1 October 2000 Fair evaluation methods for image watermarking systems
Author Affiliations +
Since the early 1990s a number of papers on ‘‘robust’’ digital watermarking systems have been presented but none of them uses the same robustness criteria. This is not practical at all for comparison and slows down progress in this area. To address this issue, we present an evaluation procedure of image watermarking systems. First we identify all necessary parameters for proper benchmarking and investigate how to quantitatively describe the image degradation introduced by the watermarking process. For this, we show the weaknesses of usual image quality measures in the context watermarking and propose a novel measure adapted to the human visual system. Then we show how to efficiently evaluate the watermark performance in such a way that fair comparisons between different methods are possible. The usefulness of three graphs: ‘‘attack versus visual-quality,’’ ‘‘bit error versus visual quality,’’ and ‘‘bit error versus attack’’ are investigated. In addition the receiver operating characteristic graphs are reviewed and proposed to describe statistical detection behavior of watermarking methods. Finally we review a number of attacks that any system should survive to be really useful and propose a benchmark and a set of different suitable images.
Martin Kutter, Fabien A. P. Petitcolas, "Fair evaluation methods for image watermarking systems," Journal of Electronic Imaging 9(4), (1 October 2000). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1287594


F MAD a feature based extension of the most...
Proceedings of SPIE (February 04 2013)
SPCA a no reference image quality assessment based on...
Proceedings of SPIE (February 04 2013)
Image quality evaluation of full reference algorithm
Proceedings of SPIE (March 08 2018)
Fair benchmark for image watermarking systems
Proceedings of SPIE (April 09 1999)
On the fragility of the binary phase only filter based...
Proceedings of SPIE (November 14 2007)

Back to Top