Theoretical analysis of the solvatochromism of organic dyes differing by the conjugation sequence

Sergei Manzhos; Makoto Komatsu; Jotaro Nakazaki; Hiroshi Segawa; Koichi Yamashita

doi:10.1117/1.JPE.2.028001

3 August 2012 Theoretical analysis of the solvatochromism of organic dyes differing by the conjugation sequence

Sergei Manzhos, Makoto Komatsu, Jotaro Nakazaki, Hiroshi Segawa, Koichi Yamashita

Author Affiliations +

Journal of Photonics for Energy, Vol. 2, Issue 1, 028001 (August 2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JPE.2.028001

Abstract

Absorption peak maxima of two organic dyes differing by the position of the methine unit differ by 61 nm in dioxane and by up to 139 nm in polar solvents. It was previously reported that the difference is not reproduced by time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) using ab initio or hybrid functionals. TDDFT errors are different between the molecules, leading to a qualitative failure of TDDFT to predict relative energetics of the dyes. We focus on the effect of polar solvents (acetonitrile, DMSO, methanol, and 2-propanol) on the absorption spectrum, specifically, on the different between the two molecules sign of the solvatochromic shift versus dioxane. Using the correction due to Peach et al., the absolute TDDFT errors can be brought within acceptable ranges of 0.2 to 0.3 eV, and the blue shift versus dioxane is reproduced, although both dyes are predicted to exhibit positive solvatochromism. The inclusion of explicit solvent molecules did not appreciably change either TDDFT energies or the correction term. These results show that in dye design by changing the conjugation order, computational errors are expected to be more important than in the case of an extension of the size of conjugation, especially when polar solvents are used.

Citation Download Citation

Sergei Manzhos, Makoto Komatsu, Jotaro Nakazaki, Hiroshi Segawa, and Koichi Yamashita "Theoretical analysis of the solvatochromism of organic dyes differing by the conjugation sequence," Journal of Photonics for Energy 2(1), 028001 (3 August 2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JPE.2.028001

Published: 3 August 2012

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available