Comparative study of low-energy neutral atom imaging techniques

Herbert O. Funsten III; David J. McComas; Earl E. Scime

doi:10.1117/12.155918

1 February 1994 Comparative study of low-energy neutral atom imaging techniques

Herbert O. Funsten III, David J. McComas, Earl E. Scime

Author Affiliations +

Optical Engineering, Vol. 33, Issue 2, (February 1994). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.155918

Abstract

Low-energy neutral atom (LENA) imaging promises to be a revolutionary tool for global imaging of space plasmas. The technical challenges of LENA detection include separating them from the intense ambient UV without losing information about their incident trajectories, quantifying their trajectories, and obtaining high-sensitivity measurements. Two techniques that have been proposed for this purpose are based on fundamentally different atomic interaction mechanisms between LENAs and a solid: LENA transmission through an ultrathin foil and LENA reflection from a solid surface. Both of these methods provide LENA ionization (for subsequent removal from the UV by electrostatic deflection) and secondary electron emission (for time-of-flight start pulse generation and/or coincidence). We present a comparative study of the transmission and reflection techniques based on differences in atomic interactions with solids and surfaces. Transmission methods are shown to be superior for secondary electron emission rather than reflection methods. Furthermore, transmission methods are shown to be sufficient for LENA imaging at LENA energies of approximately 1 keV to greater than 30 keV. A hybrid instrument using reflection from a low work function surface for LENA ionization and transmission for secondary electron emission is optimal for imaging of LENAs with energies less than approximately 1 keV.

Citation Download Citation

Herbert O. Funsten III, David J. McComas, and Earl E. Scime "Comparative study of low-energy neutral atom imaging techniques," Optical Engineering 33(2), (1 February 1994). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.155918

Published: 1 February 1994

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available