Translator Disclaimer
19 March 2020 High-throughput single-cell live imaging of photobiomodulation with multispectral near-infrared lasers in cultured T cells
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Significance: Photobiomodulation is a well-established therapeutic modality. However, the mechanism of action is poorly understood, due to lack of research in the causal relationship between the near-infrared (NIR) light irradiation and its specific biological effects, hindering broader applications of this technology.

Aim: Since biological chromophores typically show several absorption peaks, we determined whether specific effects of photobiomodulation are induced with a combination of two wavelengths at a certain range of irradiance only, rather than a single wavelength of NIR light.

Approach: In order to analyze a wide array of combinations of multispectral NIR light at various irradiances efficiently, we developed a new optical platform equipped with two distinct wavelengths of NIR lasers by high-throughput multiple dosing for single-cell live imaging. Two wavelengths of 1064 and 1270 nm were selected based on their photobiomodulatory effects reported in the literature.

Results: A specific combination of wavelengths at low irradiances (250 to 400  mW  /  cm2 for 1064 nm and 55 to 65  mW  /  cm2 for 1270 nm) modulates mitochondrial retrograde signaling, including intracellular calcium and reactive oxygen species in T cells. The time-dependent density functional theory computation of binding of nitric oxide (NO) to cytochrome c oxidase indicates that the illumination with NIR light could result in the NO release, which might be involved in these changes.

Conclusions: This optical platform is a powerful tool to study causal relationship between a specific parameter of NIR light and its biological effects. Such a platform is useful for a further mechanistic study on not only photobiomodulation but also other modalities in photomedicine.

1.

Introduction

Near-infrared (NIR) light (650 to 1700 nm) has been extensively used in various medical procedures and bioimaging with its unique physical properties. NIR light is featured with reduced scattering, minimal tissue absorption with high tissue penetration depth, and low tissue autofluorescence interference compared with visible light, and therefore suitable for bioimaging with high signal-to-background ratio and resolution of deep tissues.15 In addition, it shows minimum genotoxicity.6 These characteristics collectively favor the therapeutic use of NIR light in the clinic. In fact, since low power NIR light, typically 1 mW to 5  W/cm2, shows diverse biological effects, including pain relief, facilitation of tissue regeneration, and reduction of the inflammation,711 which is broadly defined as photobiomodulation, the use of NIR light has been explored for a wide array of therapeutic purposes during the past decades.10

These beneficial effects of NIR light are mediated by mitochondrial retrograde signaling, including reactive oxygen species (ROS).715 Cytochrome c oxidase (COX) in electron transport chain (ETC) in mitochondria has been regarded as the primary source of mitochondrial ROS across organisms,14 while ROS can be generated across complexes I to IV in the ETC and other compartments in mitochondria.7,8,1618 NIR light has been shown to alter cell metabolism resulting in the generation of ROS14,15 and activation of ROS-mediated retrograde signaling via the class O forkhead box transcription factors (FOXOs), nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), activator protein 1 (AP-1), and Myc.14 Thus, mitochondrial ETC is regarded as a primary photoreceptor for NIR light.15,19 Interestingly, recent studies demonstrated that a brief exposure of the skin with NIR laser ranging from 1061 to 1301 nm at an irradiance of 0.5 to 5  W/cm2 augmented the immune response to intradermal vaccination and conferred protection.2025 In these studies, the activation of innate responses, subsequent migration of skin-resident dendritic cells, and augmentation of adaptive response were dependent on the generation of ROS.21 It has also been reported that broadband NIR light (760 to 1440 nm) induces the formation of mitochondria-derived ROS and subsequent increase in redox potential in cultured human dermal fibroblasts.26 Furthermore, 1064-nm NIR light has been shown to modify the function of COX and improve tissue oxygenation in humans.27 Although NIR light generally increases the generation of ROS, 950-nm NIR light has been reported to decrease mitochondrial membrane potential and ROS production,28 suggesting that photobiomodulation could be dependent on the types of cells, activation status of cells, laser parameters, including wavelengths, irradiance, treatment time, and pulsations. However, there is a paucity of studies to investigate interactions of NIR light of 1000 to 1400 nm with mitochondrial retrograde signaling to advance our understanding on the mode of action of this particular range of NIR light.

The effects of NIR light are also reported to be mediated by calcium signaling, which consists of a significant part of mitochondrial retrograde signaling.715 Calcium has multiple important roles in regulating the cellular functions, including survival, death, locomotion, secretion, metabolism, and gene expression.29 Light (633 to 980 nm) has been largely reported to increase intracellular calcium,30,31 while 810-nm NIR light could normalize (decrease) the excessively high level of intracellular calcium in a pathological condition,32 and 632.833 or 780 nm34 light was reported to inhibit calcium uptake by mitochondria depending on an irradiance. Although the precise molecular mechanisms of action for this effect remain unclear, heat- or light-sensitive ion channels have been suggested to be involved in the modulation of calcium signaling in photobiomodulation.31 In particular, UV-IR light was reported to modulate the function of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels, including transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1), TRPV2, and TRPV4.31,3539

Anti-inflammatory effects including pain relief and reduction of the inflammation are a hallmark of photobiomodulation.711 For example, this modality can reduce edema, leukocyte infiltration, and the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, accelerating tissue repair of muscles in young individuals.40 Accordingly, photobiomodulation on immune cells including macrophages41 and dendritic cells42 has been reported. Importantly, recent studies consistently show that ROS play a critical role in regulating T cell functions, including T cell receptor (TCR) signaling, T cell proliferation, effector function, and resolution of effector function (death).43,44 ROS are constantly generated in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation via electron leak from ETC in T cells.45 In particular, mitochondrial ROS has been shown to act on NF-κB and stimulate production of interleukin 2 (IL-2) and other pro-proliferative genes to combat exogenous pathogens or endogenous tumors.43 On the other hand, it has been shown that ROS can upregulate FasL and induce T cell death46 and that prolonged ROS signaling can suppress T cell responses.47 Thus, maintenance of the adequate level of ROS with antioxidant systems within the cell is critical for preserving the integrity of T cell immunity. Similarly, cytosolic and organellar calcium concentrations are well known to control effector functions of T cells. Calcium influx is mediated through a diverse array of receptor- or voltage-activated calcium channels in T cells.4850 Intracellular organelles, such as the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and lysosomes, also express specific channels and transporters that contribute to calcium increase in the cytosol and uptake into these organelles.5052 The strength and duration of calcium signaling have been shown to activate different transcription programs in a T cell subset-dependent manner and determine unique functions, such as metabolism, proliferation, death, differentiation, cytokine secretion, and cytotoxicity of each subset of T cells.50 The calcium and ROS signaling is tightly connected to each other in T cells. For example, upon T cell activation, calcium enters the mitochondria and activates enzymes in the TCA cycle, increasing their production of ROS.53 Calcium signaling-induced ROS generation has also been shown to play a role in IL-2 production in activated T cells. Recently, it has been demonstrated that defects in mitochondrial complex III cause decreased IL-2 production because ROS regulate the calcineurin nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT) signaling pathway.44 As described already, ROS and calcium signaling are critical for both T cell biology and mitochondrial retrograde signaling activated upon photobiomodulation,9,11 we chose a cultured T cell system to establish imaging methodology to examine responses of cells to NIR light for the current study.

Here, we report a high-throughput, single-cell resolution imaging methodology to analyze the effects of multispectral NIR wavelengths at a range of irradiance on intracellular signaling pathways in T cells using established fluorescence imaging in vitro.

2.

Dual-Laser Illumination and Real-Time Single-Cell Live Imaging System

All animal procedures were approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) IACUC (protocol number 2009N000103) and performed under the Public Health Service Policy on Human Care of Laboratory Animals.

2.1.

Optical Setup

A schematic of the optical system is described in Fig. 1. Continuous-wave Nd:YAG laser (λ=1064  nm, Ventus, Laser Quantum, United Kingdom) and indium phosphide semiconductor diode laser (λ=1270  nm, spectral width=8  nm/3  dB, 202-000, Veralase LLC) were used as sources of NIR light. To distribute the mode equally, these two optic paths were unified and directed through a multimode optic fiber (core=200  μm, NA=0.22, Thorlabs) and 1200-nm short-pass dichroic mirrors (Thorlabs). Then, the beam shape and the homogeneity were adjusted to a square through a vibrating square-core fiber (core=1000  μm, NA=0.22, Fiberguide Industries) at a focal plane. The squared 1064- and 1270-nm laser beams were further divided into two pathways using a dichroic mirror, followed by two-dimensional gradation creation through continuously variable neutral density filters (optical density = 0.04 to 2.00, Thorlabs). Beam shapes of the laser at a desired plane were determined by a beam profiler (Thorlabs Beam 7.0, Thorlabs).

Fig. 1

A schematic of the real-time, single-cell live imaging system capable of dual NIR laser irradiation. The 1064- and 1270-nm top-hat square laser beams were transformed into a gradient square beam profile at a focal plane on a cell culture device. The 1064- and 1270-nm laser paths were divided into two through 1200-nm short-pass dichroic mirrors (DMs) to create gradient beams in irradiance and then merged into one square beam. To minimize chromatic aberration, achromatic lenses were used as appropriate in the optical paths. For live imaging, a mercury lamp was used for an excitation light source. The fluorescence signal from cultured cells in the culture chamber was captured by a CCD camera on a fluorescence microscope.

JBO_25_3_036003_f001.png

2.2.

Fabrication of Cell Culture Device for Laser Illumination

The design of the cell culture device is depicted in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b). To achieve single-layer cell culture of T cells with no convection at a constant temperature during laser irradiation, we established a cell culture device using conventional soft lithography. The Si master mold was fabricated using two layers of photoresist. The first layer of photoresist, SU-8 10 (Microchem), for a cell culture chamber was spin-coated at 1250 to 2200 rpm for 40 s (15 to 25  μm). The second layer of photoresist, SU-8 100, for temperature control was then spin-coated at 1100 rpm for 40 s (250  μm). After the development, the resultant wafer was placed in a square dish, and then polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) prepolymer (a mixture of 10:1 silicon elastomer and curing agent, Sylgard 184, Dow Corning) was poured into it. Then, the square dish was cured in an oven at 70°C for 8 h. In prior to being used, the devices were sterilized by ethylene oxide gas. The water flow channel was connected to a peristaltic pump so that prewarmed water at 37°C flowed into the channel to minimize temperature change of cultured cells in the device, as shown in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d).

Fig. 2

The design of a cell culture chamber for laser irradiation. (a) The design of the PDMS device. Red lines denote a water flow channel for temperature control, and green lines show a cell culture channel. T cells were inoculated and cultured in the cell culture channel without flow. (b) A photo of the PDMS device. Bar=1.0  cm (c) The PDMS device installed on the imaging system. The photo shows a relative location of the laser beam to the chamber with the water flow channel connected to the water circulation system. (d) Measurements of temperature of the culture chamber during dual laser irradiation (n=3). The temperature of the chamber was measured using an IR camera.

JBO_25_3_036003_f002.png

2.3.

T-Cell Culture

Eight-week-old female C57BL/6J mice (stock 000664) were purchased from Jackson Laboratories and acclimated for at least 2 weeks at MGH. The spleen was removed, individually dissociated, and passed through 70- and 40-μm mesh filters to obtain single-cell suspensions of purified T cells. Erythrocytes were then removed using erythrocyte lysing buffer (eBioscience). Splenocytes were further purified to obtain T cells using magnetic beads (EasySep™ T cell isolation kit, STEMCELL Technologies, Canada). The purified T cells were washed and resuspended at a concentration of 1×106  cells/mL and incubated overnight in RPMI1640 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Thermo Fisher Scientific), 100  U/mL penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 10 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C.

2.4.

Laser Irradiation on T Cells and Imaging of Intracellular Calcium Level and ROS Generation

To examine intracellular signaling pathways activated by NIR laser light, we used well-established fluorophores to measure the levels of intracellular calcium and mitochondrial ROS. Purified T cells were loaded with 4  μM Fluo-4 AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific)54 and 5  μM MitoSOX Red (Thermo Fisher Scientific)55 for 30 min in RPMI1640. The cells were then washed with hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) buffer containing 0.5% FBS and 10 mM HEPES. Resuspended cells in 2  μL at a concentration of 8×105  cells/μL were put into a cell culture channel on the PDMS device.

The cells on the cell culture channel were irradiated with the dual-squared laser beam for 1 min, as depicted in Fig. 2(c). The gradient irradiance of the two lasers was adjusted from 200 to 400  mW/cm2 for 1064 nm and 50 to 100  mW/cm2 for 1270 nm at the focal plane. The size of a square beam was also adjustable between 1.2×1.2  mm2 and 4.0×4.0  mm2. To keep the temperature in the system constant, a peristaltic pump (Cole-Parmer) was used to circulate water warmed up to 37°C into the PDMS device in the water flow channel. The temperature on the cell culture area during dual laser irradiation at an irradiance of 400  mW/cm2 for 1064 nm and 100  mW/cm2 for 1270 nm was monitored using an IR camera (FLIR Systems).

To measure the fluorescence signals, the cells on the PDMS device were illuminated using a mercury lamp (Nikon, Japan). The signals from Fluo-4 (excitation/emission: 494/516  nm) and MitoSOX Red (510/580  nm) were captured using a fluorescence microscopy system (DIAPHOT200, Nikon). The fluorescence signal passed through 4× objective lens (NA=0.13, Nikon) and cube filters were captured by a charge-coupled device (CCD) digital camera (Hamamatsu, Japan). The exposure time of the camera was set to 1000 ms.

2.5.

Image Analysis

Image analysis scheme is shown in Fig. 4. First, captured images were processed using a 3×3 Gaussian filter to reduce background noise. Second, a pixel, which showed maximum intensity in the nearest 5×5  pixels (8×8  μm2) above empirically determined threshold, was recognized as a fluorescence signal. Cells that were stably located at the same position over time were selected for further analysis. A fold change of the fluorescence signal intensity at a desired time point over the signal before the illumination was calculated. The cells’ geometric coordinates were converted into irradiances using curve fittings for the dual square beam, as shown in Fig. 3. The analysis software program was developed using a programming language Python 3.6 and OpenCV 2 (programs are available at https://github.com/wkatagiri/CB001).

Fig. 3

Measurements of the density gradient of the dual laser beam. Relative intensities of different sizes of gradient square beams are shown. The sizes of laser beams are shown in black squares. (a)–(c) 4.0×4.0  mm2, (d)–(f) 1.2×1.2  mm2. (a, d) 1064 nm and (b, e) 1270 nm gradient beam were merged into one (c, f). The gradients were fitted into nonlinear curves: (g) 1064 nm [n=5, mean±standard error of the mean (SEM)] and (h) 1270 nm (n=5, mean±SEM). The curve fittings were performed using the least square method, where the degrees of polynomial were selected by the Akaike’s information criterion (AIC). Dash lines show 95% confidence interval (CI).

JBO_25_3_036003_f003.png

Fig. 4

Image analysis strategy. Fluorescence images were captured at 0, 1, and 5 min after the conclusion of laser irradiation. First, the images were convolved with a Gaussian filter. The pixel coordinates with the maximum intensity were defined as a location of individual cells, which were further converted into irradiances of both 1064 and 1270 nm lasers using the curve fittings shown in Figs. 3(g) and 3(h). The fluorescence intensity was measured in the prefiltered images. The fold change of the fluorescence signal at 1 and 5 min over that before laser irradiation was calculated for each time point.

JBO_25_3_036003_f004.png

2.6.

Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Analysis of Nitric Oxide Binding to Cytochrome c Oxidase

We used the time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) to estimate the absorption spectrum of COX. TDDFT calculations were carried out using Gaussian 09W program package.56 The three-parameterized Becke–Lee–Yang–Parr (B3LYP) hybrid exchange-correction functional was employed5759 and 6-311G** was used as a basis set.6062 Solvent effects were not considered in any of the processes.

A specific region around copper ion–nitric oxide–iron ion (Cu-(NO)-Fe) binding with porphyrin complex and histidine (His) was extracted from the whole COX. The model structure is depicted in Fig. 6(a): 3His-Cu-(NO)-Fe(C20N4H12)-His (structure 1). On the basis of the optimized structure 1, the TDDFT method was applied to calculate the excited states relevant to the NIR absorption.

2.7.

Statistical Analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests was performed for comparisons of more than two groups using GraphPad Prism version 8. The mean±standard error of the mean was displayed for all figures. A multiple comparison test’s corrected P value <0.05 was considered to be significant.

3.

Results

3.1.

Development of Optical Platform Equipped with Two Distinct Wavelengths of NIR Lasers

We first constructed a culture chamber for T cells, which was amenable for laser illumination. We designed the optical platform using computer-aided software [Fig. 2(a)] and developed by conventional photolithography and soft lithography [Fig. 2(b)]. The device is 18×48  mm2 in size and consists of two channels: a water flow channel (shown in red) and a cell culture channel (green). The water flow channel was connected to tubes to circulate warmed water while the laser was irradiated in the middle of the cell culture area, as shown in Fig. 2(c). The water flow channel was designed to accommodate water flow at a speed of up to 30  mL/min through peristaltic pumping. The cell culture channel was surrounded by the water flow channel to achieve homogeneous temperature distribution over the cell culture area. To assess the thermal transfer from water channel to cell culture chamber, we monitored the temperature distribution of the cell culture area in real-time during laser irradiation measured by an IR camera [Fig. 2(d)]. The temperature was stable between 33°C and 35°C during simultaneous laser irradiation with 400  mW/cm2 of 1064 nm and 100  mW/cm2 of 1270 nm up to 5 min. Hence, the effect of heat generation with laser irradiation on cultured cells in the channel was considered negligible in the following analysis, which used lower irradiances of the NIR laser for up to 1 min than those for the temperature measurement.

3.2.

Dual Laser Beam Shaping

Next, we constructed an optical system, where we irradiated the cultured cells with NIR laser and performed bioimaging at the same time. Two different sizes of the square beams were created by adjusting positions of planoconvex and achromatic lenses between gradient filters and the cell culture device [Figs. 3(a)3(f)]. The size of the square beam varied from 1.2×1.2  mm2 to 4.0×4.0  mm2. The smallest 1.2  mm2 beam was adjusted to the field of view through 4× objective lens (NA=0.13, Nikon), whereas the largest 4.0  mm2 beam was adjusted for 2.5× objective (NA=0.075, Nikon). Although both the smallest and largest squares could be applied for illumination sources, intracellular fluorescence signals in T cells could not be clearly recognized by the CCD camera with 2.5× objective lens (data not shown). Therefore, we conducted the following experiments with the smallest 1.2  mm2 using the 4× objective lens.

Curve fittings of irradiance gradient of 1064 and 1270 nm in the field are shown in Figs. 3(g) and 3(h). The line profiles of irradiance were measured toward the gradient vectors with a beam profiler. The measurement results were plotted, and fitting curves for each wavelength were then calculated based on the least square method. The gradient of irradiance of 1064 nm was fitted into quartic function E(x) [Eq. (1)], whereas that of 1270 nm was fitted into quadratic function E(y) [Eq. (2)] as shown as follows:

Eq. (1)

E(x)=384.3+(0.1546)x(7.934×104)x2+(9.238×107)x3(3.934×1010)x4,

Eq. (2)

E(y)=95.82+(2.091×102)y(4.679×105)y2.

The degree of each fitting curve function was determined by Akaike’s information criterion. The narrow 95% confidence interval of each fitting curve, as shown in Figs. 3(g) and 3(h), suggests that the fitting strategy used here was satisfactory and the irradiance gradient of the two lasers was established successfully with the optical setting.

3.3.

Calcium and ROS Responses upon NIR Laser Irradiation

Both intracellular calcium and mitochondrial ROS signaling play a critical role in regulating diverse T cell functions.43,44,4850 Therefore, we analyzed calcium and mitochondrial ROS responses in T cells induced by NIR laser irradiation using the platform established already.

T cells loaded with either calcium probe Fluo-4 or ROS probe MitoSOX Red in the cell culture channel in the PDMS device were irradiated with the dual-squared laser beam at a gradient irradiance of 200 to 400  mW/cm2 for 1064 nm and 50 to 100  mW/cm2 for 1270 nm laser. The fluorescence images were acquired using a fluorescence microscopy system equipped with a CCD digital camera. A fold change of the fluorescence signal intensity at a desired time point over the signal before the illumination was calculated for individual T cells on the captured images. As shown in Fig. 4, geometric information of each T cell in the imaging field was converted into irradiance of 1064 and 1270 nm using curve fitting with a nonlinear regression method.

Figure 5(a) shows the color map of fold changes in fluorescence intensity at 1 and 5 min after the laser irradiation. Here, we divided the population of the T cells into 25 groups based on the irradiance of 1064 and 1270 nm exposed to the cells and showed the mean fluorescence intensity of each group. Interestingly, both calcium and mitochondrial ROS signals showed a tendency to decrease (<1.0) after the laser irradiation [Fig. 5(a)]. We then compared the fold changes across combinations of lower irradiances of 1064 and 1270 nm laser [Figs. 5(b)5(e)]. In these comparisons, the fluorescence signals at 1 and 5 min were compared with those at 0 min (before laser) to take various factors, including photobleaching and leakage of the fluorophore over time into consideration. Notably, there was a clear tendency that combinations of relatively low irradiances of laser with 250 to 400  mW/cm2 for 1064 nm and 55 to 65  mW/cm2 for 1270 nm laser suppressed calcium at 1 min [Fig. 5(b)]. In addition, the calcium signal was significantly decreased with dual irradiation with 300  mW/cm2 of 1064 nm and 55  mW/cm2 of 1270 nm laser compared with that of no laser control group (p=0.0402). The signal went back to the control level 5 min after the laser irradiation [Fig. 5(c)]. Although statistical analysis did not indicate any significant difference, mitochondrial ROS also decreased with irradiances of laser with 250 to 400  mW/cm2 for 1064 nm and 55 to 65  mW/cm2 for 1270 nm laser at 1 min [Fig. 5(d)]. The change in the ROS signal also disappeared 5 min after the laser treatment [Fig 5(e)]. Together, these results indicate that a specific combination of low irradiance at 1064 and 1270 nm lasers suppresses intracellular calcium and mitochondrial ROS signal in T cells.

Fig. 5

The fold change of the fluorescent signal of intracellular calcium and ROS upon dual NIR laser exposures. The fold change of the fluorescence signals at each time point over the signals before the laser irradiation was calculated for individual T cells on the captured images. (a) Color maps of the fluorescent signal changes 1 and 5 min after the laser irradiation. (b, c) The fold changes of the intracellular calcium signal at (b) 1 min (n=30 to 284) and (c) 5 min (n=20 to 249). (d, e) The fold changes of the ROS signal at (d) 1 min (n=9 to 111) and (e) 5 min (n=7 to 92). (a)–(e) The results under gradient irradiances between 250 and 400  mW/cm2 for 1064 nm and 50 to 100  mW/cm2 for 1270 nm were shown. Results were pooled from two independent experiments. Error bars for x and y axes denote the SEM. A P value <0.05 was considered significant: *P<0.05; N.S., not significant by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

JBO_25_3_036003_f005.png

3.4.

TDDFT Computation of the Effect of NIR Light on NO Binding to COX

In order to understand the molecular mechanisms of action of these changes in ROS and calcium with NIR light beyond 1000 nm, we performed TDDFT computation of binding of NO to COX molecule (Fig. 6). The results indicate that there are three multispectral absorbance peaks in the NIR range: 961, 1319, and 1372 nm (Table 1). These peaks derive from the electronic transition from molecular orbital (MO) 203 [highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)] to low-lying unoccupied orbitals (MOs 204 to 209). Figure 6(b) displays the MOs calculated for structure 1. While the HOMO is centered at the bent Fe–N–O bonds and has the character of backbonding from Fe dxz orbital to NO π* orbital, the unoccupied orbitals do not have the bonding interaction character between Fe and NO; MOs 204 and 205 are nearly degenerated e(Fedππpor*) orbitals, MO 206 is centered at the porphyrin ring and MO 207 shows the antibonding interaction between Fe and NO. Therefore, the electronic transitions from HOMO caused by NIR light irradiation are expected to weaken the bonding between the Fe center and NO ligand. The calculated absorption peaks in the NIR spectrum at 961, 1319, and 1372 nm indicate that the illumination with NIR light could result in the NO release in deep thickness of exposed tissue (e.g., the surface of epidermis to the deepest layer of dermis) due to its maximum depth of penetration in biological tissue.63

Fig. 6

TDDF analysis. (a) A part of molecular structure of COX (PDB: 5X1F) (structure 1). Approximately, a region in a diameter of 8 Å from NO molecule was extracted from COX. A copper ion is surrounded by three histidines, whereas NO binds to an iron ion, which is coupled with porphyrin structure and a histidine. (b) Calculated MOs for complex 1 at B3LYP/6-311G** level and the orbital diagram.

JBO_25_3_036003_f006.png

Table 1

Predicted absorption of model complex in near-infrared region by TDDFT method at B3LYP/6-311G** level.

λcalca/nmEcalcb/eVOscillator strengthcConfigurationCoefficient
1372.320.900.0001203 → 2040.574
203 → 2050.406
1318.910.940.0004203 → 2040.406
203 → 2050.574
961.321.290.0002203 → 2060.102
203 → 2070.682
203 → 2090.115

aAbsorption maxima.

bCorresponding transition energy calculated by TDDFT method.

cOscillator strength calculated by TDDFT method.

4.

Discussion

In the current study, we have established for the first time a high-throughput imaging system at a single-cell resolution to evaluate responses of intracellular calcium and ROS signaling pathways in order to determine an optimal parameter of NIR laser for effective photobiomodulation based on an established fluorescence imaging in vitro. Since the effects of NIR light are diverse and the range of the wavelength and irradiance of effective NIR light is wide, seeking for an optimal parameter for a desirable biological effect is often challenging. This platform is, therefore, a powerful tool to identify the best-performing combination of NIR wavelength and irradiance not only for photobiomodulation but more broadly for other applications in photomedicine, including photodynamic and photothermal therapy, contributing to maximizing the efficacy and safety of these treatment modalities.

There are two new features in this optical platform. First, we chose to use PDMS elastomer for an irradiation chamber. PDMS is widely used in biomedical applications owing to its excellent flexibility and transparency in the visible light spectrum.64 PDMS also shows very little optical insertion loss in the NIR light spectrum, such as in 900 to 1100 nm and 1250 to 1350 nm to the extent of <0.03  dB/cm.65 Therefore, PDMS can be applied for NIR illumination with minimal loss of light intensity and heat generation. Since the temperature during the dual laser irradiation at the large irradiance of 400  mW/cm2 for 1064 nm and 100  mW/cm2 for 1270 nm was measured constant for a long time period, the effect of heat generation upon laser illumination, which might cause intracellular ROS production66 and intracellular calcium accumulation,67 can be disregarded in the current study. Thus, this platform allows us to determine the effect of photochemical effect of the NIR laser separately from its photothermal effect. Second, the system using a square beam profile allows for a simultaneous high-throughput measurement of photochemical effect of multispectral laser with a wide range of irradiance. Generally, a Gaussian beam profile is used to determine the threshold of monospectral laser in an in vitro setting.6870 However, in the current study, a square gradient beam profile was chosen as appropriate for a dual laser in order to simplify the experimental procedures. We used a square-core fiber to create a square beam profile because the use of the fiber is easier and more affordable than the phase gating71 or a micromirror device.72 Such a system is useful to study the biological effect of NIR light. Exposures to NIR light between 760 and 1400 nm have been demonstrated to increase ROS generation in a wide variety of cells and tissues, including tumor cells,7375 keratinocytes,74 fibroblasts,26 the skin tissue.7678 ROS have been postulated to act on mitochondrial COX in ECT in response to NIR light exposure,16,79 ultimately resulting in photobiomodulation.79 These studies generally used broadband light, which renders interpretation of the impact of such light on the biological system difficult. Since theoretical80 and in vitro studies81,82 showed that there are absorbance peaks of coppers in the putative photoreceptor COX in the NIR spectra at 620, 680, 760, and 820 nm, biological readouts upon photobiomodulation could be a result of significant effects of one distinct or a combination of several wavelengths of NIR light. In order to further understand the mechanism of action of photobiomodulation, it is desirable to establish a reproducible tool to examine the effect of individual or a combination of parameters of NIR light on physiological functions. In addition, a wide range of power of NIR light (1 mW to 5  W/cm2) has been reported to promote photobiomodulation,711 whereas over-dosed photoirradiation has been reported to downregulate the signaling pathways,8,83,84 such a tool should be able to examine a reasonably wide range of parameters simultaneously to identify a causal NIR laser parameter. In response to this, the current system was designed to have the capability to evaluate a combination of multiple wavelengths and a wide range of irradiance simultaneously.

Modulation of interactions between COX and NO in ETC has been linked to ROS generation.85 NO is generated by mitochondrial NO synthase in the mitochondrial inner membrane.86,87 NO is able to bind to the oxygen-binding site in competition with oxygen and act as a reversible inhibitor of COX at low concentrations, diverting the fate of oxygen into ROS formation.8891 NIR light has been shown to alter cell metabolism and induce ROS generation as it displaces NO molecules on histidine in COX subunit I between copper and iron.8891 While most of the studies on photobiomodulation employed visible and NIR light below 950 nm,18,83,92,93 some of the recent studies indicate modulatory effect of NIR light beyond 1000 nm on COX. Wang et al. demonstrated that a brief exposure of the skin of human subjects with 1064-nm NIR light at an irradiance of 250  mW/cm2 induced COX and hemoglobin oxygenation.27 In contrast, Sanderson et al. showed that COX activity was strongly suppressed by dual irradiation with 750- and 950-nm lasers.28,94 Consistently, the results of TDDFT computation of the binding of NO to COX molecule indicate that there are three multispectral absorbance peaks in the NIR range (Fig. 6 and Table 1). We further demonstrated that a combination of 1064 and 1270 nm laser suppressed mitochondrial retrograde signaling, including intracellular calcium and mitochondrial ROS (Fig. 5). These results are consistent with our previous study, showing that 1064-nm NIR laser-induced ROS generation in skin cells.21 Furthermore, Schroeder et al. similarly demonstrated that broadband NIR light (760 to 1440 nm) induced mitochondria-derived ROS generation and subsequent increase in redox potential in cultured human dermal fibroblasts.26 Together with our previous studies showing the immunomodulatory effect of NIR light ranging from 1061 to 1301 nm2023 and reports that much higher dose of NIR laser light would be needed for direct production of singlet oxygen,95 these results suggest that NIR light beyond 1000 nm shows photobiomodulation via mitochondrial retrograde signaling and that the mechanisms of action of photobiomodulation with NIR light beyond 1000 nm might involve dissociation of NO from COX.

ROS are known to regulate the differentiation and effector functions of T cells. High environmental ROS favor the development of T helper (TH) two cells with increased IL-2 and IL-4 production, skewing toward a TH2-skewed immune response.96,97 In contrast, low ROS rather promote TH1 and TH17 cell differentiation, and the use of antioxidants increases interferon-γ production, skewing the immune response to a TH1 phenotype.96,98,99 As such, this system can be useful for discovery research to identify a laser parameter modulating T cell function for therapeutic purposes. For example, with this system, we could identify a laser parameter to potentially ameliorate autoimmune inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS). MS is a neurodegenerative disorder and characterized by the infiltration of autoreactive CD4 T cells against myelin into the central nervous system (CNS).100 Since the autoreactive T cells are known to secrete high levels of TH1 and TH17 cytokines and the administration of pro-oxidants prevents the production of these inflammatory cytokines as high environmental levels of ROS promote the development of TH2 cells,96,98 a parameter of NIR light to modulate ROS in T cells may reduce the severity of MS. In fact, a recent report shows that the modulation of the Nrf2-mediated antioxidant pathway in T cells prevents CD4 T cell infiltration into the CNS, thereby ameliorating autoimmune inflammation,101 suggesting that this approach would have a clinical impact. In addition, this system could also be used to identify a laser parameter to augment antitumor response. It is well established that T cells play a critical role in antitumor immunity. Cancer is known to produce large amounts of ROS, which suppress immune function of T cells. Consistently, cellular antioxidant levels have been demonstrated to be critical for the antitumor function of T cells in the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Recent study has shown that central memory T cells with higher cytosolic glutathione, surface thiol, and intracellular antioxidant levels survive longer in tumor and control tumor growth than effector memory T cells with less antioxidant levels and that treatment with antioxidants improved the function of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs), leading to prolonged survival of patients receiving these treated TIL.102 Further work is warranted to determine if this system could be broadly used to discover such a combination parameter of NIR lasers.

The research investigation on the mechanism of action of photobiomodulation has been constantly evolving for the past two decades. Accordingly, recent studies show that alternative pathway(s) could exist for photobiomodulation other than ROS and calcium, including direct cell-free light-mediated effects on transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) or adenosine triphosphate (ATP), activation of signaling pathways, including hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) Akt/glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK3β)/β-catenin, extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK)/forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), or direct production of the singlet oxygen.31,36,7375,103,104 This imaging system could be used to further examine the involvement of these possible pathways in photobiomodulation.

5.

Conclusion

We have established an optical platform, which allows for real-time, single-cell live imaging of the intracellular signaling induced by multiple doses of two wavelengths of NIR laser light simultaneously in vitro. Armed with this system, we revealed that 1-min exposure of cultured T cells with a specific combination of 1064 and 1270 nm NIR lasers at low irradiances suppressed intracellular calcium and mitochondrial ROS signal. These results indicate that a parameter of NIR light beyond 1000 nm promotes photobiomodulation. This novel system would be not only useful for further mechanistic study of photobiomodulation but also a powerful tool to investigate optical and biological responses in photomedicine.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health [Grants NIAID #R01AI105131 (S.K.), #R21AI144103 (S.K.), NIBIB #R01EB022230 (H.S.C.)]; Grant-in-Aid to the Program for Leading Graduate School for “Science for Development of Super Mature Society” from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science and Technology in Japan (W.K.); the Research Grant of Keio Leading-edge Laboratory of Science and Technology (W.K.); Keio University Research Grant for Young Researcher’s Program (W.K.); and Massachusetts General Hospital Executive Committee on Research (ECOR) Interim Support Funding (S.K.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript, and the contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

References

1. 

J. H. Lee et al., “Design considerations for targeted optical contrast agents,” Quant. Imaging Med. Surg., 2 (4), 266 –273 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2012.12.04 Google Scholar

2. 

E. A. Owens et al., “Tissue-specific near-infrared fluorescence imaging,” Acc. Chem. Res., 49 (9), 1731 –1740 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00239 Google Scholar

3. 

S. Hu et al., “Real-time imaging of brain tumor for image-guided surgery,” Adv. Healthcare Mater., 7 (16), 1800066 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201800066 Google Scholar

4. 

J. V. Frangioni, “In vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging,” Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 7 (5), 626 –634 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2003.08.007 COCBF4 1367-5931 Google Scholar

5. 

E. A. Owens et al., “Near-infrared illumination of native tissues for image-guided surgery,” J. Med. Chem., 59 (11), 5311 –5323 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00038 JMCMAR 0022-2623 Google Scholar

6. 

I. Khan, E. Tang and P. Arany, “Molecular pathway of near-infrared laser phototoxicity involves ATF-4 orchestrated ER stress,” Sci. Rep., 5 10581 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10581 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

7. 

Y. Y. Huang et al., “Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy,” Dose Response, 7 (4), 358 –383 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.09-027.Hamblin Google Scholar

8. 

Y. Y. Huang et al., “Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy—an update,” Dose Response, 9 (4), 602 –618 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.11-009.Hamblin Google Scholar

9. 

T. I. Karu, “Mitochondrial signaling in mammalian cells activated by red and near-IR radiation,” Photochem. Photobiol., 84 (5), 1091 –1099 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/php.2008.84.issue-5 PHCBAP 0031-8655 Google Scholar

10. 

T. Karu, “Is it time to consider photobiomodulation as a drug equivalent?,” Photomed. Laser Surg., 31 (5), 189 –191 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2013.3510 Google Scholar

11. 

T. Karu, “Mitochondrial mechanisms of photobiomodulation in context of new data about multiple roles of ATP,” Photomed. Laser Surg., 28 (2), 159 –160 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2010.2789 Google Scholar

12. 

I. Bohovych and O. Khalimonchuk, “Sending out an SOS: mitochondria as a signaling hub,” Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 4 109 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2016.00109 Google Scholar

13. 

N. S. Chandel, “Evolution of mitochondria as signaling organelles,” Cell Metab., 22 (2), 204 –206 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.05.013 1550-4131 Google Scholar

14. 

F. M. da Cunha, N. Q. Torelli and A. J. Kowaltowski, “Mitochondrial retrograde signaling: triggers, pathways, and outcomes,” Oxid. Med. Cell. Longevity, 2015 1 –10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/482582 Google Scholar

15. 

T. I. Karu and S. F. Kolyakov, “Exact action spectra for cellular responses relevant to phototherapy,” Photomed. Laser Surg., 23 (4), 355 –361 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2005.23.355 Google Scholar

16. 

D. B. Zorov, M. Juhaszova and S. J. Sollott, “Mitochondrial ROS-induced ROS release: an update and review,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1757 (5–6), 509 –517 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.04.029 BBACAQ 0006-3002 Google Scholar

17. 

D. B. Zorov, M. Juhaszova and S. J. Sollott, “Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ROS-induced ROS release,” Physiol. Rev., 94 (3), 909 –950 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00026.2013 PHREA7 0031-9333 Google Scholar

18. 

M. R. Hamblin, “Mechanisms and applications of the anti-inflammatory effects of photobiomodulation,” AIMS Biophys., 4 (3), 337 –361 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3934/biophy.2017.3.337 Google Scholar

19. 

T. Karu, “Primary and secondary mechanisms of action of visible to near-IR radiation on cells,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 49 (1), 1 –17 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1011-1344(98)00219-X JPPBEG 1011-1344 Google Scholar

20. 

Y. Kimizuka et al., “Semiconductor diode laser device adjuvanting intradermal vaccine,” Vaccine, 35 (18), 2404 –2412 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.036 VACCDE 0264-410X Google Scholar

21. 

Y. Kimizuka et al., “Brief exposure of skin to near-infrared laser modulates mast cell function and augments the immune response,” J. Immunol., 201 (12), 3587 –3603 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1701687 JOIMA3 0022-1767 Google Scholar

22. 

K. Morse et al., “Near-infrared 1064 nm laser modulates migratory dendritic cells to augment the immune response to intradermal influenza vaccine,” J. Immunol., 199 (4), 1319 –1332 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1601873 JOIMA3 0022-1767 Google Scholar

23. 

S. Kashiwagi et al., “Near-infrared laser adjuvant for influenza vaccine,” PLoS One, 8 (12), e82899 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082899 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar

24. 

A. Khokhlova et al., “The photobiomodulation of vital parameters of the cancer cell culture by low dose of near-IR laser irradiation,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 25 (1), 7201510 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2018.2854539 Google Scholar

25. 

D. Dolgova et al., “Anti-inflammatory and cell proliferative effect of the 1270 nm laser irradiation on the BALB/c nude mouse model involves activation of the cell antioxidant system,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 10 (8), 4261 –4275 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.004261 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

26. 

P. Schroeder et al., “Cellular response to infrared radiation involves retrograde mitochondrial signaling,” Free Radical Biol. Med., 43 (1), 128 –135 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.04.002 FRBMEH 0891-5849 Google Scholar

27. 

X. Wang et al., “Interplay between up-regulation of cytochrome-c-oxidase and hemoglobin oxygenation induced by near-infrared laser,” Sci. Rep., 6 30540 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30540 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

28. 

T. H. Sanderson et al., “Inhibitory modulation of cytochrome c oxidase activity with specific near-infrared light wavelengths attenuates brain ischemia/reperfusion injury,” Sci. Rep., 8 (1), 3481 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21869-x SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

29. 

A. Gorlach et al., “Calcium and ROS: a mutual interplay,” Redox Biol., 6 260 –271 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2015.08.010 Google Scholar

30. 

S. K. Sharma et al., “Dose response effects of 810 nm laser light on mouse primary cortical neurons,” Lasers Surg. Med., 43 (8), 851 –859 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.21100 LSMEDI 0196-8092 Google Scholar

31. 

A. Amaroli, S. Ferrando and S. Benedicenti, “Photobiomodulation affects key cellular pathways of all life-forms: considerations on old and new laser light targets and the calcium issue,” Photochem. Photobiol., 95 (1), 455 –459 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/php.2019.95.issue-1 PHCBAP 0031-8655 Google Scholar

32. 

Y. Y. Huang et al., “Low-level laser therapy (810 nm) protects primary cortical neurons against excitotoxicity in vitro,” J. Biophotonics, 7 (8), 656 –664 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201300125 Google Scholar

33. 

H. Breitbart et al., “Changes in calcium transport in mammalian sperm mitochondria and plasma membrane irradiated at 633 nm (He-Ne laser),” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 34 (2–3), 117 –121 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/1011-1344(95)07281-0 JPPBEG 1011-1344 Google Scholar

34. 

R. Lubart et al., “Changes in calcium transport in mammalian sperm mitochondria and plasma membranes caused by 780 nm irradiation,” Lasers Surg. Med., 21 (5), 493 –499 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1997)21:5<493::AID-LSM12>3.0.CO;2-A LSMEDI 0196-8092 Google Scholar

35. 

L. Wang, D. Zhang and W. Schwarz, “TRPV channels in mast cells as a target for low-level-laser therapy,” Cells, 3 (3), 662 –673 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells3030662 Google Scholar

36. 

M. R. Hamblin, “Shining light on the head: photobiomodulation for brain disorders,” BBA Clin., 6 113 –124 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbacli.2016.09.002 Google Scholar

37. 

Y. Wang et al., “Red (660 nm) or near-infrared (810 nm) photobiomodulation stimulates, while blue (415 nm), green (540 nm) light inhibits proliferation in human adipose-derived stem cells,” Sci. Rep., 7 (1), 7781 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07525-w SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

38. 

Y. M. Lee et al., “A novel role for the TRPV1 channel in UV-induced matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 expression in HaCaT cells,” J. Cell Physiol., 219 (3), 766 –775 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.21729 Google Scholar

39. 

C. Moore et al., “UVB radiation generates sunburn pain and affects skin by activating epidermal TRPV4 ion channels and triggering endothelin-1 signaling,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 110 (34), E3225 –E3234 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312933110 Google Scholar

40. 

R. A. Mesquita-Ferrari et al., “Effects of low-level laser therapy on expression of TNF-alpha and TGF-beta in skeletal muscle during the repair process,” Lasers Med. Sci., 26 (3), 335 –340 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0850-5 Google Scholar

41. 

K. P. Fernandes et al., “Photobiomodulation with 660-nm and 780-nm laser on activated J774 macrophage-like cells: effect on M1 inflammatory markers,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 153 344 –351 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.10.015 JPPBEG 1011-1344 Google Scholar

42. 

A. C.-H. Chen et al., “Can dendritic cells see light?,” Proc. SPIE, 7565 756507 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.839766 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

43. 

M. M. Kaminski et al., “T cell activation is driven by an ADP-dependent glucokinase linking enhanced glycolysis with mitochondrial reactive oxygen species generation,” Cell Rep., 2 (5), 1300 –1315 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.009 Google Scholar

44. 

L. A. Sena et al., “Mitochondria are required for antigen-specific T cell activation through reactive oxygen species signaling,” Immunity, 38 (2), 225 –236 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.10.020 IUNIEH 1074-7613 Google Scholar

45. 

J. N. R. Gnanaprakasam, R. Wu and R. Wang, “Metabolic reprogramming in modulating T cell reactive oxygen species generation and antioxidant capacity,” Front. Immunol., 9 1075 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01075 Google Scholar

46. 

S. Devadas et al., “Discrete generation of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide by T cell receptor stimulation: selective regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and Fas ligand expression,” J. Exp. Med., 195 (1), 59 –70 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20010659 JEMEAV 0022-1007 Google Scholar

47. 

D. H. Lee et al., “Glutathione peroxidase 1 deficiency attenuates concanavalin A-induced hepatic injury by modulation of T-cell activation,” Cell Death Dis., 7 e2208 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2016.95 Google Scholar

48. 

H. Wang et al., “Low-voltage-activated CaV3.1 calcium channels shape T helper cell cytokine profiles,” Immunity, 44 (4), 782 –794 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2016.01.015 IUNIEH 1074-7613 Google Scholar

49. 

S. Feske, H. Wulff and E. Y. Skolnik, “Ion channels in innate and adaptive immunity,” Annu. Rev. Immunol., 33 291 –353 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112212 ARIMDU 0732-0582 Google Scholar

50. 

M. Trebak and J. P. Kinet, “Calcium signalling in T cells,” Nat. Rev. Immunol., 19 (3), 154 –169 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-018-0110-7 NRIABX 1474-1733 Google Scholar

51. 

D. De Stefani, R. Rizzuto and T. Pozzan, “Enjoy the trip: calcium in mitochondria back and forth,” Annu. Rev. Biochem., 85 161 –192 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034216 ARBOAW 0066-4154 Google Scholar

52. 

I. Parker and I. F. Smith, “Recording single-channel activity of inositol trisphosphate receptors in intact cells with a microscope, not a patch clamp,” J. Gen. Physiol., 136 (2), 119 –127 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200910390 JGPLAD 0022-1295 Google Scholar

53. 

E. L. Yarosz and C. H. Chang, “The role of reactive oxygen species in regulating T cell-mediated immunity and disease,” Immune Network, 18 (1), e14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4110/in.2018.18.e14 Google Scholar

54. 

A. Salles et al., “Barcoding T cell calcium response diversity with methods for automated and accurate analysis of cell signals (MAAACS),” PLoS Comput. Biol., 9 (9), e1003245 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003245 Google Scholar

55. 

D. M. Previte et al., “Reactive oxygen species are required for driving efficient and sustained aerobic glycolysis during CD4+ T cell activation,” PLoS One, 12 (4), e0175549 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175549 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar

56. 

M. J. T. Frisch et al., Gaussian 09W Program Package, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut (2009). Google Scholar

57. 

A. D. Becke, “Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior,” Phys. Rev. A, 38 (6), 3098 –3100 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098 Google Scholar

58. 

A. D. Becke, “Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange,” J. Chem. Phys., 98 (7), 5648 –5652 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913 JCPSA6 0021-9606 Google Scholar

59. 

C. Lee, W. Yang and R. Parr, “Development of the Colle–Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density,” Phys. Rev. B, 37 (2), 785 –789 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 Google Scholar

60. 

C. Lee et al., “Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions,” J. Chem. Phys., 72 (1), 650 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.438955 JCPSA6 0021-9606 Google Scholar

61. 

A. D. McLean and G. S. Chandler, “Contracted Gaussian basis sets for molecular calculations. I. Second row atoms, Z=11-18,” J. Chem. Phys., 72 (10), 5639 –5648 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.438980 JCPSA6 0021-9606 Google Scholar

62. 

M. J. Frisch, J. A. Pople and J. S. Binkley, “Self-consistent molecular orbital methods 25. Supplementary functions for Gaussian basis sets,” J. Chem. Phys., 80 3265 –3269 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.447079 JCPSA6 0021-9606 Google Scholar

63. 

S. Kashiwagi et al., “Laser vaccine adjuvants. History, progress, and potential,” Hum. Vaccines Immunother., 10 (7), 1892 –1907 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.28840 Google Scholar

64. 

S. K. Sia and G. M. Whitesides, “Microfluidic devices fabricated in poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies,” Electrophoresis, 24 (21), 3563 –3576 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200305584 Google Scholar

65. 

D. K. Cai et al., “Optical absorption in transparent PDMS materials applied for multimode waveguides fabrication,” Opt. Mater., 30 (7), 1157 –1161 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2007.05.041 OMATET 0925-3467 Google Scholar

66. 

S. Fittipaldi et al., “Role of exercise-induced reactive oxygen species in the modulation of heat shock protein response,” Free Radical Res., 48 (1), 52 –70 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3109/10715762.2013.835047 Google Scholar

67. 

S. Galadari et al., “Reactive oxygen species and cancer paradox: to promote or to suppress?,” Free Radical Biol. Med., 104 144 –164 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.01.004 FRBMEH 0891-5849 Google Scholar

68. 

R. Liljemalm and T. Nyberg, “Damage criteria for cerebral cortex cells subjected to hyperthermia,” Int. J. Hyperthermia, 32 (6), 704 –712 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2016.1181275 IJHYEQ 0265-6736 Google Scholar

69. 

R. Liljemalm and T. Nyberg, “Quantification of a thermal damage threshold for astrocytes using infrared laser generated heat gradients,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 42 (4), 822 –832 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0940-1 ABMECF 0090-6964 Google Scholar

70. 

Q. Xia and T. Nyberg, “Inhibition of cortical neural networks using infrared laser,” J. Biophotonics, 12 (7), e201800403 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201800403 Google Scholar

71. 

Y. Nakata, K. Osawa and N. Miyanaga, “Utilization of the high spatial-frequency component in adaptive beam shaping by using a virtual diagonal phase grating,” Sci. Rep., 9 (1), 4640 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40829-7 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

72. 

J. Liang et al., “High-precision laser beam shaping using a binary-amplitude spatial light modulator,” Appl. Opt., 49 (8), 1323 –1330 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.001323 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

73. 

Y. V. Saenko et al., “Mitochondrial dependent oxidative stress in cell culture induced by laser radiation at 1265 nm,” Lasers Med. Sci., 31 (3), 405 –413 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1861-z Google Scholar

74. 

S. G. Sokolovski et al., “Infrared laser pulse triggers increased singlet oxygen production in tumour cells,” Sci. Rep., 3 3484 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03484 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

75. 

F. Anquez et al., “Cancerous cell death from sensitizer free photoactivation of singlet oxygen,” Photochem. Photobiol., 88 (1), 167 –174 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.01028.x PHCBAP 0031-8655 Google Scholar

76. 

H. Piazena et al., “Effects of water-filtered infrared-A and of heat on cell death, inflammation, antioxidative potential and of free radical formation in viable skin—first results,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 138 347 –354 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.06.007 JPPBEG 1011-1344 Google Scholar

77. 

M. E. Darvin et al., “Radical production by infrared A irradiation in human tissue,” Skin Pharmacol. Physiol., 23 (1), 40 –46 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1159/000257262 Google Scholar

78. 

L. Zastrow et al., “The missing link--light-induced (280-1, 600 nm) free radical formation in human skin,” Skin Pharmacol. Physiol., 22 (1), 31 –44 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1159/000188083 Google Scholar

79. 

S. Passarella and T. Karu, “Absorption of monochromatic and narrow band radiation in the visible and near IR by both mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial photoacceptors results in photobiomodulation,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 140 344 –358 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.07.021 JPPBEG 1011-1344 Google Scholar

80. 

R. A. Marcus and N. Sutin, “Electron transfers in chemistry and biology,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 811 (3), 265 –322 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4173(85)90014-X Google Scholar

81. 

T. I. Karu et al., “Absorption measurements of a cell monolayer relevant to phototherapy: reduction of cytochrome c oxidase under near IR radiation,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 81 (2), 98 –106 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2005.07.002 JPPBEG 1011-1344 Google Scholar

82. 

T. I. Karu, “Multiple roles of cytochrome c oxidase in mammalian cells under action of red and IR-A radiation,” IUBMB Life, 62 (8), 607 –610 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.359 1521-6543 Google Scholar

83. 

T. I. Karu, L. V. Pyatibrat and G. S. Kalendo, “Photobiological modulation of cell attachment via cytochrome c oxidase,” Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 3 (2), 211 –216 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1039/b306126d PPSHCB 1474-905X Google Scholar

84. 

M. Migliario et al., “Laser-induced osteoblast proliferation is mediated by ROS production,” Lasers Med. Sci., 29 (4), 1463 –1467 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1556-x Google Scholar

85. 

P. Sarti et al., “Cytochrome c oxidase and nitric oxide in action: molecular mechanisms and pathophysiological implications,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1817 (4), 610 –619 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.09.002 BBACAQ 0006-3002 Google Scholar

86. 

D. J. Slebos et al., “Mitochondrial localization and function of heme oxygenase-1 in cigarette smoke-induced cell death,” Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., 36 (4), 409 –417 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2006-0214OC AJRBEL 1044-1549 Google Scholar

87. 

T. Zaobornyj and P. Ghafourifar, “Strategic localization of heart mitochondrial NOS: a review of the evidence,” Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol., 303 (11), H1283 –H1293 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00674.2011 Google Scholar

88. 

V. Borutaite, A. Budriunaite and G. C. Brown, “Reversal of nitric oxide-, peroxynitrite- and S-nitrosothiol-induced inhibition of mitochondrial respiration or complex I activity by light and thiols,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1459 (2–3), 405 –412 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(00)00178-X BBACAQ 0006-3002 Google Scholar

89. 

B. S. Zuckerbraun et al., “Carbon monoxide signals via inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase and generation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species,” FASEB J., 21 (4), 1099 –1106 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.06-6644com FAJOEC 0892-6638 Google Scholar

90. 

S. Moncada and J. P. Bolanos, “Nitric oxide, cell bioenergetics and neurodegeneration,” J. Neurochem., 97 (6), 1676 –1689 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03988.x JONRA9 0022-3042 Google Scholar

91. 

R. Boelens et al., “An EPR study of the photodissociation reactions of oxidised cytochrome c oxidase-nitric oxide complexes,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 724 (2), 176 –183 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2728(83)90136-6 BBACAQ 0006-3002 Google Scholar

92. 

J. P. Collman et al., “Interaction of nitric oxide with a functional model of cytochrome c oxidase,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 105 (29), 9892 –9896 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804257105 Google Scholar

93. 

M. H. Vos and U. Liebl, “Time-resolved infrared spectroscopic studies of ligand dynamics in the active site from cytochrome c oxidase,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1847 (1), 79 –85 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2014.07.018 BBACAQ 0006-3002 Google Scholar

94. 

T. H. Sanderson et al., “Publisher correction: inhibitory modulation of cytochrome c oxidase activity with specific near-infrared light wavelengths attenuates brain ischemia/reperfusion injury,” Sci. Rep., 8 (1), 6729 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25184-3 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

95. 

O. V. Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya et al., “Laser-induced generation of singlet oxygen and its role in the cerebrovascular physiology,” Prog. Quantum Electron., 55 112 –128 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantelec.2017.05.001 PQUEAH 0079-6727 Google Scholar

96. 

B. Frossi et al., “Oxidative microenvironment exerts an opposite regulatory effect on cytokine production by Th1 and Th2 cells,” Mol. Immunol., 45 (1), 58 –64 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2007.05.008 MOIMD5 0161-5890 Google Scholar

97. 

M. M. Kaminski et al., “Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species control T cell activation by regulating IL-2 and IL-4 expression: mechanism of ciprofloxacin-mediated immunosuppression,” J. Immunol., 184 (9), 4827 –4841 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0901662 JOIMA3 0022-1767 Google Scholar

98. 

S. H. Jackson et al., “T cells express a phagocyte-type NADPH oxidase that is activated after T cell receptor stimulation,” Nat. Immunol., 5 (8), 818 –827 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1096 NRIABX 1474-1733 Google Scholar

99. 

G. Fu et al., “Suppression of Th17 cell differentiation by misshapen/NIK-related kinase MINK1,” J. Exp. Med., 214 (5), 1453 –1469 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20161120 JEMEAV 0022-1007 Google Scholar

100. 

D. A. Johnson et al., “The absence of the pro-antioxidant transcription factor Nrf2 exacerbates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Toxicol. Sci., 114 (2), 237 –246 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfp274 Google Scholar

101. 

P. C. Kuo et al., “3H-1,2-dithiole-3-thione as a novel therapeutic agent for the treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Brain Behav. Immun., 57 173 –186 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2016.03.015 Google Scholar

102. 

M. J. Scheffel et al., “Efficacy of adoptive T-cell therapy is improved by treatment with the antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine, which limits activation-induced T-cell death,” Cancer Res., 76 (20), 6006 –6016 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0587 CNREA8 0008-5472 Google Scholar

103. 

M. R. Hamblin, “Mechanisms and mitochondrial redox signaling in photobiomodulation,” Photochem. Photobiol., 94 (2), 199 –212 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/php.12864 PHCBAP 0031-8655 Google Scholar

104. 

P. L. V. Lima et al., “Photobiomodulation enhancement of cell proliferation at 660 nm does not require cytochrome c oxidase,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 194 71 –75 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.03.015 JPPBEG 1011-1344 Google Scholar

Biography

Wataru Katagiri is a PhD candidate at the Department of Science and Technology, Keio University in Tokyo, Japan. He obtained his master degrees at Keio University and Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Stockholm, Sweden. He has been working on a multidisciplinary project of engineering, chemistry, and immunology at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) since 2018.

GeonHui Lee received his PhD in nano-bio-information technology at the KU-KIST Graduate School of Converging Science and Technology at Korea University in South Korea. His graduate work was focused on the mechanobiological interactions between organelle systems within cells under various external cues and mechanosensation on diverse ECM properties. As postdoctoral fellow at the National Institutes of Health, his research focuses on the identification and biological characterization of neutrophil extracellular traps formation.

Akira Tanushi is a PhD candidate in the Department of Chemistry at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He has master’s and bachelor’s degrees in chemistry from the University of Tokyo. His research focuses on catalytic reactivity of metal complexes with nontrigonal phosphorus (III) ligands.

Kosuke Tsukada is an associate professor at Keio University. He received his PhD in engineering from Keio University in 2002. He had joined the Edwin L. Steele Laboratory for tumor biology (directed by Prof. Rakesh K. Jain) at MGH and Harvard Medical School (HMS) from 2007 to 2009. His laboratory studies focuses on optical and imaging techniques for biosensors and medical imaging.

Hak Soo Choi is an associate professor of radiology at HMS and faculty of Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center and the director of the Bioengineering and Nanomedicine Program at MGH. Since 2008, his laboratory focuses on the development of novel contrast agents for tissue-specific targeting as well as image-guided cancer diagnosis and treatment by employing renal clearable multifunctional nanoprobes with avoiding nonspecific uptake in normal background tissues.

Satoshi Kashiwagi is an assistant professor of radiology at HMS and MGH. He earned his MD and PhD degrees at Keio University in Tokyo, Japan, and completed his postdoctoral training at MGH and he gained a broad and unique skill set for basic and translational research in bioimaging, immunology, reactive oxygen species, cancer biology, and laser medicine. His research group focuses on creative approaches in optical imaging and photobiomodulation using near-infrared light.

© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Wataru Katagiri, GeonHui Lee, Akira Tanushi, Kosuke Tsukada, Hak Soo Choi, and Satoshi Kashiwagi "High-throughput single-cell live imaging of photobiomodulation with multispectral near-infrared lasers in cultured T cells," Journal of Biomedical Optics 25(3), 036003 (19 March 2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.25.3.036003
Received: 19 November 2019; Accepted: 18 February 2020; Published: 19 March 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
18 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top