Dose and diagnostic performance comparison between phase-contrast mammography with synchrotron radiation and digital mammography: a clinical study report

Christian Fedon; Luigi Rigon; Fulvia Arfelli; Diego Dreossi; Elisa Quai; Maura Tonutti; Giuliana Tromba; Maria Assunta Cova; Renata Longo

doi:10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.013503

1 February 2018 Dose and diagnostic performance comparison between phase-contrast mammography with synchrotron radiation and digital mammography: a clinical study report

Christian Fedon, Luigi Rigon, Fulvia Arfelli, Diego Dreossi, Elisa Quai, Maura Tonutti, Giuliana Tromba, Maria Assunta Cova, Renata Longo

Author Affiliations +

Journal of Medical Imaging, Vol. 5, Issue 1, 013503 (February 2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.013503

Abstract

Two dosimetric quantities [mean glandular dose (MGD) and entrance surface air kerma (ESAK)] and the diagnostic performance of phase-contrast mammography with synchrotron radiation (MSR) are compared to conventional digital mammography (DM). Seventy-one patients (age range, 41 to 82 years) underwent MSR after a DM examination if questionable or suspicious breast abnormalities were not clarified by ultrasonography. The MGD and the ESAK delivered in both examinations were evaluated and compared. Two on-site radiologists rated the images in consensus according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System assessment categories, which were then correlated with the final diagnoses by means of statistical generalized linear models (GLMs). Receiver operating characteristic curves were also used to assess the diagnostic performance by comparing the area under the curve (AUC). An important MGD and ESAK reduction was observed in MSR due to the monoenergetic beam. In particular, an average 43% reduction was observed for the MGD and a reduction of more than 50% for the ESAK. GLM showed higher diagnostic accuracy, especially in terms of specificity, for MSR, confirmed by AUC analysis (p<0.001). The study design implied that the population was characterized by a high prevalence of disease and that the radiologists, who read the DM images before referring the patient to MSR, could have been influenced in their assessments. Within these limitations, the use of synchrotron radiation with the phase-contrast technique applied to mammography showed an important dose reduction and a higher diagnostic accuracy compared with DM. These results could further encourage research on the translation of x-ray phase-contrast imaging into the clinics.

Citation Download Citation

Christian Fedon, Luigi Rigon, Fulvia Arfelli, Diego Dreossi, Elisa Quai, Maura Tonutti, Giuliana Tromba, Maria Assunta Cova, and Renata Longo "Dose and diagnostic performance comparison between phase-contrast mammography with synchrotron radiation and digital mammography: a clinical study report," Journal of Medical Imaging 5(1), 013503 (1 February 2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.013503

Received: 18 August 2017; Accepted: 4 January 2018; Published: 1 February 2018

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available