1 July 2002 Mutual optimization of resolution enhancement techniques
Author Affiliations +
As subhalf wavelength optical lithography is pursued, the variety of imaging requirements increases. This can result in complex combinations of various resolution enhancement techniques. Optimization based on simple standards or rules is not possible. Problems often arise as analysis is carried out in a spatial domain, where mask and image properties are evaluated using sizing or dimensional evaluations. A more appropriate perspective for image optimization is that of the lens pupil, in a spatial frequency domain. In this paper, we describe the common characteristics of resolution enhancement, beyond the historical comparisons of alternating phase shifting masking (PSM) and strong OAI. Enhancement techniques including assist feature optical proximity correction (OPC), custom illumination, attenuated PSM, and pupil filtering are described from a spatial frequency standpoint where each can be utilized to take advantage of strengths and avoid weaknesses. As a result of this type of analysis, we will also describe an alternative OPC method in which assist features of varying tone, referred to as gray bars, provide significant image improvement.
Bruce W. Smith, "Mutual optimization of resolution enhancement techniques," Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS 1(2), (1 July 2002). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1450596


Point spread function engineering with multiphoton SPIFI
Proceedings of SPIE (March 09 2016)
New mask having functions of OAI and PSM to realize...
Proceedings of SPIE (July 26 1999)
Forbidden pitches for 130-nm lithography and below
Proceedings of SPIE (July 05 2000)
Subwavelength optical lithography
Proceedings of SPIE (August 18 2000)
Proceedings of SPIE (June 07 1996)

Back to Top