21 August 2013 Rare-earth-doped fiber designs for superluminescent sources
Author Affiliations +
Optical Engineering, 52(8), 086110 (2013). doi:10.1117/1.OE.52.8.086110
Abstract
The use of rare-earth-doped fiber section working in amplified spontaneous emission regime for different emission wavelengths is analyzed theoretically. From simulation results, the design of all-fiber superluminescent sources employing different rare earths as dopants for new optical windows and different applications is proposed. Results on different pump and signal powers in forward and backward propagation direction with respect to fiber length are presented.
Pérez-Sánchez, Bertoldi-Martins, Gallion, and Alvarez-Chávez: Rare-earth-doped fiber designs for superluminescent sources

1.

Introduction

Over the last few years, fiber-device technology has reached a mature status and is continuing to evolve. Although amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) is considered sometimes a detrimental component in all-fiber devices, in applications such as fiber gyroscopes and broadband sources for the 1550 nm Telecomm window, it is convenient for generating long wavelengths with no longitudinal mode structure and high power with short coherence lengths. Furthermore, broadband diode pumped fiber amplifiers with >30-dB gain have been achieved.1 Kilowatt-class single-frequency fiber sources have been a dot in the dramatic development curve of these devices. As for broadband devices and their wide tuning capacity, multimode interference effects,2 optical fiber fattening,3 and even laser tuning from 1530 to 1602 nm was reached with an Er3+/Yb3+ source.4 Just recently, all-fiber superluminescent sources have become an option for various sensing and Telecomm applications due to their thermal stability, wide spectrum at their output, and their relatively high power handling capacity even at the prototype stage.5 In this direction, all-fiber lasers and amplifiers doped with rare earths (REs) have contributed to the fast development of long-haul communication systems. In optical transport networks, for instance, one of the latest network developments, the so-called dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) has attracted great interest for long-haul and ultra-long-haul reach due to the fact that RE fiber optic amplifiers and Raman amplifiers are available to amplify the wavelengths transmitted along the network without requiring an optoelectrical signal conversion.6

From the design point of view, the resulting output spectrum of an ASE source is determined by different design parameters such as absorption and emission cross-section of the RE-dopant σabs, σem, total doping concentration NT, core radius a, fiber length L, energy level lifetime τ, absorption and emission wavelength σabs, σem, and coupled power Pin. For these purposes, it would indeed be difficult to change certain proprietary design parameters in commercially available fibers. Consequently, in this work, we propose to only make use of easy-to-modify design parameters, such as fiber length and coupled power, in order to explore ASE conversion efficiency and output spectrum both in forward and backward propagation, based on our recent work but extending it into other REs.

In order to explore the best results from different RE-doped ASE sources, different input powers were used in the modeling. In our simulations, it has been observed that in some cases the lifetime of some energy levels proved to be too short, and in combination with Einstein’s A=1/τ coefficient, it makes an impact by limiting the total ASE level, which causes laser generation to appear just after very short lengths of fiber. Such limiting behavior could have been prevented by using another host during the fabrication of the studied fibers. The highest-obtained efficiencies for the set of REs used are shown, after variations of fiber length and coupled pump power.

In this piece of work, we present a comparison between Er3+, Nd3+, Pr3+, Tm3+, Tm3+/Yb3+, and Er3+/Yb3+ broadband sources based on the same variables of design, with all of them being considered as superluminescent sources in the different optical communications windows. For this study, some specific atomic-level processes have to be considered, as explained below.

For Er3+-doped ASE sources, they are especially important due to the fact that their emission spectrum is around 1550 nm, which is coincident with the lowest losses band for silica fiber. Nevertheless, erbium multilevel energy structure limits its quantum efficiency required for other 1550 nm applications.7 On the other hand, a codoping technique where Yb3+ acts as a sensitizer for Er3+ molecules contained in the lattice, the Yb3+ ions in their excited level F25/2, allow the energetic transfer to the Er3+ ions in the exited level I411/2, via energetic cooperation. Thus having a nonradiative decay to the lower level I413/2, and finally falling radiatively to the ground level I415/2 (see Fig. 1). Therefore, giving the system another way for pumping. This system has an improvement in output power around 1550 nm due to this process of sensitizing between both REs with a typical concentration ratio of 101, being 10 for ytterbium and 1 for erbium.89.10

As for thulium-doped ASE sources at 2 μm, due to the high demand for capacity of WDM systems, the development of such devices at a new transmission window will soon be required. Tm3+ is promising in optical communications systems as it is possible to pump Tm3+ at 790 nm, where efficient, not-so-expensive laser diodes are available. Furthermore, among the other REs, Tm3+ has the widest emission band around 1.8 to 2.1 μm.11,12 In addition, an alternative to increase the efficiency emission from Tm3+ around 2 μm is to codope Tm3+ with Yb3+ and pump it from 910 to 980 nm. From the so-called cross-relaxation process, efficient 2 μm source operation can be achieved by using the F34H36 pump transition. Tm3+ has its level H35, which is quasiresonant coincident with the excited Yb3+ level F25/2. As already mentioned, Yb3+ has the advantage of possessing only two multiplets: the ground-state level F27/2 and the excited-state level F25/2, resulting in a highly efficient absorption from 900 nm to 1 μm. This particular energy level structure is highly desirable for an efficient absorption using commercially available laser diodes that emit 980 nm energy, in order to allow sensitization of Tm3+-doped fibers with Yb3+, as shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 1

Er3+/Yb3+ energetic transfer process.

OE_52_8_086110_f001.png

Fig. 2

Tm3+/Yb3+ energetic transfer process.

OE_52_8_086110_f002.png

All fiber ASE Nd3+- and Pr3+-doped ASE sources are also modeled in this work since such devices could be used in the second Telecomm window at 1310 nm. Direct H34G14 pumping could be used in Pr3+-doped fibers with commercial titanium–sapphire laser at 1005 nm; the optimum absorption wavelength in this transition is at 1038 nm. The emission around 1310 nm is generated in the G14H35 transition.13,14 Here we also propose an alternative around this window. We propose Nd3+ doping. The absorption is at 800 nm in order to obtain the desired emission. The 1310-nm emission is due to the F43/2I413/2 transition.15,16

ASE thulium sources can have applications within the S optical communications window at 1470 nm. Using the F34H34 pump transition at 800 nm (Refs. 17 and 18), where commercial pump diodes are available, the emission around 1470 nm is generated in the F34H36 transition.

All RE transitions with different single dopants and codoping schemes are theoretically studied by using a simple model, explained in the following sections.

2.

Theoretical Model

We used a modified version of rate equations model for three-state laser source considered in ASE regime.19,20 In this paper, the model is based on a modified version of the aforementioned Einstein rate equations, whose solution allows us to describe the evolution of pump and signal powers, for fixed pump power level and optimal fiber length and maximized output power.

(1)

dPp(Z)dz=γp(Z)Pp(z),

(2)

dPs±(z,λi)dz=±{Ge(z,λi)[Ps±(z,λi)+P0]Ga(z,λ1)Ps±(z,λ1)},
where Pp(z) is the pump power propagating in z direction parallel to the doped optical fiber axis, Ps±(z,λ1) is the output power in forward and backward directions, γp(z) is the absorption coefficient, Ge(z,λ1) is the amplification of spontaneous emission, Ga(z,λ1) is the absorption coefficient of spontaneous emission, and P0 represents an equivalent input noise power.

(3)

P0=2hvsΔs,

(4)

Δs=(cλs2)Δλs.

This analysis is performed in weak signal regime for Ps<Psat and by assuming

(5)

γp(z)=NTσpPp(z)Ppth+1,
when Pp(z)<Ppth, where Ppth is the threshold power.

(6)

Ppth=πa2hvpσpτ,
when Pp(z)>Ppth From Ref. 21, we consider Eq. (1) as

(7)

dPp(z)dz=NTπa2hvpτ.

Solving Eq. (7) with boundary conditions, Pp(0)=Pin, where Pin is the initial pump (coupled) power and is described by

(8)

Pp(z)=Pin(NTπa2hvpτ)z.

From Eq. (2) and by considering again weak operation and under the conditions Ps+(z=0,λi)=0 and Ps(z=L,λi)=0,

(9)

Ge(z,λi)=NTσe(λi)(1η)(Pp(z)thPp)Pp(z)thPp+1,

(10)

Ga(z,λi)=NTσa(λi)(1η)1Pp(z)thPp+1,

(11)

Gb(z,λi)=Ge(z,λi)Ga(z,λ1).

The overlap factor for ASE propagation in a single-mode fiber both doped and undoped does depend on wavelength and mode field diameter. This dependency has been accepted as being a ratio similar to core-to-cladding geometrical ratio. In our case, the overlap factor is described by the following equation, which depends on the fiber core radius a and the power mode spot size ωs on the signal wavelength. This overlap factor is taken into account in Ge and Ga. Γ is the overlap expressed as

(12)

Γ=exp(a2ωs2).

We therefore obtain

(13)

Ps+(z,λi)=(Ge(z,λi)Gb(z,λi)P0ezGb(z,λi)Ge(z,λ1)Gb(z,λ1))

(14)

Ps(z,λi)=(Ge(z,λi)Gb(z,λi)P0e(Lz)Gb(z,λi)Ge(z,λ1)Gb(z,λ1)).

For the model presented, three differential equations are defined. Such equations determine pump power, copropagating signal power, and also counterpropagating signal power, for different input powers and fiber lengths, on which the pump power wavelength is represented via its corresponding pump frequency, νp. Furthermore, in order to determine forward and backward ASE power levels in the model, we only take the peak value where emission is maximum and then we take the corresponding value of λi in the spectrum.

In Eq. (15), signal conversion efficiency is defined as output power in terms of the spectral converted signal, divided by the input (coupled) pump power, depending on the active material under study. Now, Pout (lambda_converted-signal) is precisely the converted output power of the superluminescent source, resulting from the quantum conversion, whereas Pin (lambda_pump-signal) is the amount of pump power at the input point of the superluminescent source at z=0. Finally, in order to calculate the signal conversion efficiency η, we use the following expression:

(15)

η=Pout(λconverted-signal)Pin(λpump-signal).

In the figures shown below, the ASE output for Er3+, Nd3+, Pr3+, Tm3+, Tm3+/Yb3, and Er3+/Yb3+ sources is shown for both counter- and copropagating pump power levels. It has clearly been observed that the ASE efficiency for codoping schemes is normally higher. The results of the different sources are presented in the curves by varying the fiber parameters such as fiber length, input power, and doping RE. We can observe the variation of the pump and output powers in forward propagation direction and backward propagation direction, along the length of the fiber and for different input powers.

For theoretical calculations of pump and signal powers in Figs. 26–35 in the Appendix, we used a total concentration of NT=1.9×1025ions/cm3, core radius of a=2μm, and an appropriate pump wavelength, according to the absorption cross-section of the RE molecules, as shown in the Appendix.

2.1.

Er3+ and Er3+/Yb3+ ASE at 1550 nm

Amplified spontaneous emission power and gain simulations from Er3+ and Er3+/Yb3+-doped fibers are shown in Figs. 3Fig. 4Fig. 56 in the region of 1550 nm.

2.2.

Tm3+ ASE at 1900 nm

Note that in Figs. 3, 5, 7Fig. 8Fig. 910 ASE backward output power is the ASE power level that propagates in the opposite direction of the pump power. ASE forward output power is the ASE power level that propagates in the same direction of the pump power. We showed the calculated conversion efficiency values, which depend on absorption and emission cross-sections for each active material studied. Also, in Figs. 3, 5, 7Fig. 8Fig. 910, we showed the efficiency ηbw as the signal conversion efficiency in the opposite direction with respect to the pump. As for ηfw, it defines the signal conversion efficiency in the same direction as the pump, i.e., forward.

Fig. 3

ASE backward-forward output power versus fiber length with Pp=20, 30, 40, and 50 mW for Er3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f003.png

Fig. 4

Net gain versus fiber length with Pp=20mW. Er3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f004.png

Fig. 5

ASE backward-forward output power versus fiber length with Pp=20, 30, 40, and 50 mW for Er3+/Yb3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f005.png

Fig. 6

Net gain versus fiber length with Pp=20mW. Er3+/Yb3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f006.png

Fig. 7

ASE backward-forward output power versus fiber length with Pp=20, 30, 40, and 50 mW. Tm3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f007.png

Fig. 8

ASE backward-forward output power versus fiber length with Pp=20, 30, 40, and 50 mW. Tm3+/Yb3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f008.png

Fig. 9

ASE backward-forward output power versus fiber length with Pp=20, 30, 40, and 50 mW. Nd3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f009.png

Fig. 10

ASE backward-forward output power versus fiber length with Pp=50, 60, 70, and 80 mW. Nd3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f010.png

2.3.

Nd3+ ASE at 1310 nm

As we can observe in Figs. 11, 12, 13, and 14, the pump power evolution along the fiber shows a declining behavior as background losses and pump energy absorption take place in the pump propagation direction. Absorption cross-section of RE molecules use up the available energy for population inversion and ASE after nonradiative decay from the corresponding excited-state levels, which in turn will allow broadband photon emission. Let us consider that under certain fiber-end circumstances, feedback from Rayleigh backscattering could be sufficient to drive the ASE source above lasing threshold, which would limit ASE power level at the output.

Fig. 11

Pp versus fiber length with Pp=20, 30, 40, and 50 mW for Er3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f011.png

Fig. 12

Pp versus fiber length with Pp=20, 30, 40, and 50 mW. Tm3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f012.png

Fig. 13

Pp versus fiber length with Pp=20, 30, 40, and 50 mW. Nd3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f013.png

Fig. 14

Pp versus fiber length with Pp=50, 60, 70, and 80 mW. Nd3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f014.png

Figures 3, 5, 7Fig. 8Fig. 910 represent output power behavior in forward and backward propagation directions along the fiber length for the whole set of REs included in this paper. It can be seen that the backward power is, in general, slightly larger than the forward power due to absorption within the first few sections of the fiber, which generated higher population inversion in those first few fiber sections and which could create an unbalanced ASE source. Figures 15, 16, 17, and 18, represent net gain versus fiber length for Tm3+ and Nd3+. Figures 19Fig. 2021 show pump power, backward and forwards ASE power and net gain, all versus fiber length, for Pr3+ sources, respectively.

Fig. 15

Net gain versus fiber length with Pp=20mW. Tm3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f015.png

Fig. 16

Net gain versus fiber length with Pp=20mW. Tm3+/Yb3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f016.png

Fig. 17

Net gain versus fiber length with Pp=20mW. Nd+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f017.png

Fig. 18

Net gain versus fiber length with Pp=80mW. Nd3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f018.png

Fig. 19

Pp versus fiber length with Pp=500, 600, 700, and 800 mW. Pr3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f019.png

Fig. 20

ASE backward-forward output power versus fiber length with Pp=500, 600, 700, and 800 mW. Pr3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f020.png

Fig. 21

Net gain versus fiber length with Pp=500mW. Pr3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f021.png

Some of the applications for 1310 nm ASE sources, such as the ones analyzed in this paper, could include optical component characterization, optical measurement systems, and optical sensing, within the O band. Please note that in early communication systems, the wavelength region situated between 1260 and 1360 nm was called “original band” and that this is the reason it is typically called “O band” as this band is used in different applications such as fiber to the home, among others. In terms of quantum efficiency, for a given fiber length and a given pump power level, the total gain varies along the fiber depending on the absorption and emission Ga and Ge coefficients, which describe the absorption and emission parameters, respectively.21

2.4.

Tm3+ ASE S-band at 1470 nm

As can be observed in Figs. 22Fig. 23Fig. 24 to 25, it has been necessary to increase the input power required for broadband generation and consequently maximum efficiency, which reached up to 58% in the present study.

Fig. 22

Pp versus fiber length with Pp=20, 30, 40, and 50 mW. Tm3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f022.png

Fig. 23

ASE backward-forward output power versus fiber length with Pp=20, 30, 40, and 50 mW. Tm3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f023.png

Fig. 24

ASE backward-forward output power versus fiber length with Pp=200, 300, 400, and 500 mW. Tm3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f024.png

Fig. 25

Net gain versus fiber length with Pp=200mW. Tm3+ fiber.

OE_52_8_086110_f025.png

In Fig. 23, we showed the efficiency ηbw as the signal conversion efficiency in the opposite direction with respect to the pump. As for ηfw, it defines the signal conversion efficiency in the same direction as the pump, i.e., forward.

2.5.

Pr3+ ASE O-band at 1310 nm

As expected, the specific design changes due to quantum characteristics natural of each RE.

The lifetime values that were used in this work are listed in Table 1, along with the emission and absorption cross-section values for the different active dopant materials studied in this paper.

Table 1

Rare-earth data for the model.

DopantTransitionλabs (nm)λem (nm)Lifetime τ (s)Absorption cross-section λabs (m2)Emission cross-section λem (m2)
ErI413/2→I415/2976155012×10−34.839×10−258.1×10−25
Er/YbI413/2→I415/2976155012×10−32.5×10−248.1×10−25
NdF43/2→I413/28001310500×10−623×10−256×10−25
PrG14→H3510171310879×10−60.2×10−243.8×10−25
TmH34→F3479014701.5×10−33×10−259×10−24
TmF34→H3678019003.35×10−33.3×10−252.09×10−24
Tm/YbF34→H3697619003.35×10−32.5×10−242.09×10−24

Moreover, as one can observe in pump propagation and ASE signal figures, each signal with initial pump power Pp(0) reaches a maximum output power; the output power is higher for a higher input power since each pump power level at the fiber input has an ideal fiber length. As expected, we observe that the efficiency increases up to >50% for a codoped scheme ASE with similar simulation parameters of design, both in forward and backward directions compared to a single dopant scheme. The increased output signal in codoped fiber is due to the effective cross-section of Er3+ and Tm3+ fiber increases via the presence of Yb3+ since the total absorption gets higher.

3.

Conclusions

Our paper provides simulation results of ASE energy obtained from a series of active RE-doped materials that are being used to develop useful applications in a variety of fields, such as gyroscopes, sensors, and modern Telecommunications in current available optical windows, using a simple modified model based on Einstein’s rate equations.

We have shown a generalized, simple method for simulating and obtaining valuable design parameters for superluminescent sources at 1.31, 1.47, 1.55, and even 1.9 μm region and further. This simple method is applied just by modifying the coupled power into the redoped fiber, the fiber length parameter, and as such via the variation of efficiencies for different dopants as shown in the obtained results. Some of the ASE results at 1310 and 1550 nm could be important for communication systems and free-space communication applications. As mentioned before, 1310 nm ASE sources could find applications in optical component characterization, optical measurement systems, and optical sensing in structural health monitoring, for instance. From the codoping results, we can observe the advantage of using a codoped section to increase the output signal power in forward and backward propagating directions, as expected. Our theoretical calculations are useful to explain and even predict the behavior of the superluminescent all-fiber sources in terms of optimum length, total ASE power, gain and conversion efficiency. We can foresee the possibility to use these kinds of fibers to design DWDM sources due to the fact that these kinds of sources have a big spectral broadband.

Finally our results could be used for designing RE-doped superluminescent sources since it predicts output powers and efficiencies in both the forward and backward pump propagation directions. We could venture to recommend our paper for investigating new designs of ASE sources, using a method that modifies the fiber parameters in a simple way, via an optimization route for the desired application.

Appendices

Appendix:

Absorption and Emission Spectra of Studied Rare Earths

The spectra shown (Figs. 26Fig. 27Fig. 28Fig. 29Fig. 30Fig. 31Fig. 32Fig. 33Fig. 34 to 35) were obtained from Refs. 4, 7, 13, and 15.

Fig. 26

Absorption cross-section Pr3+.

OE_52_8_086110_f026.png

Fig. 27

Emission cross-section Pr3+.

OE_52_8_086110_f027.png

Fig. 28

Absorption cross-section Nd3+.

OE_52_8_086110_f028.png

Fig. 29

Emission cross-section Nd3+.

OE_52_8_086110_f029.png

Fig. 30

Absorption cross-section Er3+.

OE_52_8_086110_f030.png

Fig. 31

Emission cross-section Er3+.

OE_52_8_086110_f031.png

Fig. 32

Absorption cross-section Tm3+.

OE_52_8_086110_f032.png

Fig. 33

Absorption cross-section Tm3+.

OE_52_8_086110_f033.png

Fig. 34

Emission cross-section Tm3+.

OE_52_8_086110_f034.png

Fig. 35

Absorption cross-section Yb3+.

OE_52_8_086110_f035.png

References

1. 

J. M. Souzaet al., “Broad-band diode-pumped ytterbium-doped fiber amplifier with 34-dBm output power,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 11(1), 39–41 (1999).IPTLEL1041-1135http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/68.736383Google Scholar

2. 

A. Castillo-Guzmanet al., “Widely tuneable erbium-doped fiber laser based on multimode interference effect,” Opt. Express 18(2), 591–597 (2010).OPEXFF1094-4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.000591Google Scholar

3. 

R. I. Mata-Chávezet al., “Wavelength band-rejection filters based on optical fiber fattening by fusion splicing,” Opt. Laser Technol. 40(4), 671–675 (2008).OLTCAS0030-3992http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2007.08.010Google Scholar

4. 

J. Nilssonet al., “High-power and tunable operation of erbium-ytterbium co-doped cladding-pumped fiber lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 39(8), 987–994 (2003).IEJQA70018-9197http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JQE.2003.814373Google Scholar

5. 

G. G. Perez-SanchezE. Pinzon-EscobarJ. A. Alvarez-Chavez, “Superluminiscent Er3+/Yb3+-doped fiber source design for 1550 nm applications,” Proc. SPIE 8497, 84970U (2012).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.928542Google Scholar

6. 

L. de La Cruz-Mayet al., “Raman threshold for nth-order cascade Raman amplification,” Opt. Fiber Technol. 17(3), 214–217 (2011).1068-5200http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2011.02.002Google Scholar

7. 

M. J. Digonnet, Rare-Earth-Doped Fiber Lasers and Amplifiers, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (2001).Google Scholar

8. 

W. L. Barneset al., “Er3+Yb3+ and Er3+ doped fiber lasers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 7(10), 1461–1465 (1989).JLTEDG0733-8724http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/50.39081Google Scholar

9. 

C. Lesteret al., “Modeling of Yb3+-sensitized Er3+-doped silica waveguide amplifiers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 13(5), 740–743 (1995).JLTEDG0733-8724http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/50.387791Google Scholar

10. 

R. AhmadM. RochetteS. Chatigny, “Spectrally wide, and high-power Er-Yb fiber amplifier for 40Gb/s telecommunications applications,” in Conf. on Lasers, and Electro-Optics, and Quantum Electronics, and Laser Science, pp. 1–2, Optical Society of America, Washington, DC (2010).Google Scholar

11. 

J. LiuP. Wang, “High-power broadband thulium-doped all-fiber superfluorescent source at 2 um,” Photon. Technol. Lett. 25(3), 242–245 (2013).IPTLEL1041-1135http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2012.2230437Google Scholar

12. 

S. W. Harunet al., “Ytterbium-sensitized thulium-doped fiber laser with a single-mode output operating at 1 900-nm region,” Chin. Opt. Lett. 10(10), 101401 (2012).COLHBT1671-7694http://dx.doi.org/10.3788/COLGoogle Scholar

13. 

R. C. Schimmel, Towards More Efficient Praseodymium Doped Fiber Amplifiers for the O-Band, Universiteit Eindhoven, The Netherlands (2006).Google Scholar

14. 

Y. Nishidaet al., “Development of an efficient praseodymium-doped fiber amplifier,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 34(8), 1332–1339 (1998).IEJQA70018-9197http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/3.704316Google Scholar

15. 

E. Lebrasseuraet al., “Optical amplification and laser spectroscopy of neodymium-doped fluoride glass channel waveguides,” J. Alloys Compd. 275–277, 716–720 (1998).JALCEU0925-8388http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(98)00423-XGoogle Scholar

16. 

R. F. KalmanM. J. F. DigonnetP. F. Wysocki, “Modeling of three-level laser superfluorescent fiber sources,” Proc. SPIE 1373, 209–222 (1990).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.24944Google Scholar

17. 

P. F. Moultonet al., “Tm-doped fiber lasers: fundamentals and power scaling,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron. 15(1), 85–92 (2009).IJSQEN1077-260Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2008.2010719Google Scholar

18. 

O. Mahranet al., “Wavelength division multiplexing of yttria-alumina-silica doped with thulium optical fiber amplifiers,” Int. J. Res. Rev. Appl. Sci. 10(2), 314–321 (2012).IJRRAH2076-7366Google Scholar

19. 

E. DesurvireJ. R. Simpson, “Amplification of spontaneous emission in erbium-doped single mode fiber,” J. Lightwave Technol. 7(5), 835–845 (1989).JLTEDG0733-8724http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/50.19124Google Scholar

20. 

G. E. Sandoval-RomeroV. Argueta-DíazO. Pottiez, “Theoretical results of the analytical and numerical solutions of superluminescent fiber sources,” Phys. Status Solidi C 6(S1), S227–S230 (2009).PSSCGL1610-1634http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssc.v6.5sGoogle Scholar

21. 

E. F. Pinzón-Escobaret al., “Experimental results of the superluminescent fiber laser sources for fiber optic sensors,” Proc. SPIE 7839, 78391R (2010).PSISDG0277-786Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.868243Google Scholar

Biography

OE_52_8_086110_d001.png

Grethell G. Pérez-Sánchez obtained a BEng degree in electronics at Metropolitan Autonomous University, Mexico City, in 2005, an MSc in telecommunications at Escuela Superior de Ingenieria Mecanica y Electrica—Instituto Politecnico Nacional in 2011, and is now pursuing a PhD in all-fiber superluminescent sources at Centro de Invetigacion e Innovacion Tecnologica—Instituto Politecnico Nacional. Her research interests range from active and passive fiber devices for telecom and other applications to semiconductor and fiber amplifiers and nonlinear dynamics. She is a member and cofounder of IPN SPIE student chapter and has presented her work in a few international conferences and meetings.

OE_52_8_086110_d002.png

Indayara Bertoldi-Martins received a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering with emphasis in telecommunications from the Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas in 2004 and an MS degree and PhD from the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering of State University of Campinas in 2007 and 2011. Currently she is postdoctoral in Telecom ParisTech. Her interests are in the field of optical communications such as research related to transport layer and physical layer for the development of future optical network technologies.

OE_52_8_086110_d003.png

Philippe Gallion received his PhD from the University of Reims in 1975 and the Doctorates Science from the University of Montpellier in 1986. His present research topics focus on advanced digital communications systems and networks, quantum communication and quantum cryptography, nonlinearity and noise in Raman distributed optical amplifiers. He is a full professor at Télécom Paris Tech. He is an author of several text books, more than 130 international technical publications, and more than 130 communications and lectures at conferences. He is a member of the Optical Society of America and a senior member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. He is the chairman of the IEEE Photonics Society (formerly Laser and Electro Optics Society) French Chapter. He serves on the editorial board and scientific committee of several technical publications and as a member of program or steering committee of international scientific meeting.

OE_52_8_086110_d004.png

Jose A. Alvarez-Chávez received a BEng degree in mechanics at Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico in 1992, obtained an MSc in telecommunications from Centro de Investigacion Cientifica y de Educacion Superior de Ensenada in 1994, and a PhD in fiber lasers and amplifiers from the Optoelectronics Research Centre, Southampton University in 2003. He worked for TelMex and Iusacell in Mexico and Xtera Communications Inc. in the United States in 2002, and Southampton Photonics Ltd. in the United Kingdom in 2005. His research activities include all-fiber active and passive devices, high-power fiber lasers and amplifiers and fiber sensors. He has been a senior research fellow at Centro de Invetigacion e Innovacion Tecnologica—Instituto Politecnico Nacional since 2007.

Grethell G. Perez-Sanchez, Indayara Bertoldi-Martins, Phillipe Gallion, Jose A. Alvarez-Chavez, "Rare-earth-doped fiber designs for superluminescent sources," Optical Engineering 52(8), 086110 (21 August 2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.52.8.086110
Submission: Received ; Accepted
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES


SHARE
KEYWORDS
Thulium

Superluminescent sources

Erbium

Absorption

Ytterbium

Neodymium

Optical engineering

Back to Top