The photonic generation, processing, distribution, filtering, and control of microwave and millimeter wave signals are of interests for a number of applications due to the advantages of large bandwidth, fast tunability, immunity to electromagnetic interference, and low weight of photonic components. An important component in many microwave photonics applications is a phase shifter that provides large bandwidth and fast response time. Various techniques for realizing photonic phase shifters have been demonstrated such as wavelength conversion,1 stimulated Brillouin scattering,2 slow light effect in semiconductor devices,3 and cross-phase modulation.4 Recently, a photonic microwave phase shifter utilizing a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) microring resonator (MRR) by the directional coupler, which was experimentally showing a 0-deg to 336-deg phase shifting range by the thermo-optical tuning, is proposed.5
In Fig. 1, the optical tap could be implemented in the dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) system, formed by a multiplexer, a optical amplifier, and a demultiplexer, to fully utilize 25-GHz channel spacing for microwave phase management through the thermal tuning photonic bus.6 Therefore, the microwave phase shifter tuning using DWDM channel spacing on SOI MRR with a wavelength-insensitive multimode interferometer (MMI) coupler was proposed and demonstrated. To meet the highest phase tuning range, the SOI MRR was designed for a low quality factor under the over-coupling condition.5
Approach and Design
The transmitted phase shift and the quality factor of a MMI-coupled ring resonator can be derived as follows:
When owns the larger value, the is lower and the phase slope relative to wavelengths gets smaller. Since we need to get the broad wavelength tuning by the 25-GHz DWDM channel spacing, the large value is expected.
The MMI, which is insensitive to the wavelength and has the large processing tolerance, is involved as the coupling function in MRR. In this article, we were using the paired interference MMI for the larger , which requires the MMI length longer than the half of the beat length. The finite difference time-domain, a direct solution for Maxwell’s curl equations carried out by RSoft Fullwave, was utilized to simulate and predict the model performance of silicon-wire waveguides-based MMI coupler. Under the over-coupling condition of the broad-phase tuning range, the MMI for the transverse magnetic (TM) polarization was designed to have the length of 9.6 μm, width of 3 μm, and input/output waveguide distance as 1 μm when the silicon-wire waveguide owned the width of 0.45 μm and height of 0.26 μm. In order to get the small quality factor for a wide-phase tuning range, the MMI-coupled MRR was studied at four different ring resonator perimeters of 110, 220, 330, and 440 μm.
Experiments and Discussions
The I-line stepper lithography was implemented to fabricate the MMI-coupled MRR, which image was taken by the optical microscope camera and illustrated in the inset of Fig. 2. The scanning electronic microscope picture for silicon-wire waveguides was also demonstrated in the inset of Fig. 2. Due to the high-speed testing equipment limitation, a tunable laser source (TLS) was carried out with the intensity modulated 5-GHz signal by the vector network analyzer (Anritsu 37347C, Anritsu, Japan) through a Mach-Zehnder interferometer modulator, and the modulation spectrum could be monitored by an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA), as shown in Fig. 2. The double sideband (DSB) was generated from the intensity modulation of the TLS by the 5-GHz signal and observed in an Anritsu benchtop OSA (MS9740A) built with the high-optical wavelength resolution of 0.03 nm, as shown in Fig. 3. A JDS Uniphase interleaver with the model number of IBC-C05D02412 showed a free spectral range of 50-GHz between even and odd output ports. Since the 3-dB bandwidth of an individual interleaver channel was around 25 GHz, a 25-GHz DWDM channel spacing could then be aligned well to filter out one sideband either from the upper or lower side of the DSB. A TLS wavelength of 1555.96 nm was taken to demonstrate the single sideband (SSB) spectrum after the interleaver was implemented after a 5-GHz modulated DSB, as shown in Fig. 3. The TM-polarized light operated by the polarization controller was coupled in and out with respect to the device under test, MRR, by lensed fibers. Following that, one sideband of the modulated signal was filtered out through an interleaver, the signal was amplified using an erbium-doped fiber amplifier, and then detected by a photodetector. Finally, the microwave signal was analyzed and characterized by the vector network analyzer. In this experiment, the wavelength tuning MRR was fabricated on the SOI wafer with 260-nm thick silicon slab and a 3-μm buried silicon dioxide layer.
MMI-coupled ring resonators with four different ring resonator perimeters were characterized and shown in the inset of Fig. 4. A 110-μm perimeter of SOI MRR, utilized as the microwave phase shifter, demonstrated the smallest of 1199, which was calculated through the resonance wavelength of 1546 nm divided by the 1.29-nm linewidth measured from the OSA. After inserting the parameters from tested propagation loss as and TM-polarized group effective index as 4 (Ref. 7), and were derived as 0.25 and 0.75 from Eq. (2), respectively, which are equal to the characterized splitter ratios from the stand-alone MMI structures.
The tuning operation was performed by manipulating the wavelengths through TLS. The transmission spectrum and radio frequency (RF) phase shift versus the operating wavelengths were simultaneously demonstrated in Fig. 4. The tunable phase shift was showing 350 deg under 5-GHz microwave frequency. In the linear region of Fig. 4, the tuning range from to 150 GHz at 1546-nm central wavelength demonstrated 300-deg phase shifting between 21 deg and 321 deg. There was 25-deg phase tuning for every 25-GHz DWDM channel spacing, and the sensitivity was showing . The total microwave phase tunability from MMI MRR could achieve 350 deg through 22 DWDM channels with 25-GHz spacing. If the phase tuning needs to be improved for less sensitivity, lower and larger are necessary. From the measured propagation loss on the silicon-wire waveguide, the transmission coefficient for the 110-μm perimeter of SOI MRR can be derived as 0.96. Compared with the derived value of 0.5 from Eq. (2), the over-coupling condition for the phase shifting was also satisfied.5
A wide-operating wavelength range and high-fabrication tolerance for the MMI coupler had been implemented on the SOI-based MRR for microwave phase tuning function. For the highest phase tuning range, the MMI-coupled MRR was designed and fabricated with a circumference of 110 μm and a stable-quality-factor of 1199 across a wide range of wavelengths. A microwave phase tunability on SOI MRR was experimentally demonstrated on a 350-deg phase shift range at 22 channels with 25-GHz spacing, equal to 550-GHz wavelength detuning, under 5-GHz microwave frequency.
The authors thank Professor S.-L. Lee, Professor C.-H. Tseng, and Mr. Y.-H. Su for their full support with characterization and processing.
M. R. FisherS. L. Chuang, “A microwave photonic phase-shifter based on wavelength conversion in a DFB laser,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(16), 1714–1716 (2006).IPTLEL1041-1135http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2006.879929Google Scholar
A. LoayssaF. J. Lahoz, “Broad-band RF photonic phase shifter based on stimulated Brillouin scattering and single-sideband modulation,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(1), 208–210 (2006).IPTLEL1041-1135http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2005.861307Google Scholar
W. Xueet al., “Microwave phase shifter with controllable power response based on slow- and fast-light effects in semiconductor optical amplifiers,” Opt. Lett. 34(7), 929–931 (2009).OPLEDP0146-9592http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.34.000929Google Scholar
Y. DongH. HeW. Hu, “Photonic microwave phase shifter/modulator based on a nonlinear optical loop mirror incorporating a Mach-Zehnder interferometer,” Opt. Lett. 32(7), 745–747 (2007).OPLEDP0146-9592http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.32.000745Google Scholar
M. Puet al., “Tunable microwave phase shifter based on silicon-on-insulator microring resonator,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(12), 869–871 (2010).IPTLEL1041-1135http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2010.2046725Google Scholar
S. H. HsuJ. Chan, “Photonic bus with loop signal routing and multi-channel wavelength selection on a single silicon-on-insulator platform,” Opt. Lett. 31(14), 2142–2144 (2006).OPLEDP0146-9592http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.002142Google Scholar