Translator Disclaimer
5 August 2014 In Praise of the Null Result
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
As I discussed in my last editorial,1 there are four criteria for judging whether a paper should be published in a given scientific journal: 1) does the paper’s content match the scope of the journal; 2) is the quality of the work and writing sufficiently high; 3) is there something novel being presented; and 4) is the paper sufficiently significant. This last criterion, paper significance, is a tricky one since significance lies in the mind of the reader. Still, editors and reviewers must do their best to judge both how important the problem being addressed by the work is, and how big of an advance over the prior literature this work represents.
Chris A. Mack "In Praise of the Null Result," Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS 13(3), 030101 (5 August 2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.13.3.030101
Published: 5 August 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
2 PAGES


SHARE
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 3 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RELATED CONTENT

Development of a multi-sensor CMOS ASIC
Proceedings of SPIE (February 03 2017)
Integrated process for smart microstructures
Proceedings of SPIE (May 20 1996)
Nano self-assembly for MEMS and microelectronics applications
Proceedings of SPIE (February 07 2006)
Gas microsensing system with a FGMOS on a MEM structure
Proceedings of SPIE (July 01 2005)
S-Ku band intelligent amplifier microsystem
Proceedings of SPIE (May 18 2006)

Back to Top