal for the short wavelength. Vessel 1, which has high oxygen saturation (99%), has moderately weak signal at the short wavelength and strong signal in the long wavelength.

4.2.

Sensitivity to Differences in Oxygen Saturation

4.2.1.

Varying sO2 of both vessels

In Fig. 8, the RGB image colorization of the phantom is displayed when sO2 of both vessels is varied using the dual-path perfusion system described in Sec. 3.1. For this figure, the parameters for Dataset 1A, described in Table 3, are used. The image colorization was computed from the RGB values of the OA Combined map, as described above. To graphically show the RGB colorization of the vessels from the series of measurements, the region surrounding the vessels is arranged according to measurement number [Fig. 8(b)]. The line style colors plotted in Figs. 8(a) and 8(c) were selected to match the initial RGB measurements in Fig. 8(b). Initially, the sO2 of Vessel 1 is lower than Vessel 2. The measured colorization of Vessel 1 begins negative (red), while Vessel 2 has a positive (green) colorization. As the sO2 levels converge, the colorization becomes weaker, and around measurement number 45 this switches colors as Vessel 1 becomes more oxygenated than Vessel 2.

Fig. 8

Characterization of RGB image colorization as oxygen saturation of Vessel 1 and Vessel 2 is varied in biologically relevant phantom of Fig. 3. (a) The measured oxygen saturation is determined from sensor readings. Measurements are sequentially numbered. (b) A subregion surrounding the two vessels from the OA Combined image map graphically indicates the displayed colorization for each measurement. (c) The measured image colorization is determined by mapping the OA Combined RGB data of vessels to a value between 1 and +1. In (a) and (c), the plotted line colors match initial measurements of (b).

JBO_24_12_121915_f008.png

4.2.2.

Effect of vessel sO2 on relative maps

In Fig. 9, some of the OA Combined and OA Total image maps used to generate Fig. 8 are shown at full-size for several sO2 levels. The oxygen saturation difference ΔsO2 (the difference of measured sO2 between the two vessels) is indicated for each case. For OA Combined, statistical color mapping causes the strongly oxygenated vessel (relative to the background level) to appear green, and the strongly deoxygenated vessel (relative to the background level) to appear red. Signal that is midway between these levels is transparent. As described in Fig. 5, the colorization adjusts dynamically based on the image content to present regions that have significant sO2 differences relative to background levels. In the top row of Fig. 9, it is observed that with the relative colorization, the resulting color mapped images remain virtually the same until ΔsO2 is below a background noise level. Below this level, when the vessels are no longer distinguishable, the colorization represents amplified background variability, since the sO2 levels of both vessels have become nearly the same (Fig. 9, top right). In the bottom row of Fig. 9, the corresponding OA Total maps are shown. When sO2 levels are adjusted, the amount of hemoglobin in the blood does not change. Thus, changing the sO2 does not have a substantial impact on the yellow colorization displayed here. Since the visibility in OA Total remains high, characterizing the ability to detect small differences applies only for relative sO2 maps and not for ctHb.

Fig. 9

Images of PVCP phantom as sO2 is varied. (top row) In OA Combined mode, the contrast of colorization between the two vessels depends on the magnitude of the difference in oxygen saturation ΔsO2. (bottom row) In OA Total mode, the intensity does not change substantially as sO2 is varied, since ctHb signal is relatively independent of sO2. Images are collected from Dataset 1A. The image height is 40 mm.

JBO_24_12_121915_f009.png

4.2.3.

Relative contrast sensitivity measurement

Results from Dataset 1B are shown in Fig. 10, for vessel depth of 15 mm and hematocrit of 42%. Vessel 1 was held at a constant fully oxygenated sO2 level of 99%, while Vessel 2 was varied from low oxygenation to full oxygenation. The line style colors plotted in Figs. 10(a) and 10(c) match the RGB measurements in Fig. 10(b). Less distinction is observed between the two vessels as their oxygen saturation measurements become closer together. The measurement number at which ΔC0.5 first occurs was identified and is indicated in the plots with a vertical blue dotted line. In Fig. 10, this corresponds with measurement 24. The displayed vessel images [Fig. 10(b)] highlight how this corresponds to the last measurement where sufficient color distinction was detected. At this measurement number, the difference in actual measured oxygen saturation ΔM between the two vessels, which corresponds to RCS, was determined as 4.6%.

Fig. 10

Ability to distinguish vessels in biologically relevant phantom. (a) Vessel 1 sO2 level is held constant at full oxygenation and Vessel 2 sO2 level is varied. (b) OA Combined RGB colorization of (left) Vessel 1 and (right) Vessel 2 by measurement number. High relative sO2 appears green. Low relative sO2 appears red. Mid-range relative sO2 values become transparent. (c) The measured image colorization as determined from RGB data. In plot (c), contrast distinction threshold of ΔC=0.5 is reached at measurement number 24. This occurs when the measured oxygen saturation difference ΔM is 4.6%, as shown in (a).

JBO_24_12_121915_f010.png

4.3.

Varying of Vessel Depth and Blood Hematocrit Level

4.3.1.

RCS measurement

The values for ΔM of Dataset 1B, where depth was varied, are recorded in Table 4(a). The observed trend is that as depth is increased (from 15 to 30 mm), ΔM is increased (from 4.6% to 9.7%). This occurs because the CBR becomes lower as depth is increased, which increases the sO2 difference required for color distinction. The parameter ΔM is able to assist with characterizing this phenomenon. A similar trend is observed for Dataset 1C in Table 4(b), where the testing was repeated for varied levels of hematocrit. As hematocrit is decreased (from 42% to 10%), ΔM is increased (from 4.6% to 7.8%). Similar to Table 4(a), the ΔM is increased because the CBR becomes lower as hematocrit decreases.

Table 4

Summary of results for RCS.

(a) Dataset 1B, αhct=42%
DepthΔM
15 mm4.6%
23 mm4.7%
30 mm9.7%
(b) Dataset 1C, depth=15  mm
HematocritΔM
42%4.6%
24%4.5%
10%7.8%

4.3.2.

Image colorization versus sO2 difference

From the datasets, we can also examine the difference in image colorization as a function of ΔsO2, the difference in oxygen saturation. This is plotted in Fig. 11. The threshold where ΔC=0.5 is indicated by a horizontal dotted line. The curves, as depth is varied for Dataset 1B, are shown in Fig. 11(a). In Fig. 11(b), the trend is plotted for the three hematocrit levels from Dataset 1C. From these curves, the value of ΔM can be derived by finding the x-coordinate where each curve intersects the dotted line. This also characterizes RCS by illustrating the relationship between ΔsO2 and ΔC and provides information about how ΔM changes with the threshold for ΔC. In addition, Fig. 11 shows that for cases where CBR is higher (15 mm depth, 42% hematocrit), the ability to distinguish the vessels based on image colorization increases. It also shows that the maximum difference in image colorization plateaus beyond a certain level of sO2, and this level is greater at high CBR. It is seen that below ΔC0.5, the curves have greater variability, which illustrates why this cutoff level was relevant.

Fig. 11

Image colorization difference ΔC is compared to oxygen saturation difference ΔsO2. (a) Depth is varied at fixed hematocrit level of 42%. (b) Hematocrit level is varied at fixed depth of 15 mm. The horizontal dashed line corresponds to threshold ΔC=0.5.

JBO_24_12_121915_f011.png

The effect of varying depth on CBR is shown visually in Fig. 12. OA Combined and OA Total maps are shown for different imaging depths, when the vessels are held at constant sO2 levels. At 15 mm depth, the intensity of the background is low. Background intensity visually becomes greater when the vessels are imaged at 23 mm and is substantially increased when the vessels are at 30 mm. The signal received from a vessel becomes weaker as its depth is increased. However, since the reference region encompasses the vessels, the statistics for color mapping automatically maximize the contrast of the vessels. This means that when the color mapping is targeted to deep vessels, the colorization scales automatically to visualize these weaker signals. As a result, when the vessels are imaged at 30 mm depth, amplification of the near-field background is observed in the image; however, the background for region surrounding the vessels is transparent. This is what is desired for the analysis described above, where the RGB values for the region surrounding the vessels determine the image characterization.

Fig. 12

OA Combined and OA Total maps as depth is varied. Vessel 1 (oxygenated, left) has constant sO2 of 99%. Vessel 2 (deoxygenated, right) has constant sO2 of 5%. OA Combined maps are shown in (a)–(c). OA Total maps are shown in (d)–(f). The CBR of the vessels is reduced as depth increases. Selecting a reference region to visualize deep vessels causes an increase of statistical gain parameter σ, which amplifies near-field background while contrast of targets is maximized. The region surrounding vessels is used for analysis.

JBO_24_12_121915_f012.png

4.4.

Penetration Depth

The results of penetration depth testing from Dataset 2 are shown in Fig. 13. This is displayed graphically in Fig. 13(a). Figure 13(b) demonstrates that both targets are visible in OA Combined map to depths of around 48 mm. In Fig. 13(c), both targets are visible in OA Total beyond 42 mm, while Vessel 1 remained visible to around 48 mm.

Fig. 13

Vessel contrast as depth is varied. Vessel 1 (oxygenated) has constant sO2 of 99%. Vessel 2 (deoxygenated) has constant sO2 of 5%. (a) Image maps are displayed for both vessels. (b) OA Combined map colorization for relative sO2 is plotted as a function of depth. Vessel distinction is present to 48 mm. (c) OA Total map colorization for ctHb as a function of depth. At 42 mm, signal from Vessel 2 reaches visibility threshold, while Vessel 1 remains above threshold until 48 mm. (d) CBR measurement of OA Short (757 nm) image map, which presents signal from deoxygenated blood. Vessel 1 is above CBR threshold to 32 mm and Vessel 2 remains above threshold to 42 mm. (e) CBR measurement of OA Long (1064 nm), which presents signal from oxygenated blood. Vessel 1 remains below CBR threshold, while Vessel 2 remains above threshold to 48 mm penetration depth.

JBO_24_12_121915_f013.png

In Figs. 13(d) and 13(e), the CBR measurement was used to determine the penetration depth of the targets at each wavelength. A CBR threshold value of 1.5 was used, which corresponds to when the targets could be distinguished from the background. Below this threshold, it was difficult to visualize the vessels clearly. In Fig. 13(d), for OA Short (757 nm), the oxygenated target maintains CBR>1.5 up to a depth of 32 mm, while the deoxygenated target maintains CBR>1.5 up to a depth of 42 mm. In Fig. 13(e), for OA Long (1064 nm), the oxygenated target maintains CBR>1.5 up to a depth of 48 mm, while the deoxygenated target did not have significant contrast even at the minimum depth of 14 mm. Therefore, the penetration depth for OA Short (757 nm), which strongly detects HbR, is determined to be 42 mm. For OA Long (1064 nm), which strongly detects HbO2, the penetration depth was determined to be 48 mm.

5.

Discussion

5.1.

Characterization of Relative sO2 and ctHb with Dual-Path Flow System

We investigated the use of a dual-path perfusion flow system to perform device characterization for statistical color mapping of relative sO2 and ctHb. Controlling the sO2 level of two independent vessels permits determining the ability to resolve differences in sO2 level.

In a single-vessel configuration, which was described in previously published approaches,50,54 the device characterization would be difficult for several reasons: (i) first, the signal intensity and oxygenation level of the background medium are not adjustable. If the relative colorization of a single vessel was compared to the background, the background would serve as a fixed reference. When the sO2 level of the vessel reached that of the background, the vessel would become transparent according to the color map of Fig. 6. The transparency would be a problem for analyzing the amount of image colorization. (ii) The background produces a relatively weak OA signal, whereas a vessel can produce a strong signal from blood. The CBR of the background is weak (by definition it is equal to zero), whereas for a vessel it is higher. Therefore, using the phantom’s background as a reference point for a quantitative sO2 level, which has an inherently low CBR, would be problematic. (iii) The homogeneity of the phantom background causes it to predominantly emit low-frequency OA signal. This tends to be filtered out by the system transfer-function response, so the DC portion of the received signal is blocked. Therefore, the absence of vascularity makes it difficult to use the phantom’s background as a quantitative reference point for sO2.

On the other hand, the two-vessel configuration permits the ability to characterize mappings of relative sO2 and ctHb by examining the difference between each vessel as they are simultaneously imaged. This avoids the issues of the single-vessel configuration described above.

5.2.

Differences between Phantoms and Breast Tissue

When performing characterization on a phantom, there are several potential limitations in interpreting the results due to differences between phantoms and breast tissue. However, phantom-based results can be used to make some general interpretations about relative color mapping in tissue.

When performing characterization, both targets in the phantom were imaged at approximately equal depth, and due to the homogeneous material properties, the targets received nearly equal fluence and had nearly equal acoustic propagation paths for measurement. This represents an ideal scenario for performing controlled characterization, as the independent variables of the blood can be isolated based on the amount of signal generated by either target.

Conversely, biological tissue has increased heterogeneity of optical and acoustical properties compared to the phantom, which can impact signal generation. As a result, tissue may have decreased CBR compared to the phantom. In addition, benign or malignant lesions may occur at different depths and have different hematocrit levels. By definition, the CBR increases with OA signal strength, which is impacted by depth [Eq. (4)] and hemoglobin concentration [Eq. (3)]. Therefore, this situation may lead to reduced CBR during imaging for some lesions. Furthermore, while the phantom only has two targets, acoustic interference from other sources or targets in tissue can lead to decreased CBR. A decrease in CBR may reduce penetration depth. This may also impact relative colorization, since it was demonstrated in Sec. 4.3 that RCS is impacted by the CBR. When CBR is reduced, for example, at increased depth, or at decreased hematocrit level, the ΔM increases (as shown in Fig. 11). In this case, a greater difference in sO2 between each vessel would be required to maintain distinguishable colorization.

Other factors can also impact the RCS and ability to display relative sO2. To illustrate this, consider a perturbation ΔΦ from a modeled fluence distribution Φ. From Eq. (1), the generated OA signal depends on Φ. Variability of optical properties or spatial nonhomogeneity, which may be present in tissue, tends to increase ΔΦ for targets being imaged. If ΔΦ is increased, then ΔM, which represents the difference in actual sO2 values to distinguish the targets, may also increase. With the phantom characterization apparatus, at either specific wavelength, both targets receive nearly equal fluence, and perturbation from the modeled Φ is assumed to be small. However, in a scenario where targets receive a greater uncompensated ΔΦ, such as in tissue, this may correspond with greater ΔM. In addition, in tissue, the Grüneisen parameter Γ can vary spatially, leading to additional perturbation in signal generation. For tissue, it is assumed that there is small variability in Γ. Spatial variability in Γ can lead to increased ΔM. Likewise, spatial variation in hematocrit level could produce a similar effect.

5.3.

Visualizing Relative sO2 and ctHb with Statistical Color Mapping

In statistical color mapping, which performs relative colorization of sO2 and ctHb (as described in Sec. 3.2.1), the goal is to maximize the contrast of a target or lesion compared to background tissue, rather than to measure precise numerical values of a parameter. Colorization is determined dynamically, to highlight areas that are relatively more significant compared to others. The approach is considered qualitative because numerical measurements of sO2 and ctHb are not conveyed with the generated RGB maps.

One advantage for statistical color mapping is the ability to display relative sO2 and ctHb when quantitative parameter estimates could have offset and scaling that is difficult to determine in advance. Specifically, the procedure can help compensate for some variability in tissue OA properties and fluence distribution that impact OA signal generation, as described in Sec. 5.2. To dynamically maximize contrast, colorization is determined relative to a background reference region, by computing μ and σ in Eq. (6). This tends to cancel out perturbation to parameters that affect signal generation, when stationary over the reference region. For example, if the assumed parameters and coefficients contributing to Eq. (1) or Eq. (9) are offset or scaled from their actual values (e.g., by stronger signal from one wavelength), then μ and σ of the estimated sO2 and ctHb quantities will also be offset and scaled, at least to a first approximation. However, with statistical mapping, any offset and scaling to the distribution of parameter estimates will be dynamically compensated, relative to the background. In other approaches, where quantitative parameter estimates are directly output or mapped to a fixed color, variations in fluence distribution and OA properties may result in the displayed color or output being shifted.

For purposes of diagnostic imaging in tissue, the statistical reference region used to compute μ and σ (described in Sec. 3.2.1) is commonly set to encompass the entire mid-field of the image (e.g., from 5 to 30 mm). This is selected to provide and maximize statistical contrast of the image based on properties of the full image region. This is applicable when imaging tissue, which can have more than two vessels as configured in our phantom. By using the statistics of this region, the mapping detects areas of contrast that appear as outliers from background levels, which presents information about the relative spatial distributions of ctHb and sO2. In clinical studies, this was demonstrated to be an effective method to visualize breast lesions compared to the background tissue.7,9,13,14

5.4.

Application of Relative sO2 and ctHb for OA/US Clinical Breast Diagnosis

Several clinical studies for breast cancer diagnosis715 have examined the ability to distinguish benign from malignant lesions using relative OA/US maps generated with an investigational Imagio® breast imaging system. For radiological assessment during these studies, the OA/US maps were formatted as a six-on-one composite image, similar to Fig. 7, which displays ultrasound, OA Total, OA Combined, OA Relative, OA Short, and OA Long. Results from a Feasibility study were initially reported by Zalev et al.1315 and Otto et al.70 In a Pilot study of 100 subjects, Neuschler et al.8 found that using the relative OA/US technique to assess images resulted in downgrading of benign masses and upgrading of malignant masses compared with conventional ultrasound. In a multicenter OA/US study of 209 subjects, Menezes et al.9 also found that certain benign masses suspicious for cancer could potentially be downgraded to a category where biopsy is not required. Butler et al.10 reported on a correlation between relative OA/US image features and the histopathology of benign and malignant lesions. Menezes et al. reported that OA/US might also be useful to differentiate breast cancer molecular subtypes.11 A subsequent multicenter Pivotal study (Neuschler et al.7) consisted of 2105 subjects from 16-sites, where seven blinded and independent radiologists assessed 1079 benign and 678 malignant breast masses. In the study, relative OA/US was found to exceed diagnostic specificity of conventional ultrasound by 14.9%.

These results demonstrate the diagnostic potential of relative OA/US maps for clinical breast imaging. Accordingly, there is a practical significance for characterizing relative sO2 and ctHb maps for this application.

5.5.

Other OA Visualization Approaches for Clinical Breast Imaging

In addition to the studies listed above, other visualization approaches for OA have been investigated for clinical breast imaging. Kitai et al.29 performed comparison of OA with MRI. Asao et al.30 investigated simultaneous acquisition of OA and ultrasound. Toi et al.31 described producing high-resolution vascular images using a 3-D tomographic full-breast imaging device, where a relative index, called the S-factor, was used to display qualitative sO2 maps. Kruger et al.32,33 developed a 3-D tomographic OA breast imaging device capable of imaging vessels in breast tissue at 250 μm resolution using a single optical wavelength. Klosner et al.34 also developed a system for high-resolution 3-D imaging of breast vasculature. A volumetric 3-D handheld probe for OA imaging is described by Dean-Ben et al..35 Li et al.36 investigated lesion visibility from ctHb and sO2 contrast. Lin et al.37 formed colorized 3-D images of arteries and veins by analyzing heartbeat information and compared this to full-breast images with depth-encoded colorization. Garcia-Uribe et al.42 used OA to image sentinel lymph nodes in breast tissue. Heijblom et al.3840 and Manohar et al.41 investigated lesion visibility and the appearance of masses in OA. In addition, several review papers for OA breast imaging have compared the visualization approaches of various imaging devices, along with the corresponding tumors features that were clinically detected.15,12,19,20,43

5.6.

Relationship of Statistical Mapping with Quantitative Imaging Approaches

Relative OA/US imaging with statistical color mapping is different from quantitative imaging approaches. In quantitative imaging, numerical measurements of physical parameters such as sO2 and ctHb are displayed directly, or linked to colorization, and therefore the numerical quantities can be evaluated during clinical assessment. This involves determining accurate measurement of numerical values for tissue chromophore levels or other parameters. A review of quantitative OA imaging techniques by Cox et al.71 describes implementation and the associated challenges with these approaches in detail. Quantitative numerical values are difficult to calibrate due to variability of tissue properties between subjects.

A distinction between statistical mapping and quantitative approaches is illustrated by the RGB image characterization of Sec. 3.3, where the measured image colorization was used instead of the sO2 level. In particular, to quantitatively determine sO2 or ctHb from a statistically mapped RGB image, the values of σ and μ in Eq. (6) must be known (to uniquely relate the color palette to the physical parameter values). However, since σ and μ are internal variables that are not provided as output, this is underdetermined, and values were mapped between kmin and kmax. In this sense, only the relative spatial information is accessible from the statistically mapped RGB output.

6.

Conclusion

We have presented a method for characterizing colorized OA image maps that display spatial information regarding relative blood oxygen saturation and hemoglobin in tissue. A biologically relevant PVCP-based phantom was constructed to mimic the optical and acoustical properties of breast tissue. The phantom comprised two independently oxygenated vessels filled with bovine blood. A statistical color mapping procedure was used to generate RGB colorization of OA signal. A technique was proposed to characterize the ability to resolve small differences in sO2 when using maps with relative colorization. In the PVCP phantom, it was measured that distinguishing the two vessels required a sO2 difference of 4.6%, when imaged at 15 mm depth and at 42% hematocrit. By analyzing the effects of varying vessel depth and hematocrit level, it was determined that a reduction of CBR increases the sO2 difference required to distinguish vessels. In addition, by analyzing the color mapping approach, we examined how the spatial distributions of relative sO2 and ctHb may potentially be used during clinical assessment to visualize differences between benign and malignant lesions for breast cancer diagnosis. Future work involves performing further device characterization and developing techniques to improve visualization of diagnostic imaging features.

7.

Appendix A: Derivations

7.1.

Optical Absorption of Biological Tissue

In biological tissue, absorption can be modeled as a mixture of HbR, HbO2, melanin, and several other less significant chromophores (e.g., water and lipids).59 At optical wavelength λ, the overall absorption coefficient μa(λ) is a weighted combination of the i’th chromophore’s absorption μa,i(λ) times its volume fraction fv,i. For example,

μa(λ)=fv,HbO2×μa,HbO2(λ)+fv,HbR×μa,HbR(λ)+fv,melanin×μa,melanin(λ)+fv,water×μa,water(λ)+fv,lipids×μa,lipids(λ)+.
Equivalently, this can be written as a summation of the mass concentration ci times the optical extinction coefficient εi(λ). Thus,
μa(λ)=ifv,i×μa,i(λ)=ici×εi(λ).
Commonly, the optical absorption coefficient μa(λ) is computed by considering absorption only from hemoglobin, since melanin is present mainly in the epidermal layer, and the other chromophores are assumed negligible. Therefore, at position x, the absorption can be approximated as

Eq. (7)

μa(λ,x)=cHbO2(x)×εHbO2(λ)+cHbR(x)×εHbR(λ).
This expression can also be grouped in terms of sO2 and ctHb. By substituting Eq. (2) into Eq. (7), this results in Eq. (3), which has a linear dependence of μa(λ) on ctHb.

7.2.

Computation of cHbO2 and cHbR

To determine cHbO2 and cHbR from transducer measurements, Eq. (1) must be inverted, which relies on the wavelength-specific optical absorption of Sec. 7.1. For a tissue sample with known hemoglobin concentrations, the generated OA pressure can be obtained by combining Eq. (1) with Eq. (7). For wavelength λ, and position x, this is

p0(λ,x)=Γ(x)×Φ(λ,x)×[cHbO2(x)×εHbO2(λ)+cHbR(x)×εHbR(λ)].
Since multiple optical wavelengths are used, this is repeated for each wavelength. It is convenient to write this in matrix form. If two wavelengths are used, i.e., λ1=757  nm and λ2=1064  nm, this becomes
[p0(λ1,x)p0(λ2,x)]p(x)=Γ(x)[Φ(λ1,x)00Φ(λ2,x)][εHbO2(λ1)εHbR(λ1)εHbO2(λ2)εHbR(λ2)]A(x)[cHbO2(x)cHbR(x)]c(x).
For each position x, this can be written more compactly as

Eq. (8)

p=Ac.
When imaging tissue, the unknown concentrations of cHbO2(x) and cHbR(x), which are represented by c˜, can be solved by inverting the 2×2 matrix for A in Eq. (8). Thus,

Eq. (9)

c˜=A1p˜.
Here, p˜ represents a map of the initial pressure p0(λ,x), which has been reconstructed by an imaging algorithm using data recorded from transducers, because p from Eq. (8) is not directly measured.

To compute estimates of sO2(x) and ctHb(x) for OA images, the values of cHbO2(x) and cHbR(x) can be substituted into Eqs. (2a) and (2b).

Disclosures

Authors (JZ, LMR, BAC, JH, EC, GLGM, CA, AB, XS, SM, AAO) disclose employment or equity position at Seno Medical Instruments; Author (MCK) declares no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank: Dr. A. Thomas Stavros for assistance with using OA/US to distinguish benign and malignant lesions; Alyssa Lopez and Mike Karaz for assistance with image acquisition; Tammy Garcia and Ann Waterhouse for providing feedback on this manuscript; Lynnette Kline, Beverly Richter, and Sandy Doty for providing administrative assistance; Nick Alexander for setting up the linear actuator used in penetration depth measurements; Alfredo Ramirez, Greg Schmid, and Tam Do for hardware and firmware support; Victoria Pacheco for assistance with mechanical designs; Sergey Ermilov for discussions about phantom and tissue properties; Tom Miller, Don Herzog, William Ackerman, and Heather Hanson for assistance with the apparatus and phantom used in initial experiments; and, members of the Seno team, who contributed to the development of the Imagio® breast imaging system. This work was supported in part by a Discovery grant awarded to MCK by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), funding reference number RGPIN-2017-06496.

References

1. 

A. A. Oraevsky, “Optoacoustic tomography: from fundamentals to diagnostic imaging of breast cancer,” Biomedical Diagnostics HandBook, 715 –757 Taylor Francis(2014). Google Scholar

2. 

S. Zackrisson, S. Van De Ven and S. S. Gambhir, “Light in and sound out: emerging translational strategies for photoacoustic imaging,” Cancer Res., 74 (4), 979 –1004 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2387 Google Scholar

3. 

P. K. Upputuri and M. Pramanik, “Recent advances toward preclinical and clinical translation of photoacoustic tomography: a review,” J. Biomed. Opt., 22 (4), 041006 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.4.041006 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

4. 

K. S. Valluru and J. K. Willmann, “Clinical photoacoustic imaging of cancer,” Ultrasonography, 35 (4), 267 –280 (2016). https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.16035 Google Scholar

5. 

K. S. Valluru, K. E. Wilson and J. K. Willmann, “Photoacoustic imaging in oncology: translational preclinical and early clinical experience,” Radiology, 280 (2), 332 –349 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.16151414 RADLAX 0033-8419 Google Scholar

6. 

J. Yao and L. V. Wang, “Photoacoustic tomography: fundamentals, advances and prospects,” Contrast Media Mol. Imaging, 6 (5), 332 –345 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/cmmi.443 Google Scholar

7. 

E. I. Neuschler et al., “A pivotal study of optoacoustic imaging to diagnose benign and malignant breast masses: a new evaluation tool for radiologists,” Radiology, 287 (2), 398 –412 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017172228 RADLAX 0033-8419 Google Scholar

8. 

E. I. Neuschler et al., “Downgrading and upgrading gray-scale ultrasound bi-rads categories of benign and malignant masses with optoacoustics: a pilot study,” Am. J. Roentgenol., 211 (3), 689 –700 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18436 AJROAM 0092-5381 Google Scholar

9. 

G. L. G. Menezes et al., “Downgrading of breast masses suspicious for cancer by using optoacoustic breast imaging,” Radiology, 288 (2), 355 –365 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018170500 RADLAX 0033-8419 Google Scholar

10. 

R. Butler et al., “Optoacoustic breast imaging: imaging-pathology correlation of optoacoustic features in benign and malignant breast masses,” Am. J. Roentgenol., 211 1155 –1170 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18435 AJROAM 0092-5381 Google Scholar

11. 

G. L. G. Menezes et al., “Optoacoustic imaging of the breast: correlation with histopathology and histopathologic biomarkers,” Eur. Radiol., 29 (12), 6728 –6740 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06262-0 Google Scholar

12. 

A. A. Oraevsky et al., “Clinical optoacoustic imaging combined with ultrasound for coregistered functional and anatomical mapping of breast tumors,” Photoacoustics, 12 30 –45 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2018.08.003 Google Scholar

13. 

J. Zalev et al., “Opto-acoustic image fusion technology for diagnostic breast imaging in a feasibility study,” Proc. SPIE, 9419 941909 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2081679 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

14. 

J. Zalev et al., “Opto-acoustic breast imaging with co-registered ultrasound,” Proc. SPIE, 9038 90381J (2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2043050 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

15. 

J. Zalev et al., “Clinical feasibility study of combined opto-acoustic and ultrasonic imaging modality providing coregistered functional and anatomical maps of breast tumors: part II,” Proc. SPIE, 8581 858103 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2009112 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

16. 

J. Zalev et al., “Clinical feasibility study of combined opto-acoustic and ultrasonic imaging modality providing coregistered functional and anatomical maps of breast tumors: part I,” Proc. SPIE, 8223 82230A (2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.910968 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

17. 

J. J. Niederhauser et al., “Combined ultrasound and optoacoustic system for real-time high-contrast vascular imaging in vivo,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 24 (4), 436 –440 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2004.843199 ITMID4 0278-0062 Google Scholar

18. 

S. Y. Emelianov et al., “Combined ultrasound, optoacoustic, and elasticity imaging,” Proc. SPIE, 5320 101 –113 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.537155 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

19. 

S. Manohar and M. Dantuma, “Current and future trends in photoacoustic breast imaging,” Photoacoustics, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2019.04.004 Google Scholar

20. 

N. Nyayapathi and J. Xia, “Photoacoustic imaging of breast cancer: a mini review of system design and image features,” J. Biomed. Opt., 24 (12), 121911 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.12.121911 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

21. 

W. A. Berg et al., “Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk,” JAMA, 307 (13), 1394 –1404 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.388 JAMAAP 0098-7484 Google Scholar

22. 

M. J. Silverstein et al., “Image-detected breast cancer: state of the art diagnosis and treatment,” J. Am. Coll. Surg., 201 (4), 586 –597 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.05.032 JACSEX 1072-7515 Google Scholar

23. 

A. Vlahiotis et al., “Analysis of utilization patterns and associated costs of the breast imaging and diagnostic procedures after screening mammography,” ClinicoEconomics Outcomes Res. CEOR, 10 157 –167 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S150260 Google Scholar

24. 

R. K. Jain, “Normalizing tumor microenvironment to treat cancer: bench to bedside to biomarkers,” J. Clin. Oncol., 31 (17), 2205 –2218 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.46.3653 JCONDN 0732-183X Google Scholar

25. 

P. Carmeliet and R. K. Jain, “Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases,” Nature, 407 (6801), 249 –257 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35025220 Google Scholar

26. 

G. Bergers and L. E. Benjamin, “Angiogenesis: tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch,” Nat. Rev. Cancer, 3 (6), 401 –410 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1093 NRCAC4 1474-175X Google Scholar

27. 

M. Papetti and I. M. Herman, “Mechanisms of normal and tumor-derived angiogenesis,” Am. J. Physiol., 282 (5), C947 –C970 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00389.2001 AJPHAP 0002-9513 Google Scholar

28. 

R. K. Jain, “Taming vessels to treat cancer,” Sci. Am., 298 (1), 56 –63 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0108-56 SCAMAC 0036-8733 Google Scholar

29. 

T. Kitai et al., “Photoacoustic mammography: initial clinical results,” Breast Cancer, 21 (2), 146 –153 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-012-0363-0 BCATDJ 0161-0112 Google Scholar

30. 

Y. Asao et al., “Photoacoustic mammography capable of simultaneously acquiring photoacoustic and ultrasound images,” J. Biomed. Opt., 21 (11), 116009 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.11.116009 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

31. 

M. Toi et al., “Visualization of tumor-related blood vessels in human breast by photoacoustic imaging system with a hemispherical detector array,” Sci. Rep., 7 41970 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41970 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

32. 

R. A. Kruger et al., “Photoacoustic angiography of the breast,” Med. Phys., 37 (11), 6096 –6100 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3497677 MPHYA6 0094-2405 Google Scholar

33. 

R. A. Kruger et al., “Dedicated 3-D photoacoustic breast imaging,” Med. Phys., 40 (11), 113301 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4824317 MPHYA6 0094-2405 Google Scholar

34. 

M. Klosner et al., “Advanced laser system for 3-D optoacoustic tomography of the breast,” Proc. SPIE, 9708 97085B (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2209398 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

35. 

X. L. Deán-Ben et al., “Volumetric hand-held optoacoustic angiography as a tool for real-time screening of dense breast,” J. Biophotonics, 9 (3), 253 –259 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201500008 Google Scholar

36. 

X. Li et al., “High resolution functional photoacoustic tomography of breast cancer,” Med. Phys., 42 (9), 5321 –5328 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4928598 MPHYA6 0094-2405 Google Scholar

37. 

L. Lin et al., “Single-breath-hold photoacoustic computed tomography of the breast,” Nat. Commun., 9 (1), 2352 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04576-z NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

38. 

M. Heijblom et al., “The state of the art in breast imaging using the Twente photoacoustic mammoscope: results from 31 measurements on malignancies,” Eur. Radiol., 26 (11), 3874 –3887 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4240-7 Google Scholar

39. 

M. Heijblom et al., “Visualizing breast cancer using the Twente photoacoustic mammoscope: what do we learn from twelve new patient measurements?,” Opt. Express, 20 (11), 11582 –11597 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.011582 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

40. 

M. Heijblom et al., “Photoacoustic image patterns of breast carcinoma and comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging and vascular stained histopathology,” Sci. Rep., 5 11778 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11778 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

41. 

S. Manohar et al., “Initial results of in vivo non-invasive cancer imaging in the human breast using near-infrared photoacoustics,” Opt. Express, 15 (19), 12277 –12285 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.012277 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

42. 

A. Garcia-Uribe et al., “Dual-modality photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging system for noninvasive sentinel lymph node detection in patients with breast cancer,” Sci. Rep., 5 15748 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15748 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

43. 

M. W. Schellenberg and H. K. Hunt, “Hand-held optoacoustic imaging: a review,” Photoacoustics, 11 14 –27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2018.07.001 Google Scholar

44. 

J. Zalev and B. Clingman, “Statistical mapping in an optoacoustic imaging system,” US Patent 9,330,452, Filed: March 11, 2013, Issued: May 3, 2016 (2016).

45. 

J. R. Cook, R. R. Bouchard and S. Y. Emelianov, “Tissue-mimicking phantoms for photoacoustic and ultrasonic imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 2 (11), 3193 –3206 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.003193 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

46. 

A. A. Oraevsky, D. A. Tsyboulski and T. G. Miller, “Methods and compositions for tissue-equivalent opto-acoustic phantoms,” US Patent 9,655,594, Filed: Dec 17, 2013, Issued: May 23, 2017 (2017).

47. 

E. Maneas et al., “Gel wax-based tissue-mimicking phantoms for multispectral photoacoustic imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 9 (3), 1151 –1163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.001151 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

48. 

P. M. Henrichs et al., “Phantoms for development of LOIS as a modality for diagnostic imaging of breast cancer,” Proc. SPIE, 5320 8 –16 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.536869 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

49. 

G. M. Spirou et al., “Optical and acoustic properties at 1064 nm of polyvinyl chloride-plastisol for use as a tissue phantom in biomedical optoacoustics,” Phys. Med. Biol., 50 (14), N141 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/14/N01 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

50. 

W. C. Vogt et al., “Biologically relevant photoacoustic imaging phantoms with tunable optical and acoustic properties,” J. Biomed. Opt., 21 (10), 101405 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.10.101405 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

51. 

S. E. Bohndiek et al., “Development and application of stable phantoms for the evaluation of photoacoustic imaging instruments,” PLoS One, 8 (9), e75533 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075533 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar

52. 

M. Fonseca et al., “Characterisation of a phantom for multiwavelength quantitative photoacoustic imaging,” Phys. Med. Biol., 61 (13), 4950 –4973 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/61/13/4950 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

53. 

W. C. Vogt et al., “Performance evaluation of photoacoustic oximetry imaging systems using a dynamic blood flow phantom with tunable oxygen saturation,” Proc. SPIE, 10494 1049426 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2290164 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

54. 

W. C. Vogt et al., “Photoacoustic oximetry imaging performance evaluation using dynamic blood flow phantoms with tunable oxygen saturation,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 10 (2), 449 –464 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.000449 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

55. 

J. Zalev et al., “Characterization of opto-acoustic color mapping for oxygen saturation of blood using biologically relevant phantoms,” Proc. SPIE, 10878 108781Q (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2506906 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

56. 

H. F. Zhang et al., “Imaging of hemoglobin oxygen saturation variations in single vessels in vivo using photoacoustic microscopy,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 90 (5), 053901 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2435697 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

57. 

M. Xu and L. V. Wang, “Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 77 (4), 041101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2195024 RSINAK 0034-6748 Google Scholar

58. 

S. Krueger and R. Nossal, “Sans studies of interacting hemoglobin in intact erythrocytes,” Biophys. J., 53 (1), 97 –105 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83070-4 BIOJAU 0006-3495 Google Scholar

59. 

S. L. Jacques, “Optical properties of biological tissues: a review,” Phys. Med. Biol., 58 (11), R37 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/11/R37 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

60. 

W.-F. Cheong, S. A. Prahl and A. J. Welch, “A review of the optical properties of biological tissues,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 26 (12), 2166 –2185 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1109/3.64354 IEJQA7 0018-9197 Google Scholar

61. 

L. Wang, S. L. Jacques and L. Zheng, “MCML–Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in multi-layered tissues,” Comput. Meth. Programs Biomed., 47 (2), 131 –146 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(95)01640-F Google Scholar

62. 

I. Katz-Hanani et al., “Age-related ultrasonic properties of breast tissue in vivo,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 40 (9), 2265 –2271 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.03.034 USMBA3 0301-5629 Google Scholar

63. 

F. T. d’Astous and F. S. Foster, “Frequency dependence of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter in breast tissue,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 12 (10), 795 –808 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(86)90077-3 USMBA3 0301-5629 Google Scholar

64. 

J.-P. Delille et al., “Breast cancer: regional blood flow and blood volume measured with magnetic susceptibility-based MR imaging—initial results,” Radiology, 223 (2), 558 –565 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2232010428 RADLAX 0033-8419 Google Scholar

65. 

D. Grosenick et al., “Time-domain scanning optical mammography: II. Optical properties and tissue parameters of 87 carcinomas,” Phys. Med. Biol., 50 (11), 2451 –2468 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/11/002 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

66. 

S. A. Prahl, M. J. van Gemert and A. J. Welch, “Determining the optical properties of turbid media by using the adding–doubling method,” Appl. Opt., 32 (4), 559 –568 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.32.000559 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

67. 

W. Zijlstra and A. Buursma, “Spectrophotometry of hemoglobin: absorption spectra of bovine oxyhemoglobin, deoxyhemoglobin, carboxyhemoglobin, and methemoglobin,” Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B, 118 (4), 743 –749 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0491(97)00230-7 Google Scholar

68. 

T. Clerbaux et al., “Comparative study of the oxyhaemoglobin dissociation curve of four mammals: man, dog, horse and cattle,” Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A, 106 (4), 687 –694 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(93)90382-E Google Scholar

69. 

R. K. Dash and J. B. Bassingthwaighte, “Blood HbO2 and HbCO2 dissociation curves at varied O2, CO2, pH, 2, 3-DPG and temperature levels,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 38 (4), 1683 –1701 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-9948-y ABMECF 0090-6964 Google Scholar

70. 

P. Otto et al., “Improved differentiation of breast tumors using laser opto-acoustic ultrasonic imaging system,” in Proc. Eur. Cong. Radiol., (2012). Google Scholar

71. 

B. T. Cox et al., “Quantitative spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging: a review,” J. Biomed. Opt., 17 (6), 061202 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.6.061202 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

Biographies of the authors are not available.

© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Jason Zalev, Lisa M. Richards, Bryan A. Clingman, Jeff Harris, Edgar Cantu, Gisela L. G. Menezes, Carlos A. Avila, Allison Bertrand, Xavier R. Saenz, Steve C. Miller, Alexander A. Oraevsky, and Michael C. Kolios "Opto-acoustic imaging of relative blood oxygen saturation and total hemoglobin for breast cancer diagnosis," Journal of Biomedical Optics 24(12), 121915 (17 December 2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.12.121915
Received: 13 June 2019; Accepted: 22 November 2019; Published: 17 December 2019
JOURNAL ARTICLE
16 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top