24 June 2014 Observation of phase defect on extreme ultraviolet mask using an extreme ultraviolet microscope
Author Affiliations +
J. of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, 13(2), 023012 (2014). doi:10.1117/1.JMM.13.2.023012
Abstract
Influences of phase defect structures on extreme ultraviolet (EUV) microscope images were examined. Phase defects on the bottom of a multilayer (ML) do not always propagate vertically upward to the ML’s top surface. For this study, two types of masks were prepared. One was an EUV blank with programmed phase defects made of lines in order to analyze the inclination angle of the phase defects. The other was an EUV mask that consists of programmed dot type phase defects 80 nm wide and 2.4 nm high with absorber patterns of half-pitch 88-nm lines-and-spaces. The positions of the phase defects relative to the absorber lines were designed to be shifted accordingly. Transmission electron microscope observations revealed that the line type phase defects starting from the bottom surface of the ML propagated toward the ML’s top surface, while inclined toward the center of the EUV blank. At the distances of 0 and 66 mm from the center of the EUV blank, the inclination angles varied from 0 to 4 deg. The impacts of the inclination angles on EUV microscope images were significant even though the positions of the phase defect relative to the absorber line, as measured by a scanning probe microscope, were the same.
Amano, Terasawa, Watanabe, Toyoda, Harada, Watanabe, and Kinoshita: Observation of phase defect on extreme ultraviolet mask using an extreme ultraviolet microscope

1.

Introduction

Extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography is considered to be the most promising next-generation lithography after the point where 193-nm immersion lithography would cease to deliver smaller features. However, the path toward establishing the EUV lithography faces many technical difficulties. Issues with insufficient light-source power, particle-free mask handling, defect-free mask, availability of flat mask blanks,12.3.4.5 and resist material development6,7 are some of those difficulties that need to be resolved. From the viewpoint of EUV mask fabrication, mask pattern defect inspection89.10 and repair1112.13 are some of the even more demanding tasks to be addressed. The reason is that for the EUV lithography generation, the device pattern feature size happens to be exceedingly small and calls for higher repairing accuracy than what has been achieved for optical lithography.1415.16 Regarding the types of defects, the nature of the pattern defects in the EUV mask is mostly the same as in the case of optical masks except for those defects that are classified as reflective multilayer (ML) defects, such as bump or pit phase defects that propagate through the ML during their deposition, and are hard to repair.17 Therefore, to minimize the effect of the phase defect on the printed images on wafer, two methods are suggested. One method is to cover the phase defects beneath the absorber pattern by shifting the location of the device pattern during the mask patterning.1819.20 The other is to eliminate the influence of the phase error by simply removing the absorber away from the close proximity of the phase defects after fabricating the device pattern.21 To make these methods succeed, it would be necessary to be able to pinpoint the locations of the phase defects and the affected areas.2223.24

As for the growth model of the phase defect due to the bumps on the quartz substrate surface, several transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of the phase defects indicated that the growth of a phase defect starting as a bump on the quartz substrate surface does not always propagate in a vertical direction.25,26 This means that ML surface geometry measurement of phase defects using scanning probe microscope (SPM) or nonactinic system may not be the right tool for phase defect mitigation strategy of covering, or compensating for, the phase defects by manipulating the absorber pattern. Therefore, to understand the influence of the propagation angle of the phase defect on the compensation strategy, a programmed phase defect EUV mask was prepared, and absorber lines with the phase defects were observed using SPM and EUV microscope.

2.

Experiment

2.1.

Preparation of a Programmed Line Type Phase Defect EUV Blank

A programmed line type phase defect EUV blank (with no absorber) consists of a Ru-capped Mo/Si ML deposited on a quartz substrate with seeds on quartz for the creation of line type phase defects. The ML consisted of a 2.5-nm-thick Ru film on a 40-bilayer Mo (2.2 nm thick)/Si (4.8 nm thick) film. To serve as seeds for the phase defects, lines of 100 nm in width, arrayed in 7×7 with a pitch of 22 mm, were fabricated on the quartz substrate. As a first step, a photoresist layer was coated on the chrome layer on a quartz substrate. Next, a set of line patterns were drawn on the photoresist layer by an electron beam writing system (EBM-8000, NuFlare Technology Inc., Yokohama, Japan). Then after developing the photoresist layer, the chrome layer was etched. As a last step, the quartz substrate was etched and the chrome layer was removed. After running through a cleaning process, the patterned substrate was then coated with a Ru-capped ML. The nonflatness of the blank before and after the ML coating was below 20 and 800 nm, respectively, and the ML surface was higher in the center of the EUV blank than in its corners.

2.2.

Preparation of a Programmed Dot Type Phase Defect EUV Mask

To investigate the influence of the phase defect on EUV microscope images, a programmed phase defect EUV mask was prepared. Figure 1(a) shows the mask design. Dots on quartz substrate and the absorber patterns of half-pitch (hp) 88-nm L/S were arrayed in block A (at the center of the mask) and block B (66 mm away from the block A). The fabrication processes of the dot type phase defects are same as the line type phase defects. The positions of the phase defects relative to the absorber lines were designed to be shifted in a prescribed fashion as shown in Fig. 1(b). The position of the phase defect was defined as 0 nm when the center of the phase defect coincided with the center of the absorber line. The right side of the absorber line was defined as plus direction as shown in Fig. 1(c). The dimensions and the positions of the phase defects at the mask surface were measured using an SPM (L-Trace II, Hitachi High-Tech Science Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

Fig. 1

(a) Arrangement of the test pattern. (b) Illustrations of the hp 88-nm L/S pattern with dot type phase defect. (c) Definition of the phase defect position.

JM3_13_2_023012_f001.png

2.3.

Imaging Conditions and Data Analysis

Figure 2 illustrates the imaging optics of the EUV microscope developed by Tohoku University27 that was utilized in this study. The EUV light was sourced from a beam line BL3 of the NewSUBARU synchrotron facility at the University of Hyogo. The outer and inner numerical apertures of the illumination optics were 0.25 and 0.14, respectively. The coherence factor of the illumination light was about 0.01 because the synchrotron source size is very low. The incident angle of the EUV light to the EUV mask was 11 deg, and the angle between the plane of incidence and line pattern direction was approximately 20 deg. The exposure time to take an image was set at 30 s. To reduce the influence of the speckle noise on the EUV microscope image, nine images of the same pattern were taken and superimposed.

Fig. 2

Schematic model of the extreme ultraviolet (EUV) microscope optics.

JM3_13_2_023012_f002.png

Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show the schematic models of an EUV mask and an EUV microscope image of the mask, respectively. When a phase defect is not adequately covered by the absorber line, image intensity of the L/S pattern varies depending on the phase defect position. Figure 3(c) shows the intensity profile of the EUV microscope image along a line A-A′ drawn across the L/S pattern containing the defect. Here, IML, IABS, and IDEF stand for the intensities of the reflected lights from the space pattern without the phase defect, line pattern, and space pattern with the phase defect, respectively. The normalized intensity was calculated by the following equations:

(1)

I=(IDEFIABS)/(IMLIABS).

Fig. 3

Illustrations of (a) the phase defect in L/S pattern and (b) the EUV microscope image. (c) Intensity profiles along the line AA′.

JM3_13_2_023012_f003.png

3.

Results and Discussions

3.1.

Analysis of the Phase Defect Structure

According to our previous work, the path of a pit type phase defect propagating from the bottom of an ML and ending at the top is inclined toward the center of the mask.28 Furthermore, the inclination angle increases in proportion to the distance from the center of the mask. In this section, to determine the increasing angle of inclination, and to determine the angles of the line type phase defects, a set of line type phase defects in blocks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 [Fig. 4(a)] were prepared for TEM observation. Figure 4(b) describes the schematic view of the TEM observation direction. Each TEM observation sample was cut perpendicularly to the line type phase defect using a focused ion beam. The TEM images and the inclination angles of the phase defects are shown in Fig. 4(c). The inclination angle was defined as the angle between a vertical line from the quartz substrate surface and a line connecting the center of the line pattern on the quartz substrate with the center of the raised surface of the ML. These TEM images clearly show that the phase defect’s propagation through the ML is inclined toward the center of the EUV blank. The relationship between the inclination angles of the phase defects and the distances of the phase defects from the center of the EUV blank is summarized in Fig. 5. Then from this information, the inclination angles of the phase defects in block B [Fig. 1(a)] were estimated to be 4 deg.

Fig. 4

(a) Arrangement of the test pattern. (b) Direction of the phase defect observation. (c) Cross-sectional TEM images and calculated inclined angles of the phase defects.

JM3_13_2_023012_f004.png

Fig. 5

Inclination angle of the phase defect as a function of the distance of the phase defects from the center of the blank.

JM3_13_2_023012_f005.png

3.2.

Measurement of the Phase Defects Using SPM

The profiles and sizes of the phase defects evaluated in this study were measured using SPM. Figures 6(a) and 6(b) represent the SPM image and cross-sectional profiles of the dot type phase defect on the ML. The measured dimension of the phase defect on the ML was 80.0 nm in full-width at half-maximum and 2.4 nm in height.

Fig. 6

(a) Scanning probe microscope (SPM) image of the dot type phase defect on the ML. (b) Cross-sectional profile of (a).

JM3_13_2_023012_f006.png

The phase defect positions relative to the absorber lines were also measured using SPM. To evaluate the influence of the inclination angles of the phase defects on the EUV microscope images, the same position of the phase defect relative to the absorber line needed to be identified in both block A and block B. Calculating from the total thickness of the ML and the inclination angle of the phase defect in block B, the phase defect position shifts about 20 nm toward the center of the mask in relation to the position of the dot on the quartz substrate. Figure 7(a) represents a test pattern which, by the help of SPM, enables us to measure the positional shift of the phase defect relative to the absorber pattern. The test pattern consists of a square-shaped absorber hole 1×1μm in size and a phase defect in the center of the hole. On the mask pattern data, the center of the square hole was aligned with the center of the phase defect. After running through the fabrication process of the programmed phase defect mask, the test patterns in the blocks A and B were measured using SPM. Figure 7(b) shows the cross-sectional profiles of the test pattern in blocks A and B. The measured positional shift of the phase defect in block B was 19.9 nm, which corresponded to 4 deg of the inclination angle. This result agreed well with the result described in Sec. 3.1.

Fig. 7

(a) Design of the test pattern. (b) Cross-sectional profiles along the line X–X′.

JM3_13_2_023012_f007.png

The SPM measurement sites in block B were selected by taking into consideration the positional shift of the phase defects. Figure 8 represents the SPM profiles of the hp 88-nm L/S pattern with dot type phase defect 80 nm in size and 2.4 nm in height prepared for EUV microscope observation. In both blocks A and B, the measured phase defect positions were 0, 8, 56, 88, and 160 nm.

Fig. 8

SPM images of the programmed phase defect EUV mask and the measured defect positions.

JM3_13_2_023012_f008.png

3.3.

Observation of the Phase Defects Using EUV Microscope

The L/S patterns with various positions of the phase defect shown in Fig. 8 were observed using the EUV microscope. Figure 9(a) shows the EUV microscope images and their intensity profiles. The intensity fluctuations observed in the images are due to speckle pattern effect occurring with the utilization of a synchrotron EUV source that has a high spatial coherence. These fluctuations are not mask defect.27 However, the captured images clearly indicate the intensity loss of the EUV light from the space pattern due to the presence of the phase defects. In these cases, the locations of the phase defects were defined as 56, 88, and 160 nm in position. The influence of the phase defect position on the intensity loss of the EUV light was calculated in accordance with Eq. (1). Figure 9(b) represents the normalized light intensity of the space pattern affected by the phase defect as a function of the phase defect position. For both blocks A and B, the maximum drop value of 0.4 was observed at the position of 88 nm; and the intensity differences between blocks A and B were negligibly small at the position of 56 and 160 nm. On the other hand, the impact of the inclination angle on the intensity loss of the EUV light was significant when the phase defect location was 8 nm in position. This phenomenon is the effect of the positional shift of the effective defect position caused by the inclination angle. The effective defect position shifts about 1nm/deg to the inclined direction compared with the vertical grown one.28

Fig. 9

(a) EUV microscope images and intensity profiles of the programmed phase defect EUV mask. (b) Normalized light intensity of the space pattern image as a function of the defect position.

JM3_13_2_023012_f009.png

After running through the mask patterning process, removing of the absorber pattern away from the proximity of the phase defect is recommended as an effective way to eliminate the influence of the phase defect on wafer printing image. The decision on the removing area is based on the information of SPM image. However, this study showed that SPM is not a perfect method to pinpoint the actual phase defect position because the phase defect does not always propagate vertically through the ML. On the other hand, a EUV microscope has potential to pinpoint the actual position and affected area by the phase defect.

4.

Summary and Conclusion

The fact that a phase defect does not always propagate in a vertical direction from the bottom surface of the ML to the ML’s top surface makes it necessary to examine the effect of the phase defect structures on an EUV microscope image of a mask pattern. To prepare the mask with various inclination angles, line patterns were fabricated on the surface of a quartz substrate using a standard mask patterning process. Also, the patterned quartz substrate was then coated with an ML for the purpose of analyzing the phase defect propagation through it. The propagation of the phase defect through the ML was then observed by TEM. An inclination angle of 4 deg was observed at a distance of 66 mm from the center of the EUV blank. Next a programmed dot type phase defect EUV mask was fabricated for the EUV microscope observation. The EUV mask consisted of hp 88-nm L/S patterns, and programmed phase defect 80 nm wide and 2.4 nm high. Finally, the relative positions of the phase defects and absorber patterns were measured by SPM, and an inclination angle dependency of the phase defect impact on the EUV microscope images was clearly observed. The EUV microscope could identify the positional shift of the effective phase defect position caused by the inclined propagation through the ML.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Tsukasa Abe of Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd., for his technical advice, fabrication of the programmed phase defect mask, and measurement of the defect size using SPM. This work was supported by New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO).

References

1. 

R. Jonckheereet al., “Dependence of EUV mask printing performance on blank architecture,” Proc. SPIE 6921, 69211W (2008).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.771967Google Scholar

2. 

N. Davydovaet al, “Mask aspects of EUVL imaging at 27 nm node and below,” Proc. SPIE 8166, 816624 (2011).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.896816Google Scholar

3. 

T. Shokiet al., “Improvement of total quality on EUV mask blanks toward volume production,” Proc. SPIE 7636, 76360U (2010).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.849363Google Scholar

4. 

H. Kinoshitaet al., “Mask technology of extreme-ultraviolet lithography,” Proc. SPIE 3412, 358–368 (1998).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.328848Google Scholar

5. 

Y. ArisawaT. TerasawaH. Watanabe, “Impact of EUV mask roughness on lithography performance,” Proc. SPIE 8679, 86792S (2013).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2011635Google Scholar

6. 

H. Aoyamaet al., “Applicability of extreme ultraviolet lithography to fabrication of half pitch 35 nm interconnects,” Proc. SPIE 7636, 76361N (2010).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.846325Google Scholar

7. 

Y. Kikuchiet al., “Study of EUV outgassing spatial distribution toward witness plate in the EUV outgas tester,” Proc. SPIE 8679, 86790M (2013).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2011709Google Scholar

8. 

H. Hashimotoet al., “Development of a new mask pattern inspection tool NPI-7000 and applied results to EUV mask inspection,” Proc. SPIE 8441, 844117 (2012).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.973655Google Scholar

9. 

R. Hiranoet al., “Evaluation of novel projection electron microscopy (PEM) optics for EUV mask inspection,” Proc. SPIE 8679, 86791T (2013).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2010615Google Scholar

10. 

S. Shimomuraet al., “Demonstration of defect free EUV mask for 22 nm NAND flash contact layer using electron beam inspection system,” Proc. SPIE 7969, 79691B (2011).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.879565Google Scholar

11. 

F. Aramakiet al., “Development of new FIB technology for EUVL mask repair,” Proc. SPIE 7969, 79691C (2011).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.879609Google Scholar

12. 

M. Waiblingeret al., “e-beam induced EUV photomask repair: a perfect match,” Proc. SPIE 7545, 75450P (2010).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.863542Google Scholar

13. 

T. Amanoet al., “Study of EUV mask defect repair using FIB method,” Proc. SPIE 7823, 782323 (2010).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.864213Google Scholar

14. 

Z. ZhangT. Liang, “Investigation of resist effects on EUV mask defect printability,” Proc. SPIE 6730, 673016 (2007).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.746707Google Scholar

15. 

T. Lianget al., “EUV mask pattern defect printability,” Proc. SPIE 6283, 62830K (2006).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.681844Google Scholar

16. 

H. Aoyamaet al., “Repair specification study for half-pitch 32-nm patterns for EUVL,” Proc. SPIE 6730, 67305L (2007).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.746586Google Scholar

17. 

D. V. den Heuvelet al., “Natural EUV mask blank defects: evidence, timely detection, analysis and outlook,” Proc. SPIE 7823, 78231T (2010).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.865812Google Scholar

18. 

T. Onoueet al., “Development of fiducial marks on EUV blanks for defect mitigation process,” Proc. SPIE 8322, 832226 (2012).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.919745Google Scholar

19. 

T. MurachiT. Amano, “Registration accuracy improvement of fiducial mark on EUVL mask with MIRAI EUV ABI prototype,” Proc. SPIE 8679, 86791U (2013).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2011047Google Scholar

20. 

T. MurachiT. AmanoS. H. Oh, “Fiducial mark requirements from the viewpoints of actinic blank inspection tool for phase-defect mitigation on EUVL mask,” Proc. SPIE 8522, 85221U (2012).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.976819Google Scholar

21. 

R. Jonckheereet al., “Repair of natural EUV reticle defects,” Proc. SPIE 8166, 81661G (2011).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.898864Google Scholar

22. 

A. Tchikoulaevaet al., “EUV actinic blank inspection: from prototype to production,” Proc. SPIE 8679, 86790I (2013).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2011776Google Scholar

23. 

T. Suzukiet al., “EUV actinic blank inspection tool with a high magnification review mode,” Proc. SPIE 8441, 844115 (2012).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.964983Google Scholar

24. 

T. Yamaneet al., “Phase defect analysis with actinic full-field EUVL mask blank inspection,” Proc. SPIE 8166, 81660G (2011).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.898898Google Scholar

25. 

T. AmanoY. ArisawaT. Terasawa, “Impact of the phase defect structure on an actinic dark-field blank inspection signal and wafer printability,” Proc. SPIE 8322, 832234 (2012).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.916309Google Scholar

26. 

T. AmanoT. Terasawa, “Propagation of surface topography of EUV blank substrate through multilayer and impact of phase defect structure on wafer image,” Proc. SPIE 8679, 86791P (2013).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2011074Google Scholar

27. 

M. Toyodaet al., “At-wavelength extreme ultraviolet lithography mask observation using a high-magnification objective with three multilayer mirrors,” Appl. Phys. Express 5(11), 112501 (2012).1882-0778http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/APEX.5.112501Google Scholar

28. 

T. AmanoT. Terasawa, “Propagation of surface topography of extreme ultraviolet blank substrate through multilayer and impact of phase defect structure on wafer image,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 12(3), 033015 (2013).JMMMHG1932-5150http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.12.3.033015Google Scholar

Biography

Tsuyoshi Amano received his BS and MS degrees in applied chemistry from Keio University in 1997 and 1999, respectively. He joined Dai Nippon Printing Co. Ltd., where he carried out research on mask process, metrology, and repair technology. In 2011, he was assigned to EUVL Infrastructure Development Center, Inc. (EIDEC), and since then he has been engaged in the development of patterned masks and blank inspection technology.

Biographies of the other authors are not available.

Tsuyoshi Amano, Tsuneo Terasawa, Hidehiro Watanabe, Mitsunori Toyoda, Tetsuo Harada, Takeo Watanabe, Hiroo Kinoshita, "Observation of phase defect on extreme ultraviolet mask using an extreme ultraviolet microscope," Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS 13(2), 023012 (24 June 2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.13.2.023012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
KEYWORDS
Extreme ultraviolet

Microscopes

Photomasks

Scanning probe microscopy

Quartz

Transmission electron microscopy

Phase measurement

Back to Top