|
1.IntroductionCommercial silicon solar cells have a thickness of about 50 to 100 μm to absorb as much light as possible, especially in the near-infrared regime.1 Excessive thickness of the solar cell does not only increase its manufacturing cost but also its carbon footprint during its manufacture. To reduce both, thin-film photovoltaic (PV) solar cells made of amorphous and polycrystalline silicon are being actively investigated. The absorption efficiency of these thin-film solar cells can be improved by incorporating antireflection coatings2–4 and texturing of the front surface.5–7 The metallic back-reflector of a solar cell can also be textured at transverse length scales greatly larger than a thousand nanometers, but planar backing appears to perform better.8 In contrast, periodic texturing of the metallic back-reflector was indicated even in the early 1980s to help absorb light better, if the period were a few hundred nanometers.9 Hence, the use of a metallic surface-relief grating as the back-reflector may result in higher efficiency.10,11 A metal/semiconductor interface can guide surface-plasmon-polariton (SPP) waves. This was appreciated by Anderson in the 1980s,12,13 but the prism-coupled technique suggested to exploit the broad solar spectrum seems not to have gained traction in the research community. A few years ago,14 research interest returned when it was realized that an electric field of large magnitude, existing close to the back-reflector inside the semiconductor when an SPP wave is excited, is favorable to the generation of electron–hole pairs. In single-junction amorphous-silicon (a-Si) solar cells backed by a periodically corrugated metallic back-reflector, the semiconductor is almost homogeneous. Therefore, only one SPP wave, that too of the -polarization state, can be launched at a given free-space wavelength of light,15,16 leading to modest gains in light absorption efficiency.14,17 But multiple SPP waves of both linear polarization states can be guided by a periodicially corrugated metal/semiconductor interface, if the semiconductor is periodically nonhomogeneous along the direction normal to the mean plane of the metal/semiconductor interface; this results in enhanced absorption of light of both linear polarization states, according to a predecessor study.18 However, the semiconductor in that study18 was taken to have a continuously varying relative permittivity, which is not easily implementable. Therefore, we set out to theoretically investigate the usefulness of exciting multiple SPP waves in a realistic tandem solar cell with a piecewise homogeneous semiconductor, as shown schematically in Fig. 1. The solar cell is supposed to be made of a-Si alloys, and the metallic back-reflector is periodically corrugated. The a-Si alloys can be fabricated using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition over planar and patterned substrates.19 The composition of the alloys can be controlled by controlling the ratio of precursor gases (e.g., silane, hydrogen, methane, and germane) and the deposition temperature.20 A top layer of aluminum-doped zinc oxide (AZO) allows electrical contact. Also, an AZO layer is sandwiched between the metal and the semiconductor to avoid the deterioration of the electrical properties of the a-Si alloy closest to the metal.1 The plan of this paper is as follows. The methodology for computation is provided in brief in Sec. 2, and the numerical results are presented in Sec. 3. Concluding remarks are presented in Sec. 4. An dependence on time is implicit, with denoting the angular frequency and . The free-space wavenumber, the free-space wavelength, and the intrinsic impedance of free space are denoted by , , and , respectively, with being the permeability and the permittivity of free space. Vectors are in boldface, and the Cartesian unit vectors are identified as , , and . 2.Methodology2.1.Periodically Corrugated Metallic Back-ReflectorLet us consider the boundary-value problem shown schematically in Fig. 1. The regions and are vacuous, the region is occupied by a dielectric material with a piecewise homogeneous relative permittivity to be specified in Sec. 3, and the region by a metal with a spatially uniform relative permittivity . The region contains the periodically corrugated interface of period along the -axis. The relative permittivity in the reference unit cell of this region is given by Here, is the grating-shape function, and is the unit step function. All relative permittivities are frequency dependent.To find the reflectance and transmittance of this solar cell when a linearly polarized plane wave is incident on it, the rigorous coupled-wave approach (RCWA)21,22 was used. The adoption of this method for a piecewise homogeneous partnering dielectric material has been explained elsewhere,16,23,24 and only a brief description is provided here. In the vacuous half-space , let a plane wave, propagating in the plane at an angle with respect to the -axis, be incident on the solar cell. Hence, the incident, reflected, and transmitted electric field phasors can be written in terms of Floquet harmonics as follows: where , and . The unit vectors and represent the - and -polarization states, respectively. The coefficients of the ’th-order Floquet harmonics in the incident, reflected, and transmitted electric field phasors are , , and , respectively. The index for specular components, whereas nonspecular components are indicated by .In the RCWA, the relative permittivity in the region is expanded as a Fourier series with respect to , viz., where can be stated piecewise. The field phasors are written in the same region in terms of Floquet harmonics as with unknown scalar functions and .The RCWA was implemented using Mathematica™ after replacing by the set in the foregoing equations. A numerically stable algorithm25–27 was used to find the reflection amplitudes and transmission amplitudes in terms of the incidence amplitudes . Thus,
2.2.Planar Metallic Back-Reflector: Canonical Boundary-Value ProblemTo predict the wavenumbers of Floquet harmonics (of order ) that SPP waves would manifest as in the problem described in Sec. 2.1,23 let us consider the underlying canonical boundary-value problem where one half-space (say, ) is occupied by a metal with relative permittivity and the other half-space () by a periodically nonhomogeneous dielectric material such that each period of it contains the three cells (but not the AZO layers) present in the region in Fig. 1. Let an SPP wave propagate parallel to the -axis with wavenumber and attenuate as . Therefore, in the region , the electric and magnetic field phasors may be written as and where , is complex valued, and for attenuation as . Here, and are unknown coefficients with the same units as the electric field, with the subscripts and , respectively, denoting the - and -polarization states. The field phasors in the half-space can be written as where the functions and are not known.After imposing the standard boundary conditions at the interface plus the condition that the field phasors must decay as , a dispersion equation was obtained and solved using the Newton–Raphson method28 for the wavenumber as a function of . The formulation has been explained in detail elsewhere.16,29 3.Numerical Results and DiscussionFor the illustrative numerical results presented in this section, the various layers of the tandem solar cell in Fig. 1 were assumed to be made of a-Si alloys as follows:
Thus the tandem solar cell would function as a spectrum-splitting solar cell.1,20 All the - and -type layers were taken to be 20-nm thick, and the thickness of all intrinsic layers was taken to be 200 nm. The relative permittivities of the a-Si alloys as functions of are presented in Fig. 2. They were computed using a model provided by Ferlauto et al.20 The thicknesses of the two AZO layers were set as and . The refractive index of AZO was obtained as a function of by using a single-oscillator model developed for AZO films deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering at a substrate temperature of 170°C.30 The imaginary part of the refractive index of AZO is negligible in the visible and the near-infrared regimes.30 The information provided in this paragraph is sufficient to specify . The metal was taken to be silver, and its relative permittivity was taken from a standard source.31,32 Moreover, we set . 3.1.Planar Back-ReflectorBefore we present the results for the periodically corrugated metallic back-reflector, let us present the results when the back-reflector is planar (i.e., ). The total reflectances and are presented in Fig. 3 for and . The corresponding absorptances are and , because transmittances are negligible as the thickness exceeds the penetration depth of silver. Since the absorption of light by AZO is negligible, light is absorbed only by the cells and the metal. Furthermore, the nonspecular components of the reflected field are absent because the metallic back-reflector is planar and then suffices. Figure 3 shows that both total reflectances are very low when , but both are very high when . This dimorphism is due to the higher values of the imaginary parts of the relative permittivities of the a-Si alloys at shorter wavelengths. Therefore, considerable room for enhancement of the absorption of light by the semiconductor layers is available when . The absence of sharply defined bands with low reflectance in Fig. 3 indicates that no SPP waves are excited. Parenthetically, we note that high-phase-speed SPP waves can indeed be excited with a planar interface if the partnering dielectric material is several-periods thick33; but, as these SPP waves will not play a significant role in enhancing the absorption of light in solar cells, their excitation was not investigated. 3.2.Simple Surface-Relief Grating as the Back-ReflectorLet us next consider that the tandem solar cell is backed by a simple surface-relief grating with as the grating-shape function.For the computation of the reflectances, the wavelength range was restricted to because of convergence problems with the RCWA when . This is due to the fact that a-Si alloys are highly dissipative for , as can be seen from the plots of the real and the imaginary parts of the relative permittivities in Fig. 2. However, the high dissipation in turn implies that the light absorption efficiency in this narrow spectral regime is very high and does not offer much room for improvement. 3.2.1.Lx = 400 nmSuppose next that the period and the trough-to-crest height . We set after ascertaining that the RCWA provided converged solutions. The total reflectances and as functions of and are presented in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b), respectively. Also in the same figure, the angle is plotted in relation to when an SPP wave is predicted to be excited as a Floquet harmonic of order ,23 being the wavenumber of either a - or an -polarized SPP wave delivered by the solution of the canonical boundary-value problem described in Sec. 2.2. As the transmittances were found to be negligible, the higher that the total reflectance is, the lower is the corresponding absorptance.The two upper panels in Fig. 4 show the presence of low-reflectance bands when . These bands could be due to the excitation of either SPP waves or waveguide modes34 that propagate in the bulk of the tandem solar cell. The two lower panels in Fig. 4 show the locations in space where SPP waves are predicted to be excited for the chosen solar cell. Comparisons of Figs. 4(a) and 4(c), and of Figs. 4(b) and 4(d), suffice to identify the low-reflectance bands that represent the excitation of SPP waves. Clearly then, multiple - and -polarized SPP waves are excited due to the periodic corrugation of the metallic back-reflector. The low-reflectance bands that do not correspond to the branches in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d) most likely represent the excitation of waveguide modes that are guided by the tandem solar cell. Comparisons of Figs. 3(a) and 4(a), and of Figs. 3(b) and 4(b), show that and are generally smaller for , when the metallic back-reflector is periodically corrugated than when it is planar. The decreases in and are surely due to the excitation of SPP waves and waveguide modes, thereby resulting in enhanced absorption of light by the tandem solar cell. The decrease in is more than the decrease in , which is in line with the theoretical prediction from the canonical boundary-value problem of a smaller number of -polarized SPP waves than of -polarized SPP waves. The absence of the low-reflectance bands (representing the excitation of SPP waves) for both linear polarization states when , even though the canonical boundary-value problem predicts the excitation of SPP waves, is inconsequential. This is because the absorption of light by the tandem solar cell is very high in this spectral regime. Most likely, those bands are not easily evident. 3.2.2.Lx = 500 nmLet us now increase the period of corrugations to , but remains fixed. The RCWA algorithm delivered converged reflectances for . The total reflectances and are presented as functions of and in Figs. 5(a) and 5(b), respectively. The points in space when either a - or an -polarized SPP wave is predicted to be excited are identified in Figs. 5(c) and 5(d), respectively. Comparisons of Figs. 4(c) and 5(c), and of Figs. 4(d) and 5(d), show that the points in space when are at different positions and are different in number for than for for both the linear polarization states. Parenthetically, we note that the wavenumbers of SPP waves (for any given ) obtained by the solution of the underlying canonical boundary-value problem are independent of the period of the corrugations; however, the condition that needs to be satisfied for those SPP waves to be excited involves the period . Comparisons of Figs. 5(a) and 5(c), and of Figs. 5(b) and 5(d), allow us to conlcude that several low-reflectance bands (for ) are due to the excitation of SPP waves. This excitation of multiple SPP waves is accompanied by overall low reflectances in the near-infrared spectral regime () as compared to Fig. 3 for the planar metallic back-reflector. 3.3.Compound Surface-Relief Grating as the Back-ReflectorAn SPP wave is excited in the grating-coupled configuration when the condition is met.16,23 To increase the number of SPP waves, a compound surface-relief grating with each period having several periods of more than one simple surface-relief grating can be used.35,36 For this purpose, we chose a compound grating with specified in the reference unit cell of the region . A schematic representation of the compound grating is shown in Fig. 6. The density plots of the reflectances and as functions of and for a compound grating with , , , and are given in Fig. 7. We chose each period of the compound grating to comprise two periods each of the simple sinusoidal gratings with periods and —instead of and —to avoid difficulties in computing the Fourier coefficients used in Eq. (10). Moreover, was chosen after ensuring the convergence of the reflectances.The low-reflectance bands in Fig. 7 representing the excitation of SPP waves could either be attributed to an individual simple surface-relief grating in the compound grating or the compound grating itself, though the efficiency of the excitation is generally smaller with the compound grating than with either of the simple grating alone.36 Furthermore, not all SPP waves excited by individual simple gratings may be excited by the compound grating. A comparison of Fig. 7 with Fig. 3 shows that the reflectance in the near-infrared regime is generally lower when a compound grating is used than when the metallic back-reflector is planar. 3.4.Solar-Spectrum-Integrated Absorption EfficiencyThe solar-spectrum-integrated (SSI) absorption efficiency is defined by37 for unpolarized light coming from the sun, where is the solar irradiance spectrum for AM1.5.38 The SSI absorption efficiency is plotted in Fig. 8 as a function of when the metallic back-reflector is (1) planar, (2) the simple grating of Sec. 3.2.1, (3) the simple grating of Sec. 3.2.2, or (4) a compound grating of Sec. 3.3, with and . The figure shows that increased by up to 20% when the solar cell is backed by a periodically corrugated reflector than a planar reflector. For , the simple grating with period gives the highest SSI absorption efficiency. When either or , the compound grating yields the highest SSI absorption efficiency.To delineate the enhancement of absorption efficiency in the near-infrared spectral regime, the SSI absorption efficiencies are presented in Figs. 9(a) and 9(b) when and , and and , respectively. Figure 9(a) shows that is enhanced up to 5% only when . This is due to the fact that semiconductor materials used in the solar cell are highly dissipative in this spectral regime. Furthermore, in this spectral regime, both the simple gratings and the compound grating have very similar effects on . This is also evident from Fig. 9(a) since is about 80% over a wide range of the incidence angle even when the metallic back-reflector is planar. The plots of in Fig. 9(b), however, show an enhancement of up to 100% when . Let us repeat that multiple SPP waves excited with either the simple or the compound grating are all dominant in this spectral regime. Therefore, the enhancement in can be attributed to the excitation of multiple SPP waves. 4.Concluding RemarksThe effect of multiple SPP waves on the SSI absorption efficiency of a thin-film tandem solar cell made of a-Si alloys with a periodically corrugated metallic back-reflector was theoretically investigated. The boundary-value problem to find the total reflectances as functions of the free-space wavelength and the angle of incidence for incident linearly polarized plane waves was set up and solved for a typical tandem solar cell. The low-reflectance bands representing the excitation of SPP waves by simple gratings were identified by comparing the total-reflectance spectrums with the solution of the underlying canonical boundary-value problem. A compound grating with each period occupying several periods of two simple gratings was also investigated. The total reflectance in the near-infrared regime was found to decrease for both linear polarization states when the metallic back-reflector is periodically corrugated than when it was planar. The identification of multiple SPP waves showed that most of the decrease in total reflectance results from the excitation of SPP waves. Furthermore, the use of different periods for the corrugations of the metallic back-reflector showed that the position of low-reflectance bands in the space can be changed by changing the period of the corrugations. A compound grating was found to deliver a larger number of SPP waves than a simple grating, but the excitation efficiency was generally lower than when a simple grating was used. The SSI absorption efficiency as a function of the incidence angle using an AM1.5 solar spectrum showed that an enhancement of the absorption efficiency of as much as 20% is achievable when the back reflector is periodically corrugated. A further analysis of the efficiency by dividing the spectral regime into and showed that most of the enhancement in absorption comes from the enhancement in the near-infrared spectral regime. Let us note that the absorption efficiency of the tandem solar cell depends not only on the period of the corrugations of the metallic back-reflector, but also on the other parameters such as the depth, shape, and the duty cycle of the corrugations.37 Furthermore, the choice of periodically corrugated back-reflector depends on the thicknesses and the materials used for making a solar cell. Since multiple SPP waves are guided due to the periodic nonhomogeneity of the partnering semiconductor material, an enhancement in the absorption efficiency should be expected in any thin-film solar cell. Therefore, we hope that our numerical studies have provided experimentalists with some useful guidelines to exploit surface multiplasmonics16 for harvesting solar energy not only in those cells that are made of a-Si alloys but also of compound semiconductor materials. AcknowledgmentsThis work was partially supported by US National Science Foundation grant DMR-1125591. The authors thank Liu Liu, A. Shoji Hall, Greg D. Barber, Theresa S. Mayer, and Thomas E. Mallouk of the Pennsylvania State University for helpful discussions during the course of this work. A. L. thanks the Charles G. Binder Endowment at Penn State for ongoing support of his research. ReferencesS. J. Fonash, Solar Cell Device Physics, 2nd Ed.Academic Press, Burlington, MA
(2010). Google Scholar
S. K. Dhungelet al.,
“Double-layer antireflection coating of for crystalline silicon solar cells,”
J. Korean Phys. Soc., 49
(3), 885
–889
(2006). KPSJAS 0374-4884 Google Scholar
S. A. BodenD. M. Bagnall,
“Sunrise to sunset optimization of thin film antireflective coatings for encapsulated, planar silicon solar cells,”
Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl., 17 241
–252
(2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pip.v17:4 PPHOED 1062-7995 Google Scholar
J.-Y. Chuet al.,
“17.2% efficiency multicrystalline solar cells by optimizing structure of the double antireflection layer,”
J. Photon. Energy, 1
(1), 017001
(2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3549274 JPEOBV 1947-7988 Google Scholar
R. M. SwansonR. A. Sinton,
“High-efficiency silicon solar cells,”
Advances in Solar Energy, 427
–484 Plenum Press, New York
(1990). Google Scholar
P. Verlindenet al.,
“The surface texturization of solar cells: a new method with V-grooves with controllable sidewall angles,”
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 26
(1), 71
–78
(1992). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0927-0248(92)90126-A SEMCEQ 0927-0248 Google Scholar
N. Yamadaet al.,
“Characterization of antireflection moth-eye film on crystalline silicon photovoltaic module,”
Opt. Express, 19
(S2), A118
–A125
(2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.00A118 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
G. Aijuanet al.,
“Effect of the back surface topography on the efficiency in silicon solar cells,”
J. Semicond., 30
(7), 074003
(2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/30/7/074003 JSOEB4 1674-4926 Google Scholar
P. ShengA. N. BlochR. S. Stepleman,
“Wavelength-selective absorption enhancement in thin-film solar cells,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 43
(6), 579
–581
(1983). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.94432 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar
C. HeineR. H. Morf,
“Submicrometer gratings for solar energy applications,”
Appl. Opt., 34
(14), 2476
–2482
(1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.002476 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar
M. A. GreenS. Pillai,
“Harnessing plasmonics for solar cells,”
Nat. Photon., 6
(3), 130
–132
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.30 1749-4885 Google Scholar
L. M. Anderson,
“Parallel-processing with surface plasmons: a new strategy for converting the broad solar spectrum,”
in Proc. 16th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conf.,
371
–377
(1982). Google Scholar
L. M. Anderson,
“Harnessing surface plasmons for solar energy conversion,”
Proc. SPIE, 408 172
–178
(1983). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.935723 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
H. A. AtwaterA. Polman,
“Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices,”
Nat. Mater., 9
(3), 205
–213
(2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat2629 NMAACR 1476-1122 Google Scholar
S. A. Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications, Springer, New York
(2007). Google Scholar
J. A. Polo Jr.T. G. MackayA. Lakhtakia, Electromagnetic Surface Waves: A Modern Perspective, Elsevier, Waltham
(2013). Google Scholar
V. E. Ferryet al.,
“Plasmonic nanostructure design for efficient light coupling into solar cells,”
Nano Lett., 8
(12), 4391
–4397
(2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl8022548 NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar
M. FaryadA. Lakhtakia,
“Enhanced absorption of light due to multiple surface-plasmon-polariton waves,”
Proc. SPIE, 8110 81100F
(2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.893492 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
B. B. Van Akenet al.,
“PECVD deposition of and using a linear RF source,”
Proc. SPIE, 6651 66510C
(2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.732383 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
A. S. Ferlautoet al.,
“Analytical model for the optical functions of amorphous semiconductors from the near-infrared to ultraviolet: applications in thin film photovoltaics,”
J. Appl. Phys., 92
(5), 2424
–2436
(2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1497462 JAPIAU 0021-8979 Google Scholar
M. G. MoharamT. K. Gaylord,
“Diffraction analysis of dielectric surface-relief gratings,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am., 72
(10), 1385
–1392
(1982). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.72.001385 JOSAAH 0030-3941 Google Scholar
L. Li,
“Multilayer modal method for diffraction gratings of arbitrary profile, depth, and permittivity,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 10
(12), 2581
–2591
(1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.10.002581 JOAOD6 0740-3232 Google Scholar
M. FaryadA. Lakhtakia,
“Grating-coupled excitation of multiple surface plasmon-polariton waves,”
Phys. Rev. A, 83
(1), 013814
(2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.013814 PLRAAN 1050-2947 Google Scholar
M. Faryadet al.,
“Excitation of multiple surface-plasmon-polariton waves guided by a periodically corrugated interface of a metal and a periodic multilayered isotropic dielectric material,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 29
(4), 704
–713
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.29.000704 JOBPDE 0740-3224 Google Scholar
M. G. MoharamE. B. GrannD. A. Pommet,
“Formulation for stable and efficient implementation of the rigorous coupled-wave analysis of binary gratings,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 12
(5), 1068
–1076
(1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.12.001068 JOAOD6 0740-3232 Google Scholar
F. WangM. W. HornA. Lakhtakia,
“Rigorous electromagnetic modeling of near-field phase-shifting contact lithography,”
Microelectron. Eng., 71
(1), 34
–53
(2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2003.09.003 MIENEF 0167-9317 Google Scholar
N. ChateauJ.-P. Hugonin,
“Algorithm for the rigorous coupled-wave analysis of grating diffraction,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 11
(4), 1321
–1331
(1994). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.11.001321 JOAOD6 0740-3232 Google Scholar
Y. Jaluria, Computer Methods for Engineering, Taylor & Francis, Washington
(1996). Google Scholar
M. FaryadA. Lakhtakia,
“On surface plasmon-polariton waves guided by the interface of a metal and a rugate filter with sinusoidal refractive-index profile,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 27
(11), 2218
–2223
(2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.27.002218 JOBPDE 0740-3224 Google Scholar
X.-Y. GaoY. LiangQ.-G. Lin,
“Analysis of the optical constants of aluminum-doped zinc oxide films by using the single-oscillator model,”
J. Korean Phys. Soc., 57
(4), 710
–714
(2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.3938/jkps.57.710 KPSJAS 0374-4884 Google Scholar
Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, Academic Press, Boston
(1985). Google Scholar
M. R. M. AtallaM. FaryadA. Lakhtakia,
“On surface plasmon-polariton waves guided by the interface of a metal and a rugate filter with a sinusoidal refractive-index profile. Part II: High-phase-speed solutions,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 29
(11), 3078
–3086
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.29.003078 JOBPDE 0740-3224 Google Scholar
N. S. KapanyJ. J. Burke, Optical Waveguides, Academic Press, New York
(1972). Google Scholar
I. Dolevet al.,
“Multiple coupling of surface plasmons in quasiperiodic gratings,”
Opt. Lett., 36
(9), 1584
–1586
(2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.001584 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
M. FaryadA. Lakhtakia,
“Excitation of multiple surface-plasmon-polariton waves using a compound surface-relief grating,”
J. Nanophoton., 6
(1), 061701
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.6.061701 JNOACQ 1934-2608 Google Scholar
M. Solanoet al.,
“Optimization of the absorption efficiency of an amorphous-silicon thin-film tandem solar cell backed by a metallic surface-relief grating,”
Appl. Opt., 52
(5), 966
–979
(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.000966 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar
(
(2013) http://pveducation.org/pvcdrom/appendices/standard-solar-spectra July ). 2013). Google Scholar
BiographyMuhammad Faryad received MSc and MPhil degrees in electronics from the Quaid-i-Azam University, Pakistan, in 2006 and 2008, respectively, and the PhD degree in engineering science and mechanics from the Pennsylvania State University, USA, in 2012. Currently, he is a postdoctoral scholar at the Pennsylvania State University. His research interests include sculptured thin films, solar cells, and electromagnetic surface waves. He is a member of Optical Society of America and SPIE. Akhlesh Lakhtakia received degrees from the Banaras Hindu University (BTech and DSc) and the University of Utah (MS and PhD), in electronics engineering and electrical engineering, respectively. He is the Charles Godfrey Binder (Endowed) Professor of Engineering Science and Mechanics at the Pennsylvania State University, and presently serves as the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Nanophotonics. His current research interests include nanotechnology, bioreplication, forensic science, surface multiplasmonics, and complex materials including metamaterials and sculptured thin films. He is a fellow of SPIE, Optical Society of America, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Physical Society, and Institute of Physics (UK). He was the sole recipient of the 2010 SPIE Technical Achievement Award. |