Translator Disclaimer
23 June 2020 Frontal cerebral oxygenation asymmetry: intersubject variability and dependence on systemic physiology, season, and time of day
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Significance: Our study reveals that frontal cerebral oxygenation asymmetry (FCOA), i.e. a difference in the oxygenation between the right and left prefrontal cortex (PFC), is a real phenomenon in healthy human subjects at rest.

Aim: To investigate FCOA, we performed a study with 134 healthy right-handed subjects with the systemic physiology augmented functional near infrared spectroscopy (SPA-fNIRS) approach.

Approach: Subjects were measured 2 to 4 times on different days resulting in an unprecedented number of 518 single measurements of the absolute values of tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) and total hemoglobin concentration ([tHb]) of the right and left PFC. Measurements were performed with frequency-domain functional near-infrared spectroscopy. In addition, the cardiorespiratory parameters were measured simultaneously.

Results: We found that (i) subjects showed an FCOA (higher StO2 on the right PFC), but not for tHb; (ii) intrasubject variability was excellent for both StO2 and tHb, and fair for FCOA; (iii) StO2 correlated significantly with blood CO2 concentration, [tHb] with heart rate, respiration rate (RR), and the pulse–respiration quotient (PRQ), and FCOA with RR and PRQ; (iv) FCOA and StO2 were dependent on season and time of day, respectively; (v) FCOA was negatively correlated with the room temperature; and (vi) StO2 and tHb were not correlated with the subjects mood but with their chronotype, whereas FCOA was not dependent on the chronotype.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that FCOA is real, and it provides unique insights into this remarkable phenomenon.

1.

Introduction

Our own preliminary measurements suggested that cerebral oxygenation differed between the right and left prefrontal cortex (PFC) in healthy human adults at rest.1 This phenomenon, which we named frontal cerebral oxygenation asymmetry (FCOA), is characterized by higher tissue oxygenation over the right PFC compared to the left.

Hemispheric specialization has been reported for a wide range of cerebral functions.2 For example, it is known that the regions in the left hemisphere are usually dominant for language and logical processing, whereas regions in the right hemisphere are specialized for spatial recognition and emotional control.3,4 Lateralization of function was first reported in the domain of language functions, which is widely accepted as a fundamental feature of neural organization, where it was revealed that the left hemisphere is dominant in language processing.5,6 Additionally, more than 90% of the population prefers the right hand for manual activities, with superior fine motor control and motor strength, which is controlled by the left hemisphere.4 Research has demonstrated that neural organization exists for the control motor actions, where each brain hemisphere contributes exclusive control mechanisms to the movement of each arm.7 Mutha et al.7 suggested that the left hemisphere provides predictive control mechanisms, whereas the right one contributes positional control mechanisms during movement of either arm. In addition to lateralization of language and motor control, face processing has also been shown to have laterality to neural activity and connectivity. It has been demonstrated that areas in the right hemisphere are more anatomically connected, more synchronized during rest, and more actively communicating with each other during face perception compared to the left hemisphere.8 Interestingly, numerous electroencephalography (EEG) studies have demonstrated a right–left asymmetry in brain activity during the resting state. Frontal EEG asymmetry (FEA) activity has been explained using the approach-withdrawal model suggesting that there are two different types of motivation.9,10 The approach motivation signifies the propensity to move toward the desired stimulus and is associated with a higher left frontal activity, whereas the withdrawal/avoidance motivation indicates a propensity to move or stay away from an undesired stimulus and is associated with higher right frontal activity.1113 However, only a few studies on the asymmetry of brain tissue oxygenation and metabolism have been performed so far.1,14 This prompted us to investigate this fascinating phenomenon in many subjects using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

From a methodological point of view, three main types of NIRS-based optical tissue spectroscopy techniques have been developed so far: continuous wave (CW-NIRS), frequency domain (FD-NIRS), and time domain (TD-NIRS). CW-NIRS can provide information on concentration changes of oxyhemoglobin ([O2Hb]) and deoxyhemoglobin ([HHb]) but cannot determine absolute baseline values. Therefore, it is appropriate for applications in cognitive neuroscience as absolute values are not crucial and functional activity is relatively assessed with respect to the baseline.15 FD-NIRS and TD-NIRS measure not only the light intensity as CW NIRS but also the time of flight of photons through tissue. Therefore, time resolved techniques such as TD-NIRS and FD-NIRS are able to provide absolute [O2Hb], [HHb], and total hemoglobin ([tHb]) concentrations as well as absolute tissue oxygen saturation [StO2=([O2Hb]/[tHb])×100].16,17 This is relevant additional information, e.g., the [tHb] is strictly proportional to cerebral blood volume by the hematocrit. Thus these systems have widely been used in many diverse fields and applications including clinical monitoring, traumatic brain injury, anesthesiology, neonatology, and psychiatry.18 A comprehensive review on the history of fNIRS development, methodology, and imaging instrumentation has been published by Scholkmann et al.19 In this study, we performed optical neuroimaging using multidistance FD-NIRS. This approach is also able to reduce the sensitivity to extracerebral tissue. It is known that the oxygenation of the brain depends on its activity state, and the metabolic changes in the brain are interrelated with systemic parameters.2022 Therefore, it is essential to employ the systemic physiology augmented (SPA) fNIRS approach, which additionally and simultaneously measures absolute values of cardiorespiratory parameters including the end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2), heart rate (HR), respiration rate (RR), and the pulse-respiration quotient (PRQ).

The main goal of this study was to investigate FCOA in a large number of healthy humans at rest to elucidate whether FCOA is a real and robust phenomenon. To facilitate a better understanding of this phenomenon, we employed SPA-fNIRS to assess whether FCOA depends on systemic physiological activity, absolute tissue oxygenation, or hemoglobin concentration. We also aimed to explore the effects of chronobiological and psychological variables on FCOA, as well as cerebral hemodynamics and oxygenation at the PFC during the resting state.

2.

Subjects and Methods

2.1.

Subjects

The study was carried out with 134 healthy subjects (85 female, 49 male, age 24.7±3.4 years, and range 20 to 46 years). The subjects were all right-handed, according to the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory.23 Subjects were nonsmoking and indicated neither current nor previous history of neurological and psychiatric disorders or alcohol and drug abuse. Subjects were asked to refrain from consuming caffeine and eating 2 h prior to the experiment. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Canton of Bern. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the measurements. Subjects were also informed of their right to discontinue participation at any time.

2.2.

Experimental Protocol

The resting state data were taken from a set of studies with different stimuli. Each measurement began with a baseline phase lasting 8 min, during which the subjects sat upright in a comfortable chair in a dark room. For this study, we examined only the last 5 min of this baseline period. Each subject was measured on four different days but at the same time of day to prevent chronobiological artifacts. They were asked to keep their eyes open throughout the entire measurement and to move their head or body as little as possible during the measurement to avoid movement artifacts. Additionally, the subjects were asked to fill out two questionnaires before and after each measurement in order to assess their mood: the positive affect negative affect schedule (PANAS)24 and the self-assessment manikin test (SAM; five points scale).25 The PANAS and SAM questionnaires are used as tools to measure state influence. Trait influence evaluation was not performed in our study. Additionally, we determined the chronotype by the Horne and Östberg morningness-eveningness questionnaire.26 Measurements were performed between 7:00 am and 9:00 pm. The mean room temperature was 22.8°C±0.6°C.

2.3.

Measurement Setup

The Imagent (ISS Inc., Champaign, Illinois, USA), a multichannel FD-NIRS system, which employs a multidistance approach, was used to determine absolute values of the [O2Hb], [HHb], [tHb], and StO2 at a sampling rate of 2.5 Hz on the PFC. The Imagent’s light source consists of 16 laser diodes at 760 nm and 16 laser diodes at 830 nm. Four highly sensitive photomultiplier tubes serve as detectors. The sensors were placed bilaterally on the left and right prefrontal cortex (L-PFC and R-PFC) of subjects at position Fp1 and Fp2, according to the international 10 to 20 system.27 Each of the two ISS sensors had four light emitters and one light detector connected to an optical fiber delivering the light to the photomultiplier tube. The source–detector separations (d) were 2.0, 2.5, 3.5, and 4.0 cm with the sources and detectors arranged collinearly.

HR was measured by SOMNOtouch™ NIBP (SOMNOmedics GmbH, Randersacker, Germany) with a sampling rate of 4 Hz. This device calculated the HR from the ECG data by calculating the RR intervals. RR and end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) were measured noninvasively by a NONIN LifeSense (NONIN Medical, Plymouth, Minnesota, USA). Data were recorded at a sampling rate of 1 Hz. All data were recorded simultaneously.

2.4.

Signal Processing and Statistical Analysis

One subject was excluded from data analysis due to the perceived discomfort of the fNIRS sensors. 126 subjects completed all four measurements; only for seven subjects, the number of experimental sessions was lower. Therefore, the entire data for the current analysis comprised 518 single measurements. All signal processing was performed in MATLAB (R2017a, MathWorks, Inc., Massachusetts, USA).

2.4.1.

Cerebral oxygenation and hemodynamics

Prior to analysis, data with extremely low (StO2<40%) or improper high values (StO2>100%) were removed by visual inspection. Movement artifacts in the StO2 and [tHb] signals were removed by the movement artifact reduction algorithm (MARA) based on moving standard deviation and piecewise-interpolation.28 For 86% of the signal time series, no processing with MARA was necessary. To remove high-frequency noise, signals were low pass filtered using a robust second-degree polynomial moving average (RLOESS) with a span of 2 min. This method assigns zero weight to data outside six mean absolute deviations (MAD). For each measurement, the 5-min median of the baseline phase was calculated for each cerebral parameter. Absolute values of StO2 and [tHb] from the L-PFC and R-PFC were averaged to obtain a single value for the whole PFC. Moreover, the laterality index—defined as the difference between the absolute values for the R-PFC and L-PFC—was determined and is indicated by a “Δ.” Finally, median values and the interquartile range (IQR) of StO2 and [tHb] were calculated for each individual subject.

2.4.2.

Cardiorespiratory parameters

All cardiorespiratory parameters, including HR, PETCO2, and RR, were also denoised by the RLOESS method with a window length of 3, 1, and 2 min, respectively. Additionally, the PRQ (= HR/RR) was calculated to quantify the coupling between HR and RR. The 5-min median of the baseline phase was determined for all systemic physiology data. The IQR of parameters was calculated for each individual subject.

2.4.3.

Statistical analysis

Outliers (defined as exceeding three scaled MAD from the median) of each dataset were removed prior to the correlation analysis. The best nonlinear curve fitting (from many models including line, poly, cubic, degree 4 and 5 polynomial, piecewise linear function with 2 segments, and exponential) was estimated with R statistical software (R 3.5.2, Performance Analytics package, r-project.org) and OriginPro (version 2018b, OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA) for each pair of parameters (8 parameters and 28 pairs) and a robust nonlinear regression was then calculated with MATLAB using the least absolute residuals method in order to avoid false-positive correlation detection. P-values were then obtained from goodness-of-fit results of each parameter pair. A false discovery rate (FDR) correction was subsequently applied to the p-values in order to correct for the multiple comparison situation. The bootstrapped evidence (BSE) test was conducted to find bootstrapped correlations between all parameters (28 pairs). This nonparametric method is an actual resampling procedure that takes the precision with which both the experimental (H1) and null (H0) hypothesis can be estimated into account.29 This test is also more robust compared to classical statistics by minimizing false positives while maintaining sensitivity. To investigate the dependence of cerebral parameters on seasonal changes, we applied the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) by JASP (jasp-stats.org, version 0.9.2.0). ANCOVA is appropriate to test the main and interaction effects of categorical variables (covariates) on a continuous dependent variable. In this analysis, age and sex were selected as covariates, and a cerebral parameter and season were chosen as dependent and fixed factors, respectively. Since ANCOVA (Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test; Dunn’s post hoc comparisons; Holm correction) showed that the covariates (sex and age) have interaction effects on most cerebral variables, the effect of seasonal changes, time of day, and temperature on cerebral parameters were investigated separately for both female and male groups. For this analysis, eight subjects aged over 30 years were excluded from these evaluations in order to have a sample in a small age range (20 to 30 years of age). Finally, Cosinor analysis [Eq. (1)] and the sum of 2 cosine functions [Eq. (2)] were applied in order to find the best chronobiological fit model of the cerebral parameters:

Eq. (1)

f(t)=M+Acos[2π(t+φ)24],
where f(t) denotes the value of the function at time t (e.g., a cerebral parameter), M is the midline estimating statistic of rhythm, A is the amplitude, t is measured in hours, and φ is the acrophase:

Eq. (2)

f(t)=base+A1cos[2π(t+φ)24]+A2cos[2π(t+φ)12].  
where f(t) represents the value of the function at time t, base is the cerebral parameter baseline value, A1 and A2 are the amplitudes of the cosine functions, and φ is the acrophase.

2.4.4.

Reliability analysis

The intrasubject variability of all data, including cerebral and cardiorespiratory parameters were analyzed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) using the R statistical software (R 3.5.2, ICC package, r-project.org). ICC is a more desirable measure of reliability, reflecting both degrees of correlation and agreement between measurements. According to Fleiss,30 ICC values <0.4, between 0.4 and 0.6, in the range of 0.6 and 0.75, and >0.75 are indicative of poor, moderate, good, and excellent reliability, respectively.

3.

Results

3.1.

Cerebral Oxygenation and Perfusion: Higher StO2 of Right PFC

For StO2, we found right-dominant activity (ΔStO2>0), i.e., a highly significant (p<0.0001) FCOA was detected in the resting state [Fig. 1(a)]. No significant (p=0.324) asymmetry was found for [tHb] [Fig. 1(b)]. The intersubject mean value representing the normal value of StO2 and [tHb] was (mean±SD) 73.0%±5.9% and 41.4±9.3  μM, respectively [Figs. 1(c) and 1(d)]. For the right and left PFC the normal values of StO2 were 73.7%±6.9% (right) and 72.3%±6.1% (left), and of [tHb] 41.4±10.8 (right) and 41.4±10.1 (left) [Figs. 2(a) and 2(b)]. The absolute values of StO2 and [tHb] during the resting state are shown in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d). All data were normally distributed. From this point on, the outliers were removed and not considered for subsequent evaluations. After removal of the outliers, FCOA remained highly significant (p<0.0001) [nonsignificant for [tHb] (p=0.218)].

Fig. 1

(a) FCOA of StO2 at the PFC sorted in descending order on the individual subjects. (b) Asymmetry of [tHb] and absolute values of (c) StO2, (d) [tHb], (e) PETCO2, (f) HR, (g) RR, and (h) PRQ displayed according to the ΔStO2 sorting, at the PFC for individual subjects during resting state. The median and the IQR are shown for each subject.

NPH_7_2_025006_f001.png

Fig. 2

Diamond box plots showing distributions of absolute (a) StO2 and (b) [tHb] values at the R-PFC and L-PFC, (c) StO2, (d) [tHb], (e) PETCO2, (f) ΔStO2, (g) ΔtHb, (h) HR, (i) RR, and (j) PRQ values in resting state. The diamond spans the first quartile to the third quartile (IQR). A segment inside the diamond shows the median and whiskers above and below the box plots represent the 95% prediction interval. The asterisks indicate the level of high significance between absolute StO2 values of the R-PFC and L-PFC (*p<0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Outliers are not displayed.

NPH_7_2_025006_f002.png

3.2.

Cardiorespiratory Activity

Figures 1(e)1(h) and 2(e), 2(h)2(j) show the absolute values of PETCO2, HR, RR, and PRQ for the individual subjects during resting state. On the group level, mean absolute and SD values of cardiorespiratory parameters were as follows (data were normally distributed): PETCO2: 39.2±4.4  mmHg, HR: 68±11 beats/min (BPM), RR: 16.5±2.9 breaths/min (BrPM), and PRQ: 4.2±0.9. These values were all in the normal range for healthy adults at rest.

3.3.

Relationships with Systemic Physiology

A correlation matrix of ΔStO2, ΔtHb, StO2, [tHb], PETCO2, HR, RR, and log(PRQ) variables during the resting state is depicted in Fig. 3(a). In detail, Table S1 in the Supplementary Material shows curve fitted models, goodness-of-fit results, BSE parameter, and a significance level for each pair of variables. Statistically significant correlations were found between cerebral and cardiorespiratory parameters for six pairs of variables: ΔStO2 versus RR (pFDR=0.022, p=0.010), ΔStO2 versus log(PRQ) (pFDR=0.024, p=0.012), StO2 versus PETCO2 (pFDR<0.0001, p<0.0001), [tHb] versus HR (pFDR=0.001, p<0.0004), [tHb] versus RR (pFDR=0.029, p=0.016), and [tHb] versus log(PRQ) (pFDR<0.0001, p<0.0001).

Fig. 3

(a) Correlation matrix of bivariate scatter plots of ΔStO2, ΔtHb, StO2, [tHb], PETCO2, HR, RR, and log(PRQ). The best nonlinear fit is presented for pairs with a significant correlation (red: significant correlation proved by both FDR-corrected and uncorrected p values; blue: only uncorrected p value). The level of significance is calculated from goodness-of-fit results. The red and blue shaded areas show 95% of confidence intervals. Outliers are not displayed. (b) Bar chart of r- and ε values for each pair of ΔStO2, ΔtHb, StO2, [tHb], PETCO2, HR, RR, and log(PRQ) parameters (sorted in descending order of r-values). ε values <0.5, near-zero (0.5<ε<0.5), between 0.5 and 1, and >1 are indicative of no, inconclusive, moderate, and strong correlation, respectively. (c) Bar chart of ICC values for all cerebral and cardiorespiratory parameters. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval. The reliability of the ICC is indicated.

NPH_7_2_025006_f003.png

Correlations were also observed between the cerebral parameters: ΔStO2 versus ΔtHb (pFDR=0.008, p=0.003), ΔStO2 versus StO2 (pFDR<0.0001, p<0.0001), ΔStO2 versus [tHb] (pFDR=0.020, p=0.008), and StO2 versus [tHb] (pFDR<0.0001, p<0.0001). A relatively strong correlation between cardiorespiratory parameters was also present: PETCO2 versus HR (pFDR<0.0001, p<0.0001), PETCO2 versus RR (pFDR=0.039, p=0.022), PETCO2 versus log(PRQ) (pFDR<0.0001, p<0.0001), HR versus RR (pFDR=0.001, p<0.0005), HR versus log(PRQ) (pFDR<0.0001, p<0.0001), and RR versus log(PRQ) (pFDR<0.0001, p<0.0001). Since PRQ was calculated from HR and RR, we expected a linear correlation of HR versus log(PRQ), and RR versus log(PRQ). Additionally, Fig. 3(b) illustrates the coefficient of correlation “r” and BSE parameter “ε” for each pair. The order of correlation starting from strongest (r-value close to 1 and ε>0.5) is as follows: (1) StO2 versus PETCO2, (2) StO2 versus [tHb], (3) PETCO2 versus HR, (4) [tHb] versus log(PRQ), (5) PETCO2 versus log(PRQ), (6) ΔStO2 versus StO2, (7) HR versus RR, and (8) [tHb] versus HR.

3.4.

Intrasubject Variability: ICC Values Indicate Good-to-Excellent Reliability of Most Parameters

Figure 3(c) presents the ICC values of all variables. The ICC of StO2, [tHb], StO2 (left), [tHb] (right), [tHb] (left), PETCO2, HR, and RR indicates excellent reliability. The ICC of the PRQ, StO2 (right), and ΔtHb shows good and the ICC of ΔStO2 represents moderate reliability.

3.5.

Dependence of Cerebral Parameters on Sex and Seasonal Changes

The impact of sex and seasons (infradian changes) on cerebral parameters is depicted in Fig. 4. A significant difference due to sex (p<0.0001) was observed in both StO2 and [tHb]. In addition, Δ[tHb] was higher for males compared to females (p<0.001), but not for ΔStO2 (p=0.635). We found that FCOA showed the same trend of seasonal changes for both female and male groups and was higher in autumn and winter compared to spring and summer (spring versus autumn, p=0.001; spring versus winter, p<0.001; summer versus autumn, p=0.024; summer versus winter, p<0.001 and autumn versus winter, p=0.011). Interestingly, a Cosinor model fitted to [tHb] data represents completely contrary patterns for male and female groups. Absolute [tHb] values of males were higher in spring and summer than that of in autumn and winter. Conversely, the [tHb] values of females were observed at higher levels in autumn and winter in comparison with spring and summer.

Fig. 4

Changes in StO2, [tHb], ΔStO2, and ΔtHb due to time of year [infradian changes (a)–(d)] and time of day [circadian changes (e)–(h); morning: 7:00–9:30 and 9:30–12:00; afternoon: 12:00–14:30 and 14:30–17:00; evening: 17:00–19:30 and 19:30–22:00] for females (orange) and males (green). Cosinor model and the sum of 2 cosines function are fitted to infradian and circadian changes, respectively (female, dark orange lines; male, dashed green lines). Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval.

NPH_7_2_025006_f004.png

3.6.

Dependence of Cerebral Parameters on Time of Day

The effect of time of day (circadian changes) on cerebral parameters is also shown in Fig. 4. A sum of 2 cosine functions was applied to fit the circadian rhythm of the data. The same trend of higher StO2 values in the morning was observed for males and females (p<0.001). Males demonstrated very high [tHb] values in the early morning and late evening (p<0.001), but the trend was almost opposite in females (p<0.05). The highest FCOA for [tHb] values were found at 10:00 and 14:00 for males and females, respectively. Regardless of sex, a highly significant difference was found between StO2 values of morning and afternoon (p<0.001). There was also a significant difference between StO2 values of morning and evening (p=0.011). No significant changes were found for [tHb] (morning versus afternoon: p=0.061; morning versus evening: p=0.17).

3.7.

Dependence of Cerebral Parameters on Temperature

Figure 5 shows the changes in room temperature with respect to season 5(a) and time of day 5(b), and the temperature dependency of cerebral parameters [5(c)5(f)]. The mean room temperature was 22.8°C±0.6°C (range: 20.8°C to 24.8°C). Since the room was not air-conditioned, time of day and seasonal changes had an impact on the room temperature. As expected, the maximum room temperatures were recorded in summer and during the late evening. There was no significant linear correlation between room temperature and cerebral. The only exception was ΔStO2, which decreased with increasing room temperature (females: r=0.35, p<0.0001; males: r=0.30, p<0.0002).

Fig. 5

Changes in temperature with (a) time of year and (b) time of day. Dependence of (c) StO2, (d) [tHb], (e) ΔStO2, and (f) ΔtHb on temperature. The lines represent a linear fit and the shaded areas and error bars show 95% confidence intervals. Outliers are not displayed.

NPH_7_2_025006_f005.png

3.8.

Dependence of Cerebral Parameters on Mood and Chronotype

The mean valence, arousal, and dominance ratings during resting state assessed by SAM scales (ranging from 1 to 5) was 4.02±0.69, 2.92±0.91, and 3.24±0.77, respectively. The dependence of cerebral parameters on mood and chronotype is displayed in Fig. 6. No correlation was observed between the cerebral parameters and the positive affect scale of the PANAS questionnaire. The Horne and Östberg index was calculated for each subject to measure the chronotype. The highest numbers (score: 59 to 86) indicate morningness and the lowest numbers (score: 16 to 41) eveningness. Scores from 42 to 58 indicate neither morningness nor eveningness. We found a linear correlation between StO2 versus chronotype (r=0.1, p=0.03), and [tHb] versus chronotype (r=0.09, p=0.04).

Fig. 6

The scatter plots show the dependence of StO2, [tHb], ΔStO2, and ΔtHb on chronotype (Horne-Östberg index) and mood (positive affect scale of PANAS). Correlations between the data are indicated by a linear fit, and the red shaded areas indicate 95% confidence intervals. Outliers are not displayed.

NPH_7_2_025006_f006.png

4.

Discussion

4.1.

Absolute Values of Tissue Oxygenation and Hemoglobin Concentration

The normal range of StO2 and [tHb] of the brain was investigated for medical applications. These absolute values are approximately in accordance with the literature.31,32 The absolute StO2 values of the PFC are in good agreement with Choi et al. (R-PFC: 74.75%±5.83% versus. L-PFC: 75.63%±5.86%; N=30, age: 20 to 50 years, device: Imagent, ISS Inc.).33 However, our absolute [tHb] values at the PFC are lower in comparison with their findings (R-PFC: 79.68±12.15  μM, L-PFC: 76.93±14.98  μM). Our [tHb] values are similar to those of Vernieri et al. (left versus right frontal region: 46.2±11.9  μM versus 44.0±12.9  μM; 30 subjects, age: 63.9±8.2, device: Oximeter, ISS Inc.).34 Moreover, our StO2 values are a bit higher compared to our previous study [StO2 (right) = 68.6% (IQR: 63.5% to 72.4%), StO2 (left) = 56.8% (IQR: 52.9% to 63.4%); 24 subjects, age: 22.0±6.4 years, device: OxiplexTS, ISS Inc.].1 The reasons for the difference between studies may be the age, physiological state of subjects, or methodology.

4.2.

Absolute Values of Cardiorespiratory Parameters

Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) is one of the strongest parameters that affect CBF and [tHb].19 Therefore, PaCO2 has been included in functional brain studies to ensure a correct interpretation of the signals.3537 We measured PaCO2 by the PETCO2 method, which also provides continuous and noninvasive RR. Our PETCO2 values were in agreement with the literature.3841

Our findings showed that the mean value of HR was 68±11 BPM (range: 41 to 116 BPM, females: 69±11 BPM, males: 66±11 BPM; p=0.036). In 35,000 healthy subjects, a mean HR of 72 BPM (age: 20 and over, females: 74±0.2 BPM, males: 71±0.3 BPM; p<0.05) was determined, which is close to our results.42

The mean RR value measured in our study was 16.5±2.9 BrPM, which is within typical RR for adults (range: 6.9 to 27.1 BrPM, females: 16.8±2.8 BPM, males: 16.1±3.1 BPM; p=0.015).

The PRQ is a parameter to attain the overall current state of human physiology.43 PRQ represents the state of the ANS and is a measure of cardiorespiratory coordination. PRQ is time- and sex-dependent, and changes during human development, physical activity, and body posture with specific patterns during sleep.43 The resting state PRQ distribution has a peak at 4.4446 We also found a mean resting state PRQ of 4 (4.2±0.9, ranging from 2.1 to 9.0).

4.3.

Relationships with Systemic Physiology

Although systemic physiological activity affects the absolute values of StO2 and [tHb], FCOA was not influenced. The reason is that both R-PFC and L-PFC are affected in the same way by systemic physiology.1,21 Although we generally confirmed this finding, we found nonlinear correlations between ΔStO2 versus RR (p=0.022) and ΔStO2 versus PRQ (p=0.024).

As expected, we found a highly significant (R2=0.10, p<0.0001) positive linear correlation between StO2 and PETCO2. Our finding is in agreement with the study carried out by Miller and Mitra.47 and with the physiologically well-known CO2-response, i.e., a decrease in PETCO2 (hypocapnia) reduces the CBF by cerebral vasoconstriction.48 This reduced oxygen supply leads to a lower StO2.35,36 Hence, PETCO2 is positively correlated with StO2

4.4.

Frontal Cortex Oxygenation Asymmetry

In EEG studies, activity in left frontal regions is mostly associated with appetitive motivation and approach-related affect such as hope, happiness, and joy (positive affect). Conversely, the right frontal regions are related to vigilant attention and behavioral inhibition that regularly occurs during certain withdrawal-related affect such as depression and nervousness (negative affect).11,12,4951 In general, the right frontal cortex reflects motivational systems of approach and avoidance, whereas the left frontal cortex inhibits the amygdala and downregulates negative affect.52,53 Higher right frontal activity is attributed to greater negative affect (e.g., film-induced fear and disgust), whereas positive affect (e.g., film-induced happiness) elicits a higher left frontal activity.54,55

We hypothesized that the FCOA reveals asymmetry of the PFC neuronal activity at rest. The StO2 was higher at the R-PFC than the L-PFC, indicating that the R-PFC is more activated than the L-PFC and this indicates a higher inhibitory activity or withdrawal motivation. This is reasonable considering that the subjects were in the resting state. Such rightward lateralization has also been found in the literature.56,57 Although our findings are in line with several studies indicating that the right cortices have a stronger response compared to the left ones, some studies have reported no hemispheric differences or even leftward regional lateralization.33,58 Liu et al.6 demonstrated that right or left regional laterality could be observed across different brain systems depending on multiple genetic or environmental mechanisms.

4.4.1.

FCOA as an indicator of human health

The R-PFC plays a vital role in the brain’s response to stress because this area is a primary part of both the emotion and vigilance networks. Neurons that are either the target or the releasing site of an array of stress mediators (neurotransmitter and hormone) have been recognized in this area.59 Thus FCOA is associated with specific emotional responses to mental stress and personality traits (state influence versus trait influence).14,52,60 High left frontal brain activity is more psychologically and physically healthy than relatively less left frontal brain activity.53,61 Individuals with higher L-PFC activity have lower concentrations of the stress hormone cortisol and the corticotrophin-releasing hormone, higher activity of natural killer cells, and higher antibody concentration in response to influenza vaccines.53,62 It was also demonstrated that subjects with higher L-PFC activity, recover more quickly from a negative occurrence with higher levels of psychological well-being.53,63 Conversely, dominant R-PFC activity is associated with increased activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis59,6466 and higher secretion of corticotrophin-releasing hormone and adrenal steroid hormones (e.g., glucocorticoids and adrenal androgens).6669 Higher R-PFC activity may occur during stressful situations, such as a test or job interview.70 An EEG study showed that FEA was shifted from the left during an easy examination session to the right during a stressful examination session.71 A higher change in FEA from the easy to the stressful session was associated with more adverse health conditions. Further research suggested that subjects with more R-PFC activity compared to L-PFC are sensitive to mental stress and prone to exhibit various stress-induced somatic disorders.56,64 Moreover, it was found that higher levels of R-PFC activation predict a reduced immune response in humans.59,62 The more an individual’s FEA is changed during periods of stress, the more negative health consequences are likely to be experienced.49

We observed no correlation between cerebral parameters; in particular, FCOA and the positive affect scale of the PANAS questionnaire.

Depression is associated with an under-activation of the approach system and/or over-activation of the withdrawal system.72 Research provides support for an association between FEA and depression12,73,74 and may predict the emotional state in depression disorders.72 Although there is a small number of studies linking FEA with psychopathology, the research suggests FEA may be a promising marker of depression vulnerability.49 Decreased relative left-frontal activity during resting state was attributed to increased vulnerability to depression.75 In adolescent boys without a history of depression, right-sided frontal activation predicted depressive symptoms 1 year later.76 Many studies indicate that FEA is a valid marker for depression vulnerability. Regardless of whether anxiety was used as a covariate or not, frontal alpha asymmetry indicative of relatively higher right frontal activity predicts depression, whereas the opposite is not true.77

Thus the measurement of such an FEA and FCOA may have considerable clinical value.

4.4.2.

Anatomic, physiologic, and genetic influences

The corpus callosum provides a neuroanatomical correlation in the asymmetry of the frontal cortices.78 Negative affect generally leads to activation in the R-PFC, amygdala, inferior frontal gyrus, and insula, whereas the L-PFC may play a role in the downregulation of amygdala and is associated with reward-related cortical regions.53,65,79 The neural correlates of vigilance and sustained attention are primarily localized in the right prefrontal and parietal lobe and the thalamus.80 The link between left frontal and left amygdala activity is crucial for emotional regulation.73

Genetic models have been proposed to account for cerebral dominance, and anatomical asymmetries are likely influenced by genetic factors. However, no gene or pathway has yet been identified as a determinant of lateralization, although there are a number of candidates including LMO4, STMN4, BAI1, and IGFBP5, which were highly expressed in the right regions.3,81,82

4.4.3.

FEA as a promising marker of subject characteristics and emotions

It was demonstrated that asymmetry in PFC neuronal activity during the resting state, measured with EEG, predicts the emotional state.72

Table 1 shows a summary of the emotions and characteristics of individuals with FEA.

Table 1

A summary of subject characteristics and emotions with left and right dominant activity

Left dominant activityRight dominant activityReferences
Anxious apprehension (e.g., worry)Anxious arousal (e.g., panic)72, 73, and 8384.85.86
ManiacsPhobias (social phobics)50, 83, 87 and 88
ExtrovertIntrovert (neuroticism)89 and 90
Promotion (a need for growth and advancement)Prevention (a need for safety and security)91 and 92
Anger, joy, and jealousyDisgust and depression12 and 9394.95.96.97
Hostility to social rejectionIsolation to social rejection60 and 98
Higher socioeconomic statusLower socioeconomic status99
Defensiveness100 and 101
Hopelessness75 and 102
Less risk-taking103
Ostracism104
Obsessive-compulsive disorder105
More concerned with making mistakes and punishment106

4.4.4.

Environment and certain situational variable

Experimental, environmental, and situational factors that influence approach or withdrawal motivation may affect FCOA. These variables include body posture, experimental conditions, trait variables, and timing. Thus the seasons and time of day play essential roles in FCOA scores. We found higher R-PFC activity (higher StO2) associated with more depression in autumn and winter compared to spring and summer. These findings are in line with a previous study.107 Indeed, it is known that the population experiences a worsening of their mood and stronger depressive symptoms (seasonal affective disorder) in winter.108110 This is also visible in the highly significant seasonal variation in cortisol levels in winter and autumn compared to spring and summer.111 Thus it is reasonable that we found a significant influence of the seasons on FCOA.

We also found a significant dependence of the StO2 on the time of day (Fig. 4). Higher StO2 values were observed in the morning compared to the afternoon and evening. Since [tHb] was not significantly changed during the day, such an increase in StO2 may imply that more oxygenated blood was present in the brain tissue during the morning hours compared to the evening and afternoon. We can interpret this increase as reduced oxygen consumption and, thus, energy metabolism in the morning, which would be in agreement with the synaptic homeostasis hypothesis.112 This increase could also be linked to circadian effects, e.g., cortisol rhythm exerting its wake-promoting effect in the morning hours.113,114 Moreover, the present findings indicated that the time of day has no significant influence on FCOA, which is in line with the literature.115

It was also shown in this study that FCOA in StO2 decreased with increasing room temperature. In other words, we found that the lower the room temperature, the higher the R-PFC activation. Lower room temperature increased whole-body cooling sensation and reduced thermal comfort, especially after prolonged exposure.116 Our findings are in line with the approach-motivational model, which links higher R-PFC activation to greater withdrawal-related affect (negative affect) such as uncomfortableness, nervousness, and depression. It is known that increasing the length of daylight and temperature results in a decrease in the depression score,110,117 which indirectly confirms our findings in terms of the effects of both seasons and temperature on FCOA.

5.

Conclusion

We found highly significant (p<0.0001) FCOA, which was correlated to room temperature, RR, and PRQ but was not affected by mood or chronotype of the subject. This higher right PFC activity may be due to the more prominent inhibition activity during the resting state.

The absolute values of StO2 and [tHb] were influenced by systemic physiological activity, such as PETCO2, HR, RR, and PRQ, and gender.

FCOA and StO2 were dependent on season and time of day, respectively. FCOA was higher in autumn/winter compared to spring/summer, whereas StO2 was higher in the morning than in the afternoon/evening.

These relevant findings were only achievable using FD-fNIRS instrumentation that enabled the measurement of absolute values while using a SPA-fNIRS approach.

Our study demonstrates that FCOA is real, while providing unique insights to understand this remarkable phenomenon.

Disclosures

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our students for their work and our subjects for participating in this study. The financial support of the Software AG Foundation (Grant No. P12117) and the Christophorus Foundation (Grant Nos. 253CST and 355CST) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Oliver Kress, PhD for valuable comments and proofreading of the manuscript.

References

1. 

F. Scholkmann, H. Zohdi and U. Wolf, “Right-left asymmetry of prefrontal cerebral oxygenation: does it depend on systemic physiological activity, absolute tissue oxygenation or hemoglobin concentration?,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 1232 105 –112 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34461-0_15 AEMBAP 0065-2598 Google Scholar

2. 

A. Hougaard et al., “Cerebral asymmetry of fMRI-BOLD responses to visual stimulation,” PLoS One, 10 e0126477 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126477 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar

3. 

T. Sun and C. A. Walsh, “Molecular approaches to brain asymmetry and handedness,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 7 655 –662 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1930 NRNAAN 1471-003X Google Scholar

4. 

K. Hugdahl, “Symmetry and asymmetry in the human brain,” Eur. Rev., 13 119 –133 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798705000700 Google Scholar

5. 

F. Homae, “A brain of two halves: insights into interhemispheric organization provided by near-infrared spectroscopy,” Neuroimage, 85 354 –362 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.023 NEIMEF 1053-8119 Google Scholar

6. 

H. Liu et al., “Evidence from intrinsic activity that asymmetry of the human brain is controlled by multiple factors,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 106 20499 –20503 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908073106 PNASA6 0027-8424 Google Scholar

7. 

P. K. Mutha, K. Y. Haaland and R. L. Sainburg, “The effects of brain lateralization on motor control and adaptation,” J. Mot. Behav., 44 455 –469 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2012.747482 JMTBAB Google Scholar

8. 

Y. Wang et al., “Multimodal mapping of the face connectome,” Nat. Hum. Behav., 4 397 –411 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0811-3 Google Scholar

9. 

R. J. Davidson, “Emotion and affective style: hemispheric substrates,” Psychol. Sci., 3 39 –43 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00254.x 1467-9280 Google Scholar

10. 

R. J. Davidson, “Affective style and affective disorders: perspectives from affective neuroscience,” Cognit. Emot., 12 307 –330 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379628 COEMEC Google Scholar

11. 

P. A. Gable, L. B. Neal and A. H. Threadgill, “Regulatory behavior and frontal activity: considering the role of revised-BIS in relative right frontal asymmetry,” Psychophysiology, 55 e12910 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12910 PSPHAF 0048-5772 Google Scholar

12. 

B. D. Nelson et al., “Depression symptom dimensions and asymmetrical frontal cortical activity while anticipating reward,” Psychophysiology, 55 e12892 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12892 PSPHAF 0048-5772 Google Scholar

13. 

P. C. Schmid et al., “Frontal cortical effects on feedback processing and reinforcement learning: relation of EEG asymmetry with the feedback-related negativity and behavior,” Psychophysiology, 55 e12911 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12911 PSPHAF 0048-5772 Google Scholar

14. 

W. Ishikawa et al., “New method of analyzing NIRS data from prefrontal cortex at rest,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 789 391 –397 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7411-1_52 AEMBAP 0065-2598 Google Scholar

15. 

P. Pinti et al., “The present and future use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for cognitive neuroscience,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1464 (1), 5 –29 (201820). https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13948 ANYAA9 0077-8923 Google Scholar

16. 

H. Zohdi et al., “Long-term changes in optical properties (μa, μ′s, μeff and DPF) of human head tissue during functional neuroimaging experiments,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 1072 331 –337 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91287-5_53 AEMBAP 0065-2598 Google Scholar

17. 

F. Scholkmann et al., “Absolute values of optical properties (μa, μ’s, μeff and DPF) of human head tissue: dependence on head region and individual,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 1072 325 –330 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91287-5_52 AEMBAP 0065-2598 Google Scholar

18. 

F. Lange and I. Tachtsidis, “Clinical brain monitoring with time domain NIRS: a review and future perspectives,” Appl. Sci., 9 1612 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9081612 Google Scholar

19. 

F. Scholkmann et al., “A review on continuous wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging instrumentation and methodology,” Neuroimage, 85 6 –27 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.004 NEIMEF 1053-8119 Google Scholar

20. 

F. Scholkmann et al., “Effect of short-term colored-light exposure on cerebral hemodynamics and oxygenation, and systemic physiological activity,” Neurophotonics, 4 045005 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.4.4.045005 Google Scholar

21. 

N. Nasseri et al., “Impact of changes in systemic physiology on fNIRS/NIRS signals: analysis based on oblique subspace projections decomposition,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 1072 119 –125 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91287-5_19 AEMBAP 0065-2598 Google Scholar

22. 

H. Zohdi, F. Scholkmann and U. Wolf, “Long-term blue light exposure changes frontal and occipital cerebral hemodynamics: not all subjects react the same,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 1269 (2020). AEMBAP 0065-2598 Google Scholar

23. 

R. C. Oldfield, “The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory,” Neuropsychologia, 9 97 –113 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 NUPSA6 0028-3932 Google Scholar

24. 

D. Watson, L. C. Anna and A. Tellegen, “Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 54 1063 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 JPSPB2 0022-3514 Google Scholar

25. 

M. M. Bradley and P. J. Lang, “Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential,” J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry, 25 49 –59 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9 JBTEAB Google Scholar

26. 

J. A. Horne and O. Östberg, “A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms,” Int. J. Chronobiol., 4 (2), 97 –110 (1976). IJCBAU 0300-9998 Google Scholar

27. 

H. H. Jasper, “The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 10 370 –375 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(58)90053-1 ECNEAZ 0013-4694 Google Scholar

28. 

F. Scholkmann et al., “How to detect and reduce movement artifacts in near-infrared imaging using moving standard deviation and spline interpolation,” Physiol. Meas., 31 649 –662 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/31/5/004 PMEAE3 0967-3334 Google Scholar

29. 

D. S. Schwarzkopf, “Non-dichotomous inference using bootstrapped evidence,” 017327 (2015). Google Scholar

30. 

J. Fleiss, The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments, Wiley, New York (1986). Google Scholar

31. 

V. Quaresima et al., “Bilateral prefrontal cortex oxygenation responses to a verbal fluency task: a multichannel time-resolved near-infrared topography study,” J. Biomed. Opt., 10 011012 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1851512 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

32. 

Y. Murayama et al., “Relation between cognitive function and baseline concentrations of hemoglobin in prefrontal cortex of elderly people measured by time-resolved near-infrared spectroscopy,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 977 269 –276 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55231-6_37 AEMBAP 0065-2598 Google Scholar

33. 

J. Choi et al., “Noninvasive determination of the optical properties of adult brain: near-infrared spectroscopy approach,” J. Biomed. Opt., 9 (1), 221 –229 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1628242 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

34. 

F. Vernieri et al., “Transcranial Doppler and near-infrared spectroscopy can evaluate the hemodynamic effect of carotid artery occlusion,” Stroke, 35 64 –70 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000106486.26626.e2 SJCCA7 0039-2499 Google Scholar

35. 

F. Scholkmann et al., “Cerebral hemodynamic and oxygenation changes induced by inner and heard speech: a study combining functional near-infrared spectroscopy and capnography,” J. Biomed. Opt., 19 017002 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.017002 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

36. 

F. Scholkmann et al., “End-tidal CO2: an important parameter for a correct interpretation in functional brain studies using speech tasks,” Neuroimage, 66 71 –79 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.025 NEIMEF 1053-8119 Google Scholar

37. 

F. Scholkmann, M. Wolf, U. Wolf, “The effect of inner speech on arterial CO2 and cerebral hemodynamics and oxygenation: a functional NIRS study,” Oxygen Transport to Tissue XXXV, 81 –87 Springer, New York (2013). Google Scholar

38. 

C. J. Gauthier et al., “Absolute quantification of resting oxygen metabolism and metabolic reactivity during functional activation using QUO2 MRI,” Neuroimage, 63 1353 –1363 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.065 NEIMEF 1053-8119 Google Scholar

39. 

J. Hinkelbein et al., “Accuracy and precision of three different methods to determine Pco2 (Paco2 vs. Petco2 vs. Ptcco2) during interhospital ground transport of critically ill and ventilated adults,” J. Trauma, 65 10 –18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31815eba83 Google Scholar

40. 

A. M. Golestani et al., “Mapping the end-tidal CO2 response function in the resting-state BOLD fMRI signal: spatial specificity, test-retest reliability and effect of fMRI sampling rate,” Neuroimage, 104 266 –277 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.031 NEIMEF 1053-8119 Google Scholar

41. 

I. Lajoie, F. B. Tancredi and R. D. Hoge, “Regional reproducibility of BOLD calibration parameter M, OEF and resting-state CMRO2 measurements with QUO2 MRI,” PLoS One, 11 e0163071 –31 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163071 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar

42. 

Y. Ostchega et al., “Resting pulse rate reference data for children, adolescents, and adults: United States, 1999–2008,” Natl. Health Stat. Rep., 41 1 –16 (2011). Google Scholar

43. 

F. Scholkmann and U. Wolf, “The pulse-respiration quotient: a powerful but untapped parameter for modern studies about human physiology and pathophysiology,” Front. Physiol., 10 1 –18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00371 FROPBK 0301-536X Google Scholar

44. 

F. Scholkmann, H. Zohdi and U. Wolf, “The resting-state pulse-respiration quotient of humans: lognormally distributed and centred around a value of four,” Physiol. Res., 68 1027 –1032 (2019). https://doi.org/10.33549/physiolres.934232 PHRSEJ 0862-8408 Google Scholar

45. 

M. Moser et al., “Phase and frequency coordination of cardiac and respiratory function,” Biol. Rhythm Res., 26 100 –111 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/09291019509360328 BRHREI 0929-1016 Google Scholar

46. 

D. von Bonin et al., “Adaption of cardio-respiratory balance during day-rest compared to deep sleep-An indicator for quality of life?,” Psychiatry Res, 219 638 –644 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.06.004 PSRSDR Google Scholar

47. 

S. Miller and K. Mitra, “NIRS-based cerebrovascular regulation assessment: exercise and cerebrovascular reactivity,” Neurophotonics, 4 041503 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.4.4.041503 Google Scholar

48. 

K. Szabo et al., “Hypocapnia induced vasoconstriction significantly inhibits the neurovascular coupling in humans,” J. Neurol. Sci., 309 58 –62 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2011.07.026 JNSCAG 0022-510X Google Scholar

49. 

S. J. Reznik and J. J. B. Allen, “Frontal asymmetry as a mediator and moderator of emotion: an updated review,” Psychophysiology, 55 e12965 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12965 PSPHAF 0048-5772 Google Scholar

50. 

R. J. Davidson, D. C. Jackson and N. H. Kalin, “Emotion, plasticity, context, and regulation: perspectives from affective neuroscience,” Psychol. Bull., 126 890 –909 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.890 PSBUAI 0033-2909 Google Scholar

51. 

H. Fischer et al., “Right-sided human prefrontal brain activation during acquisition of conditioned fear,” Emotion, 2 233 –241 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.2.3.233 EBMOEN Google Scholar

52. 

J. J. B. Allen et al., “Frontal EEG alpha asymmetry and emotion: from neural underpinnings and methodological considerations to psychopathology and social cognition,” Psychophysiology, 55 e13028 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13028 PSPHAF 0048-5772 Google Scholar

53. 

R. J. Davidson, “What does the prefrontal cortex ‘do’ in affect: perspectives on frontal EEG asymmetry research,” Biol. Psychol., 67 219 –234 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.008 Google Scholar

54. 

A. J. Tomarken, R. J. Davidson and J. B. Henriques, “Resting frontal brain asymmetry predicts affective responses to films,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 59 791 –801 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.791 JPSPB2 0022-3514 Google Scholar

55. 

R. E. Wheeler, R. J. Davidson and A. J. Tomarken, “Frontal brain asymmetry and emotional reactivity: a biological substrate of affective style,” Psychophysiology, 30 82 –89 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03207.x PSPHAF 0048-5772 Google Scholar

56. 

W. Ishikawa et al., “Correlation between asymmetry of spontaneous oscillation of hemodynamic changes in the prefrontal cortex and anxiety levels: a near-infrared spectroscopy study,” J. Biomed. Opt., 19 027005 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.2.027005 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

57. 

Y. Murayama, L. Hu and K. Sakatani, “Relation between prefrontal cortex activity and respiratory rate during mental stress tasks: a near-infrared spectroscopic study,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 923 209 –214 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38810-6_28 AEMBAP 0065-2598 Google Scholar

58. 

A. J. Metz et al., “Continuous coloured light altered human brain haemodynamics and oxygenation assessed by systemic physiology augmented functional near-infrared spectroscopy,” Sci. Rep., 7 10027 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09970-z SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

59. 

J. Wang et al., “Perfusion functional MRI reveals cerebral blood flow pattern under psychological stress,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102 17804 –17809 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503082102 PNASA6 0027-8424 Google Scholar

60. 

E. Harmon-Jones and P. A. Gable, “On the role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in approach and withdrawal motivation: an updated review of the evidence,” Psychophysiology, 55 e12879 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12879 PSPHAF 0048-5772 Google Scholar

61. 

E. Harmon-Jones, “Contributions from research on anger and cognitive dissonance to understanding the motivational functions of asymmetrical frontal brain activity,” Biol. Psychol., 67 51 –76 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.003 Google Scholar

62. 

M. A. Rosenkranz et al., “Affective style and in vivo immune response: neurobehavioral mechanisms,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 100 11148 –11152 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1534743100 PNASA6 0027-8424 Google Scholar

63. 

D. C. Jackson et al., “Now you feel it, now you don’t: frontal brain electrical asymmetry and individual differences in emotion regulation,” Psychol. Sci., 14 612 –617 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1473.x 1467-9280 Google Scholar

64. 

K. Sakatani, “Optical diagnosis of mental stress: review,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 737 89 –95 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1566-4_14 AEMBAP 0065-2598 Google Scholar

65. 

R. M. Buijs and C. G. Van Eden, “The integration of stress by the hypothalamus, amygdala and prefrontal cortex: balance between the autonomic nervous system and the neuroendocrine system,” Prog. Brain Res., 126 117 –132 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(00)26011-1 PBRRA4 0079-6123 Google Scholar

66. 

M. Tanida, M. Katsuyama and K. Sakatani, “Relation between mental stress-induced prefrontal cortex activity and skin conditions: a near-infrared spectroscopy study,” Brain Res., 1184 210 –216 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.058 BRREAP 0006-8993 Google Scholar

67. 

K. E. Habib, P. W. Gold and G. P. Chrousos, “Neuroendocrinology of stress,” Endocrinol. Metab. Clin., 30 695 –728 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8529(05)70208-5 ECNAER 0889-8529 Google Scholar

68. 

C. Tsigos and G. P. Chrousos, “Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, neuroendocrine factors and stress,” J. Psychosom. Res., 53 865 –871 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00429-4 JPCRAT 0022-3999 Google Scholar

69. 

M. Tanida, M. Katsuyama and K. Sakatani, “Effects of fragrance administration on stress-induced prefrontal cortex activity and sebum secretion in the facial skin,” Neurosci. Lett., 432 157 –161 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2007.12.014 NELED5 0304-3940 Google Scholar

70. 

B. S. McEwen and E. N. Lasley, The End of Stress as We Know It, Joseph Henry Press, Washington, D.C. (2002). Google Scholar

71. 

R. S. Lewis, N. Y. Weekes and T. H. Wang, “The effect of a naturalistic stressor on frontal EEG asymmetry, stress, and health,” Biol. Psychol., 75 239 –247 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.03.004 Google Scholar

72. 

A. H. Kemp et al., “Disorder specificity despite comorbidity: resting EEG alpha asymmetry in major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder,” Biol. Psychol., 85 350 –354 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.08.001 Google Scholar

73. 

G. E. Bruder, J. W. Stewart and P. J. McGrath, “Right brain, left brain in depressive disorders: clinical and theoretical implications of behavioral, electrophysiological and neuroimaging findings,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 78 178 –191 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.021 NBREDE 0149-7634 Google Scholar

74. 

N. van der Vinne et al., “Frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: fact or fiction? A meta-analysis,” NeuroImage Clin., 16 79 –87 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.07.006 Google Scholar

75. 

R. Nusslock et al., “Cognitive vulnerability and frontal brain asymmetry: common predictors of first prospective depressive episode,” J. Abnorm. Psychol., 120 497 –503 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022940 Google Scholar

76. 

A. M. Mitchell and P. Pössel, “Frontal brain activity pattern predicts depression in adolescent boys,” Biol. Psychol., 89 525 –527 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.12.008 Google Scholar

77. 

P. Pössel et al., “A longitudinal study of cortical EEG activity in adolescents,” Biol. Psychol., 78 173 –178 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.02.004 Google Scholar

78. 

D. J. L. G. Schutter and E. Harmon-Jones, “The corpus callosum: a commissural road to anger and aggression,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 37 2481 –2488 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.013 NBREDE 0149-7634 Google Scholar

79. 

R. J. Davidson, “Darwin and the neural bases of emotion and affective style,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1000 316 –336 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1280.014 ANYAA9 0077-8923 Google Scholar

80. 

M. Sarter, B. Givens and J. P. Bruno, “The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up,” Brain Res. Rev., 35 146 –160 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(01)00044-3 BRERD2 0165-0173 Google Scholar

81. 

T. Sun et al., “Early asymmetry of gene transcription in embryonic human left and right cerebral cortex,” Science, 308 1794 –1798 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110324 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

82. 

C. Lai et al., “A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder,” Nature, 413 519 –523 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35097076 Google Scholar

83. 

R. J. Davidson et al., “While a phobic waits: regional brain electrical and autonomic activity in social phobics during anticipation of public speaking,” Biol. Psychiatry, 47 85 –95 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00222-X BIPCBF 0006-3223 Google Scholar

84. 

G. Wiedemann et al., “Frontal brain hipoactivity as a biological substrate of anxiety in patients with panic disorders,” Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 56 78 –84 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.56.1.78 ARGPAQ 0003-990X Google Scholar

85. 

W. Heller et al., “Patterns of regional brain activity differentiate types of anxiety,” J. Abnorm. Psychol., 106 376 –385 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.106.3.376 Google Scholar

86. 

E. E. Smith, L. Zambrano-Vazquez and J. J. B. Allen, “Patterns of alpha asymmetry in those with elevated worry, trait anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms: a test of the worry and avoidance models of alpha asymmetry,” Neuropsychologia, 85 118 –126 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.010 NUPSA6 0028-3932 Google Scholar

87. 

K. Kano et al., “The topographical features of EEGs in patients with affective disorders Kunio,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 83 124 –129 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(92)90025-D ECNEAZ 0013-4694 Google Scholar

88. 

D. A. Moscovitch et al., “Frontal EEG asymmetry and symptom response to cognitive behavioral therapy in patients with social anxiety disorder,” Biol. Psychol., 87 379 –385 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.04.009 Google Scholar

89. 

T. Canli et al., “An fMRI study of personality influences on brain reactivity to emotional stimuli,” Behav. Neurosci., 115 33 –42 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.115.1.33 BENEDJ 0735-7044 Google Scholar

90. 

C. L. Smith and M. A. Bell, “Stability in infant frontal asymmetry as a predictor of toddlerhood internalizing and externalizing behaviors,” Dev. Psychobiol., 52 158 –167 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20427 DEPBA5 0012-1630 Google Scholar

91. 

D. C. Molden, Y. L. Angela, E. T. Higgins, “Motivations for promotion and prevention,” Handbook of Motivation Science, 169 –187 Guilford Press, New York (2008). Google Scholar

92. 

D. M. Amodio et al., “Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity,” J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 40 225 –232 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00100-8 JESPAQ 0022-1031 Google Scholar

93. 

E. Harmon-Jones, C. K. Peterson and C. R. Harris, “Jealousy: novel methods and neural correlates,” Emotion, 9 113 –117 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014117 EBMOEN Google Scholar

94. 

N. J. Kelley et al., “Jealousy increased by induced relative left frontal cortical activity,” Emotion, 15 550 –555 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000068 EBMOEN Google Scholar

95. 

N. A. Jones and N. A. Fox, “Electroencephalogram asymmetry during emotionally evocative films and its relation to positive and negative affectivity,” Brain Cognit., 20 280 –299 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(92)90021-D Google Scholar

96. 

L. A. Killeen and D. M. Teti, “Mothers’ frontal EEG asymmetry in response to infant emotion states and mother-infant emotional availability, emotional experience, and internalizing symptoms,” Dev. Psychopathol., 24 9 –21 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579411000629 Google Scholar

97. 

C. S. Carver and E. Harmon-Jones, “Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications,” Psychol. Bull., 135 183 –204 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013965 PSBUAI 0033-2909 Google Scholar

98. 

J. E. Beeney et al., “EEG asymmetry in borderline personality disorder and depression following rejection,” Pers. Disord. Theory Res. Treat., 5 178 –185 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000032 Google Scholar

99. 

A. J. Tomarken et al., “Resting frontal brain activity: linkages to maternal depression and socio-economic status among adolescents,” Biol. Psychol., 67 77 –102 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.011 Google Scholar

100. 

J. P. Kline and S. Allen, “The failed repressor: EEG asymmetry as a moderator of the relation between defensiveness and depressive symptoms,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 68 228 –234 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.02.002 IJPSEE 0167-8760 Google Scholar

101. 

N. W. Crost, C. A. Pauls and J. Wacker, “Defensiveness and anxiety predict frontal EEG asymmetry only in specific situational contexts,” Biol. Psychol., 78 43 –52 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.12.008 Google Scholar

102. 

J. A. Coan and J. J. B. Allen, “Frontal EEG asymmetry as a moderator and mediator of emotion,” Biol. Psychol., 67 7 –50 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.002 Google Scholar

103. 

L. R. R. Gianotti et al., “Tonic activity level in the right prefrontal cortex predicts individuals’ risk taking,” Psychol. Sci., 20 33 –38 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02260.x 1467-9280 Google Scholar

104. 

T. Kawamoto, H. Nittono and M. Ura, “Cognitive, affective, and motivational changes during ostracism: an ERP, EMG, and EEG study using a computerized cyberball task,” Neurosci. J., 2013 1 –11 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/304674 NERADN 0168-0102 Google Scholar

105. 

M. Ischebeck et al., “Altered frontal EEG asymmetry in obsessive-compulsive disorder,” Psychophysiology, 51 596 –601 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12214 PSPHAF 0048-5772 Google Scholar

106. 

K. Nash, M. Inzlicht and I. McGregor, “Approach-related left prefrontal EEG asymmetry predicts muted error-related negativity,” Biol. Psychol., 91 96 –102 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.05.005 Google Scholar

107. 

C. K. Peterson and E. Harmon-Jones, “Circadian and seasonal variability of resting frontal EEG asymmetry,” Biol. Psychol., 80 315 –320 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.11.002 Google Scholar

108. 

L. Päeske et al., EEG Functional Connectivity Detects Seasonal Changes, Springer, Singapore (2019). Google Scholar

109. 

D. Armbruster, B. Brocke and A. Strobel, “Winter is coming: seasonality and the acoustic startle reflex,” Physiol. Behav., 169 178 –183 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.11.038 PHBHA4 0031-9384 Google Scholar

110. 

A. Magnusson, “An overview of epidemiological studies on seasonal affective disorder,” Acta Psychiatr. Scand., 101 176 –184 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.101003176.x Google Scholar

111. 

J. A. King et al., “Sequence and seasonal effects of salivary cortisol,” Behav. Med., 26 67 –73 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/08964280009595753 BEMEEF 0896-4289 Google Scholar

112. 

G. Tononi and C. Cirelli, “Sleep function and synaptic homeostasis,” Sleep Med. Rev., 10 49 –62 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2005.05.002 Google Scholar

113. 

C. Cajochen, S. Chellappa and C. Schmidt, “What keeps us awake?—the role of clocks and hourglasses, light, and melatonin,” Int. Rev. Neurobiol., 93 57 –90 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7742(10)93003-1 Google Scholar

114. 

A. J. Metz et al., “Brain tissue oxygen saturation increases during the night in adolescents,” Oxygen Transport to Tissue XXXV, 113 –119 Springer, New York (2013). Google Scholar

115. 

J. R. Velo et al., “Should it matter when we record? Time of year and time of day as factors influencing frontal EEG asymmetry,” Biol. Psychol., 91 283 –291 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.06.010 Google Scholar

116. 

K. W. Tham and H. C. Willem, “Room air temperature affects occupants’ physiology, perceptions and mental alertness,” Build. Environ., 45 40 –44 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.04.002 BSENDV 0142-310X Google Scholar

117. 

J. Molin et al., “The influence of climate on development of winter depression,” J. Affect. Disord., 37 151 –155 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0327(95)00090-9 JADID7 Google Scholar

Biography

Hamoon Zohdi received his MSc degree in biomedical engineering from the University of Bern in 2016. He is a PhD student at the Institute of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. His current research focuses on fNIRS with a special interest in investigating changes in cerebral and systemic physiology in humans elicited by different colored light exposures.

Felix Scholkmann received his PhD from the University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland, in 2014. He is a research associate at the University of Bern and a postdoc and a research associate at the University of Zurich. His research focuses on biomedical signal processing, biophotonics/neurophotonics (development and application of NIRS), neuroscience, integrative physiology, and biophysics.

Ursula Wolf is a full professor at the Medical Faculty of the University of Bern and the director of the Institute of Complementary and Integrative Medicine. Her research interests focus on integrative medicine, in particular patient centered research, integrative physiology, and clinical studies.

© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Hamoon Zohdi, Felix Scholkmann, and Ursula Wolf "Frontal cerebral oxygenation asymmetry: intersubject variability and dependence on systemic physiology, season, and time of day," Neurophotonics 7(2), 025006 (23 June 2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.7.2.025006
Received: 7 January 2020; Accepted: 8 June 2020; Published: 23 June 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
19 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top