Herein, we sincerely make an apology to readers for our misguidance. We have made a mistake on the analysis of the optical path difference produced by the Savart polariscope which resulted in the improper design of a wide-field-of-view Savart polariscope. The correct statements are presented.
"Response to the comment on Design and analysis of wide-field-of-view polarization imaging spectrometer," Optical Engineering 50(4), 049701 (1 April 2011). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3562982