Open Access
1 February 1982 Guest Editorial: Image Quality
Patrick S. Cheatham
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The term image quality can, unfortunately, apply to anything from a public relations firm's discussion to a comparison between corner drugstores' film processing. If we narrow the discussion to optical systems, we clarify the problem somewhat, but only slightly. We are still faced with a multitude of image quality measures all different, and all couched in different terminology. Optical designers speak of MTF values, digital processors talk about summations of before and after image differences, pattern recognition engineers allude to correlation values, and radar imagers use side-lobe response values measured in decibels. Further complexity is introduced by terms such as information content, bandwidth, Strehl ratios, and, of course, limiting resolution. The problem is to compare these different yardsticks and try to establish some concrete ideas about evaluation of a final image. We need to establish the image attributes which are the most important to perception of the image in question and then begin to apply the different system parameters to those attributes.
Patrick S. Cheatham "Guest Editorial: Image Quality," Optical Engineering 21(1), 210101 (1 February 1982). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.7972849
Published: 1 February 1982
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Image quality

Image processing

Digital image processing

Modulation transfer functions

Digital image correlation

Imaging systems

Optical design

RELATED CONTENT

Focus finding using scale invariant patterns
Proceedings of SPIE (February 04 2013)
Zoom optics design and optimization with digital image process
Proceedings of SPIE (September 11 2008)
Cardio-PACs: a new opportunity
Proceedings of SPIE (May 18 2000)

Back to Top