1 July 2005 Comparison of human observer and algorithmic target detection in nonurban forward-looking infrared imagery
Author Affiliations +
Optical Engineering, 44(7), 076401 (2005). doi:10.1117/1.1948147
Abstract
We have performed an experiment that compares the performance of human observers with that of a robust algorithm for the detection of targets in difficult, nonurban forward-looking infrared imagery. Our purpose was to benchmark the comparison and document performance differences for future algorithm improvement. The scale-insensitive detection algorithm, used as a benchmark by the Night Vision Electronic Sensors Directorate for algorithm evaluation, employed a combination of contrastlike features to locate targets. Detection receiver operating characteristic curves and observer-confidence analyses were used to compare human and algorithmic responses and to gain insight into differences. The test database contained ground targets, in natural clutter, whose detectability, as judged by human observers, ranged from easy to very difficult. In general, as compared with human observers, the algorithm detected most of the same targets, but correlated confidence with correct detections poorly and produced many more false alarms at any useful level of performance. Though characterizing human performance was not the intent of this study, results suggest that previous observational experience was not a strong predictor of human performance, and that combining individual human observations by majority vote significantly reduced false-alarm rates.
Bruce A. Weber, "Comparison of human observer and algorithmic target detection in nonurban forward-looking infrared imagery," Optical Engineering 44(7), 076401 (1 July 2005). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1948147
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
RELATED CONTENT

Use of boosting to improve LVQ ATR classifiers
Proceedings of SPIE (April 05 2002)
Boosting algorithm for LVQ ATR classifiers
Proceedings of SPIE (July 25 2002)

Back to Top