Comparison Of Large Aperture Telescopes With Parabolic And Spherical Primaries

Dietrich Korsch

doi:10.1117/12.7973950

Abstract

Quasi-Cassegrain-type four-mirror telescopes are compared to conventional two-mirror Cassegrain telescopes for use as high performance, very large aperture space telescopes. Spherical and parabolic primaries with continuous as well as segmented surfaces are considered. Imaging characteristics and misalignment sensitivities serve as the principal criteria of comparison. The evaluation shows that parabolic primaries yield superior wide-field performance, whereas spherical primaries hold distinct advantages regarding manufacturability and regarding certain alignment aspects in the case of segmentation.

Citation Download Citation

Dietrich Korsch, "Comparison Of Large Aperture Telescopes With Parabolic And Spherical Primaries," Optical Engineering 25(9), 251034 (1 September 1986). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.7973950 . Submission:

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

PERSONAL SIGN IN
Full access may be available with your subscription

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Remember Email/Username on this computer

Remember Password

No SPIE account? Create an account
or Institutional Sign In via Shibboleth

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $20.00

Non-members: $25.00 ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years