7 May 2013 Dopant profiles in heavily doped ZnO
Author Affiliations +
Optical Engineering, 52(5), 053801 (2013). doi:10.1117/1.OE.52.5.053801
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is used to compare the composition as a function of depth of as-grown zinc oxide (ZnO) films heavily doped with Ga and similar samples annealed in air for 10 min at 600°C, with particular attention given to the near-surface region. Films are grown by pulsed laser deposition (PLD) using a ZnO target containing 3 wt% Ga 2 O 3 . Electrical properties of these samples are determined from temperature-dependent Hall-effect measurements. The as-grown film has the following characteristics: (1) ∼11 Zn:O ratio with a Ga concentration of ∼3.3 at %; (2) no excess Ga in the near-surface region; and (3) excellent electrical characteristics: ρ=2.42×10 −4  Ω-cm , n=8.05×10 20   cm −3 , and μ=32.1   cm 2 /V-s -s at 300 K. For the annealed sample: (1) the Zn:O ratio remains ∼11 , but the Ga concentration is ∼3 at %, which is ∼10% lower than in the as-grown film; (2) ∼7 at % Ga is measured in the near-surface region; and (3) a significant increase in resistivity to ρ[/i]=0.99  Ω-cm , n=1.97×10 18   cm −3 , and μ=3.2  cm 2 /V-s at 300 K. Analysis of the O chemical shift suggests formation of a mixed ZnO/Ga 2 O 3 surface layer ≤5-nm -thick accounts for the observed changes in the Ga profile after annealing.
Claflin, Leedy, and Look: Dopant profiles in heavily doped ZnO



Transparent conductive oxides (TCOs) have been used for more than 60 years as transparent electrodes for a wide range of applications such as photodetectors, displays, solar cells, and light-emitting diodes. Indium tin oxide (ITO) is the most common commercially available TCO material, but limited world supplies of In have increased costs significantly over the past decade.8 One promising candidate to replace ITO is zinc oxide (ZnO) heavily doped with one or more of the group III metals, Al, Ga, or In, since material costs are lower, and high-quality ZnO films can be easily deposited on many different substrates, using a variety of growth techniques.

Several groups have successfully grown thin film and bulk samples of ZnO heavily doped with group III metals.910.11.12.13 For TCO applications, it is desirable to maximize the activated dopant concentration to realize the lowest resistivity film possible. This dopant activation commonly involves some form of high-temperature annealing treatment. However, it has been shown that high-temperature annealing causes group III metals to accumulate at the surface.14 There have been several experimental estimates of group III metals’ solubility limits in ZnO,11,1516.17.18 which suggest that in thin films it is possible to greatly exceed the thermodynamic doping limit found in bulk crystal growth; however, we are not aware of any quantitative theoretical values for these solubility limits.19

In the present work, we use x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to compare the dopant profiles for as-grown ZnO films heavily doped with Ga versus those of similar samples annealed in air. Hall-effect measurements of the electrical characteristics of these films are used in conjunction with this composition information to help understand changes in bonding chemistry that result from this anneal.



A 540-nm-thick Ga-doped ZnO film was deposited on a 3-in. sapphire wafer by pulsed-laser-deposition (PLD) at 200°C in a pure Ar atmosphere, using a ZnO target containing 3 wt% Ga2O3. This unconventional growth process, in the absence of an O2 ambient, has been previously described in detail13 and shown to produce highly conductive ZnO films. Two adjacent 1×1cm2 pieces were cut from the center region of this wafer for the present study; one was used to characterize the as-grown film, while the second sample was annealed at 600°C in air for 10 min prior to analysis.

Temperature-dependent Hall-effect measurements were performed over the range 6 to 320 K using a LakeShore 7507 apparatus. Ohmic contacts were made using indium dots at the four corners of each sample to allow for measurements using the Van der Pauw geometry. The composition of each sample was determined by XPS using a Perkin-Elmer (PHI) 5500 spectrometer equipped with a hemispherical analyzer and a monochromatic Al K α x-ray source operated at 400 W. High-resolution spectra of Zn 2p3/2, O 1 s, Ga 2p3/2, and Al 2p photoelectron peaks were acquired at a pass energy of 11.75 eV with a 400 μm aperture. Depth profiles were acquired using an Ar ion sputtering source operated at 4 keV. Sputtering rates of 23 and 21nm/min were determined for the as-grown and annealed samples, respectively. A series of very short duration sputtering steps were used to probe the near-surface region of each sample, followed by longer duration sputter steps through the “bulk” of these films until the substrate was reached. Elemental compositions were determined following each sputter step from integrated core-level XPS peaks using known sensitivity factors.20


Experimental Results and Analysis

Room temperature electrical characteristics of as-grown and annealed ZnO:Ga samples were derived from Hall-effect measurements and are listed in Table 1. The values of ND and NA were calculated by assuming doubly charged acceptors, probably Zn vacancies (VZn). Analysis details and fitting processes have been described elsewhere21 and are not reproduced here. For both samples, the carrier density is nearly independent of temperature, as shown in Fig. 1, which confirms that the electrons in these layers are degenerate. The electron concentration decreases by a factor of 400× and the mobility decreases by a factor of 10× following the 600°C anneal resulting in a corresponding 4000× increase in resistivity. It is interesting to note, however, that the donor concentration in the annealed sample is only reduced by about 10%. A significant increase in compensating acceptors (see Table 1) has a much larger impact on the electron density, possibly because H, which passivates acceptors in ZnO,22 diffuses out above 475°C.23

Table 1

Room temperature electrical characteristics of as-grown and annealed ZnO:Ga samples derived from Hall-effect measurements.

Operationρ (Ω−cm)μ (cm2/V-s)n (cm−3)ND (cm−3)NA (cm−3)K=NA/ND

Fig. 1

Temperature-dependent carrier concentration data for as-grown and annealed ZnO:Ga samples.


Composition profiles through the entire depth of the as-grown ZnO:Ga sample and focusing on the near-surface region are shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. Note that the plotted Ga concentration has been multiplied by a factor of 10 for clarity. The concentration of Zn, O, and Ga remain uniform throughout the sample, with Zn and O nominally in a 11 ratio (as expected) and [Ga] 3.3 at %. Similar composition profiles for the annealed sample are shown in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively. In the “bulk” of the annealed sample, the ratio of Zn and O is again 11, which is similar to that of the as-grown film, but the Ga concentration has decreased slightly to 3 at %. However, at the surface, the annealed sample shows a layer 5nm thick containing a significant accumulation of Ga (peak concentration more than 2× the measured concentration in the as-grown sample) and a corresponding Zn deficit. It is widely agreed18 that the incorporation of group III metals in ZnO thin films deposited by physical vapor techniques such as PLD can exceed the thermodynamic solubility limits. The high Ga concentrations measured in the as-grown sample are much greater than the 0.001 at % thermodynamic solubility limit estimated for Ga in ZnO. Given this substantial imbalance, it is possible that during the anneal at 600°C Ga rapidly diffuses to the surface because of the large thermodynamic driving force.

Fig. 2

Composition profile in as-grown ZnO:Ga sample from x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) sputter depth profile measurement. Note that the Ga concentration is multiplied 10× for clarity.


Fig. 3

Composition profile in the near-surface region of the as-grown ZnO:Ga sample shows no Ga accumulation.


Fig. 4

Composition profile in annealed ZnO:Ga sample from XPS sputter depth profile measurement.


Fig. 5

Surface Ga accumulation layer, d5nm thick, observed in annealed ZnO:Ga sample. Peak Ga concentration is 2× value found in “bulk” of sample.


In addition to providing these quantitative measures of atomic concentration, XPS is a powerful technique for investigating the local bonding environment of atoms through small changes in their binding energies or chemical shifts. High-resolution photoelectron spectra of the O 1 s peak in the surface and “bulk” regions of the annealed sample are shown in Fig. 6(a) and 6(b), respectively, along with least-squares fits to Voigt functions. In the surface region, the O 1 s photoelectron spectrum is composed of two peaks separated by a 1.0eV chemical shift, whereas in the bulk region, only one fitted peak is required. Comparing Fig. 6(a) and 6(b), it is clear that the lower binding energy peak corresponds with Zn-O bonding, which is the only spectral feature present in the “bulk” region of the sample. The higher binding energy peak observed in the surface region spectrum is consistent24,25 with Ga-O bonding in Ga2O3. The relative proportion of these two components in the surface layer was estimated to be 50% ZnO and 50% Ga2O3 by comparing the integrated intensities of these two peaks. A corresponding chemical shift in the Ga 2p3/2 photoelectron peak was too small and the peak intensity too weak to be evaluated reliably.

Fig. 6

Comparison of high resolution O 1s photoelectron spectra measured in (a) surface and (b) bulk regions of the annealed ZnO:Ga sample.




We investigated the electrical properties and composition profiles of heavily Ga-doped ZnO films grown by PLD. As-grown films exhibit excellent electrical characteristics with a room temperature resistivity value of ρ=2.42×104Ω-cm and uniform levels of Zn, O, and 3.3 at % Ga. No excess Ga is seen in the near-surface region. Heavily doped ZnO:Ga samples annealed at 600°C in air show an 4000× increase in room temperature resistivity resulting primarily from an increase in compensation by unpassivated acceptors. A surface Ga accumulation layer 5nm thick with a peak concentration more than twice the level in the as-grown film is found in the annealed sample. Analysis of the O 1s chemical shift measured by XPS suggests that this surface layer is composed of a mixture of ZnO and Ga2O3 in 11 ratio.


We wish to thank T. A. Cooper for the Hall-effect measurements. Support for DCL was provided by AFOSR Grant FA9550-10-1-0079 (J. Hwang), NSF Grant DMR0803276 (C. Ying), DOE Grant DE-SC0006952 (R. Kortan), and AFRL Contract HC1047-05-D-4005 (D. Tomich).



G. Haacke, “Transparent conducting coatings,” Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci 7(8), 73–93 (1977).ARMSCX0084-6600http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ms.07.080177.000445Google Scholar


I. HambergC. G. Granqvist, “Evaporated Sn-doped In2O3 films: basic optical properties and applications to energy-efficient windows,” J. Appl. Phys. 60(11), R123–R159 (1986).JAPIAU0021-8979http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.337534Google Scholar


C. G. Granqvist, “Transparent conductors as solar energy materials: a panoramic review,” Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. Cells 91(17), 1529–1598 (2007).SEMCEQ0927-0248http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2007.04.031Google Scholar


T. Minami, “Transparent conducting oxide semiconductors for transparent electrodes,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 20(4), S35–S44 (2005).SSTEET0268-1242http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/20/4/004Google Scholar


D. C. Look, “Recent advances in ZnO materials and devices,” Mater. Sci. Eng. B 80(1–3), 383–387 (2001).MSBTEK0921-5107http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5107(00)00604-8Google Scholar


S. J. Peartonet al., “Recent progress in processing and properties of ZnO,” Prog. Mater. Sci. 50(3), 293–412 (2005).PRMSAQ0079-6425http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.04.001Google Scholar


U. Ozguret al., “A comprehensive review of ZnO materials and devices,” J. Appl. Phys. 98(4), 041301 (2005).JAPIAU0021-8979http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1992666Google Scholar


A. C. Tolcin, “U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, Indium,” http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/indium/index.html (2013).Google Scholar


Z. C. JinI. HambergC. G. Granqvist, “Optical properties of sputter-deposited ZnO:Al thin films,” J. Appl. Phys. 64(10), 5117–5131 (1988).JAPIAU0021-8979http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.342419Google Scholar


K. HagaP. S. WijesenaH. Watanabe, “Group III impurity doped ZnO films prepared by atmospheric pressure chemical-vapor deposition using zinc acetylacetonate and oxygen,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 169–170, 504–507 (2001).ASUSEE0169-4332http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(00)00747-9Google Scholar


H. GomezM. de la L. Olvera, “Ga-doped ZnO thin films: effect of deposition temperature, dopant concentration, and vacuum-thermal treatment on the electrical, optical, structural and morphological properties,” Mater. Sci. Eng. B 134(1), 20–26 (2006).MSBTEK0921-5107http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2006.07.039Google Scholar


B. Wanget al., “Hydrothermal growth and characterization of indium-doped-conducting ZnO crystals,” J. Cryst. Growth 304(1), 73–79 (2007).JCRGAE0022-0248http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.01.047Google Scholar


R. C. Scottet al., “Effects of Ar vs. O-2 ambient on pulsed-laser-deposited Ga-doped ZnO,” J. Cryst. Growth 324(1), 110–114 (2011).JCRGAE0022-0248http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2011.03.002Google Scholar


D. C. LookB. ClaflinH. E. Smith, “Origin of conductive surface layer in annealed ZnO,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(12), 122108 (2008).APPLAB0003-6951http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2903505Google Scholar


R. WangA. W. Sleight, “High conductivity in gallium-doped zinc oxide powders,” Chem. Mater. 8(2), 433–439 (1996).CMATEX0897-4756http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm950372kGoogle Scholar


M. Komatsuet al., “Ga, N solubility limit in co-implanted ZnO measured by secondary ion mass spectrometry,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 189(3–4), 349–352 (2002).ASUSEE0169-4332http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(01)01026-1Google Scholar


M. H. Yoonet al., “Solid solubility limits of Ga and Al in ZnO,” J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 21(21), 1703–1704 (2002).JMSLD50261-8028http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020841213266Google Scholar


J. Kobayashiet al., “Properties of gallium- and aluminum-doped bulk ZnO obtained from single-crystals grown by liquid phase epitaxy,” J. Cryst. Growth 311(19), 4408–4413 (2009).JCRGAE0022-0248http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.07.037Google Scholar


S. B. ZhangS. WeiA. Zunger, “Elements of doping engineering in semiconductors,” NREL/CP-590-25746, http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy99osti/25746.pdf (1998).Google Scholar


J. F. Moulderet al., Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN (1992).Google Scholar


D. C. Look, Chapter 1 in Electrical Characterization of GaAs Materials and Devices, Wiley, New York (1989).Google Scholar


D. C. Looket al., “Mobility analysis of highly conducting thin films: application to ZnO,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(6), 062102 (2010).APPLAB0003-6951http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3310043Google Scholar


J. BangK. J. Chang, “Atomic structure and diffusion of hydrogen in ZnO,” J. Korean Phys. Soc. 55(1), 98–102 (2009).KPSJAS0374-4884http://dx.doi.org/10.3938/jkps.55.98Google Scholar


M. Passlacket al., “Ga2O3 films for electronic and optoelectronic applications,” J. Appl. Phys. 77(2), 686–693 (1995).JAPIAU0021-8979http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.359055Google Scholar


M. J. GuittetJ. P. CrocombetteM. Gautier-Soyer, “Bonding and XPS chemical shifts in ZrSiO4 versus SiO2 and ZrO2: charge transfer and electrostatic effects,” Phys. Rev. B 63(12), 125117 (2001).PRBMDO0163-1829http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.125117Google Scholar

Biographies and photographs of the authors are not available.

Bruce Claflin, Kevin D. Leedy, David C. Look, "Dopant profiles in heavily doped ZnO," Optical Engineering 52(5), 053801 (7 May 2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.52.5.053801
Submission: Received ; Accepted


Zinc oxide


Chemical analysis

Statistical analysis


Photoemission spectroscopy

Back to Top